戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 dtB-Rif + NAC) but not rifaximin alone (CdtB-Rifaximin).
2  with that of vancomycin, metronidazole, and rifaximin.
3 d pharmacologic treatment with lactulose and rifaximin.
4 es in patients with MHE after treatment with rifaximin.
5 size these MMIPs for selective extraction of rifaximin.
6  were minimally affected in 19 patients post-rifaximin.
7 apacity (43.20 mg g(-1)) and selectivity for rifaximin.
8 is, compared with simvastatin 20 mg/day plus rifaximin.
9 ,011 dynes x s/cm(5) ) revealed no effect of rifaximin.
10  to study the efficacy and safety profile of rifaximin.
11 at treatment with the nonsystemic antibiotic rifaximin.
12 S symptoms with antibiotic therapy including rifaximin.
13 bo, over a 6-month period (hazard ratio with rifaximin, 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28 to 0
14 < 0.01) and receiving antibiotics other than rifaximin (10.5 days; p < 0.01) were associated with lon
15 00 mg/day (n=18), simvastatin 20 mg/day plus rifaximin 1200 mg/day (n=16), or placebo of both medicat
16 domly assigned to simvastatin 40 mg/day plus rifaximin 1200 mg/day (n=18), simvastatin 20 mg/day plus
17 tients (16 in the simvastatin 40 mg/day plus rifaximin 1200 mg/day group, 14 in the simvastatin 20 mg
18 imin 1200 mg/day, simvastatin 20 mg/day plus rifaximin 1200 mg/day, or placebo of both medications fo
19 to receive either simvastatin 40 mg/day plus rifaximin 1200 mg/day, simvastatin 20 mg/day plus rifaxi
20 signed to receive simvastatin, 20 mg/d, plus rifaximin, 1200 mg/d (n = 117), or identical-appearing p
21 ons), levofloxacin (500 mg; 111 persons), or rifaximin (1650 mg; 107 persons), in combination with lo
22 emission then began maintenance therapy with rifaximin 200 mg/day (to 1800 mg/day) for up to 24 month
23 uadalajara, Mexico, 210 U.S. adults received rifaximin (200 mg/d, 200 mg twice daily, or 200 mg 3 tim
24  were randomly assigned to receive 400 mg of rifaximin 3 times daily for 10 days (n = 43) or placebo
25 patients (44.1%) who responded to open-label rifaximin, 382 (35.6%) did not relapse and 692 (64.4%) d
26 romycin, 3.8 hours; levofloxacin, 6.4 hours; rifaximin, 5.6 hours).
27  responding to a 2-week course of open-label rifaximin 550 mg 3 times daily, who then relapsed during
28 ssigned to groups given repeat treatments of rifaximin 550 mg or placebo 3 times daily for 2 weeks.
29 le outpatients with cirrhosis and ascites to rifaximin 550 mg twice a day (n = 36) or placebo twice a
30                            Of patients given rifaximin, 91% improved their cognitive performance, com
31                                              Rifaximin, a gut-targeted antibiotic, improves cognitive
32                                 We evaluated rifaximin, a minimally absorbed antibiotic, as treatment
33                              The efficacy of rifaximin, a minimally absorbed antibiotic, is well docu
34 discuss the potential mechanism of action of rifaximin, a minimally absorbed antibiotic.
35                                              Rifaximin, a non-absorbable antibiotic used in managing
36                                              Rifaximin, a nonabsorbable antibiotic that decreases lip
37                              The efficacy of rifaximin, a nonabsorbed antimicrobial agent, was demons
38 rated by an improved synthetic strategy, and rifaximin, a potent PXR agonist, demonstrated that conic
39 ces screening (OR 1.20 [1.13, 1.27]), use of rifaximin after a discharge for hepatic encephalopathy (
40 ng, endoscopic varices screening, and use of rifaximin after hospitalization for hepatic encephalopat
41                                     However, Rifaximin allowed a higher intestinal microbiome diversi
42 ith rifaximin + NAC (CdtB-Rif + NAC) but not rifaximin alone (CdtB-Rifaximin).
43 ized clinical trials assessing the effect of rifaximin, alone or in combination with other drugs, on
44 conditional recommendations for eluxadoline, rifaximin, alosetron, (moderate certainty), loperamide (
45 review of the following agents: eluxadoline, rifaximin, alosetron, loperamide, tricyclic antidepressa
46                                              Rifaximin altered microbiota diversity and composition,
47                                         Oral rifaximin altered the composition of bacterial communiti
48 estraint stressors, and investigated whether rifaximin altered the gut microbiota, prevented intestin
49                                              Rifaximin alters the bacterial population in the ileum o
50                                              Rifaximin, an antibiotic of the ansamycin class has been
51                                              Rifaximin, an oral, non-systemic, broad-spectrum antibio
52 a developed in 14.74% of participants taking rifaximin and 53.70% of those taking placebo (rate ratio
53 has been an increased interest in the use of rifaximin and albumin in various settings of ArLD.
54                     ARGs are not affected by rifaximin and are associated with hospitalizations and d
55 cted mucosal breaks in 20% of subjects given rifaximin and in 43% of subjects given placebo (P = .05
56 For patients with HE, 32.4% and 63.3% filled rifaximin and lactulose, respectively.
57 d ALT between the simvastatin 20 mg/day plus rifaximin and placebo group (for AST -14 IU/L [-91 to 64
58 tes of adverse events were comparable in the rifaximin and placebo groups.
59 e azithromycin, effectiveness of single-dose rifaximin, and emerging resistance to front-line agents
60     Both FDX and OP-1118 (unlike vancomycin, rifaximin, and metronidazole) effectively inhibited spor
61 rmacological treatments such as antibiotics (rifaximin), anti-inflammatory drugs (mesalazine) and pro
62                                              Rifaximin appears promising as a chemoprophylaxis for tr
63     Nitazoxanide, tolevamer, ramoplanin, and rifaximin are key agents being evaluated as new therapie
64 there were no significant changes within the rifaximin arm.
65 e there was no significant change within the rifaximin arm.
66  and 1.9% in azithromycin, levofloxacin, and rifaximin arms, respectively) (P = .55).
67 74.8% of the levofloxacin, azithromycin, and rifaximin arms, respectively.
68  findings challenge the conventional view of rifaximin as a low-risk intervention and support mechani
69                        Patients' response to rifaximin as a maintenance therapy appears to be favorab
70 onstipation were randomly assigned to either rifaximin at a dose of 550 mg or placebo, three times da
71                        Among patients not on rifaximin at enrollment, GPB reduced the proportion of p
72  In contrast, vancomycin, metronidazole, and rifaximin (at similar sub-MICs) did not inhibit sporulat
73 from chronic liver disease to receive either rifaximin, at a dose of 550 mg twice daily (140 patients
74 study is needed in Asia to determine whether rifaximin can prevent diarrhea caused by invasive bacter
75 th CdtB and treated with placebo (CdtB-PBS), rifaximin (CdtB-Rifaximin), or rifaximin + NAC (CdtB-Rif
76 g simulator performance after treatment with rifaximin, compared with placebo.
77 erimental and clinical evidence suggest that rifaximin could have other beneficial effects on the cou
78 mics in patients with cirrhosis and ascites; rifaximin did not affect glomerular filtration rate or l
79                 Four weeks of treatment with rifaximin did not reduce the hepatic venous pressure gra
80 , respectively (P < 0.001 for both), and all rifaximin doses were superior to placebo.
81  mucolytic N-acetylcysteine (NAC) to improve rifaximin efficacy.
82 us omeprazole (20 mg once daily), and either rifaximin-EIR (400 mg) or placebo, twice daily for 14 da
83 f patients who received the 800-mg dosage of rifaximin-EIR (61 of 98) were in remission, compared wit
84 ients given the 400-mg and 800-mg dosages of rifaximin-EIR had low rates of withdrawal from the study
85                     Administration of 800 mg rifaximin-EIR twice daily for 12 weeks induced remission
86                     Data from patients given rifaximin-EIR were compared with those from individuals
87 efficacy and safety of 400, 800, and 1200 mg rifaximin-EIR, given twice daily to 402 patients with mo
88 ents given the 400-mg and 1200-mg dosages of rifaximin-EIR, respectively; these rates did not differ
89 ion and support mechanistic evidence linking rifaximin exposure to cross-resistance against critical
90 ine whether a gastroresistant formulation of rifaximin (extended intestinal release [EIR]) induced re
91 er a delayed-release antibiotic formulation (rifaximin-extended intestinal release [EIR]) prevents th
92 nvenient and reliable method for trace-level rifaximin extraction from milk using eco-friendly MMIPs.
93                                              Rifaximin followed by systemic antibiotics maintained mi
94 eatment predominantly involves lactulose and rifaximin following rigorous treatment of so-called know
95 had IBS without constipation, treatment with rifaximin for 2 weeks provided significant relief of IBS
96 dence in the literature regarding the use of rifaximin for different gastrointestinal disorders.
97                          However, the use of rifaximin for prevention or treatment of other complicat
98 ine kinase in the simvastatin 20 mg/day plus rifaximin group (4.2 IU/L [-804 to 813]; p=0.992).
99 tly higher in the simvastatin 40 mg/day plus rifaximin group (nine [56%] of 16 patients) compared wit
100                  None of the subjects in the rifaximin group developed large lesions, compared with 9
101 rematurely in the simvastatin 40 mg/day plus rifaximin group due to recommendations by the data safet
102      A total of 13.6% of the patients in the rifaximin group had a hospitalization involving hepatic
103 addition, significantly more patients in the rifaximin group had a response to treatment as assessed
104 ge-liver disease scores, but patients in the rifaximin group had increased levels of the anti-inflamm
105   Patients in the simvastatin 40 mg/day plus rifaximin group showed a significant increase in AST and
106   Patients in the simvastatin 40 mg/day plus rifaximin group showed an increase in creatine kinase at
107           Significantly more patients in the rifaximin group than in the placebo group had adequate r
108              Similarly, more patients in the rifaximin group than in the placebo group had adequate r
109 lopathy occurred in 22.1% of patients in the rifaximin group, as compared with 45.9% of patients in t
110 drivers were randomly assigned to placebo or rifaximin groups and followed up for 8 weeks (n = 42).
111  rifaximin or the simvastatin 20 mg/day plus rifaximin groups compared with placebo.
112                                              Rifaximin had no effect on hepatic venous pressure gradi
113                                              Rifaximin has been shown to be of benefit to these patie
114 ative options to standard therapies, whereas rifaximin has demonstrated success in uncontrolled trial
115                              Simvastatin and rifaximin have shown beneficial effects in liver cirrhos
116 f fusidic acid and bacitracin and, possibly, rifaximin if resistance to this agent becomes widespread
117                                              Rifaximin improves IBS symptoms for up to 10 weeks after
118 n was more effective than only lactulose and rifaximin in improving grades of HE, recovery time from
119 nvestigated the efficacy and tolerability of rifaximin in maintaining symptomatic and endoscopic remi
120   We also studied ARGs pre- and 8 weeks post-rifaximin in patients with compensated cirrhosis in an o
121    Treatment with simvastatin 40 mg/day plus rifaximin in patients with decompensated cirrhosis was a
122  multiple pathogenic events, the efficacy of rifaximin in the prevention or management of complicatio
123 nt doses of simvastatin, in combination with rifaximin, in patients with decompensated cirrhosis.
124                      This study explores how rifaximin influences gut microbiota functions and its as
125                                              Rifaximin is a gastrointestinal-selective antibiotic wit
126                                              Rifaximin is a poorly absorbed antimicrobial with activi
127                                              Rifaximin is an oral nonsystemic antibiotic with minimal
128                                              Rifaximin is currently approved in the United States for
129                                              Rifaximin is currently used worldwide in patients with c
130                                              Rifaximin is effective for the treatment of travelers' d
131       Future studies should evaluate whether rifaximin is effective in preventing postinfectious irri
132                                              Rifaximin is FDA-approved for treatment of irritable bow
133                                              Rifaximin is gaining attention for its potential activit
134                                              Rifaximin is increasingly important as a therapy for hos
135                          One difference from rifaximin is the site of delivery of AEMCOLO which appea
136                                              Rifaximin is used to treat patients with functional gast
137 jor morbidity despite standard of care (SOC; rifaximin/lactulose).
138 Over the 8-week study period, patients given rifaximin made significantly greater improvements than t
139        Over a 6-month period, treatment with rifaximin maintained remission from hepatic encephalopat
140              Intestinal decontamination with rifaximin may improve hemodynamics.
141 -one patients began maintenance therapy with rifaximin (median dose 200 mg/day); 33 (65%) maintained
142  group, 14 in the simvastatin 20 mg/day plus rifaximin mg/day group, and 14 in the placebo group).
143              In immune nonresponders to ART, rifaximin minimally affected microbial translocation and
144 ulation and decrease portal hypertension and rifaximin modulates the gut microbiome and might prevent
145                              We propose that rifaximin modulates the ileal bacterial community, reduc
146 3-IS levels compared to mono-antibiosis with Rifaximin (n = 14) or intravenous Vancomycin (n = 4, not
147 ly assigned to receive repeat treatment with rifaximin (n = 328) or placebo (n = 308).
148   Compared with no study treatment (n = 22), rifaximin (n = 43) use was associated with a significant
149 zed to a combination of LOLA, lactulose, and rifaximin (n = 70) or placebo, lactulose, and rifaximin
150 ifaximin (n = 70) or placebo, lactulose, and rifaximin (n = 70).
151  variability normalized in rats treated with rifaximin + NAC (CdtB-Rif + NAC) but not rifaximin alone
152 o (CdtB-PBS), rifaximin (CdtB-Rifaximin), or rifaximin + NAC (CdtB-Rif + NAC) for 10 days.
153 le and treated with placebo (Control-PBS) or rifaximin + NAC (Control-Rif + NAC, safety), or inoculat
154                                  The optimal rifaximin + NAC combination was then tested in a validat
155 and disease progression, study the effect of rifaximin on ARG burden, and compare ARGs in cirrhosis w
156 controlled trial investigates the effects of rifaximin on hemodynamics, renal function, and vasoactiv
157  the first part with the potential impact of rifaximin on pathogenic mechanisms in liver diseases, wh
158 e between the the simvastatin 40 mg/day plus rifaximin or the simvastatin 20 mg/day plus rifaximin gr
159 ted with placebo (CdtB-PBS), rifaximin (CdtB-Rifaximin), or rifaximin + NAC (CdtB-Rif + NAC) for 10 d
160 ering therapy by l-ornithine l-aspartate and rifaximin orally for 4 weeks.
161       Noninferiority could not be shown with rifaximin (P = .07).
162  mortality (P < .001) for patients receiving Rifaximin plus systemic antibiotics compared to other ty
163                                              Rifaximin prevents travelers' diarrhea with minimal chan
164                                              Rifaximin provided 72% and 77% protection against travel
165 ut normalized in CdtB-Rif + NAC but not CdtB-Rifaximin rats.
166 score, gender, use of antibiotics other than rifaximin, reason for admission and hepatitis C are pred
167                                 In addition, rifaximin recipients had a lower bloating score after tr
168              Over the 10 weeks of follow-up, rifaximin resulted in greater improvement in IBS symptom
169                         Mono-antibiosis with Rifaximin revealed higher 3-IS levels (P < .001), higher
170                                              Rifaximin safely prevented travelers' diarrhea in Mexico
171                                              Rifaximin significantly influenced gut microbiota and pr
172 ups that did not report travelers' diarrhea, rifaximin significantly reduced the occurrence of mild d
173                                              Rifaximin significantly reduced the risk of an episode o
174 of responders was significantly greater with rifaximin than placebo (38.1% vs 31.5%; P = .03).
175 2%; P = .018) was significantly greater with rifaximin than placebo, but not stool consistency (51.8%
176                Eighty participants completed rifaximin therapy or placebo, and follow-up data were av
177                                              Rifaximin therapy was not cost-saving at current prices
178  changes in coliform flora were found during rifaximin therapy.
179 hronic pouchitis, studies found success with rifaximin, tinidazole, and oral budesonide.
180             The addition of simvastatin plus rifaximin to standard therapy does not improve outcomes
181                                              Rifaximin treatment also significantly reduced the risk
182 atients receiving other antibiotics prior to rifaximin treatment exhibit greater AMR risks.
183 cacy and safety data from clinical trials of rifaximin treatment of IBS.
184 e five colonized patients received long-term rifaximin treatment to prevent hepatic encephalopathy.
185  the 5 colonized patients received long-term rifaximin treatment to prevent hepatic encephalopathy.
186 nts with relapsing symptoms of IBS-D, repeat rifaximin treatment was efficacious and well tolerated.
187                                              Rifaximin trial: ARG abundance patterns were minimally a
188 onstrate a two-fold AMR risk associated with rifaximin use (HR = 1.89; 95% CI = 1.49-2.40), with sign
189 t study, we evaluate the association between rifaximin use and subsequent AMR in patients with cirrho
190                                              Rifaximin use is also associated with an escalated risk
191 ing evidence raised concerns that widespread rifaximin use may promote antimicrobial resistance (AMR)
192 score, serum sodium, albumin, lactulose use, rifaximin use, and benzodiazepine/barbiturate sedation.
193  significant bacterial resistance will limit rifaximin use.
194 unts <350 cells/mm(3) were randomized 2:1 to rifaximin versus no study treatment for 4 weeks.
195 )T-cell activation (median change, 0.0% with rifaximin vs +0.6% with no treatment; P = .03).
196 stration of carbon tetrachloride (CCl4), and rifaximin was administered daily.
197                                              Rifaximin was found to be safe and well tolerated in lon
198                                              Rifaximin was found to lead to better maintenance of rem
199                                              Rifaximin was found to lead to better maintenance of rem
200       Combination of LOLA with lactulose and rifaximin was more effective than only lactulose and rif
201                                     Although rifaximin was slightly more effective than lactulose in
202                 Twenty subjects on lactulose/rifaximin were randomized 1:1.
203 ent of irritable bowel syndrome-diarrhoea is rifaximin, which was approved in May 2015.
204      Treatments considered were lactulose or rifaximin, which were assumed to reduce the MVA rate to
205  with cirrhosis, including 59 already taking rifaximin, who had experienced two or more hepatic encep
206  Single-dose azithromycin, levofloxacin, and rifaximin with loperamide were comparable for treatment
207 In a resazurin checkerboard assay, combining rifaximin with NAC had significant synergistic effects i
208        These findings suggest that combining rifaximin with NAC may improve the percentage of IBS-D p
209 ups (Rifaximin without systemic antibiotics, Rifaximin with systemic antibiotics, and Ciprofloxacin/M
210  antibiotic activity, we formed 3 subgroups (Rifaximin without systemic antibiotics, Rifaximin with s

 
Page Top