ライフサイエンスコーパス: self-esteem

1 s; discrimination; depression; and decreased self-esteem).

2 fostering person-level dispositions such as self-esteem.

3 ic impairments, social dysfunction, and poor self-esteem.

4 nd help children alleviate guilt and enhance self-esteem.

5 motor learning, personality, attitudes, and self-esteem.

6 ic impairments, social dysfunction, and poor self-esteem.

7 tant, with a significant effect on patients' self-esteem.

8 regret after donation and do report enhanced self-esteem.

9 ation, physical activity, socialization, and self-esteem.

10 fness, anxious and depressed mood, and lower self-esteem.

11 symptoms, substance use, social support, and self-esteem.

12 chievement, performance in everyday life and self-esteem.

13 e at the core of mental illness, such as low self-esteem.

14 nance contest outcomes, and three domains of self-esteem.

15 cy Questionnaire and examined in relation to self-esteem.

16 nd expected social approval drive changes in self-esteem.

17 creases self-awareness, self-confidence, and self-esteem.

18 gnificantly and consistently associated with self-esteem.

19 mine the ORs and 95% CIs associated with low self-esteem.

20 eading to social embarrassment and decreased self-esteem.

21 e of 0 to 30; higher scores indicate greater self-esteem.

22 MD = 0.70, p = 0.03) had positive effects on self-esteem.

23 rience growth in meaning, relationships, and self-esteem.

24 ription Questionnaire II was used to measure self-esteem.

25 e-like, digital CBT approaches for improving self-esteem.

26 proving self-esteem in young adults with low self-esteem.

27 g cochlear implants or hearing aids appraise self-esteem.

28 a good quality of life, dignity, privacy and self-esteem.

29 negative emotions associated with threats to self-esteem.

30 into adulthood, with detrimental effects on self-esteem.

31 elves on 24 SPMVs and completed a measure of self-esteem.

32 abnormal explanatory style coupled with low self-esteem.

33 (2.5 to 5.3, n=133), emotional wellbeing and self-esteem 1.3 units (0.2 to 2.3, n=133), family health

34 There was no evidence of contagion for self-esteem (1.13, 0.95-1.34), smoking (1.14, 0.46-2.82)

35 high-level narrative processes that enhance self-esteem [3].

36 icipants had poor mental health, 15% had low self-esteem, 6% smoked regularly, 4% tried drugs, and 18

37 bility (68%/23%), level of stress (58%/28%), self-esteem (69%/13%), sexual relationships (73%/4%), an

38 xperienced no change or favorable effects in self-esteem (83%), level of stress in life (83%), and em

39 afforded surgeons their earliest measure of self-esteem, a critical attribute that was indispensable

40 ng efforts affect important outcomes such as self-esteem, academic achievement, and health.

41 and physical health, emotional wellbeing and self-esteem, access to services, family health, and pain

42 xplore functions of identity other than just self-esteem, adjustment, or well-being; and should imple

43 Self-esteem affects stress processing, however in a sex-

44 ion, esthetics, feel of implant, speech, and self-esteem also showed significant improvement over the

45 f-report or mother report, except for higher self-esteem among BCFH-positive girls (P = .01).

46 e symptoms and enhancing quality of life and self-esteem among individuals with IDs.

47 Our findings indicate that low self-esteem and a lack of positive self-esteem developme

48 lf-esteem, schematic self-beliefs, momentary self-esteem and affect, general psychopathology, quality

49 Patients reported more positive feelings of self-esteem and an average health status.

50 alth: physical activity, healthy eating, and self-esteem and body image.

51 No significant correlations emerged between self-esteem and demographic factors, communication skill

52 CS was unrelated to behavior, self-esteem and depressive symptoms adjusted for infant

53 Improvements in self-esteem and depressive symptoms both mediated 9% of

54 ons reported somatic stress symptoms and low self-esteem and displayed more caseness of anxiety/depre

55 itive and breast cancer families have higher self-esteem and do not have poorer psychosocial adjustme

56 ry analyses indicated significant changes in self-esteem and emotion regulation difficulties, but not

57 nwanted companion responsible for their poor self-esteem and emotional impairment.

58 behavior therapy) used for patients with low self-esteem and high eating disorder psychopathology.

59 not be prematurely restricted to addressing self-esteem and interpersonal dimensions only.

60 s been traditionally restricted to issues of self-esteem and interpersonal relationships, rather than

61 attention to current PSA, had high masculine self-esteem and little distress from sexual dysfunction,

62 ese by investigating the association between self-esteem and neural responses to evaluation of one's

63 ships, trust, and communication in promoting self-esteem and overall wellbeing.

64 gression, were more impulsive, and had lower self-esteem and poorer problem-solving skills.

65 Differences in self-esteem and problem-solving skills distinguished bet

66 n may optimize and stabilize improvements in self-esteem and promote neuro-wellbeing.

67 cs and physiologic functions while restoring self-esteem and psychological health.

68 ultant short stature is a critical issue for self-esteem and quality of life in many children with CK

69 me unanticipated ("sleeper") effects as both self-esteem and quality of life were improved after 3 ye

70 ear follow-up were also found on measures of self-esteem and quality of life, which did not distingui

71 anisms such as positive and negative affect, self-esteem and self-efficacy, a sense of meaning and pu

72 n improving health-related skills, enhancing self-esteem and self-efficacy, promoting social support,

73 onstrated efficacy on the primary outcome of self-esteem and signaled beneficial effects on several s

74 we investigated sex-specific associations of self-esteem and stress reaction on behavioral, hormonal

75 s or physical disability and post-injury low self-esteem and stress were associated with disability a

76 There was no association between self-esteem and suicidal ideation after control for depr

77 Effects on self-esteem and well-being were found even in the absenc

78 an-dog tactile interaction increases owner's self-esteem), and a minority was mainly associated with

79 uals report high levels of self-sufficiency, self-esteem, and authoritarianism.

80 functioning, which included quality of life, self-esteem, and body image.

81 ia, notably problems with relatedness, work, self-esteem, and chronic subclinical depressive traits.

82 is associated with trichodynia, anxiety, low self-esteem, and depression, which have implications for

83 atio in women and testosterone in men), age, self-esteem, and disclosure status (whether LGB particip

84 al loss), 2) early adolescence (neuroticism, self-esteem, and early-onset anxiety and conduct disorde

85 ell-being, work capacity, comorbid symptoms, self-esteem, and emotion regulation complemented by week

86 acity, well-being, comorbid psychopathology, self-esteem, and emotion regulation.

87 had lower levels of employment, income, and self-esteem, and fewer were married and had children.

88 Their self-perceptions of coping ability, self-esteem, and interpersonal relations were also lower

89 elligence quotient, physical health, height, self-esteem, and later happiness.

90 nally making sense; citing healing, improved self-esteem, and life feeling more worth living.

91 sing the Brief Symptom Inventory, as well as self-esteem, and life satisfaction.

92 sion was a risk factor for depression, lower self-esteem, and more negative abortion-specific outcome

93 a, higher interpersonal dependency and lower self-esteem, and parental alcohol/drug use disorder.

94 easures of hairpulling, depression, anxiety, self-esteem, and psychosocial functioning.

95 everity of hairpulling, depression, anxiety, self-esteem, and psychosocial functioning.

96 ing Scales, the jumping to conclusions bias, self-esteem, and quality of life served as secondary out

97 across several domains, including attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes, and discuss their predicti

98 ess communication skills, social engagement, self-esteem, and temperament.

99 e importance of family support, promotion of self-esteem, and the setting of realistic and attainable

100 r passivity (12 studies), including negative self-esteem, anxious or avoidant behavior, poor emotiona

101 Sex differences have been reported in self-esteem as well as stress reactions, but so far thei

102 sanctions, such as shame, guilt and loss of self-esteem, as opposed to purely external sanctions, su

103 ore at 7 (n = 6294) and 11 years (n = 5598), self-esteem assessed from self-reported Culture-Free Sel

104 The primary outcome was RSES self-esteem at postintervention and 6-month follow-up.

105 -48 AAS users and 41 nonusers-on measures of self-esteem, attitudes toward male roles, body image, ea

106 t [SE], -0.28 [0.08]), and poorer caregiving self-esteem (average marginal effect [SE], -0.48 [0.16])

107 their caregivers reported poorer caregiving self-esteem (average marginal effect [SE], -0.51 [0.16])

108 d = -0.39) schematic self-beliefs, momentary self-esteem (B = 0.29; 95% CI, 0.01-0.57; P = .04; Cohen

109 However, it is unclear whether self-esteem based on social approval should be understoo

110 th, Health Outlook, Health Distress, Fleming Self-Esteem, Bergner Physical Appearance, and Sexual Fun

111 isfaction (3.66, 2.92-4.58; p<0.0001), lower self-esteem (beta 1.83, 95% CI 1.47-2.19; p<0.0001), and

112 beta, 1.54; 95% CI, 0.79 to 2.30), had lower self-esteem (beta, 8.40; 95% CI, 1.68 to 15.12), and wer

113 Psychosocial mechanisms included self-esteem, body image, and friendship.

114 Sexual function, self-esteem, body image, and general health of female pa

115 The effects could be explained by changes in self-esteem, body image, and intrusive thoughts about th

116 g age, treatment, time since treatment, poor self esteem/body image, physical symptoms, poor performa

117 chological resources--optimism, mastery, and self-esteem--buffer the deleterious effects of stress an

118 d self-development strategies (e.g. improved self-esteem), but the same use of avoidance strategies (

119 iendly, adaptive interventions for improving self-esteem, but robust trial-based evidence is pending.

120 Self-esteem can be conceptualized as a 'gauge of social

121 tions such as extraversion, neuroticism, and self-esteem can markedly influence levels of SWB.

122 s, health risk behavior participation, child self-esteem, child pubertal development, child and adult

123 criticism and described disconcertingly low self-esteem; citing guilt, shame, and negative self-perc

124 d, -0.37 [95% CI, -0.67 to -0.07]; P = .02), self-esteem (Cohen d, 0.36 [95% CI, 0.13 to 0.59]; P = .

125 ed 9 themes: Bonding/Attachment; Body Image; Self Esteem/Confidence; Female Role Models; Family and S

126 Self-esteem, crucial for psychological well-being, can b

127 o-emotional difficulties (e.g., anxiety, low self-esteem, depressive symptoms, and internalizing prob

128 that low self-esteem and a lack of positive self-esteem development can be detrimental to harmonious

129 esteem in adolescence as well as a depressed self-esteem development over the next three decades were

130 Self-esteem did not change significantly after surgery.

131 rve models demonstrated that irrespective of self-esteem domain, low levels of self-esteem in adolesc

132 ely, as did dominance contest losses and two self-esteem domains.

133 dren with hearing loss are at risk for lower self-esteem due to differences from hearing peers relati

134 PA significantly improved self-esteem during and after cancer treatment (pooled SM

135 ody exercises) may have a positive effect on self-esteem during and after cancer treatment, with canc

136 activity (PA) (both general and its type) on self-esteem during and after cancer treatment.

137 Overall, PA interventions improved self-esteem during cancer treatment (pooled SMD = 0.50,

138 esults show that belief-based models explain self-esteem dynamics in response to social evaluation be

139 ckground, their own intelligence, health and self esteem, education and other adult socioeconomic out

140 continent patients and to help restore their self-esteem, eliminate their self-imposed isolation, and

141 ncluding life satisfaction, positive affect, self-esteem, emotional processing, and emotional express

142 tational model that captures fluctuations in self-esteem engendered by prediction errors that quantif

143 = 0.050; small to medium effect size) and in self-esteem (F1,97 = 17.94; P < .001; etap2 = 0.156; lar

144 ties Questionnaire and Emotional well-being, Self-esteem, Family functioning, and Social networks sub

145 improved sense of well-being and a boost in self-esteem for living kidney donors.

146 nitive biases (g = 0.16; 95% CI, 0.03-0.29), self-esteem (g = 0.17; 95% CI, 0.03-0.31), negative symp

147 Self-esteem had an impact on precuneus, insula and STG a

148 Self-esteem has been associated with neural responses to

149 iefs, and psychological (sense of coherence, self-esteem, health locus of control) and social factors

150 once/week, children had greater odds of low self-esteem if 5 or more times/week they ate supper in f

151 only obesity per se, but also its effects on self-esteem in a hostile cultural climate.

152 pective of self-esteem domain, low levels of self-esteem in adolescence as well as a depressed self-e

153 ationship exists between meal regularity and self-esteem in children.

154 sociation exists between meal regularity and self-esteem in grade 5 children.

155 ly, as a marker of functional status and for self-esteem in patients developing chronic illness.

156 ith honesty of greater significance for male self-esteem in societies with unequal gender roles.

157 to understand the potential role of implicit self-esteem in the combined antidepressant effect of ket

158 g theta rhythm brain modulation on improving self-esteem in young adults with low self-esteem.

159 Targeting low self-esteem in youth exposed to childhood adversity is a

160 fectively negative sense of the self, and of self-esteem, in depression.

161 mate value (SPMV), and its association with self-esteem, in eight cultures.

162 Depression decreased and self-esteem increased from preabortion to postabortion,

163 Across women and men, lower self-esteem increases the effort in emotion and stress p

164 and children's behavioural difficulties and self-esteem independent of frequency of engagement.

165 ns, and higher scores on the fifth subscale [self-esteem] indicating favorable influence); and 3-item

166 Oral health beliefs and self-esteem indirectly predicted gingival bleeding via t

167 ticipants showed substantial improvements in self-esteem, internal locus of control, and psychologica

168 eem assessed from self-reported Culture-Free Self-Esteem Inventory score at 11 years (n = 6937) and d

169 Self-esteem is predicted by status within a group and he

170 Self-esteem is shaped by the appraisals we receive from

171 manent ileostomy and has improved associated self-esteem issues.

172 and future social exclusion was predicted by self-esteem, loneliness, depression, and income, but not

173 Assessments of self-esteem, maladaptive beliefs, and mood were conducte

174 n, school attendance, part-time work status, self-esteem, marital status, living arrangements, and nu

175 Yet, self-esteem may have acted as a protective factor during

176 ychological interventions aimed at enhancing self-esteem may promote support for a more inclusive soc

177 Self-esteem mediated an association between sports parti

178 Self-esteem mediated the association between sports part

179 Our findings suggest that trait self-esteem modulates the degree of both affective proce

180 patients' physical function (n = 23, 79.3%), self-esteem (n = 18, 62.1%), emotions (n = 16, 55.2%), s

181 Losing a mother, blaming others, low self-esteem, negative coping, and complicated grief were

182 Distal outcomes were self-esteem, negative symptoms, quality of life, well-be

183 e effective without interventions to improve self-esteem of people with mental illness.

184 , used items 2 (subject: depressed mood), 6 (self-esteem or failure), and 1 (interest), yielding a Cr

185 less than once/week had greater odds of low self-esteem (OR: 1.97; 95% CI, 1.51-2.56).

186 nch were associated with greater odds of low self-esteem [OR = 2.92 (95% CI, 1.87-4.57) and OR = 4.82

187 ood intolerance, clinical perfectionism, low self-esteem, or interpersonal difficulties appeared to r

188 ood intolerance, clinical perfectionism, low self-esteem, or interpersonal difficulties.

189 ype, or current depression, anxiety, stress, self-esteem, or well-being between the groups (P>0.05).

190 g, number of goods, and household crowding), self-esteem, oral health beliefs, and frequency of tooth

191 ioeconomic status, pattern of dental visits, self-esteem, oral health beliefs, toothbrushing frequenc

192 al difficulties outcome, and of 4991 for the self-esteem outcome.

193 Self-esteem (P < .05) and global Eating Disorder Examina

194 social exclusion was further associated with self-esteem (p < 0.001), loneliness (p = < 0.001), incom

195 tization, and interpersonal sensitivity (low self-esteem) (P<.001); were more likely to be abusing dr

196 eir parents reported child narcissism, child self-esteem, parental overvaluation, and parental warmth

197 atient emotional functioning (depression and self-esteem), patient health beliefs (perceived illness

198 mbination of pessimistic thinking style (low self-esteem, pessimistic explanatory style, and negative

199 , -6.59 to -0.98; P = .008; Cohen d = -0.38) self-esteem, positive (B = 1.58; 95% CI, 0.41-2.75; P =

200 Preabortion and postabortion depression and self-esteem, postabortion emotions, decision satisfactio

201 Positive oral health beliefs and higher self-esteem predicted higher frequency of toothbrushing.

202 integration (psychological and physical) and self-esteem-proxy indicators of socioeconomic inclusion.

203 e of unintentional injury risk behavior were self-esteem, pubertal development, parent monitoring, an

204 Secondary outcomes were improvements in self-esteem, quality of life, and participant satisfacti

205 condition, which can have a major impact on self-esteem, quality of life, mood and relationships.

206 on group compared with the control group for self-esteem, quality of life, self-efficacy, coping stra

207 with standardized measures of work, income, self-esteem, quality of life, symptoms, and hospitalizat

208 der uncertainty, and have their roots in low self-esteem, rather than excessive social concern.

209 Self-esteem ratings attained significant positive correl

210 have lower levels of optimism, mastery, and self-esteem, relative to G/G homozygotes.

211 group members' in-group pride and collective self-esteem, relative to using their native language.

212 anterior cingulate cortex, while updates in self-esteem resulting from these errors co-varied with a

213 d included youth (aged 12-26 years) with low self-esteem (Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale [RSES] <26) exp

214 12-26 years) with low self-esteem (Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale [RSES] <26) exposed to childhood adver

215 self-esteem was measured using the Rosenberg self-esteem scale after scanning.

216 , BSI-Anxiety, BSI-Depression, and Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale mental scales (| d| </= 0.31).

217 hdrawal and social anxiety, while The Global Self-Esteem scale of the Self-Description Questionnaire

218 Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), and Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale questionnaires and by the accelerometr

219 95% CI, -5.0 to 1.0; P = .18) and Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale score (adjusted mean difference, -1.4;

220 13.2 [2.9] at 18 months; mean [SD] Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale score: mentorship group, 16.0 [4.6] at

221 the Female Sexual Function Index, Rosenberg Self-Esteem scale, Body Image scale and SF-36, respectiv

222 Additional measures including the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, Perceived Stress Scale-10, and Relati

223 Self-esteem was measured with the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, with a score range of 0 to 30; higher

224 dary outcomes included positive and negative self-esteem, schematic self-beliefs, momentary self-este

225 relatedness, and patient-invested contingent self-esteem (Self-Determination Theory); and attitudes t

226 Resilience-related mediators included self-esteem, self-acceptance, and depression.

227 258) examining associations with loneliness, self-esteem, self-derogation, and depressive symptoms us

228 nt internalizing symptoms (e.g., loneliness, self-esteem, self-derogation, depressive affect) and the

229 mpts to fortify relational needs (belonging, self-esteem, shared understanding, and trust), which lea

230 independent fashion: participants with lower self-esteem show higher activation of regions involved i

231 ential donors (SHR [95% CI]: 1.0 [1.0-1.1]), self-esteem (SHR [95% CI]: 0.4 [0.2-0.8]), transplant kn

232 tantly, they suggest that in the short term, self-esteem signals the direction and rate of change of

233 Children with hearing loss rated global self-esteem significantly more positively than hearing p

234 ome measures focused on depression, anxiety, self-esteem, social adjustment, and quality of life.

235 able family environment), early-adolescence (self-esteem, social deviance, conduct disorder), late-ad

236 ly environment, childhood parental loss, low self-esteem, social deviance, education, recent trauma,

237 to their unfavorable effect on esthetics and self-esteem, these conditions also are associated with d

238 r BWL, 2.9 for CBTgsh, and 0.73 for IPT; for self-esteem, they were 2.4 for BWL, 1.9 for CBTgsh, and

239 In Study 3, people with high self-esteem thought PSRs would be responsive to their ne

240 eed to understand components contributing to self-esteem to improve identification, counseling, and e

241 o-births, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.39 to 3.18), lower self-esteem (turnaway-births, -0.33; 95% CI, -0.56 to -0

242 insula and insula-vmPFC connectivity during self-esteem updates.

243 and contingency of a student's professional self-esteem upon patients' achievements.

244 were binary indicators of: mental health and self-esteem using validated scales, smoking, drinking wi

245 nt improvements in diet, weight, well-being, self-esteem, vitality, and biomarkers of cardiometabolic

246 cial anxiety and social withdrawal, and that self-esteem was a protective factor during these challen

247 Higher self-esteem was associated with a more positive trajecto

248 rain regression analyses revealed that trait self-esteem was associated with the bilateral orbitofron

249 Trait self-esteem was measured using the Rosenberg self-esteem

250 Self-esteem was measured with the Rosenberg Self-Esteem

251 An association between arts ability and self-esteem was only found amongst children who have hig

252 ttesting to the specificity of this finding, self-esteem was predicted by parental warmth, not by par

253 RSES self-esteem was, on average, higher in the experimental

254 e development of general and domain-specific self-esteem, we report results from a population-based s

255 rs of attributional style, hopelessness, and self-esteem were assessed in subjects aged 7-17 years (5

256 Childhood parental loss and low self-esteem were more potent variables in the model in m

257 depression and lower-than-normative explicit self-esteem were randomized in a double-blind, parallel-

258 rs of attributional style, hopelessness, and self-esteem when suicidal ideation fades in psychiatrica

259 ection task, and reported greater collective self-esteem, when surveyed in Hebrew, rather than in Ara

260 y predictor of treatment completion was high self-esteem, which was associated with a 51% rate of tre

261 downs, and to investigate the association of self-esteem with these trajectories.