ライフサイエンスコーパス: rhizobial

1 hanges in the host-associated members of the Rhizobiales.

2 mbiotic and pathogenic bacteria in the order Rhizobiales.

3 mbioses between herbivorous ants and related Rhizobiales.

4 among themselves and relatives in the order Rhizobiales.

5 y associated with the Rhodobacterales or the Rhizobiales.

6 eased from surface-sterilized ferns with the Rhizobiales.

7 ding water and revealed species of the order Rhizobiales.

8 h may be due to a high relative abundance of Rhizobiales.

9 pecies confirmed persistent association with Rhizobiales.

10 he abundance distribution of N-fixing trees (rhizobial, actinorhizal, and both types together) vary w

11 ts ubiquitination activity to fine-tune both rhizobial and AM root endosymbioses.

12 ssive stages of infection and development of rhizobial and AM symbioses.

13 n or recycling of signaling complexes during rhizobial and AMF symbiosis.

14 in Medicago truncatula roots in response to rhizobial and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal signals.

15 controlled at multiple levels involving both rhizobial and host genes.

16 n the common signaling pathway shared by the rhizobial and mycorrhizal symbioses.

17 sociated with significant diminution of both rhizobial and mycorrhizal symbiotic colonization.

18 the transcriptional upregulation of several rhizobial and plant genes involved in S-assimilation, hi

19 rotein is involved in bacterial entry, while rhizobial and plant mutant studies suggest that Epr3 reg

20 riptomic and biochemical approaches to study rhizobial and plant sulfur (S) metabolism in nitrogen (N

21 sis signaling pathway, required for both the rhizobial and the arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) endosymbio

22 of the 80-90% of land plants able to develop rhizobial and/or mycorrhizal endosymbiosis.

23 g taxa were identified, including members of Rhizobiales and Burkholderiales which were abundant in t

24 nitrogen-fixing prokaryotes or diazotrophs (Rhizobiales and Frankiales), reflected in increased abun

25 haproteobacteria, Agrobacterium tumefaciens (Rhizobiales) and Brevundimonas subvibrioides (Caulobacte

26 llination, seed dispersal, plant protection, rhizobial, and mycorrhizal mutualisms.

27 Here, we found VP of Mycoplasma, Rhizobiales, and Rickettsiales showed significantly high

28 stinct from the currently known chitin-based rhizobial/arbuscular mycorrhizal signaling molecules.

29 etic layer of D. scoparium, while members of Rhizobiales are detected throughout the gametophytes.

30 creasing numbers of reports suggest that the rhizobial association with legumes has recycled part of

31 ications for the use of both mycorrhizal and rhizobial associations for sustainable productivity in c

32 e developed a light (lux)-dependent assay of rhizobial attachment to roots and demonstrated that muta

33 Rhizobial bacteria activate the formation of nodules on

34 Legumes form symbioses with rhizobial bacteria and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi that

35 way to form symbiotic associations both with rhizobial bacteria and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi.

36 oscillations is similar for LCOs produced by rhizobial bacteria and by mycorrhizal fungi; however, My

37 llowing plant recognition of Nod factor from rhizobial bacteria and Myc factor from mycorrhizal fungi

38 to transduce two different signals, one from rhizobial bacteria and one from mycorrhizal fungi, by us

39 tion in both the symbiotic relationship with rhizobial bacteria and the plant defense response.

40 Rhizobial bacteria colonize legume roots for the purpose

41 Rhizobial bacteria enter a symbiotic association with le

42 Rhizobial bacteria enter a symbiotic interaction with le

43 ies of legume symbiosis with nitrogen-fixing rhizobial bacteria have traditionally focused on nodule

44 he result of a symbiosis between legumes and rhizobial bacteria in soil.

45 Infection of legume hosts by rhizobial bacteria results in the formation of a special

46 bioses with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and rhizobial bacteria share a common signaling pathway in l

47 Nitrogen-fixing rhizobial bacteria that associate with leguminous plants

48 microbial partners--namely, nitrogen-fixing rhizobial bacteria that colonize roots of legumes and ar

49 es in the soil, legumes enter symbioses with rhizobial bacteria that convert atmospheric nitrogen int

50 s (LCOs) are signaling molecules produced by rhizobial bacteria that trigger the nodulation process i

51 It is known that in rhizobial bacteria these proteins form a network that re

52 Legumes develop symbiotic interactions with rhizobial bacteria to form nitrogen-fixing nodules.

53 rry out endosymbiotic nitrogen fixation with rhizobial bacteria, a process that takes place in a spec

54 en soils promote symbiotic interactions with rhizobial bacteria, leading to the formation of nitrogen

55 (RN) symbiosis, formed by legume plants and rhizobial bacteria, requires an ongoing molecular dialog

56 acid also inhibits the plant's responses to rhizobial bacteria, with direct effects on Nod factor-in

57 ect agriculturally important nitrogen-fixing rhizobial bacteria.

58 h mycorrhizal fungi and with nitrogen-fixing rhizobial bacteria.

59 f both arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi and rhizobial bacteria.

60 ates infection by both mycorrhizal fungi and rhizobial bacteria.

61 ungi and between legumes and nitrogen-fixing rhizobial bacteria.

62 legumes also associate with nitrogen-fixing rhizobial bacteria.

63 e persistent but less abundant heterotrophic Rhizobiales bacteria possibly contributed to lowering O2

64 Gut-associated microbiota of ants include Rhizobiales bacteria with affiliation to the genus Barto

65 atively regulate the plant's response to the rhizobial bacterial signal, Nod factor.

66 ycorrhiza fungus Glomus intraradices and the rhizobial bacterium Sinorhizobium meliloti as well as wi

67 Nitrogen-fixing rhizobial bacteroids import dicarboxylates by using the

68 e solubility and availability of Fe(III) for rhizobial bacteroids.

69 Here, we harness the photosensors of rhizobial bathy-phytochromes to construct synthetic TCSs

70 est to the involvement of core Nod factor in rhizobial biofilm establishment.

71 Previous studies determined the role of rhizobial CelC2 cellulase in different steps of the symb

72 root surface and lectin-binding sites on the rhizobial cell surface.

73 ants that the same gene is also required for rhizobial colonization and nodulation.

74 For many legumes, rhizobial colonization initiates in root hairs through t

75 We show that rhizobial colonization of drepp mutant roots as well as

76 med based on available nitrogen and previous rhizobial colonization.

77 fix nitrogen effectively due to ineffective rhizobial colonization.

78 To transform the experimental assessment of rhizobial competitiveness and effectiveness, we have use

79 Rhizobial competitiveness is measured by identifying str

80 on of WIF to N(2)-fixing Burkholderiales and Rhizobiales could have provided additional competitive a

81 plant gene expression responses caused by a rhizobial defect in succinoglycan production, rather tha

82 y M. truncatula for inducing and maintaining rhizobial differentiation within nodules, as demonstrate

83 legoid legumes and is involved in control of rhizobial differentiation.

84 Greater rhizobial diversity accumulated in association with the

85 -CAN alters dramatically the PG structure of Rhizobiales (e.g., Agrobacterium tumefaciens, Sinorhizob

86 asion of plant immune responses triggered by rhizobial effectors.

87 positive role for NAD1 in the maintenance of rhizobial endosymbiosis during nodulation.

88 t this event was central to the evolution of rhizobial endosymbiosis.

89 Iron supplied by the plant is crucial for rhizobial enzyme nitrogenase that catalyses nitrogen fix

90 um loti strain R7A and Lotus japonicus Gifu, rhizobial exopolysaccharide (EPS) plays an important rol

91 In microscale thermophoresis (MST) assays, rhizobial exopolysaccharide binding is detected with aff

92 3, distinguishes compatible and incompatible rhizobial exopolysaccharides at the epidermis.

93 come apparent that rhizobial Nod factors and rhizobial exopolysaccharides play key roles in the initi

94 acellular loop 5 of FadLSm and further alpha-rhizobial FadL proteins contains determinants of specifi

95 oop 5 by the corresponding region from alpha-rhizobial FadL proteins transferred sensitivity for long

96 erlook the potential effect of host genes on rhizobial fitness (i.e. how many rhizobia are released f

97 red by horizontal gene transfer (HGT) from a rhizobial fungus.

98 riation in target DNA sequences from diverse rhizobial genes for nodulation and symbiosis.

99 rains in the mixed inoculation indicate that rhizobial genes involved in chromosome segregation, cell

100 rovokes changes in the expression profile of rhizobial genes.

101 Two distinct nearly full-length Rhizobiales genomes were identified in leaf-pocket-enric

102 Bacteria of the rhizobial group employ the LuxR-type transcriptional act

103 ship between herbivory and the prevalence of Rhizobiales gut symbionts within ant genera.

104 soybean, supporting a role for flavonoids in rhizobial host range.

105 nes in several a-proteobacteria of the order Rhizobiales including Bradyrhizobium sp. ORS 375, encodi

106 The phylogeny of the Rhizobiales indicates that this mode of zonal growth may

107 plant leads to the activation of a number of rhizobial-induced genes.

108 ates that LjVPY1 and LjVPY2 are required for rhizobial infection and colonization by AMF.

109 revealed that mature miR172c increased upon rhizobial infection and continued increasing during nodu

110 se in Lotus japonicus increased the level of rhizobial infection and enhanced nodulation.

111 biotic receptor kinase, negatively regulates rhizobial infection and nodulation during the nitrogen-f

112 n extracellular nucleotides, is critical for rhizobial infection and nodulation.

113 heir nod+ parents, F487A and PI262090 during rhizobial infection and nodule initiation by using RNA-s

114 key transcription factor that controls both rhizobial infection and nodule organogenesis.

115 ial role of ERN1/ERN2 to coordinately induce rhizobial infection and nodule organogenesis.

116 In the nad1 mutant plants, rhizobial infection and propagation in infection threads

117 Rhizobial infection and root nodule formation in legumes

118 with M. truncatula mutants having defects in rhizobial infection and symbiosome development demonstra

119 PROTEIN COMPONENT1 (ARPC1) as essential for rhizobial infection but not for arbuscular mycorrhiza sy

120 tion gene expression and hormone levels upon rhizobial infection compared with GUS roots.

121 Genetic analysis shows that defective rhizobial infection in exo70h4 is similar to that in vpy

122 innate immunity and plays a negative role in rhizobial infection in L. japonicus.

123 -SCR module enabled cell division coupled to rhizobial infection in legumes.

124 in distinct functions in AM colonisation and rhizobial infection in Lotus japonicus.

125 a deeper understanding of early responses to rhizobial infection in Medicago roots.

126 and leads us to propose a two-step model for rhizobial infection initiation in legume RHs.

127 ceptors, defense responses are triggered and rhizobial infection may abort.

128 To allow rhizobial infection of legume roots, plant cell walls mu

129 Rhizobial infection of legumes is regulated by a number

130 mponent of the signaling pathway controlling rhizobial infection of legumes.

131 loti symbiosis, chemical signaling initiates rhizobial infection of root nodule tissue, where a large

132 to a better understanding of tip growth, the rhizobial infection process, and also lead to improvemen

133 produced in roots and root hairs during the rhizobial infection process.

134 receptors discern NF modifications to enable rhizobial infection remains unknown.

135 one for symbiotic association, whereas after rhizobial infection rip1 transcript is specifically asso

136 Plants mutated in this gene have abnormal rhizobial infection threads and fewer nodules, and in th

137 xin signaling is necessary for initiation of rhizobial infection threads.

138 eiches early hyphal root colonization, while rhizobial infection was clearly impaired.

139 tions in ARGONAUTE7, enhances nodulation and rhizobial infection, alters the spatial distribution of

140 ot growth but prevents nodule organogenesis, rhizobial infection, and the induction of two key nodula

141 resulted in improved root growth, increased rhizobial infection, increased expression of early nodul

142 at Os-POLLUX can restore nodulation, but not rhizobial infection, to a Medicago truncatula dmi1 mutan

143 oduction and modulating nodule formation and rhizobial infection.

144 le primordia, and mutation of ARF16a reduced rhizobial infection.

145 loops that control Nod factor levels during rhizobial infection.

146 mediates ENOD11 expression during subsequent rhizobial infection.

147 nctate intermediates preceding intracellular rhizobial infection.

148 trol the extent of nodulation in response to rhizobial infection.

149 nesis, specifically at the site of impending rhizobial infection.

150 rs, triggering both nodule organogenesis and rhizobial infection.

151 content transiently increased in roots after rhizobial infection.

152 tically co-localizes with VPY and LIN during rhizobial infection.

153 ses to CelC2 during early steps of symbiotic rhizobial infection.

154 ule formation in tissues underlying sites of rhizobial infection.

155 exhibit early symbiotic responses including rhizobial infection.

156 gnalling mediated by DELLA proteins inhibits rhizobial infections and controls the NF induction of th

157 suggest that LIN functions in maintenance of rhizobial infections and differentiation of nodules from

158 ry pathways modulating NF signalling control rhizobial infections and nodulation efficiency.

159 Rhizobial infections correlate with an expansion of the

160 rning microtubule (MT) reorganization during rhizobial infections remain to be discovered.

161 MtCEP1 increases nodulation by promoting rhizobial infections, the developmental competency of ro

162 amily, and investigated its functions during rhizobial infections.

163 der of magnitude in the number of persistent rhizobial infections.

164 activation of ERN1 transcription to regulate rhizobial infections.

165 ons to permit easy identification of optimal rhizobial inoculants for field testing to maximize agric

166 Rhizobial inoculation enhances the association between S

167 Upon rhizobial inoculation, FLOT4 uniquely becomes localized

168 ein levels decreased in cerberus roots after rhizobial inoculation.

169 and also in nodule primordia in response to Rhizobial inoculation.

170 yrases, Mtapy2 and Mtapy3, was unaffected by rhizobial inoculation.

171 biotic features in a symrk null mutant where rhizobial invasion of the epidermis and nodule organogen

172 gene block the initiation and development of rhizobial invasion structures, termed infection threads,

173 izobium japonicum, yet little is known about rhizobial iron acquisition strategies.

174 excess hemin, whereas overexpression of the rhizobial iron regulator (rirA) has no effect on hut loc

175 Rhizobiales is typically the most abundant and taxonomic

176 To establish compatible rhizobial-legume symbioses, plant roots support bacteria

177 ave been largely confined to two models: the rhizobial-legume symbiotic association and pathogenesis

178 greatest similarity: Shewanella-like (SLP), Rhizobiales-like (RLPH), and ApaH-like (ALPH) phosphatas

179 These structural differences define the rhizobial lipid-A compounds as a potentially novel class

180 Rhizobial lipid-A differs significantly from previously

181 ssumed to lack the ability to respond to the rhizobial lipo-chitin Nod factors, which are the essenti

182 edge, has never been reported from any other rhizobial LPS.

183 The symbiosis between rhizobial microbes and host plants involves the coordina

184 fixing symbiosis requires the recognition of rhizobial molecules to initiate the development of nodul

185 xpression pattern of hrrP and its effects on rhizobial morphology are consistent with the NCR peptide

186 We found that rhizobial N-fixing trees were nearly absent below 15 deg

187 The climate-envelope projection showed that rhizobial N-fixing trees will likely become more abundan

188 Finally, oxygen-sensitive rhizobial NifA proteins presumably bind a metal cofactor

189 the legume family can form associations with rhizobial nitrogen-fixing bacteria, and this association

190 -nodule symbioses involve the recognition of rhizobial Nod factor (NF) signals by NF receptors, trigg

191 Interestingly, rhizobial Nod factor signal oligosaccharides that induce

192 of several legume species in response to the rhizobial Nod factor signal.

193 ells requires appropriate recognition of the rhizobial Nod factor signaling molecule, and this recogn

194 , as well as other nonlegumes, recognize the rhizobial Nod factor via a mechanism that results in str

195 Compatible interaction between rhizobial Nod factors and host receptors enables initial

196 It has also recently become apparent that rhizobial Nod factors and rhizobial exopolysaccharides p

197 Rhizobial Nod factors are the key signaling molecules in

198 ique nodule symbiosis that is independent of rhizobial Nod factors.

199 of iso/flavonoids is their ability to induce rhizobial nod gene expression and/or their ability to mo

200 In legume nitrogen-fixing symbioses, rhizobial nod genes are obligatory for initiating infect

201 t flavones might act as internal inducers of rhizobial nod genes, and that flavonols might act as aux

202 similarity to fungal chitin deacetylases and rhizobial NodB chitooligosaccharide deacetylases.

203 ctors from transgenic R. fredii carrying the rhizobial nodS gene were resistant to FAA II, suggesting

204 Rhizobial nodulation (Nod) factors activate both nodule

205 which is induced in roots and root hairs by rhizobial nodulation (Nod) factors via activation of the

206 release flavonoids that are detected by the rhizobial nodulation (Nod) protein NodD, initiating the

207 Rhizobial nodulation competitiveness and effectiveness a

208 es, such as chitin, peptidoglycan (PGN), and rhizobial nodulation factor (NF), that induce immune or

209 Rhizobial nodulation factors (NFs) activate a specific s

210 ct host specificity, primarily determined by rhizobial nodulation factors (NFs).

211 ess is initiated following the perception of rhizobial nodulation factors by the host plant.

212 teria and is especially prevalent within the Rhizobiales order.

213 three well-studied bacteria belonging to the Rhizobiales order: the plant symbiont Sinorhizobium meli

214 egumes have more bargaining power than their rhizobial partner at lower nitrogen availabilities highl

215 ants form nodules after infection with their rhizobial partner.

216 better able to maintain this across diverse rhizobial partners (i.e. low plasticity in fitness) rela

217 of Medicago truncatula roots in response to rhizobial perception.

218 We also find that rhizobial phylotype diversity and composition of soils c

219 essing the genetic diversity present in wild rhizobial populations to predict genes and molecular pat

220 In addition to its origin of Rhizobiales, protein phylogeny infers that BioZ is domes

221 s used as the cofactor of multiple plant and rhizobial proteins (e.g. plant leghemoglobin and bacteri

222 Interactions among symbionts, from rhizobial quorum sensing to fusion of genetically distin

223 nt alphaproteobacterial group comprising the Rhizobiales, Rhodobacterales, Caulobacterales, Parvularc

224 Rhizobiales/Rhodobacterales/Rhodospirillaceae-like phosp

225 e soybean (Glycine max) ecto-apyrase GS52 in rhizobial root hair infection and root nodule formation,

226 elated, polarly growing members of the order Rhizobiales, setting the stage for in-depth analyses of

227 rides called Nod factors function as primary rhizobial signal molecules triggering legumes to develop

228 ation in legume root nodules is initiated by rhizobial signaling molecules [Nod factors (NF)].

229 signal transduction following perception of rhizobial signaling molecules has mostly remained elusiv

230 ROP9-GmRACK1 and support the hypothesis that rhizobial signals promote the formation of a protein com

231 chitooligosaccharide Nod factors are the key rhizobial signals which initiate infection/nodulation in

232 conserved across legume species, responds to rhizobial signals, and initiates legume-specific cortica

233 the plant genes required for transduction of rhizobial signals, the Nod factors, are also necessary f

234 These data suggest that both rhizobial species have an IHF homolog that stimulates Dc

235 of symbiotic exopolysaccharide produced by a rhizobial species is one of the factors involved in opti

236 In rhizobial species that nodulate inverted repeat-lacking

237 ith strains of their cognate and non-cognate rhizobial species, R. leguminosarum bv trifolii and E. m

238 analysis reveals that ropA1 homologs in many Rhizobiales species are often found as two genetically l

239 Rhizobiales species, however, predominantly grow by PG s

240 oes not occur in response to a non-symbiotic rhizobial strain or a root pathogen.

241 both the host plant and the hrrP-expressing rhizobial strain, suggesting its involvement in symbioti

242 nodule senescence in an allele-specific and rhizobial strain-specific manner, and its function is de

243 ypes when hosts are inoculated with a single rhizobial strain.

244 oculating plants with a mixed inoculum of 68 rhizobial strains (Ensifer meliloti) via a select-and-re

245 ecreted during the infection process by some rhizobial strains can influence infection and modify the

246 Meanwhile, some rhizobial strains have evolved a peptidase to specifical

247 1-5) differentially altered the frequency of rhizobial strains in nodules even though npd2 mutants ha

248 Association analyses of the rhizobial strains in the mixed inoculation indicate that

249 ctures formed on alfalfa roots only when the rhizobial strains produced Nod factor from the alfalfa-n

250 s biflorus, binds to Nod factors produced by rhizobial strains that nodulate this plant and has a ded

251 However, plants usually house multiple rhizobial strains that vary in their fixation ability, s

252 Compatible rhizobial strains were used for coinoculation of the pla

253 ials using nine native legume species and 40 rhizobial strains, we find that bacterial rRNA phylotype

254 ot redundant with regard to their effects on rhizobial strains.

255 in a large collection of Medicago-nodulating rhizobial strains.

256 biosis Receptor-like Kinase) is required for rhizobial suppression of plant innate immunity in Lotus

257 These effects are strongly influenced by the rhizobial surface polysaccharides that affect NCR-induce

258 ant symbiotic associations with legumes, and rhizobial surface polysaccharides, such as K-antigen pol

259 ying a supercompetitive and highly effective rhizobial symbiont for peas.

260 in response to treatment of the roots with a rhizobial symbiont or with a carbohydrate ligand.

261 The nitrogen-fixing rhizobial symbiont Sinorhizobium meliloti 1021 produces

262 the model legume Medicago truncatula and its rhizobial symbiont Sinorhizobium meliloti, which include

263 n and determines the selection of compatible rhizobial symbionts in legumes.

264 oot nodule cell may contain several thousand rhizobial symbionts, each enclosed in a membrane envelop

265 nt of bacteria including plant pathogens and rhizobial symbionts.

266 signaling processes between plant hosts and rhizobial symbionts.

267 ewly identified NF-YB and NF-YC subunits for rhizobial symbiosis and binding to the promoter of MtERN

268 ptor, advancing the prospects of engineering rhizobial symbiosis into nonlegumes.

269 However, the role of small RNAs in legume-rhizobial symbiosis is largely unexplored.

270 The legume-rhizobial symbiosis results in the formation of root nod

271 of ERN1 and the closely related ERN2 to the rhizobial symbiosis were then evaluated by comparing the

272 itrogen fixation by free-living bacteria and rhizobial symbiosis with legumes plays a key role in sus

273 l cells enabled the initial establishment of rhizobial symbiosis(1-3).

274 In the establishment of the legume-rhizobial symbiosis, bacterial lipochitooligosaccharide

275 several key proteins involved in initiating rhizobial symbiosis, including SICKLE, NUCLEOPORIN133, a

276 to the well-characterized role of MtSkl1 in rhizobial symbiosis, we show that MtSkl1 is involved in

277 Glomus and Gigaspora spp., and they promote rhizobial symbiosis.

278 nable investigation of the role of miRNAs in rhizobial symbiosis.

279 molecule in the establishment of the legume/rhizobial symbiosis.

280 ificity is a prominent feature of the legume-rhizobial symbiosis.

281 abales), MtNFP is essential for establishing rhizobial symbiosis.

282 to improve our understanding of the soybean-rhizobial symbiosis.

283 l and temperate origins and actinorhizal and rhizobial symbiotic associations, each grown under warm

284 However, some rhizobial T3Es can also circumvent the need for nodulati

285 e we review the multifaceted roles played by rhizobial T3Es during symbiotic interactions with legume

286 Rhizobial taxa dominate N-fixing tree richness at lower

287 However, within the Rhizobiales, there are many budding bacteria, in which n

288 GPR homologs are found in numerous Rhizobiales; thus, our results and proposed model are fu

289 Here, we show that rhizobial transfer RNA (tRNA)-derived small RNA fragment

290 Rhizobial trees were more abundant in dry than in wet ec

291 Three families of rhizobial tRFs were confirmed to regulate host genes ass

292 hizobium symbiosis is strictly controlled by rhizobial type III effectors (T3Es) in some cases.

293 within the Burkholderiales, Pseudomonadales, Rhizobiales, Verrucomicrobiales, and Xanthomonadales, an

294 Sequence reads from a member of the Rhizobiales were identified in the data collected in a g

295 ants, bacteria from an ant-specific clade of Rhizobiales were more broadly distributed.

296 served among several genera within the order Rhizobiales, where bgsA encodes a glycosyl transferase w

297 s an ancestral and conserved trait among the Rhizobiales, which includes important mutualists and pat

298 of SAR11, classifying all but one strain as Rhizobiales with strong statistical support.

299 n recent research in the Actinomycetales and Rhizobiales, with emphasis on Mycobacterium and Agrobact

300 Fur, RirA, and BatR) described in the order Rhizobiales, with the greatest overall change in the tra