ライフサイエンスコーパス: seismicity

1 oustic emissions (AEs) (analogous to natural seismicity).

2 and quantitative tool to spatially forecast seismicity.

3 is the trigger of instability that leads to seismicity.

4 should lead to temporal clustering of global seismicity.

5 cy events, analogous to volcanic long-period seismicity.

6 s are likely to exist, due to a lack of deep seismicity.

7 on for its presence in other regions of deep seismicity.

8 tes of hydroacoustically recorded earthquake seismicity.

9 , the slow slip began before the increase in seismicity.

10 pid tapering to markedly decreased levels of seismicity.

11 recurrence statistics derived from regional seismicity.

12 zard and for processes that drive intraplate seismicity.

13 e propagation direction, including triggered seismicity.

14 ction based on spatio-temporal variations of seismicity.

15 served logarithmic periodicity in precursory seismicity.

16 luence on the nature of self-organization of seismicity.

17 nstead it must depend on the fluctuations in seismicity.

18 ions between faults associated with regional seismicity.

19 ip distribution on the main rupture from the seismicity.

20 brittle crust and of the causes of volcanic seismicity.

21 drothermal system as the cause of uplift and seismicity.

22 ned from the depth of the current background seismicity.

23 could help to manage and mitigate triggered seismicity.

24 reduction in both the deformation rates and seismicity.

25 y experiencing significant ground uplift and seismicity.

26 orage beneath the depths of located volcanic seismicity.

27 properties distinguish regions with ongoing seismicity.

28 ure, promoting fault weakening and shallower seismicity.

29 increase seems to be insufficient to trigger seismicity.

30 namic strains no longer triggered detectable seismicity.

31 relationships with volcanism and deep-focus seismicity.

32 olonged, large amplitude uplift and elevated seismicity.

33 episodes accompanied by increases in shallow seismicity.

34 assess the potential for reservoir-triggered seismicity.

35 genic(1,23), was associated with substantial seismicity.

36 variation of regional stress in relation to seismicity.

37 hanism for localized crustal deformation and seismicity.

38 been linked to lithospheric deformation and seismicity.

39 rovide the source of the observed uplift and seismicity.

40 arriers while triggering intense surrounding seismicity.

41 roduce fluid overpressures which may trigger seismicity.

42 t could result in overpressuring and induced seismicity.

43 er-arrival times population marks background seismicity.

44 ring the occurrence of postinjection induced seismicity.

45 of inducing 20% of 2008 to 2013 central U.S. seismicity.

46 potential impacts on crustal deformation and seismicity.

47 r injected tracks the long-term evolution of seismicity.

48 Furthermore, we interpret the band of seismicity above the magma chamber as a zone of hydrothe

49 also review the historical and instrumental seismicity affecting this region.

50 Seismicity along continental transform faults is usually

51 a's national hazard maps have not considered seismicity along the Baribis Fault.

52 manifests as migrating swarms of extensional seismicity along the ridge axis, can provide the small i

53 Seismicity also indicates that the same dike path was pa

54 nce of M6+ events occurred in 2022, and both seismicity and aseismic slip gradually increased again s

55 as island-arc volcanism, intermediate-depth seismicity and chemical exchange between the subducting

56 lerating rates of geophysical signals (e.g., seismicity and deformation) preceding large-scale dynami

57 file cases of damage caused by this trailing seismicity and due to the loss of control for risk manag

58 There were no precursor signals such as seismicity and edifice inflation.

59 We show that perplexing patterns in seismicity and fault plane solutions can be accounted fo

60 The patterns of seismicity and faulting are similar to those observed in

61 These interpretations are consistent with seismicity and GPS-geodetically observed right-lateral s

62 issions and thermal anomalies, combined with seismicity and ground observations, we show that in Dece

63 re and mineralogy, so the connection between seismicity and healing may help to explain recent observ

64 Here we use seismicity and hydrogeological models to show that fluid

65 ween the start of injection and the onset of seismicity and in regions that went on to host moderate

66 Here, using an integrated analysis of seismicity and magma rheology, we show that the orientat

67 t zone behaviors using geodetic observation, seismicity and microearthquake focal mechanisms.

68 Ground-based monitoring of seismicity and modulation by external forces in the fiel

69 hus facilitate a better understanding of the seismicity and other precursors of dyke-fed eruptions.

70 The origin and prevalence of triggered seismicity and remote aftershocks are under debate.

71 Preliminary examination of seismicity and seafloor morphology farther north along t

72 cale erosion rates correlate with historical seismicity and storm-driven runoff variability.

73 ow models that reveal a relationship between seismicity and the rate change of 'dynamic topography' (

74 seismic evidence to test whether patterns of seismicity and the stabilities of these potentially rele

75 the sequence within the context of regional seismicity and to identify areas of remaining and/or ele

76 Observations that unequivocally link seismicity and wastewater injection are scarce.

77 cking, slow slip and creep transients, swarm seismicity, and rapid pressure/stress transmission in in

78 on of these geodetic data, template-matching seismicity, and repeating earthquakes, revealed the firs

79 ns began after only minor surface uplift and seismicity, and resulted in caldera subsidence.

80 ons of aseismic slip, temporal clustering of seismicity, and spatial variations in earthquake size di

81 Both landscape evolution and regional seismicity appear to be examples of self-organized criti

82 to upper-crustal deformation and associated seismicity are highlighted by the January 19th, 2021 (Mw

83 Most observations of fluctuations of seismicity are of the rate of occurrence of smaller eart

84 b-values, and stress orientations of in-slab seismicity are temporally associated with the episodes.

85 Increased rates of deformation and seismicity are well-established precursors to volcanic e

86 ose that precursory, abnormal, low-magnitude seismicity arises if the pore fluid pressure within larg

87 ls motivated an investigation into the local seismicity around the Narli Fault.

88 ference between magnitudes in two subsets of seismicity as dependent on their population count ratio.

89 The Government cited induced seismicity as the key rationale for its November 2019 En

90 ation of subduction-related geochemistry and seismicity as well as water transportation into the deep

91 tion of burst-type repeating earthquakes and seismicity associated with a recent slow slip event(7) d

92 he "forearc seismic belt" corresponds to the seismicity assumed to result from fluid supply from the

93 Clustering of seismicity at 120-160 km depth suggests that the slab's

94 The inter-arrival times of the post 2000 seismicity at Campi Flegrei caldera are statistically di

95 relation between dehydration of minerals and seismicity at depths less than about 250 km, and conclud

96 intraplate earthquakes, temporal patterns in seismicity at remote plate boundaries, and space-based g

97 data does not support the presence of mantle seismicity beneath Los Angeles but suggests a fault mode

98 Our analyses also indicate that clustered seismicity beneath the caldera occurs on relatively imma

99 rther, the seasonal variation with an annual seismicity burst and seismic periodicity at polar wobble

100 structures hosting the mainshocks (on-fault seismicity), but also occurs within volumes of Triassic

101 re is increasing evidence that the Himalayan seismicity can be bimodal: blind earthquakes (up to Mw ~

102 at intermediate depth (50 to 200 kilometers) seismicity can be generated by dehydration reactions in

103 Analysis of seismicity can illuminate active fault zone structures b

104 ftershocks implies that such transform-fault seismicity cannot be explained by seismic triggering mod

105 that are based on observations of precursory seismicity cannot depend on the average properties of th

106 ry of the faults, develop a greatly enlarged seismicity catalog and record details of the rupture kin

107 Using a recently generated seismicity catalog from a local network in Oaxaca, we id

108 Our analysis expanded the seismicity catalog from around 12,000 to more than 54,00

109 aration is accurately quantified with global seismicity catalogs alone.

110 om earthquake occurrence rates obtained from seismicity catalogues.

111 dered to belong to a unique class of volcano-seismicity characterised by a long-duration coda, amplit

112 y on fluid-induced fault slip and associated seismicity characteristics using laboratory experiments

113 (RFS) featuring a very narrow depth range of seismicity, clearly illuminated shallow faults in the no

114 Although increased seismicity commonly accompanies geothermal production, i

115 Reservoir-triggered seismicity commonly occurs as a result of reservoir impo

116 tern equatorial Pacific reveal low-magnitude seismicity concentrated at the propagating tip of the Ga

117 Yellowstone has remained restless, with high seismicity, continuing uplift/subsidence episodes with m

118 el describes the physical processes inducing seismicity corresponding to the sequential stimulation o

119 possibility has considerable appeal, because seismicity data are routinely collected and have good sp

120 Geodetic, seismic, and seismicity data provided an integrative view of this seq

121 Seismicity data support the abandonment of laterally off

122 n 300 m from the 2 </= M < 3 mainshocks, the seismicity decay 5 min before the mainshocks is indistin

123 jacent to the central sub-basin and like the seismicity decreases to the north and south.

124 The short time delay between injection and seismicity differs from both the hypothetical expected t

125 y debated, with recent periods of uplift and seismicity driven either by the release of aqueous fluid

126 ing decreased recurrence intervals, we infer seismicity during this interval records fault-valve beha

127 ons, and Coulomb static stress transfer from seismicity earlier in the sequence are assessed in real-

128 Bimodal seismicity emerges as a result of relatively higher fric

129 gnificant implications on scales relevant to seismicity, energy resources, engineering applications a

130 t the fluctuations of the order parameter of seismicity exhibit distinct minima a few months before a

131 Dyke opening and seismicity focused at the most distal segment at any giv

132 bsequent finite-element modelling shows that seismicity focuses in regions of high-gravity-derived de

133 distinct unrest patterns, including shallow seismicity following substantial strain accumulation, al

134 The seismicity formulation predicts large changes of earthqu

135 localization, with both natural and induced seismicity generally clustered in discrete zones.

136 ly over 14 days, was revealed by propagating seismicity, ground deformation mapped by Global Position

137 Many active volcanoes exhibit changes in seismicity, ground deformation, and gas emissions, which

138 at began on September 11, although anomalous seismicity has been observed on the island since 2017.

139 t those seismic signals generated from micro seismicity have extremely low amplitude.

140 nate two puzzling features of plate boundary seismicity: how great earthquakes can re-rupture regions

141 urface geonergy can induce ground motion and seismicity, however a scarcity of observations usually o

142 f large historic earthquakes and present-day seismicity implies a modestly higher seismic hazard duri

143 ata and the frequency-magnitude relation for seismicity imply that had the largest shocks in the seri

144 beneath Long Beach, California, and identify seismicity in an actively deforming localized zone penet

145 of elevated hazard based on a lack of recent seismicity in comparison with other portions of a fault.

146 s one of the most important cases of induced seismicity in Europe and a rare example of seismicity in

147 provide additional context for understanding seismicity in hydrothermal systems, highlighting the key

148 The extent to which ongoing seismicity in intraplate regions represents long-lived a

149 hquakes in some regions while increasing the seismicity in neighboring regions, up to the present.

150 injected) provides the best correlation with seismicity in recent years.

151 c ground motion excitations representing the seismicity in Saqqara is presented.

152 he observational data of the fluctuations of seismicity in space, in time, and in a coupled space-tim

153 The 2004 M = 9.2 Sumatra earthquake altered seismicity in the Andaman backarc rift-transform system.

154 Hydrologic loads can stimulate seismicity in the Earth's crust(1).

155 The absence of seismicity in the flat-lying slab is explained by signif

156 belts, including, for example, the causes of seismicity in the Indian plate beneath the modern Himala

157 Seismicity in the Los Angeles metropolitan area has been

158 A recent dramatic increase in seismicity in the midwestern United States may be relate

159 We examined historical and instrumental seismicity in the New Madrid central U.S. region to dete

160 Our results imply that ongoing background seismicity in the New Madrid region is driven by ongoing

161 rocesses are directly triggering some of the seismicity in the region.

162 Much of the induced seismicity in the United States' midcontinent is attribu

163 Seismicity in the western United States away from the pl

164 g to analyze the more complete expression of seismicity in these catalogs may be the fastest route to

165 We directly measure fault slip and seismicity induced by fluid injection into a natural fau

166 d seismicity in Europe and a rare example of seismicity induced by gas injection into a depleted oil

167 1439), we tested whether framing of induced seismicity influences support for changing regulations.

168 The order parameter of seismicity introduced in this time domain is the varianc

169 thus show that the occurrence of background seismicity is an excellent parameter to monitor the curr

170 Seismicity is composed of isolated spatio-temporal clust

171 U.S. region to determine whether present-day seismicity is composed predominantly of aftershocks of t

172 Seismicity is concentrated in the central sub-basin and

173 ng where gravitational body forces encourage seismicity is crucial to understanding and appraising in

174 nderpin the link between fluid injection and seismicity is essential in efforts to mitigate the seism

175 e is calculated analytically; (3) background seismicity is explicitly considered within the forecasti

176 The character of the seismicity is extremely sensitive to distributions of in

177 ometers) at Kilauea volcano demonstrate that seismicity is focused on an active fault zone at 30-kilo

178 Here, we show that the background seismicity is increasing at the same rate of (1) the gro

179 Fault single-jerk seismicity is recorded by the presence of pristine quenc

180 e algorithm is self-adapting to the level of seismicity: it can be transferred without readaptation f

181 at earthquake interactions promote continued seismicity, leading to larger events.

182 Induced seismicity linked to geothermal resource exploitation, h

183 Additionally, a column of seismicity links the sill complex to a shallow decolleme

184 Seismicity localization should occur where convective ch

185 tural gradients have been invoked to explain seismicity localization, the underlying cause of seismic

186 s prudent that pore pressure change, initial seismicity locations, and Coulomb static stress transfer

187 was aseismic, or associated with very light seismicity (magnitude <5 earthquakes).

188 Here we show that this triggered seismicity marked the beginning of a five-year trend, co

189 However, the extent to which nearby seismicity may drive or exacerbate methane emissions and

190 osed methodology, based primarily on in-slab seismicity, may help monitor plate boundary conditions a

191 unt Agung awoke in August 2017, with intense seismicity, measurable ground deformation, and thermal a

192 , Colorado (USA) oil field(4) suggested that seismicity might be turned on or off by cycling subsurfa

193 Seismicity migrates downwards from the caprock and chang

194 quence, high absorption, low scattering, and seismicity migration across a fault network suggest flui

195 l harmonic forcings that are responsible for seismicity modulation on the planetary bodies and their

196 time-dependent deformation influence on the seismicity modulation remains uncertain.

197 s appear to be more sensitive to long-period seismicity modulation, however, lacking in short-period

198 From the global diversity in seismicity modulation, it has been observed that the pla

199 the Earth exhibit both short and long-period seismicity modulation.

200 leation by using the information in periodic seismicity modulations, which can be applicable to subdu

201 e detailed hydraulic stimulation and on-site seismicity monitoring data provide an unprecedented oppo

202 al represent the most likely cause of recent seismicity near Azle.

203 .5 2016-2017 Central Italy seismic sequence, seismicity not only localizes along the major structures

204 dicates that migrating patterns of 2015-2018 seismicity observed near Venus, TX are likely attributed

205 Seismicity occurred almost exclusively on a secondary fa

206 High rates of deformation and seismicity occurred from 24 February to mid-March in rel

207 beys to different scaling laws than on-fault seismicity occurring on structures characterized by elas

208 ugh of small amplitude, modulate the ongoing seismicity of the New Madrid region.

209 Seismicity of the plate boundary is therefore either non

210 Seismicity off the coast of Iquique started to increase

211 reveals that pore pressure changes initiate seismicity on critically stressed faults and Coulomb sta

212 he effective stress regime and anthropogenic seismicity on the basement faults in Delhi region.

213 ntrol may improve risk management of induced seismicity over a range of event magnitudes, if similar

214 ase ending with a decline in deformation and seismicity over several days preceding the eruption onse

215 rvoir drove 6.5 m of pre-eruptive uplift and seismicity over thirteen years, including an Mw5.4 earth

216 ting continental earthquakes as steady-state seismicity overestimates the hazard in presently active

217 s between blueschist-facies metamorphism and seismicity, particularly through dehydration reactions i

218 including interseismic strain and a bimodal seismicity pattern.

219 roaches to this problem have used precursory seismicity patterns that precede large earthquakes with

220 milar renormalizations for other premonitory seismicity patterns.

221 e the following causal mechanism for induced seismicity: pore pressure increase and earthquake intera

222 Induced seismicity potential is suppressed where tight confining

223 frastructure) or undermine (e.g., leakage or seismicity potential) this approach, but the sequestrati

224 To understand the seismicity preceding this event, we studied the location

225 intrusion correlate temporally with recorded seismicity, providing evidence that some seismic events

226 luence the earthquake occurrence process and seismicity rate along the plate-boundary or 'stable' pla

227 This accord means that changes in seismicity rate are sufficiently predictable to be inclu

228 on to pore-pressure changes can increase the seismicity rate by 6-fold and 2-fold for central and wes

229 ify the spatial and temporal patterns of the seismicity rate changes.

230 We find that the stress dependence of seismicity rate conforms to triggering theory over the e

231 The model forecasts seismicity rate during the test period based on input fe

232 hnique-the Random Forest to forecast induced seismicity rate in Oklahoma based on injection-related p

233 we compute the changes in crustal stress and seismicity rate in Oklahoma.

234 The seismicity rate increase was to the north for the Lander

235 Triggered seismicity rate increases may therefore be most likely t

236 ali, Alaska, earthquake triggered widespread seismicity rate increases throughout British Columbia an

237 ations radiated as seismic waves can trigger seismicity rate increases, as proposed for the Landers e

238 The low magnitude but moderate seismicity rate of Delhi region on the stable plate-inte

239 seismicity rate; (2) the spatial integral of seismicity rate over the whole aftershock zone is calcul

240 In western Taiwan, the seismicity rate reaches peak levels in February to April

241 rshock duration is consistent with models of seismicity rate variations based on rate- and state-depe

242 the regional scale, the timing of predicted seismicity rate, as opposed to its pattern and amplitude

243 the piecewise stationary integration of the seismicity rate; (2) the spatial integral of seismicity

244 mes after the mainshock, when low background seismicity rates allow for good aftershock detection, th

245 elsewhere might go undetected if background seismicity rates are low.

246 We infer that California seismicity rates are modestly modulated by natural hydro

247 urface deformation, hydrological loading and seismicity rates at both annual and multi-annual timesca

248 arkfield and potentially affecting long-term seismicity rates for fault systems adjacent to the valle

249 dence and reduction in stress and background seismicity rates, equivalent dynamic strains no longer t

250 mation, induce crustal stresses and modulate seismicity rates.

251 The UK had the most stringent induced seismicity regulations in the world, prior to instating

252 Leveraging seismicity relocations, here we obtain high resolution,

253 n under the Japan Sea and associated current seismicity remain challenging.

254 nd how fault roughness affects fluid-induced seismicity remains elusive.

255 micity localization, the underlying cause of seismicity remains unclear.

256 ways to assess seismic hazards and forecast seismicity response to perturbations of natural or anthr

257 The more complete picture of seismicity revealed a sharply defined caldera ring fault

258 It is widely believed that the seismicity risk can be controlled by using doublet syste

259 traffic light protocols and managing induced seismicity risks.

260 cool subduction zones exhibit differences in seismicity, seismic structure, and arc magmatism, which

261 ve been limited to a single operation and/or seismicity sequence.

262 apid pressure/stress transmission in induced seismicity sequences.

263 That seismicity shows vertical distributions extending from t

264 s with previously observed week-long shallow seismicity south of LASSIE array in Long Beach.

265 ales, as evidenced by abnormal low-magnitude seismicity spreading over the ~15-25% of Southern Califo

266 nnot depend on the average properties of the seismicity, such as the Gutenberg-Richter (G-R) distribu

267 jection-induced stress changes would promote seismicity, suggests a regional tectonic control on the

268 tood and are less prone to injection-induced seismicity than saline aquifers.

269 ing an extensive history of great earthquake seismicity that caused large shallow slip.

270 lthough models of homogeneous faults develop seismicity that has a Gutenberg-Richter distribution, th

271 One of the main concerns of DGE is induced seismicity that may produce damaging earthquakes, challe

272 Seismicity that occurs after the causative anthropogenic

273 kes (DLPs) are an enigmatic type of volcanic seismicity that sometimes precedes eruptions but mostly

274 ion and recovery of the repeating precursory seismicity that was recorded before the main landslide r

275 nt implications for interpretation of distal seismicity, the links between closely spaced arc volcano

276 For induced seismicity, the non-stationary, heterogeneous character

277 phenomena, such as the remote triggering of seismicity, there has been no means of actually monitori

278 ress transfer (CST) because it is common for seismicity to circumvent nearest-neighbour along-strike

279 e integrate new seismic images with regional seismicity to investigate an actively fragmenting subduc

280 We first gauge the response of the regional seismicity to the Landers event with a new technique, an

281 Drainage coincided with increased seismicity, transient acceleration, ice-sheet uplift, an

282 Here we present seismicity transients starting approx. 8 months before t

283 Amongst public concerns is induced seismicity (tremors).

284 ay help to explain earthquake clustering and seismicity triggering by shaking, and may be involved in

285 etreat may increase regional glacioisostatic seismicity, triggering Antarctic submarine landslides.

286 Localized seismicity under fault zones suggests that the deep exte

287 wastewater injection and U.S. mid-continent seismicity using a newly assembled injection well databa

288 ciplinary methodology for managing triggered seismicity using comprehensive and detailed information

289 l and multi-annual timescales indicates that seismicity variations are the direct result of elastic s

290 Claims of industrially induced seismicity vary from indisputable to unpersuasive and ye

291 the pre-eruptive patterns of deformation and seismicity vary widely.

292 magery and 3D numerical models, we show that seismicity was associated with a deep, sub-vertical magm

293 Increased seismicity was recorded on the middle to lower ERZ from

294 To explore the causes of this bimodal seismicity, we developed a two-dimensional, seismic cycl

295 e orogen has resulted in damaging historical seismicity, whereas south of the Main Frontal Thrust (MF

296 ions is very likely to trigger large induced seismicity, which may damage the caprock and ruin the ob

297 radiant temperature, and increased regional seismicity, which may indicate that magmatic processes p

298 Here we analyze seismicity within a subducting oceanic slab, spanning ~5

299 The perturbation of short-term seismicity within teleseismic surface waves also increas

300 The physical processes generating seismicity within volcanic edifices are highly complex a