戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1                      The images included the sacroiliac joints.
2 f the individual inflammatory changes in the sacroiliac joints.
3 umatologists for MR imaging of the spine and sacroiliac joints.
4 as a selective localization to the spine and sacroiliac joints.
5 absence of radiographic abnormalities of the sacroiliac joints.
6 notyping, and computerized tomography of the sacroiliac joints.
7 advanced changes on plain radiographs of the sacroiliac joints.
8 xamination) can depict cartilage erosions in sacroiliac joints.
9 ollowed in descending order by the pelvis or sacroiliac joints (38%), scapula or shoulder, and ribs.
10 he imaging method of choice to visualize the sacroiliac joint and spine as recognized by the new clas
11 trauma, with immune cell infiltration of the sacroiliac joints and entheseal insertion areas in the s
12   The incorporation of MRI evaluation of the sacroiliac joints and HLA-B27 testing into criteria for
13 included fat-suppressed MRI sequences of the sacroiliac joints and lumbar spine that were scored for
14 nt was stratified by MRI inflammation in the sacroiliac joints and screening high-sensitivity C-react
15  spondyloarthritis predominantly affects the sacroiliac joints and spine but is also associated with
16 osing individual inflammatory changes in the sacroiliac joints and whether there is a correlation bet
17 e scored using the New York criteria for the sacroiliac joints and, similarly, grading the lumbar and
18 of the thoracic and lumbar spine, MRI of the sacroiliac joints, and CT of the abdomen and pelvis were
19 on of cervical or lumbar facet joints or the sacroiliac joint; and paravertebral intramuscular inject
20                                              Sacroiliac joint angle and the anterior iliac wing separ
21                   Iliac angle, iliac length, sacroiliac joint angle, and anterior iliac wing separati
22  magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-determined sacroiliac joint bone edema were randomized in a double-
23 lesions that include para-syndesmophytes and sacroiliac joint bony sparing.
24 e in the depiction of structural erosions in sacroiliac joints by using MRI sequence zero echo time (
25 n into the cervical or lumbar facet joint or sacroiliac joint; epidural injections of local anaesthet
26 adiolo-gists separately for the detection of sacroiliac joints erosions, then a comparison between T1
27                           They underwent MRI sacroiliac joints examination using routine T1 TSE and S
28 horacic and lumbar spine (Fig 2), MRI of the sacroiliac joints (Fig 3), and CT of the abdomen and pel
29 in sacroiliitis grade between right and left sacroiliac joints, frequency of cervical- and lumbar-pre
30  the reference standard, synthetic CT of the sacroiliac joints has better diagnostic performance in t
31  standard, 3D THRIVE pulse sequencing of the sacroiliac joints has much better diagnostic value in th
32             The use of MRI, primarily of the sacroiliac joints, has substantially altered the diagnos
33 were lesion location (iliac wing adjacent to sacroiliac joint, iliac wing anterior and/or superior to
34 rting simultaneously in the lumbar spine and sacroiliac joints in a proportion of patients and confir
35 tive and chronic inflammatory changes in the sacroiliac joints in patients with chronic back pain and
36 ct inflammatory or structural changes to the sacroiliac joint indicative of axial spondyloarthritis a
37 deep neural network to detect MRI changes in sacroiliac joints indicative of axSpA.
38      MRI is a sensitive method for detecting sacroiliac joint inflammation, which is useful in predic
39 g, soft tissue, vertebrae, zygapophyseal and sacroiliac joints, intervertebral discs, and neurovascul
40  ramidus is mediolaterally expanded, and its sacroiliac joint is located more posteriorly.
41 logical diagnosis of inflammatory changes of sacroiliac joints is based on a 4 step radiographic grad
42               In MRI, active inflammation of sacroiliac joints is indicated by the presence of subcho
43                Grading a set of radiographs (sacroiliac joints, lumbar spine, and cervical spine) too
44  the presence of inflammatory changes in the sacroiliac joints observed in radiography according to t
45 w back pain originating in the facet joints, sacroiliac joints, or a combination of facet joints, sac
46 icipants), or a combination of facet joints, sacroiliac joints, or intervertebral disks (combination
47 ac joints, or a combination of facet joints, sacroiliac joints, or intervertebral disks, radiofrequen
48 mmation is linked to peri-fibrocartilaginous sacroiliac joint osteitis, as well as to spinal peri-ent
49  in the shoulders, spine, lateral knees, and sacroiliac joints (P = 0.0004).
50 1 years of age, fibromyalgia, apophyseal and sacroiliac joint pain, and sacral insufficiency fracture
51                          Inflammation in the sacroiliac joints precedes radiographic damage that is n
52                            MATERIAL/METHODS: Sacroiliac joints radiograms and MRI were conducted in 1
53 oints (facet joint trial, 251 participants), sacroiliac joints (sacroiliac joint trial, 228 participa
54 oint, iliac wing anterior and/or superior to sacroiliac joint, sacrum, and remainder of pelvis), mean
55                  MR imaging of the spine and sacroiliac joints significantly influences the diagnosti
56 ediated inflammatory condition involving the sacroiliac joints, spine, and peripheral joints.
57 which inflammatory changes affect mainly the sacroiliac joints, spine, peripheral joints, tendon, lig
58 e significant predictors of SBT, whereas the sacroiliac joints, sternum, foot, anterior ribs 1st-5th,
59  tendons); the axial skeleton, including the sacroiliac joints; the limb joints; and some nonarticula
60 concept of axSpA from one of erosions in the sacroiliac joints to a spectrum of disease with and with
61 trial, 251 participants), sacroiliac joints (sacroiliac joint trial, 228 participants), or a combinat
62 trial; -0.71 (95% CI, -1.35 to -0.06) in the sacroiliac joint trial; and -0.99 (95% CI, -1.73 to -0.2
63 r activity in individual vertebrae or in the sacroiliac joints was categorized as bone marrow nonvisu
64                                          The sacroiliac joints were assessed on AP radiograms of the
65           Prominent individual vertebrae and sacroiliac joints were categorized as bone marrow visual
66        Biopsies of the ilium adjacent to the sacroiliac joints were more likely adequate than those f