戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 educed corresponding to areas with RDR (mean scotopic 12.8 dB and mean mesopic 17.2 dB) as compared t
2 super p53 mouse exhibited reduced rod-driven scotopic a and b wave and cone-driven photopic b wave re
3 y (ERG) was used to evaluate the recovery of scotopic a- and b-wave amplitudes after a single 137-cd.
4 significantly decreased functional response (scotopic a- and b-wave amplitudes) in the Mcoln1(-/-) mi
5 toreceptor decline, with significantly lower scotopic a- and b-wave amplitudes, decreased cell number
6 ographic responses, characterized by reduced scotopic a- and b-wave and oscillatory potentials.
7 RGs recorded from mutant mice had diminished scotopic a- and b-wave and photopic b-wave amplitudes.
8                                              Scotopic a- and b-waves and oscillatory potentials in th
9        The least sensitive component was the scotopic a-wave (RmP3) showing a 50% reduction at an IOP
10 months, and 40% at 9 months and older, while scotopic a-wave amplitudes were decreased by 20% at 9 mo
11            In hWtEPOR compared with WT mice, scotopic a-wave amplitudes were reduced by injury, despi
12 trast, outer retinal thickness, photopic and scotopic a-wave and b-wave amplitudes and photoreceptor
13                                    Rp2h(-/-) scotopic a-wave and photopic b-wave amplitudes declined
14                           Rod ERG responses (scotopic a-wave) were not affected in CNGB3(-/-) mice.
15 croM) reduced the pSTR and nSTR, but not the scotopic a-wave, b-wave or OPs.
16 y more than 50%, whereas all five had normal scotopic a-wave, b-wave, and OP amplitudes.
17 on) was defined by the extent of photopic vs scotopic abnormality.
18 tly rod-driven, our results suggest that the scotopic acuity of the goldfish may improve as the anima
19 ng rate of AII amacrine cells limits central scotopic acuity.
20 t-adaptable synaptic functions (photopic and scotopic adaptation) of the biological visual perception
21 plitudes, and 11 had reduced photopic and/or scotopic amplitudes at their first visit.
22                             However, at high scotopic and low mesopic stimulus intensities, close to
23                                              Scotopic and mesopic fundus-controlled perimetry was per
24 d mental and physical health and for optimal scotopic and mesopic vision.
25 es of full-field stimuli were obtained under scotopic and photopic conditions and were used to catego
26 reatly reduces the light response under both scotopic and photopic conditions, but it does not elimin
27 -driven pathways, which control vision under scotopic and photopic conditions, respectively.
28 onses to full-field stimuli were obtained in scotopic and photopic conditions.
29 concentrations, manifesting in dysfunctional scotopic and photopic electroretinogram (ERG) responses.
30                                              Scotopic and photopic electroretinogram responses declin
31 pening, Nphp5(-/-) mice exhibited absence of scotopic and photopic electroretinogram responses, a phe
32  of MT1 receptors within the retina, and the scotopic and photopic electroretinograms (ERG) and retin
33                                              Scotopic and photopic electroretinograms as well as pupi
34  photoreceptors, leading to abnormalities of scotopic and photopic electroretinograms with decreased
35                            Consistently, the scotopic and photopic electroretinographic (ERG) respons
36 on of Cetn2 and Cetn3 resulted in attenuated scotopic and photopic electroretinography (ERG) response
37 njection, treated rd10 mice were examined by scotopic and photopic electroretinography and then kille
38 showed decreased a- and b-wave amplitudes of scotopic and photopic electroretinography responses 4 mo
39           INS37217 had no adverse effects on scotopic and photopic ERG amplitude and latency paramete
40                                              Scotopic and photopic ERG analysis did not reveal signif
41                        Bilateral, full-field scotopic and photopic ERGs were made at 1, 7, and 14 day
42                                         Both scotopic and photopic ffERG values were abnormal and aff
43                    All founders had abnormal scotopic and photopic ffERGs after 3 months.
44                                              Scotopic and photopic Ganzfeld ERGs were recorded from h
45 and cones and restore retinal sensitivity at scotopic and photopic luminances.
46 er several weeks, reducing the blind spot at scotopic and photopic luminances.
47                                              Scotopic and photopic microperimetry (MP-1S; Nidek Techn
48 hreshold sensitivities for each category for scotopic and photopic microperimetry.
49 network shapes visual processing in both the scotopic and photopic networks.
50 ing in both plexiform layers and in both the scotopic and photopic pathways in the mammalian retina.
51              Electroretinography showed that scotopic and photopic responses were reduced and delayed
52  electroretinogram identified mildly reduced scotopic and photopic responses.
53  and cone cell numbers were reduced, as were scotopic and photopic responses.
54 Ret function resulted in markedly diminished scotopic and photopic responses.
55 k, with implications for signal flow in both scotopic and photopic retinal networks during visual pro
56 mechanisms underlying the transition between scotopic and photopic vision in mesopic lights, when bot
57 optomotor tracking response was used to test scotopic and photopic visual performance.
58 ensitivity very different from the classical scotopic and photopic visual systems.
59 peripheral schisis, and retained near-normal scotopic b-wave amplitude and normal ERG waveforms.
60 between foveal HFONL-IS complex thinning and scotopic b-wave amplitude reduction (P = 0.005~0.01, fix
61                                      On ERG, scotopic b-wave amplitude was significantly preserved in
62          Saturated a-wave amplitude, maximal scotopic b-wave amplitude, and individual a-wave and b-w
63 ma progression rates had significantly worse scotopic B-wave amplitudes at their initial assessment t
64  observed in the saturated a-wave or maximal scotopic b-wave amplitudes between the PSS-injected eyes
65 e amplitudes) or tended toward (photopic and scotopic B-wave amplitudes) a higher mean rate of centra
66  (PDA, 5 mm); however, both also reduced the scotopic b-wave by approximately 40 %.
67 nstrated a reduction in the amplitude of the scotopic b-wave in 4 participants 3 months after implant
68                                          The scotopic b-wave was more severely affected than the a-wa
69                                              Scotopic b-waves were reduced in injured hWtEPOR mice co
70 erface reflectivity significantly influenced scotopic (beta = -0.002, P = .04) and photopic (beta = -
71 was significantly negatively associated with scotopic (beta = -0.25, P = .01) and photopic (beta = -0
72 of life with full-field ERGs that included a scotopic blue intensity series (n = 41) and a bright whi
73 d maximum when ganzfeld luminance was 10(-5) scotopic candela (scot.cd) per meter squared.
74 ined at approximately 2 seconds after the 67 scotopic cd s m(-2) conditioning flash and at approximat
75          The derived rod response to the 670 scotopic cd s m(-2) conditioning flash determined in nor
76 and at approximately 9 seconds after the 670 scotopic cd s m(-2) conditioning flash exhibited an aver
77 etween a fixed conditioning flash (67 or 670 scotopic cd s m(-2)) and a bright probe flash of fixed s
78  near the peak of A(t), k86 was 7.0 +/- 1.2 (scotopic cd s m-2)-1 (mean +/- s.d.; n = 4).
79           For Itest up to approximately 2.57 scotopic cd s m-2, the overall time course of A(t) was w
80 (2)) on a blue rod-saturating background (30 scotopic cd/m(2)).
81 39 to -12 um) and significant improvement in scotopic CDVA at 3 months (mean difference +1.6 lines; 9
82 t GCAP1 likely results in higher-than-normal scotopic cGMP levels which may, in turn, account for the
83 cts models were used to estimate mesopic and scotopic changes.
84 deficit in visual motor response (VMR) under scotopic condition.
85 spontaneous activity was typically low under scotopic conditions (range 0.2-17.2 Hz) and higher under
86 pic (M, 160 lx), low mesopic (L, 70 lx), and scotopic conditions (S, 1 lx) were obtained with the VX1
87 atial summation (Ricco's area) and age under scotopic conditions had been found.
88 de of both a- and b-waves under photopic and scotopic conditions in SSD participants.
89  of visual behaviors under both photopic and scotopic conditions might be due to alterations in visua
90           Electroretinogram recordings under scotopic conditions showed severe attenuation of the a-w
91                           During mesopic and scotopic conditions the pupil size increases, increasing
92 t to retinal illumination under photopic and scotopic conditions to identify the types of photorecept
93 g with moving bar stimuli under photopic and scotopic conditions to measure the effects of the rod sc
94               The most common response under scotopic conditions was an 'on-excitation' (32 of 48, 62
95             By using intrinsic imaging under scotopic conditions we demonstrate that visual signals g
96 appropriate signals are carried centrally in scotopic conditions when sensitivity rather than acuity
97  under photopic conditions and <6.0 mm under scotopic conditions, a root mean square of higher order
98 mize traditional refractions for mesopic and scotopic conditions, by using the information that the Z
99                                        Under scotopic conditions, the two cell classes diverge-ON cel
100 tive fields may be radically different under scotopic conditions, when the ON and OFF pathways are ou
101 ivity of RGC responses may be modified under scotopic conditions.
102 guided behaviour in the Gnat1-/- mouse under scotopic conditions.
103 es in the BTBR mice, under both photopic and scotopic conditions.
104    SBCs exhibited robust responses under low scotopic conditions.
105 tivity and visual symptoms under mesopic and scotopic conditions.
106 lity of psychophysical vision measures under scotopic conditions.
107 romatism confers a selective advantage under scotopic conditions.
108 ggests this pathway plays a major role under scotopic conditions.
109 ction in b-wave amplitude under photopic and scotopic conditions.
110 ed with elevated IOP under both photopic and scotopic conditions.
111 b-wave compared to Panx1 wildtype mice under scotopic conditions.
112 r than photon-budget or resolution, enhances scotopic contrast sensitivity by 18-27%, and improves mo
113 ation between a model of type 1 diabetes and scotopic contrast sensitivity of the optomotor response
114                        We therefore examined scotopic contrast sensitivity of the optomotor response
115                An early, progressive loss in scotopic contrast sensitivity was observed in Ins2(Akita
116  were significant for all parameters (except scotopic dim-flash b-wave implicit time), ranging from 0
117                               Improvement of scotopic dysfunction after (off-label) high-dose vitamin
118 trating mixed cone and rod dysfunction and a scotopic electronegative response to bright flashes.
119 gnostic value for patients and families with scotopic electronegative responses to bright flashes.
120                                              Scotopic electroretinogram (ERG) recording was used to i
121 tly from 9.4 +/- 4.6 to 57.6 +/- 8.8 muV for scotopic electroretinogram and from 10.9 +/- 5.6 to 45.8
122  appearance restricted peripheral vision and scotopic electroretinogram confirmed the diagnosis of re
123 monstrated increased a-wave amplitude of the scotopic electroretinogram.
124                                              Scotopic electroretinograms (ERGs) were performed 3, 7,
125                                   Full-field scotopic electroretinograms (ERGs) were recorded from 44
126                                 Photopic and scotopic electroretinograms were reviewed.
127                                   Full-field scotopic electroretinographic analysis (ERG) was perform
128 isual function, detected as a deficit in the scotopic electroretinographic response, was improved in
129 hologic changes in the RPE, and a deficit in scotopic electroretinographic response, which is reflect
130 nt the time course of retinal dysfunction by scotopic electroretinography (ERG) and by quantitative m
131                                              Scotopic electroretinography (ERG) showed a diminished c
132 es of MNU-induced retinal degeneration using scotopic electroretinography (ERG), optical coherence to
133 ogenous C3 expression, mice were analyzed by scotopic electroretinography and fluorescein angiography
134 reatment rescued a- and b-wave amplitudes of scotopic electroretinography responses, compared with ve
135 ek after ischemia by histologic analyses and scotopic electroretinography, respectively.
136 nally, the mutant protein does not support a scotopic ERG a-wave and accelerates photoreceptor degene
137 Pcdh15av-5J and Pcdh15av-Jfb mutant mice had scotopic ERG amplitudes consistently reduced by approxim
138                                              Scotopic ERG b-wave amplitudes were reduced by 15% at 1
139                                    The mixed scotopic ERG b-wave was reduced more than the a-wave.
140                                          The scotopic ERG b-wave, which reflects activity of rod-driv
141 ess (CSNB), characterized by the loss of the scotopic ERG b-wave.
142                             The amplitude of scotopic ERG b-waves in KO mice was lower than in wild-t
143 reported sensitive positive component of the scotopic ERG remained in both eyes.
144 o these components are relatively small; (2) scotopic ERG response components to brighter flashes rec
145 ence between ERG amplitudes, recovery of the scotopic ERG response, or retinal morphology between EGF
146 tinal dysfunction, with reduced photopic and scotopic ERG responses and reduced b-wave/a-wave ratios
147 P14 were evaluated at 8 months by full-field scotopic ERG responses and retinal immunohistochemistry.
148                                              Scotopic ERG responses over a range of flash intensities
149                                              Scotopic ERG responses to brighter flashes, including a-
150                                              Scotopic ERG responses were lower than age-matched WT re
151 were decreased by approximately 75%, whereas scotopic ERG responses were unchanged; visual acuity was
152                                  Substantial scotopic ERG signals were maintained in treated rd10 eye
153                                              Scotopic ERG stimuli were brief white flashes (-6.1 to 2
154                                              Scotopic ERG stimuli were brief white flashes (-6.64-2.7
155 ities, a sensitive negative component of the scotopic ERG, which normally peaks approximately 200 mse
156  reduced in patients with AQP4-IgG+ NMOSD in scotopic ERGs (compared with AQP4-IgG- subjects, patient
157                                              Scotopic ERGs to flash strengths 0.01 to 0.1 phot cd s/m
158                                 Photopic and scotopic ERGs were recorded in R439H tryptophan hydroxyl
159                                              Scotopic ERGs were simultaneously recorded from both eye
160  with diminished amplitudes of the b-wave in scotopic ERGs.
161                                 Photopic and scotopic fine matrix mapping (FMM) were performed to tes
162  The ERG demonstrated a greater reduction in scotopic function compared with photopic function.
163 acuity, Rod-Function Anxiety correlated with Scotopic Function controlling for visual field area, and
164 s by 1 mum was associated with a decrease of scotopic function of 0.96 dB.
165  vision, color vision, contrast sensitivity, scotopic function, photopic peripheral vision, mesopic p
166 y testing but have not specifically assessed scotopic function.
167 solution retinal imaging in combination with scotopic fundus-controlled perimetry allows for a more r
168 G b-wave amplitudes were reduced (photopic > scotopic) in FeSO(4)-injected eyes compared with those i
169 al pathway that controls the transmission of scotopic information.
170 s of ON and OFF ganglion cells for which the scotopic inputs derive only from the primary pathway or
171 horizontal meridian, under both photopic and scotopic levels of lighting.
172  intensity of the light phase was reduced to scotopic levels.
173 e solely responsible for photoentrainment at scotopic light intensities.
174 cross cell types was similar at photopic and scotopic light levels, although additional slow correlat
175 additional slow correlations were present at scotopic light levels.
176 as low luminance visual acuity (P < .01) and scotopic light sensitivity (P = .05).
177 eficit, mesopic light sensitivity), or rods (scotopic light sensitivity, rod-mediated dark adaptation
178 tors define circadian responses at very dim "scotopic" light levels but also at irradiances at which
179  acting downstream from phototransduction in scotopic lights, (2) rod response kinetics in mesopic li
180 sh, highly sensitive, and operates in dim or scotopic lights, whereas cone-driven vision is brisk, le
181 n the inner retina limit sensitivity in dim (scotopic) lights.
182  consistent measurements of pupil size under scotopic, low mesopic and photopic conditions, with a re
183 10(8) photons/cm(2)/s lowered the latency of scotopic (&lt;/= 2.4 x 10(8) photons/cm(2)/s) light-evoked
184             In STGD1, in extrafovea, loss of scotopic macular function preceded and was faster than t
185 D1R-KO mice showed anomalies in photopic and scotopic maximal amplitude, whereas D2R-KO mice showed h
186 ere decreased in heterozygous KI mice, their scotopic, maximal, and photopic electroretinography resp
187 re baseline mesopic mean deviation (mMD) and scotopic MD (sMD) and rates of longitudinal changes in t
188 but only transient changes were observed for scotopic measures.
189 e region (SMR) thickness, DMR/SMR ratio, PD (scotopic, mesopic and photopic light conditions), CMT1 (
190  On the pupil, chronic smoking increased the scotopic, mesopic and photopic pupil diameter and the ea
191 kup time (NCTBUT); mean NCTBUT; meibography; scotopic, mesopic and photopic pupil sizes; and dynamic
192  were smaller in the Parkinson's group under scotopic, mesopic, and photopic conditions in static pup
193                                 Under bright scotopic/mesopic conditions, this novel form of Mb outpu
194 s of dark adaptation, the same eye underwent scotopic microperimetry with an 18-degree-wide grid (52
195 er time in retinal sensitivity assessed with scotopic microperimetry with Brimo DDS than with sham (P
196                                 Photopic and scotopic multifocal electroretinograms (mfERGs) were rec
197 chanism allowed the adaptive exploitation of scotopic niches during the nocturnal bottleneck early in
198 ir temporal adaptation to photopic (day) and scotopic (night) conditions and that the asymmetry confe
199 t (P = 0.0031), and mesopic (P = 0.0018) and scotopic (P < 0.0001) sensitivity.
200                                              Scotopic P2 amplitude, but not sensitivity, was signific
201 meters of middle and outer retinal function (scotopic P2 and P3) remained normal.
202                                          The scotopic P2, OPs, and positive STR (pSTR) had intermedia
203                                   Pde6d(-/-) scotopic paired-flash electroretinograms indicated a del
204 se in cCSNB than in iCSNB; this was the only scotopic parameter that differed between the two CSNB gr
205 o regain proper visual processing within the scotopic pathway.
206  amacrine cell-a central element of the rod (scotopic) pathway.
207 sual field sensitivity, and performance on a scotopic perceptual task were measured.
208 ion was evaluated using electroretinography (scotopic, photopic, and pattern).
209 ill displayed overt obesity and diabetes, no scotopic, photopic, or c-wave ERG defects were present t
210                            In addition, mean scotopic photoreceptor (R(rod)) and postreceptor (V(max)
211 ss of Tmem30a in adult mice led to a reduced scotopic photoresponse, mislocalization of ATP8A2 to the
212  that have failed to find a correlation with scotopic pupil size and night vision complaints.
213                                  The role of scotopic pupil size as a factor in predicting night visi
214  be wise to inform their patients that large scotopic pupil size is a potential risk factor for night
215    In cataract surgery, patients with larger scotopic pupil sizes may benefit more from aspheric IOLs
216       We aim to establish normative data for scotopic pupillary size and function in the pediatric po
217 s are less sensitive to light stimuli in the scotopic range during the day, when histamine release in
218  and RPE and larger b-wave amplitudes in the scotopic range when compared with the control animals.
219 extensive under dark-adapted conditions (low scotopic range) and similar in the subjective day, subje
220  560-nm, weak, full-field flashes in the low scotopic range.
221 TR (nSTR), a positive STR (pSTR), a positive scotopic response (pSR), PII (the bipolar cell component
222                                              Scotopic response recovery peaked at 50% to 60% of the u
223 on of melatonin during the day decreased the scotopic response threshold and the amplitude of the a-
224 topic response with later attenuation of the scotopic response.
225 extinguished photopic responses, and reduced scotopic responses observed on electroretinography consi
226                                              Scotopic responses tended to show lower heritability (po
227 hotopic responses were preserved better than scotopic responses, corresponding with preferential cone
228 t cone-driven responses and slow insensitive scotopic responses.
229 idual ERGs characterized by slow insensitive scotopic responses.
230  associated with the extent of impairment in scotopic retinal function, indicating a direct structura
231 d in the Rp2(null) mice, photopic (cone) and scotopic (rod) function as measured by ERG showed a grad
232  system with preservation of night vision or scotopic (rod) function.
233                               Adaptation for scotopic (rod) vision is known to occur partly in the ro
234                                          For scotopic (rod) vision, substantial adaptation occurs in
235                                              Scotopic sensitivity losses encroach on areas within the
236                                              Scotopic sensitivity losses were more severe, and they e
237                                   Parafoveal scotopic sensitivity of the older subjects was also posi
238                                  Mesopic and scotopic sensitivity were reduced corresponding to areas
239 ling glare also reduce nighttime mesopic and scotopic sensitivity.
240                                Dark-adapted (scotopic) sensitivity of rod-dominated visual mechanisms
241 hours, indicating an early, rapid decline in scotopic signaling.
242 he loss of visual information carried by dim scotopic signals.
243     Photoreceptor function was assessed with scotopic single-flash ERGs and photoreceptors were count
244                  Rod-driven responses to dim scotopic single-flash stimuli were normal in 7 patients
245 icient, >0.35) for the following parameters: scotopic standard and bright-flash a-wave implicit times
246 annel undisturbed; on the other hand, in the scotopic state, APB application blocks all ganglion cell
247 ifferent from those in wild-type mice at low scotopic stimulus intensities.
248                 In the mammalian retina, the scotopic threshold of ganglion cells is in part dependen
249 both positive and negative components of the scotopic threshold response (pSTR and nSTR).
250 re was a selective reduction of the positive scotopic threshold response (pSTR; P < 0.001), whereas o
251       Systematic delays in the timing of the scotopic threshold response (STR) and photopic b-wave we
252 onal effects were evaluated by recording the scotopic threshold response (STR) and photopic negative
253 rable beyond P40, although a small-amplitude scotopic threshold response (STR) could still be elicite
254         The oscillatory potentials (OPs) and scotopic threshold response (STR) were also reduced.
255 he dark-adapted electroretinogram (ERG), the scotopic threshold response (STR) which originates from
256 er photopic b-wave amplitudes, and increased scotopic threshold response sensitivity in the RGS11(-/-
257                            Thresholds of the scotopic threshold response were 0.5 +/- 0.1 log cd/m2 l
258 he a-wave, b-wave, and positive and negative scotopic threshold responses (pSTR, nSTR).
259  the amplitudes of the a-waves, b-waves, and scotopic threshold responses of the ERG and also produce
260                                              Scotopic threshold responses were augmented as well.
261 RG b-wave amplitudes and diminished negative scotopic threshold responses, consistent with inner reti
262 oretinogram (ERG) oscillatory potentials and scotopic threshold responses, which reflect AC and RGC a
263 relative and sharply demarcated reduction of scotopic threshold values compared with areas of categor
264  filter was applied revealed a difference of scotopic threshold values in areas of category 1 (mean,
265                                         Mean scotopic thresholds over parafoveal areas within the rin
266 he existence of ganglion cells with elevated scotopic thresholds.
267 p to seven ambient light levels covering the scotopic to photopic regimes.
268      Sets of four white flashes (3.2-4.4 log scotopic troland [scot td-s]) were presented in the dark
269 ted half-saturation at approximately 1.5 log scotopic troland second.
270 lashes (lambda(max) 462 nm; -6.1 to +1.8 log scotopic Troland seconds(sc td s)) under fully dark-adap
271    At the dimmest flash intensity (-0.70 log scotopic trolands [scot td]/s) and the smallest stimulus
272 blue light filtering could negatively affect scotopic vision and circadian rhythms in older patients.
273                                              Scotopic vision and pupillary responsiveness have typica
274 yl esters in the eyes, exhibiting comparable scotopic vision and rod degeneration.
275  coupling is expected to extend the range of scotopic vision by circumventing saturation at the rod t
276 n an essential component of the evolution of scotopic vision in early vertebrates.
277  whereas other patients experience a loss of scotopic vision over time.
278                                     Although scotopic vision remains good until old age, disproportio
279 e decreased dynamic range and sensitivity of scotopic vision that has been observed in diabetes.
280 cd m(-2)) are blind below -4.0 log cd m(-2) (scotopic vision).
281                                 Thus, during scotopic vision, Na conductances in AIIs serve to accele
282 ells indicates a role of endocannabinoids in scotopic vision, whereas the more widespread distributio
283 e have slightly enhanced photopic but normal scotopic vision.
284 e A cells play a crucial role in night-time (scotopic) vision and have been proposed as a target for
285 lity of rod photoreceptors and rod-mediated (scotopic) vision in early AMD, including delayed rod-med
286                          During night (i.e., scotopic) vision in mammals, rod photoreceptor output is
287                                       Night (scotopic) vision is mediated by a distinct retinal circu
288               Behavioral tests revealed that scotopic visual acuity and contrast sensitivity were dec
289  point in a psychophysically derived plot of scotopic visual acuity versus eccentricity.
290 merous, AII amacrine cells form the limit of scotopic visual acuity.
291 ty closely matched the peak sampling rate of scotopic visual acuity.
292 while also avoiding the unwanted mesopic and scotopic visual disturbances that are experienced with m
293  subject the time course of dark adaptation, scotopic visual field sensitivity, and performance on a
294 ntrol subjects, but their performance at the scotopic visual field test and perceptual task did not d
295                         In contrast to BCVA, scotopic visual function tests are suitable to quantify
296 and eAMD eyes and associate with mesopic and scotopic visual functions in addition to risk-indicating
297 , which play an essential role in processing scotopic visual signals.
298  hypothesize that their acuity is set by the scotopic visual system, and have minimized the number of
299                          Inspired by natural scotopic visual systems, we adopt an all-optical method
300 ed to cone-mediated loci when measured under scotopic with a blue or red stimulus compared to standar

 
Page Top