ライフサイエンスコーパス: rinse

1 ste, and greater drowsiness than the placebo rinse.

2 and water, respectively, as a preprocedural rinse.

3 rinse, or (3) the Ca rinse followed by the F rinse.

4 y increases salivary F from a subsequent NaF rinse.

5 ly exceeded the corresponding F from the NaF rinse.

6 procedure was repeated with the alternative rinse.

7 %) subjects had an initial HPV positive oral rinse.

8 rowth of Group A Streptococcus applied after rinse.

9 n of the ICG pHLIP construct, incubated, and rinsed.

10 inhibited/reduced by chlorhexidine and honey rinses.

11 ing, systemic antibiotics, and antimicrobial rinses.

12 ing, systemic antibiotics, and chlorhexidine rinses.

13 ates, as verified by analysis of the surface rinses.

14 twice a day with placebo or 0.5% cimetidine rinses.

15 al activity of premenopausal epithelial cell rinses.

16 e leaves decreased significantly after water rinses.

17 umber of showers); and timing (pause) before rinsing.

18 raft surface after phosphate-buffered saline rinsing.

19 evels subsiding within 50-100 bed volumes of rinsing.

20 state upon being released from inhibition by rinsing.

21 ) was the oral hygiene phase, which included rinsing.

22 in a plasticizer solution, followed by water rinsing.

23 erning byproduct is readily removed by water rinsing.

24 eted NP concentrations in response to serial rinsing.

25 ly assigned to bathe patients either with no-rinse 2% chlorhexidine-impregnated washcloths or with no

26 with a commercial non-antibacterial etch-and-rinse adhesive (N) or an experimental antibacterial adhe

27 r (HL) created by a self-etch or an etch-and-rinse adhesive after 1 y.

28 5; E', 3.85 +/- 0.24) created by an etch-and-rinse adhesive in the presence or absence of biomimetic

29 resin-dentin interfaces created by etch-and-rinse adhesives.

30 y spike in the patient artery due to glucose rinse after drug administration accounted for up to 10.7

31 In both cases, the surface was rinsed after each application of IgE to remove sample co

32 oncentrations between 6.6 and 200 nM and HCl rinsing after each exposure.

33 CNT) arrays as model systems, we developed a rinsing-after-fixing approach to improve the key transpo

34 rucidal activity of different available oral rinses against SARS-CoV-2 under conditions mimicking nas

35 fluid F by 12x and 5x, compared with the NaF rinse alone.

36 BacR was detected in 18% of hand rinse and 27% of floor samples.

37 Oral rinse and anal swab samples were collected semiannually

38 Both water rinse and backwash showed effectiveness to restore the m

39 Oral rinse and cervical-vaginal lavage samples were concurren

40 E. coli were detected in a quarter of hand rinse and floor samples.

41 cipants (N = 5579) provided a 30-second oral rinse and gargle with mouthwash.

42 ation with chlorhexidine washcloths and oral rinse and intranasal povidone-iodine decreased the SSI r

43 were given chlorhexidine washcloths and oral rinse and nasal povidone-iodine solution to be used the

44 ) studies with 2 different systems (etch-and-rinse and self-etch).

45 The modified two-step etch-and-rinse and single-step systems showed less Rhodamine B pe

46 fecal contamination was estimated using hand rinse and stored water fecal indicator bacteria concentr

47 out after a complete reprocessing cycle; 420 rinse and swabs samples were collected from BCs and inte

48 The particle-antibody-BuChE product was rinsed and directly digested with pepsin.

49 period follows, after which the cultures are rinsed and placed on solid selective medium.

50 Cells were then rinsed and shifted to chase medium containing unlabeled

51 imited to topical applications such as wound rinses and dressings.

52 agents found in commercially available mouth rinses and listed on the ClinicalTrials.gov website: pov

53 After rinsing and a 12 hour stop flow period, all column solut

54 obust that patterned domains survive solvent rinsing and drying.

55 protein through the membrane and subsequent rinsing and elution yield purified polyhistidine-tagged

56 ein and isoflavones are dissociated by water rinsing and prolonged cooking, but these have no equival

57 differences in slopes between "handled + not-rinsed" and "handled + rinsed" stents (p = 0.004), and b

58 ts (p = 0.004), and between "untouched + not-rinsed" and "untouched + rinsed stents" (p = 0.037).

59 ) for a time t(i) (c(i) = 0 corresponds to a rinse) and measure the protein adsorption by optical wav

60 454 g, 5.68 L water, 36 g salt, al dente, no rinsing) and after systematic variation of amount of sal

61 e under gentle agitation and, then, removed, rinsed, and analyzed directly by DESI-MS (MS/MS).

62 hardness levels and chlorine concentrations, rinsed, and covered with chambers to determine the effec

63 otential sweep, the microfluidic channel was rinsed, and the junction was re-formed with a subsequent

64 ene, scaling and root planing, chlorhexidine rinses, and periodontal maintenance.

65 ed from 29 participants, by use of mouthwash rinses, and were split into equal aliquots, with one ali

66 ection management, use of antimicrobial oral rinses, and withdrawal of bisphosphonates are preferable

67 concentrations, exposure times, and mixing, rinsing, and pH conditions.

68 ary steps: tip pretreatment, sample loading, rinsing, and sample elution.

69 Oral rinse-and-gargle samples and questionnaire data were obt

70 of the cohort who provided two or more oral rinse-and-gargle samples with valid HPV results and who

71 EDC for both the self-etch and the etch-and-rinse approaches results in the reduction but not comple

72 in a 50 mM trehalose, 10-15% (w/w) glycerol rinse, are preserved and chemically profiled.

73 The rinse assay can be used as a screening tool for oral inf

74 An oral rinse assay was also performed to determine the total le

75 ing and root planing plus chlorhexidine oral rinse at baseline and supportive periodontal therapy at

76 nd pH 7.1) and the deposited MWNTs were then rinsed at different electrolyte solutions to induce the

77 intent, 124 had 1 or more posttreatment oral rinses available and were included in this study.

78 tivates E-selectin so that leukocytes may be rinsed away 60% more efficiently than with a buffer cont

79 Only 10-18% Hb was rinsed away in (i), and the effect of this rinsing on pe

80 Residual RF could be rinsed away within 1 hour.

81 ruvate-free slice maintenance medium and not rinsed away, exposing the slices to a range of 1-5 mM gl

82 is elicited when sweet-taste inhibitors are rinsed away.

83 roducts during ice-storage were studied: (i) rinsing away Hb with water or 0.9% NaCl with/without ant

84 physiological response to CAC, brine shrimp rinse, bile salt, and amino acid cues using the electro-

85 nd 12 h), and cooking rice methods including Rinsed (boiling in excess water) and Kateh (conventional

86 conjugated to a gold particle label, (ii) a rinse buffer, and (iii) a signal amplification reagent t

87 Multiplex PCR was performed on oral rinses collected from twenty-three patients with adult-o

88 e exposure times, concentrations, and pH and rinsing conditions.

89 se, 1-minute pause, or 2-minute pause before rinsing), containing 20 participants each.

90 ial DNA was greater than that in reagent and rinse controls, and communities were markedly dominated

91 The results showed that the rinsed cooking has higher efficiency for removal of toxi

92 periodontal therapy and chlorhexidine (CHX) rinse could affect nitrite levels, leading to negative e

93 After several days of rinsing, decellularized liver samples were histologicall

94 spersed with five licks of artificial saliva rinse delivered on a VR5 schedule.

95 hole analytical procedure (i.e., extraction, rinsing, desorption, and LC-MS/MS analysis) was performe

96 contamination of DNA samples; a simple water rinse diminishes or eliminates the formation of multi-io

97 The L-PRF-treated samples without rinsing displayed numerous cells with multiple pseudopod

98 No-rinse disposable wash gloves are increasingly implemente

99 e evidence that topical 0.5% cimetidine oral rinse enhances the antibacterial function of crevicular

100 however, activated PBMC recovered HIV-1 from rinsed epithelial cells and rarely from replated epithel

101 To address this problem, a chelate-and-rinse extrafibrillar dentin demineralization strategy ha

102 The F in each extract after the Ca rinse/F rinse greatly exceeded the corresponding F from

103 Consequently, the Ca rinse/F rinse increased the total plaque F and the plaqu

104 g F), (2) 150 mmol/L Ca rinse, or (3) the Ca rinse followed by the F rinse.

105 We collected water, hand rinse, food, soil, and fly samples from 608 households.

106 ients dosed twice daily using a 1% dyclonine rinse for 1 week.

107 were randomly assigned to an EO or a placebo rinse for 90 days (40 mL/day).

108 e lowest MICs compared with honey and saline rinses for all test species examined.

109 ection in Men (HIM) Study, we evaluated oral rinses for HPV DNA and baseline sera for HPV-6, -11, -16

110 cavity of eyes with retinal breaks and then rinsed from the eye.

111 encing of human skin swab specimens and oral rinses from healthy individuals.

112 Apical rinses from polarized epithelial cells recovered from wo

113 othesis is that removal of the stimulus upon rinsing generates a receptor-based, positive, off-respon

114 The F in each extract after the Ca rinse/F rinse greatly exceeded the corresponding F from the NaF

115 erial killing was observed in the cimetidine rinse group; in the cimetidine group, 63.4% of bacteria

116 The chlorhexidine gluconate rinse had the lowest MICs compared with honey and saline

117 Soil samples collected following rinsing, however, contained significant sorbed NH(4)(+)

118 Calcium phosphate disks were then rinsed in 5% sodium hypochlorite to remove adherent oste

119 n pen previously used with high inocula, but rinsed in ethanol and stored dry (6 months).

120 Then the specimens were rinsed in saline solution.

121 luated by exposure to a series of stringency rinses in solutions of successively lower ionic strength

122 at very low levels, were identified in oral rinses in two patients suggesting potential HPV subtype

123 Consequently, the Ca rinse/F rinse increased the total plaque F and the plaque fluid

124 ion, soil V(s) measurements completed during rinse injections suggested that no significant changes i

125 gG is drawn through the membrane followed by rinsing, insertion of an electrode assembly, and additio

126 ith a fluorogenic tetrazine reagent via a no-rinse, inverse electron-demand Diels-Alder (IEDDA) react

127 on of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA in oral rinses is associated with HPV-OPC, but its potential as

128 , persistent HPV16 DNA in posttreatment oral rinses is associated with poor prognosis and is a potent

129 Human papillomavirus type 16 DNA in oral rinses is common at diagnosis but rare after treatment f

130 volunteers at two different times after wine rinsing, just after spitting of the wine (immediate rele

131 exist, the commercial availability of mouth rinses leads us to search among them for reagents that w

132 artificial saliva (AS)] separated by five AS rinse licks on a variable ratio 5 schedule.

133 washing and soaking to 5 h, then cook it by rinse method.

134 operties in vitro support the idea that oral rinsing might reduce the viral load of saliva and could

135 Subsequently, child hand rinses (n = 44) and floor sponge samples (n = 44) from l

136 ing was constructed in situ with alternating rinses of positively and negatively charged polymers.

137 le PEM is constructed in situ by alternative rinses of the cationic polymer poly(l-lysine) and the an

138 Extensive rinsing of the crystals in organic solvents such as meth

139 cific proteolytic peptides, while subsequent rinsing of the deposited sample removes contaminants.

140 etry items that remained on the skin or were rinsed off and household and functional items.

141 believed that GSE should be applied and then rinsed off in a separate step, which in effect increases

142 Particles were then rinsed off, and the degradation of the polymer was chara

143 topically, there are additional issues with rinsing off unbound probe, which can be nonuniform and i

144 six parabens were determined in 170 PCPs (41 rinse-off and 109 leave-on), including 20 baby care prod

145 oacervation is the primary mechanism used in rinse-off formulations to deliver topical agents to the

146 Phthalates were less frequently found in rinse-off PCPs but were more frequently found in perfume

147 Parabens were found in approximately 40% of rinse-off products and approximately 60% of leave-on pro

148 ed before and at 3 and 7 min after a sucrose rinse on consecutive weeks and analyzed for organic acid

149 to examine the effects of topical cimetidine rinse on neutrophil function in the gingival crevice.

150 s rinsed away in (i), and the effect of this rinsing on peroxide value (PV) or TBA-reactive substance

151 Upon rinsing, only a fraction of Cry1Ab desorbed, suggesting

152 ts were randomly allocated to a doxepin oral rinse or a placebo for the treatment of radiotherapy-rel

153 Dentin substrates were bonded with etch-and-rinse or self-etch adhesives and prepared for microtensi

154 s (irrespective of whether they are etch-and-rinse or self-etch) can activate these endogenous protea

155 Virus was not recovered from the rinsed or replated cocultures with resting PBMC; however

156 Rinsing or incubating by-products in antioxidant solutio

157 ol/L NaF (228 microg/g F), (2) 150 mmol/L Ca rinse, or (3) the Ca rinse followed by the F rinse.

158 after incubation, the digested substrate was rinsed out.

159 jects, 77.2% had an additional positive oral rinse over 12 months.

160 water:pasta ratio, cooking volume and time, rinsing, pasta shape, whole grain.

161 Oral rinse, penile swab, and vaginal swab specimens were eval

162 After rinsing, peroxidase-conjugated anti-IgG is drawn through

163 nterior surface of capillary, an appropriate rinsing procedure by hydrochloric acid and water was opt

164 mp, temperature, capillary conditioning, and rinsing procedure, etc.) were left to the discretion of

165 lters were used to optimize sample dilution, rinsing protocol, flow rate, and pore size, leading to >

166 trodes were made reusable through an ethanol rinsing protocol.

167 on-woven waffled fibers, saturated with a no-rinse, quickly vaporizing skin cleaning and caring lotio

168 ounting (HPC) were used to evaluate the swab/rinse recovery efficiency of endospores from stainless s

169 During rinsing, reductions in aqueous NH(4)(+) were observed in

170 nitrate, as the mobile phase, and a suitable rinsing regime, allowed good reproducibility and mainten

171 parallel the psychophysical responses-water rinses remove the inhibitor from the heteromeric sweeten

172 o less than once daily, 84% flossed, and 70% rinsed, respectively, less than once a week.

173 sed from, the monoliths after a desalination rinse, resulting in femtomole limits of detection via ma

174 uential showers; and a 1-minute pause before rinsing results in maximal skin surface (16.5 microg/cm2

175 matory load (OIL) was assessed in a salivary rinse sample using fluorescence microscopy.

176 An oral rinse sample, risk factor survey, cancer history, and or

177 s the detection of HPV genomic DNA from oral rinse samples and may result in exposure misclassificati

178 enomic DNA detection in Scope mouthwash oral rinse samples and the reproducibility of HPV detection i

179 ed from fecal, egg shell, fluff, and carcass rinse samples as part of a previously reported temporall

180 and the reproducibility of HPV detection in rinse samples collected 7 days apart were investigated.

181 s were compared among equal aliquots of oral rinse samples collected from a subset of individuals.

182 Of the 420 rinse samples collected from the BC of the GI endoscopes

183 nterviewed on risk factors and provided oral-rinse samples for HPV DNA typing by polymerase chain rea

184 Participants provided oral rinse samples for HPV genotyping.

185 he spectrum of HPV type distribution in oral rinse samples from 2 populations: 52 human immunodeficie

186 6 beta-HPVs and 51 gamma-HPVs in stored oral rinse samples from healthy mid-adult women (age, 30-50 y

187 Culturing rinse samples obtained from BCs provides a better indica

188 milk detection, to be used directly in final rinse samples of cleaning in place systems (CIP) of food

189 The presence of platelet factor-4 in the rinse samples was analyzed by Western blotting.

190 Oral rinse samples were collected at diagnosis and after trea

191 Oral rinse samples were evaluated for 36 types of HPV DNA usi

192 Venous blood and oral rinse samples were obtained from five healthy participan

193 were also higher for Puregene-processed oral rinse samples when a fixed volume (10 mul) rather than a

194 forearm skin swabs, genital skin swabs, oral rinse samples, and anal swabs.

195 ent, 98%; kappa value, 0.57) in matched oral rinse samples.

196 A protocol for rinsing samples to remove the adventitious glutathione s

197 stress ulcer prophylaxis, chlorhexidine oral rinse, selective digestive decontamination, short-course

198 this study was to determine whether Carolina rinse solution (CRS) used at the end of cold ischemic st

199 of the KR, namely, the presence/absence of a rinse solution and the sample acidity.

200 solution and the lactated Ringer poststorage rinse solution.

201 f 525 L of a high pH and high ionic strength rinse solution.

202 dent external mass spectrometric analysis of rinse solutions of the collected spots, either by the ne

203 However, the antiviral efficacy of oral rinsing solutions against SARS-CoV-2 has not been examin

204 Oral rinse specimens from 35 (67%) of 52 HIV-positive individ

205 Self-collected anal swab and oral rinse specimens were assessed for 37 types of HPV.

206 Oral rinse specimens were collected semiannually for up to 5

207 Self-collected anal swab and oral rinse specimens were tested for HPV DNA (37 types) by L1

208 e present in 2.1% of tonsil and 6.3% of oral-rinse specimens.

209 ecipitation with chloroform before different rinsing stages for removing methanol and water interfere

210 itro analysis revealed fewer contaminants on rinsed stents compared with untouched (p = 0.01) and han

211 en "untouched + not-rinsed" and "untouched + rinsed stents" (p = 0.037).

212 etween "handled + not-rinsed" and "handled + rinsed" stents (p = 0.004), and between "untouched + not

213 ity and can be easily regenerated by a short rinsing step for multiple biosensing analyses.

214 ed biochip can be restored by a simple water-rinsing step, making it highly convenient for use in poi

215 Multiple rinse steps provide both structural control and thermody

216 Derivatization, extraction and rinsing steps are not required to separate the analytes

217 e any additional hybridization, labeling, or rinsing steps.

218 excess, eliminating the need for repetitive rinsing steps.

219 (rotavirus, enterovirus, adenovirus) in hand rinses, stored water, and source waters in Bagamoyo, Tan

220 th adjunctive chlorhexidine therapies (e.g., rinsing, subgingival irrigation, tongue brushing).

221 A quantitative analysis of rinsed surfaces showed that the overall solution-to-solu

222 f-etch system was compared with the etch-and-rinse system.

223 For extended analyses, a sample rinsing system flushes the sample collection reservoir p

224 t tissue grafts, post-surgical chlorhexidine rinses, systemic antibiotics, and dressings.

225 as produced that can be used to periodically rinse the electrochemical cell and toilet.

226 Rinsing the cathodes with deionized water did not restor

227 removing coupons from the reactor channels, rinsing the coupons to remove planktonic cells, scraping

228 After a very brief rinsing the hybridized electrode is incubated in pH 3.0

229 aim of the present study was to observe how rinsing the mouth with solutions containing glucose and

230 After post-treatment rinsing, the L-PRF-treated disks displayed a significant

231 After rinsing, the lenses were measured for fluorescence and t

232 After 14 days of twice-daily rinsing, the level of each of the target subgingival org

233 They rinsed their mouth (for 1 min) twice a day for seven day

234 k = 914 +/- 29 kJ) significantly faster when rinsing their mouths with a 6.4% glucose solution compar

235 les were centrifuged and the precipitate was rinsed to remove more than 99.8% of the Ba2+ along with

236 e identification of targeted antiviral mouth rinses to reduce salivary viral load would contribute to

237 Oral samples were collected as follows: oral rinse, tongue base, and pharyngeal wall brushes, then to

238 the brush-alone treatment and the brush-plus-rinse treatment.

239 Subjects rinsed twice a day during periods 1 and 3 with placebo a

240 volving 21 healthy adults, in which subjects rinsed twice a day with placebo or 0.5% cimetidine rinse

241 h/gum brushing plus 0.12% chlorhexidine oral rinse, twice per day, plus upright positioning during fe

242 Independently of rinse type, in the FMS group, nitrite correlated negativ

243 differences in antibiotics and chlorhexidine rinse usage may have masked differences in the other cli

244 separation scheme (sample loading flow rate, rinsing volume, and eluent composition), we found that A

245 At each time point an oral rinse was collected and the presence or absence of ulcer

246 reeze dried products, determined by a hexane rinse, was 98.2%.

247 alyte and adequate recoveries from CIP final rinse wash samples.

248 The volume of rinse water had little influence on the recovery, due to

249 ause the shared use of cookers, cottons, and rinse water was highly correlated, a summary variable wa

250 sociated with syringe-sharing and sharing of rinse water were elevated but not significant.

251 lower income, and more likely to have shared rinse water, cotton, or cooker.

252 in a reaction between the nantokite and the rinsing water.

253 proteins in processed food, ingredients, and rinsing water.

254 ommercially-available detergent, followed by rinsing, we were able to reuse pipettes 10 times with no

255 Subjects using the test rinse were also six times more likely to exhibit an impr

256 females were recruited, and 15-second saline rinses were collected to measure OIL as represented by c

257 Semiannually collected oral rinses were evaluated for 37 HPV genotypes using the Roc

258 A subset of rinses were then compared to tissue samples in the same

259 ams termed rapid inertial solution exchange (RInSE), which utilizes inertial lift forces at finite Re

260 e protocol is completed by a deionized water rinse, which was also studied.

261 Mixture of methanol and water was used for rinsing, while acetonitrile and n-hexane were used as el

262 flux was fully recoverable following a short rinse with the feed solution and no added cleaning agent

263 in all control experiments and a cross-flow rinse with the feed solution failed to induce flux recov

264 All individuals were instructed to rinse with their respective mouthwash twice daily.

265 Patients rinsed with 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate after debridem

266 The disks were rinsed with 0.9% NaCl and exposed to the cell-rich porti

267 ) were easily reversible when the column was rinsed with DI water.

268 ther 1 or 5 sec, during which the tongue was rinsed with distilled water.

269 d NaCl and CaCl2 concentrations before being rinsed with eluents of different solution chemistries to

270 When MWNTs on SLBs were rinsed with low ionic strength solutions at pH 7.3, only

271 ed and the interior surface of the FLECs was rinsed with methanol to determine the surface concentrat

272 orescein dye was then placed into both eyes, rinsed with saline solution, and scanned at 5, 10, 15, a

273 After the cartridge was rinsed with tetrahydrofuran and water, (18)F-TFB was elu

274 subgingival sampling, 37 qualifying subjects rinsed with the essential oil mouthrinse or a negative c

275 d suspension with gentle agitation (2-16 h), rinsed with water, and scanned.

276 e was trapped on a cation-exchange resin and rinsed with water, and the (63)Zn was eluted using 0.05

277 plied to dry hair, left for 10 minutes, then rinsed with water.

278 en no scientific evidence to recommend mouth rinses with an anti-SARS-CoV-2 effect to control the vir

279 oating is constructed in situ by alternating rinses with positively and negatively charged polymers,

280 the association of HPV DNA detection in oral rinses with survival was evaluated using Cox regression

281 croscope (SEM) analysis immediately or after rinsing with 0.9% NaCl prior to fixation.

282 3.2 ml kg(-1) min(-1)) tested the effect of rinsing with a 6.4% maltodextrin solution on exercise pe

283 ces and compound concentrations, followed by rinsing with a compound-free solution.

284 hibit leaching of lipophilic additives after rinsing with a direct water jet and exhibited resistance

285 ld be made with the same sensing films after rinsing with acetone between each measurement.

286 n these surface-modified plates, followed by rinsing with an acetic acid solution, addition of matrix

287 this study was to investigate the effect of rinsing with an essential oil antimicrobial mouthrinse o

288 aliva was significantly decreased after oral rinsing with antibacterial chlorhexidine.

289 After rinsing with buffer solution to remove the sodium dodecy

290 ic proteins, such as albumin, are removed by rinsing with buffer.

291 emains bound within the cell after extensive rinsing with fresh growth medium.

292 ulatory levels) of nitrosamines upon initial rinsing with lab-grade water, with levels subsiding with

293 porosity formation on both length scales via rinsing with protic solvents.

294 ible dehybridization was achieved by intense rinsing with pure water.

295 Rinsing with the essential oil antiplaque/antigingivitis

296 ness and astringency that were lower than if rinsing with water or if presented alone without alterna

297 aping off salt crystals from its surface and rinsing with water.

298 irteen individuals accumulated plaque before rinsing with: (1) 12 mmol/L NaF (228 microg/g F), (2) 15

299 ich can be conveniently removed afterward by rinsing without disrupting the sheets.

300 Mouthwash rinses yield a higher quality and quantity of DNA than c