1 clinical features), and study designs (cross-
sectional).
2 All the studies were cross
sectional.
3 The present cross-
sectional 3T (1)H MRS study is the first to use a multiv
4 iated with echocardiographic traits in cross-
sectional analyses (false discovery rate <0.10), and 8 o
5 Cross-
sectional analyses in both cohorts showed that plasma Nf
6 Cross-
sectional analyses on prevalent DSPN were based on 1,075
7 and Spearman rank correlation test for cross-
sectional analysis and Wilcoxon signed rank test for lon
8 Cross-
sectional analysis examining interstitial chest CT findi
9 This cross-
sectional analysis is based on assessments done at enrol
10 ctronic health records, we conducted a cross-
sectional analysis of 24.4 million primary care office v
11 We performed a cross-
sectional analysis of 6032 (16% HIV/HCV coinfected) Vete
12 This study assessed cross-
sectional analysis of all heart failure clinical trials
13 Here, we report a detailed cross-
sectional analysis of clinical, imaging and molecular da
14 We conducted a cross-
sectional analysis of data from adult contacts of tuberc
15 We performed a cross-
sectional analysis of endocrine surgeons identified in t
16 In phase 1, a cross-
sectional analysis of knowledge, attitudes, and habits (
17 IGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Serial cross-
sectional analysis of National Health and Nutrition Exam
18 In this cross-
sectional analysis of physicians who participated in the
19 A cross-
sectional analysis of the Neurological, cOgnitive and VI
20 Cross-
sectional analysis showed a significant decrease (T0 ver
21 icians.METHODSIRB-exempt and expedited cross-
sectional analysis through survey to NYC residency progr
22 We did a cross-
sectional analysis using general least-squares linear mo
23 By contrast, we find by cross-
sectional analysis using genetic and pharmacological too
24 In the cross-
sectional analysis, for every 50 DOT/1000 PD increase in
25 In this retrospective cross-
sectional analysis, neurocognitive testing and 3 T brain
26 April 2009 through December 2017 in a cross-
sectional analysis.
27 re increased in all diabetic groups in cross-
sectional analysis.
28 28 met the inclusion criteria: 20 were cross-
sectional and 8 were prospective cohort.
29 Five different hypotheses using a cross-
sectional and a longitudinal design were tested to asses
30 Both cross-
sectional and cohort studies were conducted using Taiwan
31 This was an observational, cross-
sectional and descriptive study of adult Nigerians.
32 ubjects without allergy and tested for cross-
sectional and interseasonal differences in levels of ser
33 The cross-
sectional and longitudinal (on a subset of 88 patients)
34 d single-genome amplification (SGA) in cross-
sectional and longitudinal analyses to uniquely define b
35 Cross-
sectional and longitudinal associations of plasma PLP wi
36 Cross-
sectional and longitudinal comparisons of K(i) and K(i)
37 Pathology studies, cross-
sectional and longitudinal PET-only studies, and compara
38 ) and 2.02 (95% CI=1.26, 3.23) for the cross-
sectional and longitudinal studies, respectively.
39 in patients from a Mexican cohort and cross-
sectional and longitudinal United States cohorts.
40 od disorders, specifically summarizing cross-
sectional and more recent longitudinal studies demonstra
41 Most studies are cross-
sectional and rely on questionnaires with limited overla
42 Cross-
sectional and short-term analyses of data from the Melbo
43 These findings-although cross-
sectional and specific to 9-10-year-old children-might h
44 We performed cross-
sectional and time-to-event analyses in a prospective ep
45 All studies were cross-
sectional and used a range of measurement tools; none re
46 We determined the age-stratified, cross-
sectional,
and longitudinal associations between VI seve
47 Using a correlational cross-
sectional approach, we compared a number of oxidative st
48 s including distensibility index (DI), cross-
sectional area (CSA), and HPZ length were collected usin
49 n levels and increased skeletal muscle cross-
sectional area and contractility properties.
50 Bronchioles became smaller in their cross-
sectional area and diameter.
51 Maximum average change in normalized cross-
sectional area at 4-weeks was -46.1+/-45.1% post-IRF com
52 termination) time points to monitor PV cross-
sectional area at each PV ablation site.
53 Muscle and adipose tissue cross-
sectional area at the fifth, eighth, and tenth thoracic
54 eletal muscle myofibril depends on its cross-
sectional area but not on the number of active sarcomere
55 4 expression and skeletal muscle fiber cross-
sectional area in pancreatic cancer patients.
56 ivity increased lower extremity muscle cross-
sectional area in patients with myotonic dystrophy, pref
57 area, which is roughly the same as the cross-
sectional area of an acyl chain.
58 Cross-
sectional area of the cervical and upper thoracic cord (
59 thickness and spinal cord grey matter cross-
sectional area of the Timed 25-Foot Walk.
60 nied with a shorter length and smaller cross-
sectional area of the upper airway, resulting in a signi
61 imal diameter of test-set patients and cross-
sectional area profiles of the true and false lumina.
62 However, correlation with spinal cord cross-
sectional area-a predictor of disability-is poor, questi
63 ogenic myopathy, without affecting the cross-
sectional area.
64 ave significantly smaller muscle fiber cross-
sectional area.
65 Manually measured cross-
sectional areas are most commonly used, but there is a l
66 few changes were seen in mean myofiber cross-
sectional areas compared to age-matched naive controls.
67 The inspiratory and end-expiratory cross-
sectional areas of the trachea were measured.
68 ll but 1 hypothesis-testing study were cross-
sectional assessments of association.
69 We evaluated the cross-
sectional association between each dietary pattern (WD,
70 We investigated the cross-
sectional association of cumulative sugar-sweetened beve
71 Cross-
sectional associations between plasma NfL and PET amyloi
72 linear regression was used to test for cross-
sectional associations between VF damage and activity fr
73 Cross-
sectional associations of the plant-based diet indices w
74 s leads to the hypothesis that, beyond cross-
sectional associations, impaired sleep structure and phy
75 Cross-
sectional biomarker results may suffer from reverse caus
76 e correlation with clinical variables, cross-
sectional brain imaging and neurophysiological data; the
77 P-43 stage was associated with smaller cross-
sectional brain volumes, faster rates of brain atrophy a
78 impairment (MCI) have been examined in cross-
sectional,
but rarely in longitudinal studies.
79 In 2016, we conducted a cross-
sectional carriage survey (CSS5) in a community where PC
80 nges that were largely concordant with cross-
sectional clinical studies.
81 ender-matched control subjects in this cross-
sectional clinico-radiological study.
82 n +/-SD) years posttransplant; and the Cross
sectional Cohort (CSC, n=446): patients developing new-o
83 The investigation of the largest cross-
sectional cohort of CHIKV-deaths to date reveals that CH
84 ed by CD31(+) EVs in a large (n = 218) cross-
sectional cohort of patients categorized as having T2DM
85 primary case-control cohort and 1 of 2 cross-
sectional cohorts explored suggest that the gastrointest
86 SIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Three cross-
sectional cohorts: an Arizona-based neuropathology cohor
87 on cardiac structure and function (and cross-
sectional comparison to normal-weight and obese controls
88 in COPD.Methods: We applied SuStaIn to cross-
sectional computed tomography imaging markers in 3,698 G
89 Serial cross-
sectional data (April 14 to May 26, 2020) from nearly 7,
90 Cross-
sectional data (n = 408) from a 2018 PWID population est
91 localized to transmodal cortex in both cross-
sectional data and a subset of participants with longitu
92 y was based on a secondary analysis of cross-
sectional data collected as part of a randomised control
93 We analysed cross-
sectional data from 10,837 middle-aged and elderly Chine
94 Cross-
sectional data from 13 nationally representative surveys
95 We analyzed cross-
sectional data from 16 nationally representative nutriti
96 1) a series of descriptive analyses of cross-
sectional data from demographic and health surveys and m
97 Cross-
sectional data from older adults (>=60 y; n = 2420) from
98 We pooled cross-
sectional data from the 2004 to 2017 National Health Int
99 We use cross-
sectional data from the Swedish Tinnitus Outreach Projec
100 We analyzed cross-
sectional data from wave 2 of the 19 country Survey of H
101 For the current analysis we used the cross-
sectional data of 1,380 Berlin Aging Study II (BASE-II)
102 Moreover, cross-
sectional data revealed that infertile men with the high
103 count policy on dental visits based on cross-
sectional data.
104 s, we use five independently recruited cross-
sectional datasets consisting of 641,860 individuals who
105 An accuracy study with cross-
sectional design was performed out from a database of 67
106 In a cross-
sectional design, 36 patients with first onset of a depr
107 he limitations of this study include a cross-
sectional design, systematic differences in premigration
108 As previous studies have mainly used cross-
sectional designs to assess relations between source mem
109 Profiles of cross-
sectional diameter, true-lumen area, and false-lumen are
110 lly from each other, and the cisternal cross-
sectional diameters are significantly reduced compared w
111 Cross-
sectional diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
112 with a nanoconstriction at one end and cross-
sectional dimensions close to that of a single bacterium
113 to be high, existing data are largely cross-
sectional,
do not include data on preinjury and postinju
114 ct that much of the available data are cross-
sectional,
drawn from administrative or claims data, or
115 This study reports on the cross-
sectional evaluation of data of 626 users of mySinusitis
116 of Atherosclerosis) participants, the cross-
sectional (
exam 1) and longitudinal (exams 1 to 3) assoc
117 ed on exploring such relationship from cross-
sectional gene expression data.
118 ith the hypothesis that when stone tip cross-
sectional geometries become smaller over time in particu
119 ng equal, projectiles with smaller tip cross-
sectional geometries should penetrate deeper into a targ
120 arget than projectiles with larger tip cross-
sectional geometries.
121 projectile each possessing a different cross-
sectional geometry.
122 Furthermore,
sectional heating and cooling allow for the cage to trav
123 The colonic microbiota exhibits cross-
sectional heterogeneity, but the mechanisms that govern
124 Sarcopenia can be evaluated using cross-
sectional image analysis of CT-scans, at the level of th
125 Cross-
sectional images (B-scans) obtained with SD-OCT showed t
126 mages were compared with preprocedural cross-
sectional images (CT/MRI).
127 T with pre-procedure contrast enhanced cross-
sectional images in terms of tumour detection.
128 ined in this study, and a total of 165 cross-
sectional images were co-registered with histology to de
129 Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) on cross-
sectional images, time to required next treatment, trans
130 a higher percentage of RLN compared to cross-
sectional imaging (83% vs. 50%; P = 0.048), with MRLNs i
131 Pre-procedural evaluation included cross-
sectional imaging and ex vivo simulation using printed o
132 Advances in cross-
sectional imaging have resulted in increased detection o
133 y and is not inferior to preprocedural cross-
sectional imaging in terms of tumour detection.
134 Cross-
sectional imaging reveals that amorphous boron nitride p
135 Cross-
sectional imaging techniques (CT and MRI) are well suite
136 e are currently assessed by endoscopy, cross-
sectional imaging, and biomarkers.
137 nk (N = 189,488), we aimed to test the cross-
sectional independent associations and joint interaction
138 Retrospective cross-
sectional international multicentre study including pati
139 Our study is also cross-
sectional,
limiting our ability to directly test how AD
140 alize effectively to other challenging cross-
sectional medical imaging tasks when training data is li
141 quantitative faecal metagenomes of the cross-
sectional MetaCardis Body Mass Index Spectrum cohort (n
142 In this observational cross-
sectional multicenter study of 340 patients, we evaluate
143 Cross-
sectional (
n = 34) and longitudinal (n = 7) assessments
144 patic steatosis, in a population-based cross-
sectional national health survey.
145 SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Analysis of cross-
sectional nationally representative household surveys ca
146 We did a secondary analysis of cross-
sectional,
nationally representative, individual-patient
147 nability to infer causality due to the cross-
sectional nature of the surveys and the likely under-sam
148 A cross-
sectional observational study assessed dietary intake fr
149 We performed this prospective cross-
sectional observational study in a multi-site London hos
150 study of a prospective, international, cross-
sectional observational study of children with PARDS fro
151 We conducted a cross-
sectional observational study of COVID-19 hospital morta
152 A cross-
sectional observational study was conducted for a period
153 This was a cross-
sectional observational study.
154 A cross-
sectional,
observational study was conducted using the O
155 Cross-
sectional observations have shown that the timing of eat
156 uated for both eyes by the revision of cross-
sectional OCT images of 6-mm volume scans.
157 prenatal neural development comes from cross-
sectional or case studies that are not able to resolve t
158 munoprecipitation system assays in 100 cross-
sectional or longitudinal samples from patients with SAR
159 In this cross-
sectional pilot study, we recruited symptomatic and asym
160 BC analysis pipeline was applied to a cross-
sectional population cohort that included any outpatient
161 Three cross-
sectional population-representative cluster surveys were
162 gous mutation, allowed us to study the cross-
sectional progression of cardiac involvements in relatio
163 In this cross-
sectional prospective study of 49 patients with ITP and
164 n = 67), the AHQ scores replicated the cross-
sectional psychometric results and suggested sensitivity
165 We investigated the cross-
sectional relationship between SVD and in vivo neuroinfl
166 n adults with DS, and determined their cross-
sectional relationship with age, beta-amyloid pathology,
167 Findings of this cross-
sectional representative study of an adult US population
168 ding in three European cities from the cross-
sectional Research on Obesity and Diabetes among African
169 However, this notion is predicated on cross-
sectional research that is vulnerable to sampling bias.
170 Cross-
sectional resting state functional connectivity (rsFC) s
171 In this cross-
sectional retrospective cohort study, we sought to evalu
172 In a cross-
sectional retrospective study of 3120 diabetic patients
173 This cross-
sectional retrospective study quantified the ipsilesiona
174 2013 to 2015, we analyzed data from a cross-
sectional sample from the Women's Interagency HIV Study
175 A cross-
sectional sample of 171 adolescents (aged 13-16 y) who r
176 alamic nuclei volumes were tested in a cross-
sectional sample of 472 adults (293 with psychosis) and
177 neurofunctional signatures in a large cross-
sectional sample of depressed youth.
178 thy controls (n = 159) and the largest cross-
sectional sample of patients with remitted psychotic dep
179 - and postimplementation of the law in cross-
sectional samples of products with sales >1% of their sp
180 try techniques in 2 large, independent cross-
sectional samples, obtained from the Alzheimer's Disease
181 We performed a cross-
sectional,
single-visit study of adults seeking sexually
182 g ownership, partially due to repeated cross-
sectional studies comparing dog owners and non-owners, w
183 Cross-
sectional studies have shown that magnetic resonance ela
184 ing development.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Cross-
sectional studies have shown that the ability to remembe
185 37 mostly fair-quality cohort and cross-
sectional studies, 15 mostly good-quality ecological stu
186 3 (5.5%; higher prevalence of cough in cross-
sectional studies, higher incidence of pregnancy-related
187 (q = 0.004, Student's t-test) and the cross-
sectional study (q = 0.033, linear regression).
188 In this comparative descriptive cross-
sectional study 45 consecutive TB patients who referred
189 Our cross-
sectional study aimed to describe qualitative and quanti
190 This cross-
sectional study aims to investigate if a point-of-care (
191 We conducted a Community based cross-
sectional study among 502 children aged 1-9 in March 201
192 ve coronary artery bypass grafting for cross-
sectional study and collected right atrial appendage bio
193 2006 to 2014, we conducted a repeated cross-
sectional study and used linear probability regression t
194 tes of statins on metabolites from the cross-
sectional study are comparable to those from interventio
195 This was a prospective cross-
sectional study carried out at a large United Kingdom gy
196 This cross-
sectional study characterized associations between sex,
197 This cross-
sectional study compared patients with stable AAA (n = 3
198 ESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-
sectional study compared the annual profits of 35 large
199 This is a cross-
sectional study conducted with a representative sample o
200 A cross-
sectional study design was used.
201 DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: Serial cross-
sectional study design, using National Health and Nutrit
202 Taiwanese males aged 20-50 years in a cross-
sectional study in 2014.
203 This is a cross-
sectional study in 57 PHIVs, 59 HIV-exposed but uninfect
204 We performed a cross-
sectional study in Kampala, Uganda, to delineate social
205 This cross-
sectional study in Malaysia investigated association bet
206 the first time in Iran, we performed a cross-
sectional study in order to determine the prevalence of
207 This cross-
sectional study included 298 eyes of 150 GL/S patients a
208 This cross-
sectional study included 46 adult patients who underwent
209 .Materials and MethodsThis prospective cross-
sectional study included participants with DM2 and DPN (
210 DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A cross-
sectional study involving Medicare beneficiaries aged 65
211 The aim of this cross-
sectional study is to determine the serum, saliva and gi
212 In a cross-
sectional study nano- and tissue-level mechanics were co
213 In this cross-
sectional study of 159 patients with widely distributed
214 This was a cross-
sectional study of 196 patients.
215 ith postpartum gene expression using a cross-
sectional study of 324 mothers who delivered full-term (
216 connectivity and word production in a cross-
sectional study of 42 participants with aphasia due to u
217 We performed a cross-
sectional study of 664 serum samples from the Oxford, Ki
218 This is a prospective, non-randomized, cross-
sectional study of 80 neurocritical care unit patients.
219 This is a cross-
sectional study of 886 participants (645 men and 241 wom
220 al mixture with general cognition in a cross-
sectional study of adolescents residing near ferromangan
221 We conducted a cross-
sectional study of adult MDR-TB cases and their HHCs in
222 We did a dual-centre cross-
sectional study of adults with Down syndrome recruited t
223 vember 20 and 24, 2017, we conducted a cross-
sectional study of individuals with serious health probl
224 This was a cross-
sectional study of MM in PLWH aged >=70 years from the D
225 We conducted a cross-
sectional study of NHs certified by the U.S. Centers for
226 A multicenter, retrospective, cross-
sectional study of pediatric BAV patients followed since
227 DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cross-
sectional study of physicians participating in MIPS in 2
228 This was a cross-
sectional study of PLHIV randomly matched by age (+/-4 y
229 IGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Serial cross-
sectional study of rural Medicare Fee-for-Service benefi
230 metabolism and gluconeogenesis.METHODSCross-
sectional study of severe receptor IR (INSR, n = 7) vers
231 In a serial cross-
sectional study of students, the Healthy, Hunger-Free Ki
232 During 2015-2016 a cross-
sectional study on 234 randomly-selected farms investiga
233 This cross-
sectional study used FFQ data and plasma metabolomic pro
234 This cross-
sectional study used nasal epithelium collected in 2015-
235 A retrospective cross-
sectional study using routinely collected data (patient
236 A school based cross
sectional study was carried out among secondary school s
237 A cross-
sectional study was carried out in Ningxia, China to det
238 A descriptive cross-
sectional study was conducted among students aged >=18 y
239 A school-based cross-
sectional study was conducted among teachers older than
240 A community-based cross-
sectional study was conducted at Debre Berhan town.
241 A cross
sectional study was conducted in 16 selected towns in No
242 Cross-
sectional study was conducted with 176 adults with ESRD
243 A cross-
sectional study was conducted with 307 community-dwellin
244 A cross-
sectional study was conducted with a twin cohort 8-36 ye
245 A cross-
sectional study was conducted with suspected CDI patient
246 A cross-
sectional study was conducted, and breath samples from 1
247 A multi-centre cross-
sectional study was conducted.
248 A cross-
sectional study was designed to shed light on the clinic
249 TTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A multicenter cross-
sectional study was performed in pediatric wards in 56 U
250 This cross-
sectional study was performed on 95 patients with 220 im
251 A diagnostic accuracy comparative cross-
sectional study was performed, comparing two screening t
252 We performed a cross-
sectional study with 108 post-LT patients and found an I
253 In a retrospective cross-
sectional study, 23474 individuals without diabetes and
254 In this cross-
sectional study, 50 participants (mean age 62.5 +/- 11.7
255 In this cross-
sectional study, 60 women over 40 years of age were incl
256 In a cross-
sectional study, 637 adults (70% male) from clinics in u
257 In this cross-
sectional study, a large proportion of ICD or CRT-D impl
258 In this cross-
sectional study, an online survey was administered to CR
259 In the present cross-
sectional study, CDAT was translated and back-translated
260 In this multi-centre trans-
sectional study, clinical and laboratory data as well as
261 In this multinational cross-
sectional study, existing data on 4,729,307 singleton bi
262 In this single-centre cross-
sectional study, hospitalised adult (>=18 years) patient
263 For this cross-
sectional study, in partnership with a central laborator
264 at high risk of developing HCC through cross-
sectional study, including patients with cirrhosis and h
265 erials and Methods In this prospective cross-
sectional study, MRI and (1)H MR spectroscopy and functi
266 hods In this prospective single-center cross-
sectional study, participants with type 1 or 2 diabetes
267 ials and Methods In this retrospective cross-
sectional study, patients consecutively admitted to a si
268 In a cross-
sectional study, to compare fasting and postprandial tri
269 Therefore, in this cross-
sectional study, we characterized the brain inflammatory
270 In this cross-
sectional study, we examined 165 participants consisting
271 In this cross-
sectional study, we examined the association between mul
272 In this retrospective, cross-
sectional study, we performed 16S rRNA sequencing on sto
273 In this multicenter cross-
sectional study, we performed an egocentric network anal
274 In the present cross-
sectional study, we studied processes of effector select
275 In this retrospective cross-
sectional study, we took SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR-confirmed pos
276 In this cross-
sectional study, we use internal transcribed spacer 1 am
277 In this cross-
sectional study, we used customized perceptual tasks to
278 Tanzania by conducting a retrospective cross-
sectional study.
279 ndomly selected to participate in this cross-
sectional study.
280 .05 +/- 4.93 kg/m 2) took part in this cross-
sectional study.
281 of 13 to 32 weeks participated in this cross-
sectional study.
282 tionship cannot be established in this cross-
sectional study.
283 ntervention study and in subjects of a cross-
sectional study.
284 d into this observational, prospective cross-
sectional study: 68 mild primary open-angle glaucoma (PO
285 Using cross-
sectional survey data (Engage, 2017-2018) from 1,137 men
286 We performed a cross-
sectional survey in April-May 2018 among Rohingya in Cox
287 lasmodium falciparum infections from a cross-
sectional survey in Papua New Guinea.
288 Data were from a representative cross-
sectional survey of 1,521 adults (301 combustible tobacc
289 ating polymorphisms were analyzed in a cross-
sectional survey of asymptomatic P. falciparum infection
290 Data came from a cross
sectional survey of families with molecularly confirmed
291 Six cross-
sectional survey studies explored family members' and cl
292 An anonymous, nonvalidated, cross-
sectional survey was conducted online.
293 A cross-
sectional survey was undertaken of all children aged 10-
294 anal swab sample as part of a repeated cross-
sectional survey, VE against HPV-16/18 was 89.9% (95% co
295 during a prospective nine year serial cross-
sectional survey.
296 In a series of cross-
sectional surveys weighted to be representative of the a
297 and 18 months after LLIN distribution, cross-
sectional surveys were done in 50 randomly selected hous
298 NDDs (aged 6-16 years) that underwent cross-
sectional T1-weighted and diffusion-weighted magnetic re
299 periodontal examination data from the cross-
sectional US NHANES, 2009-2014 (n = 10,010), were used.
300 WAS significance strata can be explored in a
sectional view plotted within user defined levels.