ライフサイエンスコーパス: risk assessment

1 future clinical detection and improving CAD risk assessment.

2 oxavir-resistant viruses needed for informed risk assessment.

3 for life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) and risk assessment.

4 xis and treatment and 18 publications on VTE risk assessment.

5 scientists with subject matter expertise in risk assessment.

6 nfectious Diseases consultation and a 9-item risk assessment.

7 o perform a useful preoperative personalized risk assessment.

8 when used as reference values for ecological risk assessment.

9 hence of great importance for environmental risk assessment.

10 timation and optimize the use of imaging for risk assessment.

11 ant occurrence, despite wide adoption of VTE risk assessment.

12 s, and this information is essential for the risk assessment.

13 ing supplemental breast cancer screening and risk assessment.

14 able to capture important knowledge for MACE risk assessment.

15 ems to guide effective management action and risk assessment.

16 enzene exposure and genetic damage in future risk assessment.

17 markers of habitual diet and chronic disease risk assessment.

18 vel genomics features essential for enhanced risk assessment.

19 d be preferentially investigated for coastal risk assessment.

20 ology and may have clinical implications for risk assessment.

21 tidimensional approach might improve disease risk assessment.

22 measuring eGFRcys as part of cardiovascular risk assessment.

23 rography assessment and a physiological fall risk assessment.

24 ract predictive features from these data for risk assessment.

25 ented by surgeons, allows for individualized risk assessment.

26 ro TGx systems and their potential impact on risk assessment.

27 polyps, as well as endoscopic detection and risk assessment.

28 t when selecting the experimental system for risk assessment.

29 ic features, leading to an elaborate suicide risk assessment.

30 h to fill this critical need in human health risk assessment.

31 to understand complex ecosystems and improve risk assessment.

32 areful assessment of irritability in suicide risk assessment.

33 enriched in eoRC patients undergoing cancer risk assessment.

34 eranostic approaches as well as response and risk assessment.

35 criteria evaluate different information than risk assessment.

36 ecision medicine, drug screening and disease risk assessment.

37 practitioners reported performing formal VTE risk assessment.

38 ze the potential of DEB theory in ecological risk assessment.

39 erse outcomes relevant to aquatic ecological risk assessment.

40 re relevant for application in multistressor risk assessments.

41 ll contribute to the refining of food safety risk assessments.

42 ment of swine shipments available to support risk assessments.

43 prediction of high-risk CAD over traditional risk assessments.

44 icity data and the development of ecological risk assessments.

45 atform for standardized approaches to inform risk assessments.

46 nd improved safety margins and proarrhythmic risk assessments.

47 RESPOND comprised (1) home-based risk assessment; (2) 6 months telephone-based education,

48 iagnosis, (2) patient morbidity or mortality risk assessment, (3) disease outbreak prediction and sur

49 ty; (2) ecosystem functions; (3) impacts and risk assessment; (4) climate change, adaptation and evol

50 We recommend that risk assessment addresses these mechanisms with higher p

51 ue characterization may provide personalized risk assessment, affect disease detection, and further g

52 supports adding HA stability to pre-pandemic risk assessment algorithms.

53 r, and that the PRS can considerably improve risk assessment among their female first-degree relative

54 efine atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk assessments among middle-aged women.

55 e unknown, presenting great uncertainties in risk assessment and affected communities.

56 These markers could prove useful for risk assessment and as potential therapeutic targets.

57 Tumor testing can inform cancer recurrence risk assessment and cancer treatment options.

58 bidity index is a promising tool for patient risk assessment and case-mix adjustment, but refinement

59 viduals on the ground, potentially affecting risk assessment and compliance with mitigation measures.

60 of kidney injury or stress are new tools for risk assessment and could possibly guide therapy.

61 Impact of Remote Familial Colorectal Cancer Risk Assessment and Counseling (Family CARE Project), Ma

62 d available for immediate implementation for risk assessment and counseling in preoperative patients.

63 s for death can improve patient's individual risk assessment and decision making.

64 data were compiled with those from our 2016 risk assessment and duplicate reports were excluded.

65 es gene-informed molecular diagnosis, cancer risk assessment and gene-specific clinical management.

66 tient mortality and may serve as a model for risk assessment and guide therapeutic options.

67 its a 10% increase in unit-percentage of any risk assessment and in urban units a 10% increase in ski

68 a multifactorial intervention that included risk assessment and individualized plans, administered b

69 for the next generation of population-level risk assessment and intervention delivery.

70 A comprehensive risk assessment and management scheme of PPCPs in agro-f

71 pave the way into the era of individualized risk assessment and objective decision-making processes.

72 eillance on A(H3N2)v viruses is critical for risk assessment and pandemic preparedness.

73 or-recipient HLA incompatibility and improve risk assessment and prediction of transplant outcomes.

74 rticles (NPs) in freshwater is important for risk assessment and product development.

75 iomedical research fields, including disease risk assessment and prognostic prediction.

76 The risk assessment and projection framework we propose coul

77 adverse outcomes. These data may help refine risk assessment and provide new insights into the comple

78 the current status and future challenges of risk assessment and regulation of plants modified by mod

79 This model provides basic knowledge for risk assessment and remediation of both extractable and

80 insights regarding U and As mobilization for risk assessment and remediation strategies.

81 They include performing VTE risk assessment and reporting the level of VTE risk in a

82 Alterations in risk assessment and response were observed alongside neu

83 d transparency in quantitative food allergen risk assessment and risk management programs, encouragin

84 summarize current efforts to develop TGx for risk assessment and set out remaining challenges.

85 t have the benefit of specific gene-informed risk assessment and subsequent management.

86 rt in the subsurface underpins environmental risk assessment and successful material applications, in

87 bjective diagnostic criteria, more effective risk assessment and target-based interventions.

88 This outcome has important implications for risk assessment and the migratory success of monarchs in

89 se-response data in toxicology, drug design, risk assessment and translational research.

90 current practices and policies for pesticide risk assessment and use as the combinations tested here

91 associated with outcome and warrants careful risk assessment and well-designed clinical trials.

92 ons, which is often needed in the context of risk assessments and benefits analyses.

93 [IURs]) available from the USEPA non-cancer risk assessments and cancer risk assessments were develo

94 ulations is a critical precursor to accurate risk assessments and effective intervention.

95 that are typically obscured in county-level risk assessments and found that public schools, like pri

96 th available data to make rapid and accurate risk assessments and to plan the allocation of limited r

97 gy, toxicology, epidemiology, biostatistics, risk assessment, and clinical sciences.

98 ation, experimental design, applicability in risk assessment, and ecological relevance), propose a pr

99 vances in our understanding of pretransplant risk assessment, and our increasing ability to monitor p

100 gynecological history during cardiovascular risk assessment, and provide a framework for how to init

101 by the lack of blinding in the 'subjective' risk assessments, and because we only compared the perfo

102 aits, and exposure to self-harm could inform risk assessments, and might help clinicians to identify

103 Within iFAAM, a clinically validated tiered risk assessment approach for food allergens was develope

104 NP categories as part of the multiparametric risk assessment approach outlined in the European Societ

105 nded the Hygiene Department for a biological risk assessment (April 2014-June 2018).

106 ing constituents potentially complicates CNT risk assessment as analysis techniques focusing solely o

107 diomic features or as predictive markers for risk assessment as they are sensitive to system or image

108 pathology, and should be included in suicide risk assessments as these symptoms may provide targets f

109 s used to establish multivariable models for risk assessment at 3 and 12 months posttransplantation b

110 ion (seasons of risk) estimated with routine risk assessment at each clinic visit (when available), a

111 k assessment on admission, and receiving any risk assessment before the pressure ulcer.

112 itro cell-based assays are needed to improve risk assessments before transplant.

113 "abortive lever pressing," a species-typical risk assessment behavior seen here during punished drug

114 ot predict (cardiovascular) event or improve risk assessment beyond that provided by CAR.

115 emerging arbovirus threat, is essential for risk assessment but challenging due to cross-reactivity

116 lustrates the potential for improving cancer risk assessment by integrating genetic risk scores.

117 Although preoperative cardiac risk assessment can facilitate the identification of vul

118 ring population-level HIV testing, inclusive risk assessment (combining serodifferent partnership, an

119 efforts have not yet led to improvements in risk assessment compared with existing risk scores.

120 Results for the human health risk assessment concluded the probability of PAHs intake

121 Within the environmental risk assessment conducted for pesticide registration in

122 An ecological risk assessment conducted on detected PPPs indicates tha

123 owever, the current regulatory environmental risk assessment considers thresholds from laboratory stu

124 combinations of FRS elements, individualized risk assessment could be utilized for precision medicine

125 lving lay health workers; patient education; risk assessment, counseling, and decision aids; screenin

126 Caries risk assessment (CRA) is a critical component of ECC man

127 Caries risk assessment (CRA) models for toddlers and preschoole

128 aminants (PMOCs) that are not covered by the risk assessment criteria of the Stockholm Convention.

129 CMAs are based on incomplete benefit-risk assessment data and authorisation remains condition

130 d using a novel computational tool, the NIVA Risk Assessment Database (NIVA RAdb).

131 te successful implementation of a systematic risk assessment during a large measles outbreak to ident

132 cal trial participants by conducting benefit-risk assessments during the course of a clinical trial.

133 A risk calculator was derived for individual risk assessment: Dutch COVID-19 risk model.

134 and LV longitudinal strain permit optimized risk assessment early after reperfused AMI with incremen

135 Biomarkers relevant to pretransplant risk assessment, early posttransplant care, and assessme

136 nic mechanisms and inform broadly applicable risk assessment efforts.

137 The addressing of ecological risk assessment (ERA) of contaminant mixtures has proven

138 cluding a robust framework for environmental risk assessment (ERA) that ideally builds on methods est

139 eneity in PTSD and potential applications in risk assessment for active duty military personnel under

140 Fracture risk assessment for all patients with long-term use of o

141 Review, quality assessment, and risk assessment for bias of eligible publications were p

142 We have carried out a long-term risk assessment for Bt rice to these non-target organism

143 cal genotypic variants improved the clinical risk assessment for detrimental manifestations of IPD.

144 nd shortcomings of the current environmental risk assessment for fungicides.

145 Risk assessment for this complex system requires underst

146 ical data informing inactivation methods and risk assessments for diagnostic and research laboratorie

147 ion to conservation planning that must weigh risk assessments for entire habitats and communities aga

148 The well-established schemes of existing risk assessments for invasive species assume that a spec

149 Improving risk assessment, for example, by using computer testing

150 tion, and ensuring that regulatory pesticide risk assessment frameworks are protective of this specie

151 patch-use theory, we evaluated the rodents' risk-assessment from each snake-separately, together and

152 The USPSTF reviewed the evidence on risk assessment, genetic counseling, and genetic testing

153 No studies evaluated the effectiveness of risk assessment, genetic counseling, and genetic testing

154 re is adequate evidence that the benefits of risk assessment, genetic counseling, genetic testing, an

155 adequate evidence that the overall harms of risk assessment, genetic counseling, genetic testing, an

156 for BRCA1/2 mutations; benefits and harms of risk assessment, genetic counseling, genetic testing, an

157 A 9-point risk assessment identified persons with a history of inj

158 raphy for lesion localization and detection, risk assessment, image retrieval, and classification tas

159 s an approach for contaminant monitoring and risk assessment in Antarctic marine conditions using dif

160 e methods with a view toward multiparametric risk assessment in DCM with the hope of creating paramet

161 OCTA metrics may improve progression risk assessment in DR when compared to established risk

162 rs to facilitate drug-drug interaction (DDI) risk assessment in early phase I clinical trials.

163 Fe (hydr)oxides is crucial for environmental risk assessment in environments low in natural organic m

164 DDRR genes may provide a more comprehensive risk assessment in eoRC patients.

165 As part of the PERFORM (Personalised Risk assessment in Febrile illness to Optimise Real-life

166 levels is an established diagnostic tool for risk assessment in Hymenoptera venom-allergic patients.

167 ch on risk zoning, personal and transmission risk assessment in near real-time, and risk communicatio

168 ggest that post-PCI NLR is a useful tool for risk assessment in patients with AMI who undergo PCI.

169 ism-derived in vitro methods that facilitate risk assessment in respect to relevant human diseases.

170 spatially explicit season-specific oil spill risk assessment in the Arctic and that environmental var

171 The human health risk assessment in the current study suggested that ther

172 nts should be considered for a comprehensive risk assessment in the future.

173 t are currently in use or in development for risk assessment in the setting of organ transplantation.

174 Accurate risk assessment in this cohort is important for informed

175 s and are increasingly being used in benefit-risk assessments in the development of cancer drugs.

176 ormation, such as travel history, into their risk assessments in the same way they are trained to ask

177 features ("radiomics") can provide improved risk-assessment in the diagnostic setting.

178 workarounds and nurses performing informal 'risk assessments' in relation to how best to treat indiv

179 We did a comparative risk assessment, in which the effects of suboptimal inta

180 Validation of the Elderly Risk Assessment index in the emergency department.

181 Human risk assessment is crucial prior to vaccine field distri

182 Pretransplant immunological risk assessment is currently based on donor-specific HLA

183 For a realistic risk assessment, it is extremely important to test combi

184 reliable use of predictive tests for protein risk assessment, it is important that researchers mainta

185 es are available that discuss cardiovascular risk assessment, lifestyle management, and treatment of

186 ons together with the use of CAC for further risk assessment may result in a more personalized, safer

187 previously published quantitative microbial risk assessment methodology and literature review result

188 The best predictive risk assessment methods currently relied on are in vivo

189 Eighteen risk assessment methods in 25 studies reported low accur

190 USPSTF reviewed evidence on the accuracy of risk assessment methods to identify women who could bene

191 re in disease spread in wildlife, developing risk assessment modeling, and exploring new ways of aqua

192 orts key information for improving oil spill risk assessment models and presents a novel approach to

193 l woman's breast cancer risk using validated risk assessment models, and the accuracy of these models

194 ated heart rate are not included in most VTE risk assessment models.

195 gue that the advent of genome-wide polygenic risk assessment now makes an empirical evaluation of the

196 g appropriate environmental and human health risk assessment of AMR.

197 tors that are currently used in personalized risk assessment of breast cancer.

198 her than individual species might facilitate risk assessment of CHD in HIV-infected individuals.

199 Yet, a detailed, continental-scale risk assessment of climate-related impacts on primary pr

200 roducts can provide valuable markers for the risk assessment of DA-contaminated natural waters.

201 However, risk assessment of EDCs is hampered by the lack of data

202 simultaneous determination, dissipation and risk assessment of fipronil and its metabolites in sugar

203 nd could, therefore, potentially be used for risk assessment of genotoxicity-mediated cancers.

204 summarize current guidelines in the cardiac risk assessment of kidney and liver transplant candidate

205 er additional evaluation is required for the risk assessment of materials produced from any breeding

206 of measurements for modeling purposes and in risk assessment of microbial water quality.

207 ops increase the relevance of this study for risk assessment of nanoparticles.

208 cosystem management, and closing the gaps in risk assessment of OMPs requires a data-driven approach.

209 vironmental stressors into the environmental risk assessment of pesticides.

210 Accurate and timely risk assessment of rabies in biting dogs is critical to

211 unctions, the study suggests that ecological risk assessment of registered chemicals could be simplif

212 tial pieces of information in the regulatory risk assessment of synthetic chemicals.

213 Risk assessment of these effects should consist of a con

214 PFRs, but also strongly supports the ongoing risk assessment of these emerging chemicals and most cri

215 The ecological risk assessment of these emerging pesticides necessitate

216 e for the identification, and the hazard and risk assessment of these thyroid hormone disrupting chem

217 Developing tools that improve the risk assessment of those with aortopathy is internationa

218 rating DTFs and thermal evolution to improve risk assessment of toxicants under global warming.

219 e importance of exposure order in ecological risk assessment of toxicants under realistic combination

220 g damage and information contributing to the risk assessment of transgenic maize expressing insectici

221 study is based on the environment and health risk assessment of wastewater irrigated soil and crops i

222 The PRS also refines the risk assessment of women with first-degree relatives dia

223 This would improve risk assessments of antimalarial-related cardiotoxicity

224 nary responses in realistic ecotoxicological risk assessments of contaminants interacting with climat

225 on is needed if qualitative and quantitative risk assessments of foods are to be successfully conduct

226 This analysis provides evidence for risk assessments of mTG as a food processing aid.

227 should be considered in future environmental risk assessments of neonicotinoid applications.

228 Biota monitoring and risk assessments of sites contaminated with fluorotelome

229 tely predicting transport, and in developing risk assessments of these emerging compounds in the envi

230 ving skin assessment on admission, receiving risk assessment on admission, and receiving any risk ass

231 Whether secretoneurin improves risk assessment on top of established cardiac biomarkers

232 e Orofacial Pain: Prospective Evaluation and Risk Assessment (OPPERA) nested case-control study of in

233 cotoxicology-essential information to proper risk assessment-particle size, shape, and chemical compo

234 hypothesized that this approach improves BPD risk assessment, particularly in extremely premature inf

235 A in T1D susceptibility and improve diabetes risk assessment, particularly in high-risk HLA-DR3 homoz

236 positive) infection require HBV reactivation risk assessment.Patients with chronic HBV receiving any

237 ls, giving access to crucial information for risk-assessment plans of threatened species.

238 We introduce a machine learning algorithm, Risk Assessment Population IDentification (RAPID), that

239 er adjustment for the Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment Post-Surgical (CAPRA-S) nomogram in a me

240 estation, evidence based recommendations for risk assessment, prevention and timely management, exist

241 We recommend key scientific and risk assessment principles to inform health-protective c

242 summarizes evidence regarding cardiovascular risk assessment prior to noncardiac surgery.

243 n of the plant material, which facilitates a risk assessment procedure of new (GM) plant varieties.

244 onsidered as a relevant exposure scenario in risk assessment procedures, given its potential to affec

245 The study highlights the complexity of the risk assessment process in relation to infection.

246 ing a QRA, would help them to understand the risk assessment process that had been used by the food m

247 assessing a patient's risk of infection, the risk assessment process, and strategies for mitigating i

248 to policy makers, water quality experts, and risk assessment professionals seeking to improve and pro

249 ge of a national cardiovascular and diabetes risk assessment programme in England (NHS Health Check)

250 alized data steward for data tracking on VTE risk assessment, prophylaxis, and rates.

251 Quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) has now been in use for over 35 y

252 Quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) is a tool to evaluate the use of

253 We used quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) to evaluate attributable reductio

254 o address this gap, a quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) was conducted using target risk v

255 Using quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA), the estimated risks of illness f

256 risks are communicated within a quantitative risk assessment (QRA) framework.

257 So far, risk assessments regarding opium alkaloids in poppy seed

258 es, thus opening an avenue for environmental risk assessment relevant in a variety of contexts.

259 iciently by air, continuous surveillance and risk assessment remain essential parts of our pandemic p

260 Preoperative cardiovascular risk assessment requires a focused history and physical

261 Improving earthquake and tsunami risk assessment requires understanding the material and

262 Monte Carlo simulation-based health risk assessment revealed that 3-MCPD and 1,3-DCP intakes

263 The outcome of the carcinogenic risk assessment revealed that 88.67% (for adults) and 1.

264 A microbial risk assessment revealed that the enhanced thermotoleran

265 herefore, it needs to be considered into the risk assessment scores.

266 direct costs borne by the health system for risk assessment, screening, diagnosis, and treatment.

267 Benefit-risk assessments should include summaries that are consi

268 taken place for the placing of a PAL and/or risk assessment statement on a particular food product.

269 istory of breast cancer suggests that better risk assessment strategies may benefit these women.

270 Awareness and risk assessment strategies thus require interdisciplinar

271 Therefore, future vulnerability and risk assessment studies must account for the transient b

272 The parameters for the health risk assessment, such as hazard index (HI) and hazard qu

273 A VTE risk assessment survey was distributed to providers.

274 and longitudinal validation of the available risk assessment techniques are lacking.

275 riod calls for process-based tools for flood-risk assessment that capture the physical mechanisms inv

276 ill enable scientifically based, data-driven risk assessments that inform decisions involving drinkin

277 ghts into how the interaction between immune risk assessment, the patient's immunological history, an

278 vides a real-time probability by integrating risk assessments throughout a patient's course.

279 c fractures and to compare with the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) reference standard.

280 dently of femoral neck aBMD and the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) score.

281 a bone mineral density (BMD)-based Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) score.

282 om DXA screening and the use of the fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) to guide decisions regarding

283 In addition, 14% use the risk assessment tool developed by Grams et al routinely

284 Our new risk assessment tool explains under which conditions blo

285 provided comparable performance to Fracture Risk Assessment Tool score for presymptomatic prediction

286 Women with a positive result on the risk assessment tool should receive genetic counseling a

287 mutations with an appropriate brief familial risk assessment tool.

288 The San Diego Early Test score is a simple risk-assessment tool for acute, and early human immunode

289 fied were: 1) breast cancer subtype-specific risk assessment tools applicable to women of all ancestr

290 In fact, although numerous caries risk assessment tools are available, most are not routin

291 ce and mortality; discriminatory accuracy of risk assessment tools for BRCA1/2 mutations; benefits an

292 als diagnosed as having CKD, staging and new risk assessment tools that incorporate GFR and albuminur

293 Fourteen studies (n = 43 813) of 8 risk assessment tools to guide referrals to genetic coun

294 Procedure-specific risk-assessment tools are needed to guide shared patient

295 ite Paper, we describe approaches to benefit-risk assessment using qualitative approaches such as the

296 esent a first comprehensive ecotoxicological risk assessment using species sensitivity distributions

297 USEPA non-cancer risk assessments and cancer risk assessments were developed for some of these VOCs.

298 Regular applications of structured benefit-risk assessment, whether qualitative, quantitative, or b

299 n of this paper lies in the novel method for risk assessment, which can be more precise with an incre

300 of specific analytical techniques to support risk assessment would benefit from the input of scientis