戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 chloride (0.5 mg/kg of body weight over a 60-second period).
2 nd by reduced local per capita income in the second period.
3 t for the role of the economic crisis in the second period.
4  9 days in the first period to 0 days in the second period.
5 pneumonia (27% vs. 20%, p = .130) during the second period.
6 hospital mortality rate was lower during the second period.
7 ogarithmically increasing contrast over a 10-second period.
8 ature was recorded every 5 seconds over a 30-second period.
9 .8% more use of adjunctive medication in the second period.
10  fixed point on the capillary over a several second period.
11 driven trials (n = 14) were conducted in the second period.
12 e alternative condition being applied in the second period.
13 MO) was used more than twice as often in the second period.
14 % versus 16.7%; P < 0.001) were lower in the second period.
15 eriod, followed by a decrease in rate in the second (Period 1 IRR 1.15 (95% CI 1.00-1.34)) versus Per
16 ks and the dosage remained stable during the second period (24 weeks).
17 rst time period (38 [29-49]) than during the second period (35 [27-45]; p = 0.005).
18 art of a pediatric investigation plan in the second period (4 of 16, 25% v 21 of 45, 46%).
19 immunosuppression was less common during the second period (76.4% versus 53.6%; P < 0.001).
20 h of stay significantly decreased during the second period (adjusted mean difference -1.4, 95% confid
21                                       In the second period, all 60 patients were analysed.
22 n the first period, a stable duration in the second period, and a decrease in the last.
23 /0.4) in the first period, 4% gelatin in the second period, and only crystalloids in the third period
24  (23.7%) as the leading LT indication in the second period; and the trends were significant in correl
25 s (0.3-1.0 mL/min) was performed during a 30-second period by using a microcatheter system placed wit
26 ificantly more positive (less change) in the second period compared with the first.
27 ile these mechanisms are well understood for second-period elements, involving those of the third per
28 microg/kg bolus of TPA was infused over a 15-second period followed by measurement of TPA activity, T
29 citability from 0 to 100 msec, followed by a second period from 100 to 160 msec.
30 rations, significantly increased over the 10-second period in DED patients, whereas no change occurre
31               The change in RBU sum over a 6-second period in the DTS groups combined or between the
32 nces in MRW or RNFLT slopes in the first and second periods in healthy subjects.
33                  The number of trials in the second period increased by almost 300% (16 v 45).
34                                       In the second period, indicators of heat stress were significan
35 ( n = 391; 0.90% of total admissions) to the second period ( n = 717; 1.44%).
36  in autism spectrum disorders suggest that a second period of abnormal cortical growth (i.e. greater
37 oached, sniffed, and chewed food during this second period of activity, but they ate <10% of that req
38 ed with hunting and scavenging, as well as a second period of adaptation after the rise of modern agr
39 tment (1 and 2 cycles, individually) after a second period of at least 6 mo and progression after ret
40                                          The second period of CI was 5 h and 21 min.
41                    After 2030, a large-scale second period of construction would allow nuclear energy
42 Both ERK and CREB were rephosphorylated by a second period of depolarization that followed a recovery
43                                          The second period of forest clearance probably was associate
44 edial ganglionic eminence (MGE) can induce a second period of functional plasticity in the visual cor
45     An irradiated artery was refractory to a second period of illumination delivered immediately afte
46 d after 30 min of bilateral ischemia, when a second period of ischemia of 30- or 35-min duration was
47 d inhibition of exchange activity during the second period of low [Na(+)](o).
48  retrieved, facilitating adaptation during a second period of monaural deprivation.
49               FEV1 did not change during the second period of NO inhalation.
50 ts of 7 d and longer deprivations revealed a second period of plasticity in cortical responses in whi
51 o the host circuit, but they do not induce a second period of plasticity.
52 le proteome adaptations were similar after a second period of resistance training, demonstrating repr
53  infusion was discontinued for 15 minutes, a second period of thrombus formation in the shunt demonst
54 fter training, further improvement after the second period of training, and normalization of task-rel
55                                   During the second period, one group (HS) was housed at 30 degrees C
56 bmitted to cardiologists' reviews during the second period (P<0.001).
57  s in the first versus 2 minutes 10 s in the second period (P<0.001).
58 in the first versus 77 of 273 (28.2%) in the second period (P=0.009).
59 1] in the first period vs 14% [12-15] in the second period, p<0.0001).
60                                       In the second period, patients had a more severe presentation a
61 s document on BrS in 2002 (early group); the second period reflected patients first diagnosed from 20
62 d 14.21% of patients in the first period and second period, respectively.
63  rise by about 50% and 75% for the first and second periods, respectively under the management scenar
64 vention, 49 placebo) completed the first and second periods, respectively.
65 5% CI, -infinity to 5.47%]) in the first and second periods, respectively.
66  (57.8%) were diagnosed during the first and second periods, respectively.
67  by using chronometric evaluation, over a 30-second period (RRREF), and by using the time-of-flight c
68 emic times improved significantly during the second period (SP) (2001-2014).
69       Thirty-day mortality was higher in the second period than in the first period, 25.20% vs 13.68%
70 ality rate were 1.5 to 2 times higher in the second period than in the first period.
71  strategies were used more frequently in the second period than in the first, and the death rate was
72 t period (first and second waves) and in the second period (third wave), respectively.
73 and 10 years were significantly lower in the second period; this reduction in disease-specific mortal
74 ary period and twice, early and late, in the second period to determine copper absorption.
75 t was divided into 2 equal halves (first and second periods) to determine whether there was attenuati
76 cise horizontal distance of 12 mm over a 1.2 second period using specially designed and computer cont
77  used to obtain the slopes of change and the second period was used to test the predictions.
78  used to obtain the slopes of change and the second period was used to test the predictions.
79 ficantly decreased in trauma patients in the second period when lung-protective ventilation modes wer
80  Similar risks were seen for teachers in the second period, when schools reopened in summer 2021.
81  The higher soil carbon storage rates of the second period (years 13-22) are associated with the grea
82 ing annual carbon storage rates that, by the second period (years 13-22), are 200% greater in our hig
83 verage lake volume to 21 x 10(9) m(3) in the second period; yet, this volume would be less than the l