ライフサイエンスコーパス: reverse transcription-PCR

1 t performance characteristics for SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) and highlight the imp

2 Many commercial SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assays have received

3 piratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) testing.

4 0%), exhibiting a positive response in 24/24 reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR)-confirmed COVID-19 ca

5 A reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assay of 45 specimens

6 RNA-seq, expressed sequence tags (EST), and reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR).

7 Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and reverse transcription PCR were performed to screen for h

8 using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and reverse transcription-PCR.

9 Subsequent Western blotting and reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) analyses demonstrated

10 Western blotting and reverse transcription-PCR indicated the C-terminal forms

11 By Western blotting and reverse transcription-PCR, both forms were detected in p

12 immunohistochemistry, Western blotting, and reverse transcription-PCR, we demonstrate the location o

13 shedding was examined via tissue culture and reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) testing of gill mucus

14 chemistry, polychromatic flow cytometry, and reverse transcription-PCR.

15 infection by microscopy, flow cytometry, and reverse transcription-PCR.

16 as verified by subcellular fractionation and reverse transcription-PCR, single-molecule fluorescence

17 r localization with immunohistochemistry and reverse transcription-PCR and measured olivocochlear fun

18 By chromatin immunoprecipitation and reverse transcription-PCR, we find that the filamentous

19 Microarray and reverse transcription-PCR analyses revealed that gene re

20 Chromatin immunoprecipitation-PCR and reverse transcription-PCR assays as well as transgenic s

21 and TAp73 observed upon array profiling and reverse transcription-PCR.

22 DNA sequence and reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) analyses now reveal t

23 SDS-PAGE, immunoblot, mass spectrometry and reverse transcription-PCR.

24 nin esterase (HE) protein was truncated, and reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) studies confirmed pre

25 te its functionality to perform both PCR and reverse-transcription PCR for lambda phage DNA and H3 in

26 The use of molecular diagnostics, such as reverse transcription PCR or unbiased metagenomic sequen

27 However, as molecular assays such as reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) have increased the se

28 al records of patients with EVD confirmed by reverse transcription PCR hospitalized in the Conakry ar

29 PAT mRNA was not detected by reverse transcription PCR in dodders.

30 Brk expression was determined by reverse transcription PCR on RNA extracted from surgical

31 dV species D, type 37 (HAdV-D37), we show by reverse transcription PCR and Sanger sequencing that mRN

32 RNA microarray profiling and validation by reverse transcription PCR reveals that the p53-inducible

33 e expression of AP-2 in IHCs was verified by reverse transcription PCR.

34 NDLIN-3 was detected in endothelial cells by reverse transcription-PCR and Western blots.

35 ption and protein synthesis were detected by reverse transcription-PCR and detection of latency-assoc

36 ion of argonaute and Dicer was determined by reverse transcription-PCR, and expression of protein was

37 Inflammation was evaluated by reverse transcription-PCR of proinflammatory cytokines,

38 amined for the presence of MCMV IE-1 mRNA by reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) with Southern analysi

39 Furthermore, as shown by reverse transcription-PCR, the immortalized human airway

40 ssion in miRNA-enriched RNA was validated by reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR).

41 en of those novel variants for validation by reverse transcription-PCR.

42 the microarray, the results were verified by reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) detection of 5 gastro

43 proteins containing the WxL domain which, by reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) and genomic analyses,

44 between expression of 732 genes, measured by reverse-transcription PCR, and clinical outcome in 942 p

45 In human breast cancers, reverse transcription-PCR results revealed that Smyd4 ex

46 Single-cell reverse transcription-PCR analysis of dissociated green

47 Single-cell reverse transcription-PCR analysis revealed expression o

48 Single-cell reverse transcription-PCR analysis revealed expression o

49 Quantitative single-cell reverse transcription-PCR found lower GlyRalpha1 subunit

50 Single-cell reverse transcription-PCR showed expression of VMAT1 in

51 ramidal neurons as determined by single-cell reverse transcription-PCR.

52 med with immunocytochemistry and single-cell reverse transcription-PCR.

53 d GII genotypes, were tested by conventional reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR)/bidirectional sequenc

54 etect all known TBPVs, based on conventional reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) with degenerate prime

55 outine immunohistochemistry, flow cytometry, reverse transcription-PCR, and immunoblotting methodolog

56 re compared to those of laboratory-developed reverse transcription PCR tests for 498 nasopharyngeal s

57 r previously described poliovirus diagnostic reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assays to a real-time

58 xpression were quantified by droplet digital reverse transcription-PCR (ddRT-PCR), providing further

59 d transcript profiling and limiting-dilution reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) methodologies to expl

60 Finally, reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR)-based screening for t

61 Finally, reverse transcription-PCR analysis showed the presence o

62 iagnosis exist, including pan-Trk IHC, FISH, reverse transcription PCR, DNA-based next-generation seq

63 ciency of 104.4% and similar sensitivity for reverse-transcription PCR for influenza H3 RNA.

64 on were observed, complementary results from reverse transcription-PCR experiments and gel-shift and

65 ent- and postconvalescent-phase samples from reverse transcription-PCR-confirmed cases, including 25

66 In this study, we used immunohistochemistry, reverse transcription PCR, and gene arrays to determine

67 resulting RNA was found to be amplifiable in reverse-transcription PCR.

68 Interestingly, reverse transcription PCR analysis indicated that the pr

69 ochemical studies of MM patient bone marrow, reverse transcription-PCR and protein analysis show that

70 We describe the development of a multiplex reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) with Luminex microarr

71 ction influenza A/B virus (FluA/B) multiplex reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) method that amplifies

72 Quantitative PCR and single-cell multiplex reverse transcription-PCR demonstrated message for NBCe1

73 We had recently developed a rapid multiplex reverse transcription-PCR enzyme hybridization assay (Fl

74 Moreover, we describe a sensitive nested reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assay allowing the ra

75 We developed a novel reverse transcription-PCR assay targeting HHV-6B U38, wh

76 employed transcriptome sequencing and novel reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assays to distinguish

77 the results were compared to the results of reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR), direct fluorescent a

78 ome more than once, and Sanger sequencing of reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) products indicates th

79 Using RACE PCR, reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) and RNA-seq, we show

80 6 months old for whom routine CSF EV and PeV reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) testing was performed

81 itrated using the Gen-Probe/Prodesse ProFlu+ reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assay.

82 and in vivo transcription, RNA purification, reverse-transcription PCR (RT-PCR) and restriction diges

83 Quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qPCR) studies confirmed that

84 Quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) was used to analyze

85 Quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR) is one of the most e

86 Quantitative reverse transcription PCR and immunohistochemical studie

87 Quantitative reverse transcription PCR and Western blot analysis were

88 Quantitative reverse transcription PCR was used to analyze the mRNA e

89 Using a quantitative reverse transcription PCR assay specific for all HIV-1 m

90 say for influenza virus using a quantitative reverse transcription PCR-based endpoint assessment (qPC

91 e marrow chimeras, luminex, and quantitative reverse transcription PCR assays were performed to evalu

92 A staining, flow cytometry, and quantitative reverse transcription PCR for IL-17A mRNA.

93 on CHIKV viral replication and quantitative reverse transcription PCR was used to calculate virus yi

94 ith luciferase reporter assays, quantitative reverse transcription PCR, and immunoblot analyses.

95 cell tumor clinical samples by quantitative reverse transcription PCR analysis revealed that overall

96 th RFS were further examined by quantitative reverse transcription PCR in 291 lung adenocarcinoma tis

97 independent set of specimens by quantitative reverse transcription PCR, we defined negative-associati

98 gene networks were validated by quantitative reverse transcription PCR.

99 The current quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR) assay recommended fo

100 previously described multiplex quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR) assays.

101 ancer, we developed a multiplex quantitative reverse transcription PCR method involving the purificat

102 ion of viral RNA using RT-qPCR (quantitative reverse transcription PCR), with many commercial kits no

103 analysis by downstream one-step quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR; SYBR Green chemistry

104 Our results show that quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-QPCR) amplification of PPR

105 The quantitative reverse transcription PCR (QRT-PCR) proved the uniquenes

106 Using Quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR), we show that CHM mR

107 d gene expression changes using quantitative reverse transcription PCR and used the result as referen

108 us T-cell lymphoma stages using quantitative reverse transcription PCR.

109 Validation by comparison with quantitative reverse transcription PCR showed a high correlation coef

110 copy number loss detected with quantitative reverse transcription PCR.

111 Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) analyses of the sigE

112 Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) analyses revealed th

113 Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) data indicate that n

114 Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) validated changes fr

115 Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) analysis of a select

116 Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) and nuclear run-on as

117 Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) confirmed the presenc

118 Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) measurements of RNAs

119 Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) performed on patient

120 Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR analysis revealed decreased gl

121 Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR and tandem mass spectrometry p

122 Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR and Western analysis confirmed

123 Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR revealed the presence of all f

124 Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR validation of the sequencing d

125 Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR, immunoblot analysis, immunost

126 ice only infrequently, although quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) tests indicated earl

127 In situ hybridization, PCR, and quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) analyses confirm tha

128 expression microarray data and quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) showed that the glob

129 Using microarray and quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) studies, we found th

130 genome expression profiling and quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) to monitor the macro

131 l gene expression profiling and quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) validation indicated

132 Transcriptome analysis and quantitative reverse transcription-PCR showed that the type III secre

133 (5'ppp) RNA in reporter assays, quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR), and IRF3 phosphoryla

134 phoretic mobility shift assays, quantitative reverse transcription-PCR, and transcriptional reporter

135 nly miR-155-5p was validated by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (P = 0.02).

136 selected genes were examined by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qPCR) to verify microarray re

137 toxin L (SElL), as confirmed by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) and immunoblotting.

138 ied GFP transgene expression by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) and immunohistochemi

139 ion and assembly, as assayed by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) and transmission ele

140 unt of latency as determined by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) of viral DNA in tota

141 aryngeal swabs and evaluated by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) subsequently confirm

142 CL13, and CCL19/21, as shown by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR), flow cytometry, and

143 ed by BqsR/BqsS, as measured by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR), is PA14_04180, whic

144 n read counts were validated by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR).

145 ion of miR-203 was confirmed by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR).

146 s postinfection was analyzed by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR).

147 expression in H. pylori J99 by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR), demonstrating signif

148 y-antigen binding affinities by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR).

149 following genes was measured by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR): S100A7, IL1B, IL17A,

150 ific expression, as revealed by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR analysis of a large panel of t

151 el of which was interrogated by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR and correlated with cell cultu

152 Analysis by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR revealed that PKC-delta RNA wa

153 s were further characterized by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR, Western blot, and flow cytome

154 urface adhesins, as assessed by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR.

155 and ERG status was assessed by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR.

156 (Ad5) mRNA level as measured by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR.

157 mutants, which was confirmed by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR.

158 on microscopy and quantified by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR.

159 supernatant was quantitated by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR.

160 Time course quantitative reverse transcription-PCR analysis suggested that the co

161 Furthermore, quantitative reverse transcription-PCR assays demonstrated that the C

162 es employing virB-lacZ fusions, quantitative reverse transcription-PCR, and immunoblot analysis showe

163 med infrared microspectroscopy, quantitative reverse transcription-PCR of cell wall biosynthetic gene

164 re confirmed by using multiplex quantitative reverse transcription-PCR for 16 mRNA targets in an inde

165 nfirmed by protein array and/or quantitative reverse transcription-PCR to be preferentially expressed

166 wide transcriptional profiling, quantitative reverse transcription-PCR, and microRNA analyses were us

167 s confirmed by PCR, sequencing, quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR), and functional anal

168 Currently, several quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-qPCR) assays are being use

169 by a Yersinia 16S rRNA-specific quantitative reverse transcription-PCR and was detected later by the

170 developed a multiplex one-step quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) assay for detection

171 comparing the results with the quantitative reverse transcription-PCR method routinely used in two p

172 Through quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) analysis, we have con

173 A real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) assay using the reco

174 of mRNA levels using real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) further demonstrated

175 se reporter assay and real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR).

176 ng DNA microarray and real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR); these genes include

177 urface antigen, we used var Ups quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) and sequencing with

178 To date, studies using quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) and microarrays have

179 speB mRNA level and decay using quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) and Northern blot an

180 Using quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) to further character

181 Using quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-qPCR), we found that most

182 Using quantitative reverse transcription-PCR, we found that the expression

183 orsal hippocampal punches using quantitative reverse transcription-PCR.

184 rkA gene transcription by using quantitative reverse transcription-PCR.

185 d in MB231 and MCF7 cells using quantitative reverse transcription-PCR.

186 ource and GlpR, consistent with quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) and enzyme activity

187 hony SP/AS, in conjunction with quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR), to augment or poten

188 oductive tract, as confirmed by quantitative reverse-transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) and immunohistochemi

189 n of p63 mRNA was determined by quantitative reverse-transcription PCR (qRT-PCR).

190 were collected and analyzed by quantitative reverse-transcription PCR and histologic and biochemical

191 This was verified by quantitative reverse-transcription PCR using isoform-specific primers

192 s and adenomas were analyzed by quantitative reverse-transcription PCR, single cell RNA sequencing, a

193 Results of quantitative reverse-transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) demonstrated that ex

194 ormal tissues were subjected to quantitative reverse-transcription PCR (quantitative RT-PCR) in 3 coh

195 Also, we used quantitative reverse-transcription PCR (RT-qPCR) to quantify the tran

196 ustom TALE-TFs and TALENs using quantitative reverse-transcription PCR and Surveyor nuclease, respect

197 Using quantitative reverse-transcription PCR, we show that LvHirz is expres

198 (ECM) genes was analyzed using quantitative reverse-transcription PCR.

199 miR-26a through microarray and quantitative reverse-transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) experiments as an mi

200 Validation by quantitative reverse-transcription-PCR in an additional 40 patients w

201 by intron mutagenesis, and semiquantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) showed that iron repr

202 ptional reporter system and semiquantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR), we demonstrated that

203 Both semiquantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) and quantitative real

204 , and sigG were examined by semiquantitative reverse transcription-PCR, and the corresponding sigmaF,

205 Transcriptome sequencing (RNA-Seq), reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR), Western blot, and se

206 dently in a blinded fashion using the SMART, reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR), antigen (Ag) testing

207 A strand-specific reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assay showed that pos

208 respiratory conditions using virus-specific reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assays in addition to

209 e-cell mRNA transcripts by digital, one-step reverse transcription PCR in a simple microfluidic array

210 In this study, reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) and fluorescence-acti

211 Assembly of the sequences and subsequent reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) and rapid amplificati

212 TaqMan reverse transcription-PCR and in situ hybridization were

213 viral 757/3139 spliced transcripts by TaqMan reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR), localization of infe

214 We tested 125 patients who tested reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) positive for SARS-CoV

215 a microarray screen, quantitative real-time reverse transcription PCR (qPCR) confirmed that a histor

216 has relied on complex, multi-step real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) assays; an accurate s

217 Lastly, quantitative real-time reverse transcription PCR analysis of human epithelial-d

218 ns (Zika cases) were identified by real-time reverse transcription PCR and serology in a community-ba

219 CoV-2 infection cases confirmed by real-time reverse transcription PCR assay of SARS-CoV-2 RNA.

220 oviral surveillance were tested by real-time reverse transcription PCR by the Instituto Nacional de I

221 Real-time reverse transcription PCR indicated constitutive upregul

222 on and laboratory tests, typically real-time reverse transcription PCR to detect viral RNA or rapid d

223 lated from the MAN and single-cell real-time reverse transcription PCR used to examine gene expressio

224 sitive for Zika virus infection by real-time reverse transcription PCR, including one neonate with mi

225 from the HIV study were tested by real-time reverse transcription PCR.

226 Quantitative proteomics, real time reverse transcription-PCR, and enzyme assays revealed th

227 transcript-selective quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR (Q-RT-PCR) assays for the ISG5

228 Using semiquantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR (qPCR) and promoter-lux report

229 Analysis of RNA by quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) confirmed that the b

230 , immunoblotting, and quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) measuring csgA expre

231 In response, we developed two real-time reverse transcription-PCR (rRT-PCR) assays targeting the

232 aboratory-developed DENV multiplex real-time reverse transcription-PCR (rRT-PCR) proved more clinical

233 Compared to the real-time reverse transcription-PCR (rRT-PCR) reference method, th

234 stic utility of an EV-D68-specific real-time reverse transcription-PCR (rRT-PCR) that was recently de

235 Samples were also tested by real-time reverse transcription-PCR (rRT-PCR) to detect viral RNA.

236 and on day 14 or 35 and tested by real-time reverse transcription-PCR (rRT-PCR), IgM capture enzyme-

237 Rinderpest virus (RPV), based on a real-time reverse transcription-PCR (rRT-PCR)system, was developed

238 DNA microarray and real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) analyses identified M

239 Subsequent real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) analysis on a panel o

240 ommunity (EPIC) study, we compared real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) and serology for the

241 d with viral culture and ProFlu(+) real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assay results.

242 respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assays for detection

243 In the analytic stage, real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assays remain the mol

244 6 weeks of travel were tested with real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assays targeting the

245 o combine and validate HPeV and EV real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) detection assays with

246 We have developed a real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) method specific for g

247 Our laboratory currently uses two real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) platforms, the Roche

248 hen mixed with Ag-Path-ID One Step real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) reagents and loaded i

249 KSHV mature microRNA expression by real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) revealed differential

250 We show that both real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) tests reliably quanti

251 Using real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR), PAF but not 5-HT(2A)

252 ed cell sorting flow cytometry and real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR).

253 ated using microarray analysis and real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR).

254 this was confirmed by quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR).

255 me-linked immunosorbent assays and real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR).

256 Hedgehog signaling as monitored by real-time reverse transcription-PCR analysis of Gli1 mRNA concentr

257 Real-time reverse transcription-PCR analysis of RNA revealed signi

258 Quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR analysis of total RNA extracte

259 Real-time reverse transcription-PCR and anti-DENV IgM enzyme-linke

260 rospinal fluid and identified with real-time reverse transcription-PCR and sequencing, which also yie

261 bs from PRRSV-seropositive pigs by real-time reverse transcription-PCR and sequencing.

262 genes as assessed by quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR and Western blot analyses.

263 We now show using real-time reverse transcription-PCR arrays that adipose tissue of

264 y identified by the USDA-validated real-time reverse transcription-PCR assay targeting the matrix gen

265 detection of influenza virus using real-time reverse transcription-PCR assay.

266 ption was verified by quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR in two mutant lines.

267 Real-time reverse transcription-PCR indicated that both genes are

268 ght polypeptide and microarray and real-time reverse transcription-PCR revealed decreased transcript

269 Immunohistochemistry and real-time reverse transcription-PCR revealed that WIF-1 was signif

270 and the CDC human influenza virus real-time reverse transcription-PCR swine flu panel (CDC rRT-PCR)

271 cDNAs with an improved PV-specific real-time reverse transcription-PCR system and nucleotide sequence

272 (Ct) values provided by multiplex real-time reverse transcription-PCR testing.

273 anding of the epidemiology of IDV, real-time reverse transcription-PCR was performed on a set of 208

274 Real-time reverse transcription-PCR was used to determine changes

275 nalysis) and virological (SIV(smm) real-time reverse transcription-PCR) methods.

276 up A rotavirus RNA was detected by real-time reverse transcription-PCR, and positive samples were G a

277 pture microdissection coupled with real-time reverse transcription-PCR, we confirmed that co-downregu

278 en-detection technologies based on real-time reverse transcription-PCR.

279 sPLA2 isoforms was quantified via real-time reverse-transcription PCR (qRT(2)-PCR).

280 Microarray and quantitative real-time reverse-transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis showed that

281 ure was confirmed by PEDV-specific real-time reverse-transcription PCR (RT-PCR), immunofluorescence a

282 ochemical methods and quantitative real-time reverse-transcription PCR.

283 pment and validation of a triplex real-time, reverse transcription-PCR (triplex rRT-PCR) assay for th

284 Traditional reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) identification of kno

285 In the present study, we used reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) targeting viral mRNAs

286 Using reverse transcription-PCR, bisulfite genomic sequencing,

287 Using reverse transcription-PCR, we demonstrated that these ce

288 Using reverse transcription-PCR, we documented increased Csf1

289 23 IFN-induced genes was confirmed by using reverse transcription-PCR.

290 We validated transcriptional changes using reverse transcription-PCR, and further immunofluorescenc

291 genes (GFP and YFP) was also confirmed using reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR).

292 NoVs were identified using reverse transcription-PCR and probe hybridization.

293 ression of HOXA genes was investigated using reverse transcription-PCR in primary gliomas and gliobla

294 ll agreement, respectively, with a validated reverse transcription-PCR nucleic acid amplification tes

295 However, the USDA-validated reverse transcription-PCR assay targeting the fusion gen

296 rformed (for example, antigen testing versus reverse transcription-PCR testing or influenza A/B testi

297 Predeparture serological and viral reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) testing along with re

298 Inclusion criteria were positive Ebola virus reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) test, age >/= 1 y, we

299 stics of three real-time influenza A/B virus reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assays and two real-t

300 sequence of Aspergillus oryzae together with reverse-transcription-PCR and identified a transcribed s