戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 e evaluations from others should elicit more shame.
2 chological distress by reducing internalized shame.
3 with bowel DGBIs experiencing high levels of shame.
4 , anxiety, self-harming thoughts, guilt, and shame.
5 al psychotherapies in addressing HIV-related shame.
6  mechanism evolved to help individuals avoid shame.
7 vel measures of the importance of guilt over shame.
8 rticipants felt anger, disbelief, guilt, and shame.
9 pometrics, disciplinary actions, stigma, and shaming.
10 vate actors are more effective at naming and shaming.
11 nals described feelings of guilt (53.8%) and shame (42.5%).
12 oral values and (4) moral emotions of guilt, shame and anger.
13      Participants struggled with feelings of shame and believed that others possessed stigmatizing at
14 s devaluation in the others, suggesting that shame and devaluation are informed by a common species-w
15 nstration of a close, specific match between shame and devaluation within and across cultures.
16 ans and patients, the latter emphasizing the shame and discomfort associated with current diagnostic
17 s of practices and environments, confidence, shame and distress, and containment of bleeding and odou
18 h fecal and urinary incontinence in terms of shame and embarrassment and report that it causes them t
19 chanisms-guilt and internalized norms versus shame and external reputation-to promote prosociality.
20  current thinking on the distinction between shame and guilt, and the relative advantages and disadva
21 us decades, much research remains focused on shame and guilt.
22  of vicarious or "collective" experiences of shame and guilt.
23 remember the mass murder at Port Arthur with shame and horror as a personal affront, rather than simp
24 ess and small, muting compassion, guilt, and shame and potentiating anger, disgust, and mirth.
25 igma predicted higher levels of internalized shame and self-blame and lower levels of social support
26 cific questionnaires, Decision Regret Scale, Shame and Stigma Scale).
27 ifferences between embarrassment, guilt, and shame and their relations to moral behavior is reviewed,
28 sin, promotes enhanced feelings of guilt and shame and unwillingness to harm others irrespective of t
29  work highlights the potential harm of using shaming and pressuring language in public health communi
30 hroughout Australia, an outpouring of grief, shame, and anger followed this tragic event and led quic
31  The development and socialization of guilt, shame, and empathy also are discussed briefly.
32 sconcertingly low self-esteem; citing guilt, shame, and negative self-perception due to delayed diagn
33 es focusing on health-related stigma mention shame, and research on shame in bowel DGBIs is nonexiste
34 distress via cancer disclosure, internalized shame, and social support availability.
35            Loss of independence, feelings of shame, and the fear of uncertainty were key internal sta
36 tween childhood abuse and later proneness to shame, and the phenomena of vicarious or "collective" ex
37 ck, grief, guilt, fear of blame, self-doubt, shame, anger, and betrayal were the major emotional reac
38                                              Shame appears to be a particularly important emotion der
39                                   Naming and shaming appears less effective in other countries, so fu
40 ith a large pre-post decrease in HIV-related shame as measured by the HIV and Abuse Related Shame Inv
41 scribed instances of mistreatment and public shaming as detrimental to establishing psychological saf
42 consequences of participants' decisions, and shame by varying observability.
43                                As predicted, shame closely tracks the threat of devaluation in the Un
44 based emotions - such as sadness, guilt, and shame - collectively termed Emotional Pain.
45                      For participants in the shame condition, there were no significant differences i
46      Many feelings, such as anger, contempt, shame, confusion, and pride, come about through complex
47 s Pappworth believed that only by naming and shaming could any expose act as a deterrent.
48                                          The shame-devaluation link is also specific: Sadness and anx
49  with muscle dysmorphia frequently described shame, embarrassment, and impairment of social and occup
50                      We test the theory that shame evolved as a defense against being devalued by oth
51 doxical exacerbation of sexual abuse-related shame experienced by two participants following receipt
52 ss and anxiety-emotions that coactivate with shame-fail to track devaluation.
53 ur domains (functioning, fatigue/mood, fears/shame, food) showed good levels of internal consistency
54  vasopressin, enhanced feelings of guilt and shame for intentional but not accidental harm and reduce
55 orced in part by internal sanctions, such as shame, guilt and loss of self-esteem, as opposed to pure
56                      Secondary outcomes were shame, guilt, and affect.
57 egatively valenced "self-conscious" emotions-shame, guilt, and embarrassment.
58 y internalized form of motivation relying on shame, guilt, and fear of social consequences) relative
59 negative mental health outcomes, HIV-related shame has been predictive of increased rates of substanc
60     The proportion of participants with high shame, high impulsiveness, and lower perceived importanc
61                                   Naming and shaming hinges on the ability to identify countries whos
62 elated stigma mention shame, and research on shame in bowel DGBIs is nonexistent.
63 his study was to examine the implications of shame in bowel DGBIs.
64                                    Moreover, shame in each country strongly tracks devaluation in the
65 idence was shown for increased rejection and shame in people bereaved by suicide across a range of ki
66 alysis were conducted to analyze the role of shame in the associations between bowel symptom severity
67 ame as measured by the HIV and Abuse Related Shame Inventory, with a median (IQR) change of - 5.5 (-
68                               By hypothesis, shame is a neurocomputational program tailored by select
69         Although the link between stigma and shame is acknowledged overall, few studies focusing on h
70  support for the proposition that naming and shaming is most accepted and effective in influencing th
71 ns of international cooperation, "naming and shaming" is often used as an enforcement mechanism in th
72 (for patients, predominantly fear, anger and shame); its 'whole-person' nature; and the value that pa
73 rly, faculty described feelings of guilt and shame, loss of confidence, and distraction after adverse
74 our domain (functioning, fatigue/mood, fears/shame, nutrition) and total scores.
75 body image, loss of intimacy and femininity, shame of seeking mental health services, burdened by une
76 punishment (31%-54%) or believed she brought shame on her family (51%-73%), and most were unwilling t
77 ivine punishment, and belief that she brings shame on her family.
78 ts with significant changes of guilt but not shame, pride, or affect.
79 pansion) and self-conscious emotions (guilt, shame, pride, social anxiety, and embarrassment), with a
80 nomenon of body shame, styles of coping with shame, psychobiological aspects of shame, the link betwe
81  (difference: Q4W, -24.5; Q8W, -16.1), fears/shame (Q4W, -23.9; Q8W, -20.1), and nutrition (Q4W, -15.
82  the lack of confidentiality and feelings of shame related to experiences of domestic violence as wel
83  other negative emotions (i.e., fear, anger, shame), reliably predicted current smoking as well as re
84   Stigma was significant, including personal shame, social concealment, and discomfort discussing HS
85                                       Dental shame, speech difficulties and influence of dental condi
86 ch on the domain-specific phenomenon of body shame, styles of coping with shame, psychobiological asp
87  mock-legislated punishments and perpetrator shame-suggesting that multiple justice intuitions may be
88 ssary activation of a defense is costly, the shame system should estimate the magnitude of the devalu
89 mple reported significantly higher levels of shame than the comparative sample.
90 lomacy experts favor a process of naming and shaming that relies on official intergovernmental actors
91 ping with shame, psychobiological aspects of shame, the link between childhood abuse and later pronen
92 whose efforts are inadequate and effectively shame them toward better behavior.
93                                      It is a shame this work has been missed, because it provides evi
94  these tensions-the inability for naming and shaming to work effectively within the countries least m
95 ted with the bowel DGBIs sample, showed that shame was a mediator of the associations of bowel sympto
96               Moderation results showed that shame was an exacerbator of the associations of bowel sy
97 isorder, depression, social disapproval, and shame) we also investigated change in attitudes, includi
98             Effects of oxytocin on guilt and shame were strongest in individuals scoring lower on the
99 ficult math task designed to induce anger or shame while their cardiovascular responses were measured