ライフサイエンスコーパス: short day

1 tion of COR14b under long days but not under short days.

2 ding EARLY FLOWERING7 and EARLY FLOWERING IN SHORT DAYS.

3 ing time and rosette leaf number in long and short days.

4 or SOC1 expression to wild type mostly under short days.

5 y, the expression of FLC under both long and short days.

6 of FT and SOC1 only under long days but not short days.

7 lele, flowered late under both long days and short days.

8 during long-day light cycles, but not during short days.

9 n long days and did not promote flowering in short days.

10 OWERING LOCUS T (FT) over both long days and short days.

11 A-dependent floral promotion signaling under short days.

12 than the teosinte allele under long days and short days.

13 ion in long days and increases aggression in short days.

14 siz1 mutations caused early flowering under short days.

15 s with overly elongated hypocotyls mainly in short days.

16 lesion, flower earlier than wild type under short days.

17 riation, especially when plants are grown in short days.

18 cause early flowering in both long days and short days.

19 lained 59% of flowering time variation under short days.

20 d treatments that restored responsiveness to short days.

21 elerated the onset of photorefractoriness to short days.

22 the same in explants cultured under long and short days.

23 tations that delay flowering in long but not short days.

24 igh vocal center compared with its volume on short days.

25 ene to restore flowering to ga1-3 mutants in short days.

26 on long days; and (4) four males isolated on short days.

27 ering in long days and prevents flowering in short days.

28 adual change in LEAFY expression observed in short days.

29 g dormancy known as diapause that is cued by short days.

30 of FLOWERING LOCUS C and early flowering in short days.

31 1 to accelerate flowering under noninductive short days.

32 effect if plants are vernalized or grown in short days.

33 e regulation of hypocotyl growth under warm, short days.

34 the male Syrian and male Siberian hamster in short days.

35 n the dark, promoter activity is enhanced by short days.

36 tBEL5 promoter activity in stolon tips under short days.

37 period insensitivity (PI) that can flower in short days.

38 th conversion to perennial growth pattern in short days.

39 roductive development at high temperature in short days.

40 early stages of reproductive development in short days.

41 roteins may control flowering in response to short days.

42 optimal, low temperature (15 degrees C) and short day (12-h day length) conditions.

43 ere integrated with a data set from long and short day-15 conceptuses.

44 nificantly, NUA-interacting protein EARLY IN SHORT DAYS 4 (ESD4), a SUMO protease, specifically deSUM

45 We describe a novel mutant, early in short days 4 (esd4), that dramatically accelerates the t

46 t sufficient to sustain FT2 expression under short days [5], pointing to the presence of an additiona

47 Hamsters exposed perinatally to short days (8 hr light/day) exhibited mixed results for

48 ong day (16 h light and 8 h dark; 16L:8D) to short day (8L:16D) photoperiods induces an involution of

49 s: (1) Photosensitive birds were retained on short days (8L:16D).

50 e phase change, delay floral induction under short days, adaxialize leaves and carpels, disrupt the p

51 Short days also impaired long-term spatial learning and

52 s later flowering than the wild allele under short day and exhibits a signature of selection.

53 ate3a (Hd3a) via Hd1-dependent mechanisms in short days and by targeting Hd1-independent factors in l

54 opsis causes early flowering in noninductive short days and creates plants that exhibit a more day-ne

55 PPD1 overexpression accelerates flowering in short days and is necessary for rapid flowering in respo

56 ng phenotypes, such as early flowering under short days and long days, increased abundance of SUMO co

57 supplies, we combined cold temperatures with short days and metabolic challenge.

58 ilencing causes continuous flowering in both short days and noninductive long days, similar to mutant

59 wered earlier than controls in both long and short days and were 25% taller at maturity.

60 the gi-2 loss-of-function mutant under both short-day and long-day conditions.

61 g has been extensively studied in the annual short-day and long-day plants rice (Oryza sativa) and Ar

62 ramatically reduced generation time for many short-day and long-day species by optimizing light and t

63 opsis plants was induced by a combination of short-day and long-day treatments.

64 wild strawberry, Fragaria vesca (Rosaceae), short-day and perpetual flowering long-day accessions oc

65 sion of CO, FT, and SOC1 under both long and short days, and however, the co-2 mutation attenuated th

66 aves, moves down into stolons in response to short days, and induces tuber formation.

67 ed at elevated levels at high temperature in short days, and might contribute to the inhibition of ea

68 educed body temperature were observed in the short day animals.

69 In short days, Arabidopsis plants flower several weeks late

70 opus) would reduce brain size in response to short days as well as regress their reproductive systems

71 om each animal and compared between long and short days, between castrated, intact, and castrated wit

72 ctions increased aggression within 15 min in short days but not in long days, suggesting that estroge

73 A showed a diurnal rhythm in plants grown in short-day but not in plants grown in long-day.

74 the hormone gibberellin abolish flowering in short days, but have on their own only a minor effect in

75 -G) as a consequence of delayed flowering in short days; cantil formation is observed in long days wh

76 female Ae. albopictus that were reared under short day conditions.

77 milar to that for FT under both long day and short day conditions.

78 Under short-day conditions (LD 10:14 at 22 degrees C), most in

79 tants flowered early under both long-day and short-day conditions (with much more drastic effects und

80 These proteins accumulate particularly in short-day conditions and interact to form a complex.

81 ow delayed flowering under both long-day and short-day conditions and still respond to vernalization

82 en plants were grown for several weeks under short-day conditions before transfer to long-day conditi

83 rmancy, is induced under low-temperature and short-day conditions by the downregulation of juvenile h

84 levels of their mRNAs were also enhanced by short-day conditions in selective organs.

85 levels of their mRNAs were also enhanced by short-day conditions in specific organs.

86 psis cls seedlings are slow developing under short-day conditions in vitro and die if they are transf

87 conditions, and were less viable under very short-day conditions than their wild-type counterparts.

88 Transfer of spinach from short-day conditions to LD conditions caused an increase

89 itions (with much more drastic effects under short-day conditions), suggesting that FRS6 and FRS8 reg

90 ll four genes were expressed in leaves under short-day conditions, and at least NtFT3 expression was

91 In rice, flowering is accelerated in short-day conditions, and even a brief exposure to light

92 ranscriptional repressors that accumulate in short-day conditions, as regulators of Arabidopsis gluco

93 When grown under short-day conditions, eaf1 plants were slightly pale gre

94 Under short-day conditions, however, hap3b did not show a dela

95 When type-Ia(1) cells were removed under short-day conditions, however, the incidence of nondiapa

96 Under short-day conditions, late-flowering plant lines ld-1 (l

97 s and for maintenance of cell homeostasis in short-day conditions.

98 ants are late flowering under both long- and short-day conditions.

99 on without up-regulating CO expression under short-day conditions.

100 -flowering phenotype under both long-day and short-day conditions.

101 the time of maximal growth in A. thaliana in short-day conditions.

102 early and accumulated more FT messages under short-day conditions.

103 eases were only observed under low-light and short-day conditions.

104 d to have an early flowering phenotype under short-day conditions.

105 ulation of the BEL5 RNA in stolon tips under short-day conditions.

106 m of the enzyme, exhibited reduced growth in short-day conditions.

107 t participates in hypocotyl elongation under short-day conditions.

108 HvFT1 and delayed flowering under long- and short-day conditions.

109 to promote flowering across a graft union in short-day conditions.

110 s necessary to initiate ARR competence under short-day conditions.

111 6 displays early flowering in both long- and short-day conditions.

112 n observed in stolons under tuber-inductive (short-day) conditions, indicative of a photoperiodic con

113 g at the apical meristem under noninductive (short-day) conditions.

114 ens balsamina requires continuous inductive (short-day) conditions.

115 ression is repressed by light and induced in short days, consistent with its role in floral repressio

116 toes propagate vegetatively via tubers under short days, constant throughout the year.

117 In short days, CrDOF enhances CrCO expression, a homolog of

118 oplankton) resource availability, along with short (day/days: stomach content)-, medium (month: liver

119 Short days decreased apical (stratum lacunosum-molecular

120 Short days decreased brain mass and hippocampal volume c

121 ], pointing to the presence of an additional short-day-dependent FT2 repression pathway in poplar.

122 Reproductive inhibition in short days depends on T4 only late in the nonbreeding se

123 in 1) in these two species when reared under short-day, diapause-inducing conditions.

124 oteins by PMSR2 at the end of the night in a short-day diurnal cycle alleviates this potential burden

125 motif, SHORT LIFE (SHL) and EARLY BOLTING IN SHORT DAYS (EBS), function in the chromatin-mediated rep

126 s a PAF1-like complex and EARLY FLOWERING IN SHORT DAYS (EFS), a putative histone H3 methyltransferas

127 this methyl transferase, EARLY FLOWERING IN SHORT DAYS (EFS), result in reduced levels of histone H3

128 mone gibberellin, which hastens flowering in short days, enhances the gradual change in LEAFY express

129 ing) under long-day conditions, but not in a short-day environment.

130 rons and decreased in SST+ neurons following short-day exposure at 3 months while the total number of

131 In short-day F. vesca, long photoperiods activate FvTFL1 mR

132 ns that is contingent on plants experiencing short days first.

133 rice have been uncovered, how the long- and short-day flowering pathways are integrated, and the mec

134 ich the EC is able to control both long- and short-day flowering pathways.

135 In short days, flowering was delayed and the reduction in t

136 Mice housed in either long or short days for 10 weeks were examined for performance in

137 male white-crowned sparrows and kept them on short days for 12 weeks.

138 on regulators SERRATE and EARLY FLOWERING IN SHORT DAYS from this region affect seed germination, ind

139 n of flowering time mediated by PRR37 in the short-day grass sorghum and identifies important alleles

140 In leaves of short-day grown plants, AtLEA5 transcripts exhibited a d

141 RING LOCUS T) caused precocious flowering in short-day-grown Col-0 but this was not associated with A

142 ompared with those of wild-type plants under short-day growth conditions (SD) and long-day growth con

143 types of starvation-induced chlorosis during short-day growth conditions and extended darkness, indic

144 -deficient, leaf development phenotype under short-day growth conditions.

145 In addition, mice exposed to short days had higher VO(2) values when given water with

146 Males isolated on short days had smaller HVc, RA, and area X volumes than

147 Short day hamsters were also characterized by increased

148 ificant decline in evoked release of GnRH in short day housed animals when comparing photoperiod resp

149 In contrast to short days, impairment of gibberellin biosynthesis cause

150 , stems, and vascular tissues and induced by short days in leaves and stolons.

151 The DE response was recovered under short days in the absence of the floral repressor SHORT

152 horts in the field, and two loci specific to short days in the chamber were expressed only in fall-ge

153 , stems, and vascular tissues and induced by short-days in leaves and stolons.

154 Postweaning exposure to short days increased depressive- and anxiety-like behavi

155 f elf5 mutations to cause early flowering in short days, indicates that ELF5 also affects flowering i

156 rn similar to phyB-9 over both long days and short days, indicating a modulatory role of HRB1 in the

157 ts under long days but only 19 d later under short days, indicating a strong interaction between PHYC

158 e upstream sequence of StSP6A suppressed the short day-induced activity of its promoter in both young

159 tory groups) had larger song nuclei than did short-day intact or castrated photosensitive birds and d

160 est that variation in testicular response to short days is most likely due to differences in the rele

161 at the times sampled, but were lower in the short-day isolates.

162 ng the long-day fat state as compared to the short-day lean state.

163 with the time of year when responsiveness to short-day length is re-established.

164 For example, at low temperature and short day-length, Drosophila melanogaster enters a state

165 Additionally, short day lengths enhanced the withdrawal of parasympath

166 wn to be higher in multiple brain regions in short day lengths in meadow voles, but we found no conco

167 To test the hypothesis that short day lengths increase parasympathetic and sympathet

168 Short day lengths increased both parasympathetic tone, a

169 The short day lengths of late summer program the mosquito Cu

170 orm non-reproductive social groups in winter/short day lengths that are selective in nature.

171 uitoes programmed for diapause (reared under short day lengths) fat storage was dramatically reduced

172 o seasonally cold days (low temperatures and short day lengths).

173 line and reactivity following acclimation to short day lengths.

174 d by transfer from static long day to static short day lengths.

175 sociated with reproductive refractoriness to short day lengths.

176 are altered when the mutants are grown under short-day light conditions.

177 ) spike was different during long-day versus short-day light/dark cycles.

178 Within the PT, there is also a continued short day-like profile of ICER expression, suggesting th

179 g time under four different growing regimes (short days, long days, unvernalised and vernalised).

180 Because short days may decrease hippocampal volume and impair sp

181 The accessions were grown in short days, moderate light, and high nitrate, and analyz

182 lins (GAs) by photoperiod was studied in the short-day monocot sorghum (Sorghum bicolor [L.] Moench).

183 ic expression of FT induced flowering in the short-day N. tabacum Maryland Mammoth tobacco under long

184 How ancient organisms adapted to the short day/night cycles during that time remains unclear.

185 ered earlier than the wild type under either short-day or long-day conditions, and showed a reduction

186 Depending on day length, either M cells (short days) or E cells (long days) dictate both the morn

187 h (MM) gene into cv Hicks was used to confer short-day photo-periodic sensitivity.

188 scus maniculatus) were maintained on long or short day photoperiod and either left intact, castrated,

189 ght or fluctuating light intensity, and in a short day photoperiod compared to wildtype.

190 oduction is also induced in ap2-1 flowers by short-day photoperiod and is suppressed by hy1, a mutati

191 er withdrawal of testosterone and a shift to short-day photoperiod and that the activation of caspase

192 Low intensity light and short-day photoperiod conditions also significantly indu

193 istone 3 acetylation were observed following short-day photoperiod exposure in both TH+ and SST+ neur

194 of a microRNA (miR159) in the regulation of short-day photoperiod flowering time and of anther devel

195 el of StBEL5 mRNA increased in response to a short-day photoperiod in both leaves and stolons.

196 le Gambel's white-crowned sparrows to either short-day photoperiod or long-day photoperiod and system

197 dopaminergic neurons through exposure to the short-day photoperiod rescued the behavioral consequence

198 BEL5 RNA to stolon tips was facilitated by a short-day photoperiod, and this movement was correlated

199 af morphology was altered when grown under a short-day photoperiod, at 22 degrees C, and a long-day p

200 leaf veins and petioles and is induced by a short-day photoperiod, regulated by the untranslated reg

201 es exhibited increased miR172 levels under a short-day photoperiod, supporting miR172 regulation via

202 opulation of 95 ecotypes indicate that under short-day photoperiod, the AS and B haplogroups are both

203 uced by exposure of fifth-instar larvae to a short-day photoperiod.

204 y action in SCN neurons of mice exposed to a short-day photoperiod.

205 and its movement to stolons is induced by a short-day photoperiod.

206 f3 mutations confer the resetting pattern of short-day photoperiodism, indicating that gating of phot

207 crowned sparrows and rapidly shifted them to short-day photoperiods after being held under breeding c

208 LEAFY transcript levels, delay flowering in short-day photoperiods, and perturb anther development.

209 phyC mutants flowered early when grown in short-day photoperiods, indicating that phyC plays a rol

210 tion of St BEL5 RNA increases in response to short-day photoperiods, inductive for tuber formation.

211 For example, in short-day photoperiods, the Arabidopsis floral transitio

212 in heading time under both long-day (LD) and short-day photoperiods, with stronger effects under LD.

213 s prior to T withdrawal and shifting them to short-day photoperiods.

214 vates floral initiation in both long-day and short-day photoperiods.

215 tility and early flowering in both long- and short-day photoperiods.

216 plants flowered earlier on both long-day and short-day photoperiods.

217 s in later flowering under both long-day and short-day photoperiods.

218 of a nuclear factor gene, CmNF-YB8, from the short day plant chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium)

219 long-day plant Nicotiana silvestris and the short-day plant Maryland Mammoth tobacco, the quantitati

220 y plant Nicotiana alata and the quantitative short-day plant Nicotiana otophora line 38-G-81, where i

221 The short-day plant Pharbitis nil is a model plant for the s

222 erized a novel light-regulated cDNA from the short-day plant Pharbitis nil that encodes a protein wit

223 nd increasing knowledge is available for the short-day plant rice (Oryza sativa).

224 (Fragaria vesca [Fv] SOC1) in the perennial short-day plant woodland strawberry (Fragaria vesca).

225 Cannabis sativa is a short-day plant, and its flowering is highly controlled

226 thm that is not reset at lights-off, whereas short-day plants measure night length on the basis of ci

227 esting that estrogens increase aggression in short days primarily via nongenomic pathways.

228 ed with excess GAs, such as early bolting in short days, resistance to the GA biosynthesis inhibitor

229 ent with a role for insulin signaling in the short-day response that ultimately leads to a cessation

230 ity, however these effects are attenuated in short day (SD) animals that display hypophagia and reduc

231 n ndufs4 than in ndufs8.1 ndufs8.2 under the short day (SD) condition, both mutants displayed a simil

232 ted that clavata2 (clv2) mutants grown under short day (SD) conditions showed suppression of the flow

233 onse of onion plants under long day (LD) and short day (SD) conditions.

234 xposed to long day lengths (i.e., summer) or short day (SD) lengths (i.e., winter) at baseline and du

235 Transfer of spinach plants from short day (SD) to LD conditions caused an increase in th

236 The short day (SD) treatment leads to apical growth cessatio

237 interrupting the LD treatment by 6 weeks of short day (SD), and that this replacement is associated

238 Long day (LD, 15 h) and short day (SD, 13 h) buds were floral competent by 21 da

239 Mice were acclimated to short-day (SD) 'winter' and long-day (LD) 'summer' photo

240 lar, the bspA 2.8 kb promoter conferred both short-day (SD) and nitrogen (N) inducibility to GUS and

241 d that the spa1-3 mutant flowers early under short-day (SD) but not long-day (LD) conditions.

242 tants are late flowering, particularly under short-day (SD) condition, while XAL2 overexpressing plan

243 Application of GAs to plants in short-day (SD) conditions resulted in rapid stem elongat

244 Arabidopsis still flowers under short-day (SD) conditions, albeit much later than in LD

245 chome on earlier leaves than plants grown in short-day (SD) conditions.

246 vated testosterone (T) levels, compared with short-day (SD) conditions.

247 T2 is a nonphotoperiodic florigen permitting short-day (SD) flowering and FveTFL1 is the long-hypothe

248 Under short-day (SD) photocycles, hypocotyl elongation is maxi

249 otato (Solanum tuberosum ssp andigena) under short-day (SD) photoperiodic conditions.

250 as lesioned, and the sparrows were housed on short-day (SD) photoperiods in the absence of T treatmen

251 n the inner bark of plants exposed to either short-day (SD) photoperiods or elevated levels of nitrog

252 , a cucurbit species responsive to inductive short-day (SD) photoperiods, and Zucchini yellow mosaic

253 uction of fewer leaves, than plants grown in short-day (SD) photoperiods.

254 thaliana flowering early under noninductive short-day (SD) photoperiods.

255 Sorghum is a typical short-day (SD) plant and its use in grain or biomass pro

256 nthemum (Chrysanthemum indicum), an obligate short-day (SD) plant, floral evocation is not limited to

257 Mutations in ID1 impact the ability of the short-day (SD) vernalization, cold vernalization, and lo

258 tion in both day-neutral temperate maize and short-day (SD)-requiring tropical maize.

259 to a previously given single floral-inducing short-day (SD).

260 At ZT8, CBF transcript levels in short-day (SD; 8-h photoperiod) plants were three- to fi

261 tion (long day [LD] females are territorial, short day [SD] females live socially), provide a model f

262 ht interruption, NI) and non-photoinductive (short day, SD) conditions.

263 nscription and early spike development under short days (SDs).

264 is maintained even if plants are returned to short days (SDs).

265 der short photoperiods (8 h light:16 h dark, short day sensitive).

266 n high transcript levels under both long and short days, showed a significant down-regulation of COR1

267 programmed for diapause by a photoperiodic (short-day) signal were assayed as they traversed the dia

268 In the short-day species strawberry, a crop vegetatively propag

269 The short-day-specific diurnal rhythm of cry2 is determined

270 ants with high HvFT1 expression levels under short days suggested that HvCEN interacts with HvFT1 to

271 ression is increased in long days but not in short days, suggesting that estrogens decrease aggressio

272 operiods activate FvTFL1 mRNA expression and short days suppress it, promoting flower induction.

273 thaliana) leaves synthesize starch faster in short days than in long days, but the mechanism that adj

274 o significantly higher in plants grown under short days than under long days.

275 scription factor called NFL (NO FLOWERING IN SHORT DAY) that is essential to induce flowering specifi

276 In short days, the evening-phase expression of SbPRR37 does

277 In both long and short days, the quantitative trait locus of largest effe

278 During short days, the rhythm is lost and DEA1 expression becom

279 If growth at night is low, as in short days, there is a delay before growth recovers duri

280 (2) Photosensitive birds were moved from short days to long days (20L:4D) and photostimulated for

281 continuous short days) were transferred from short days to long days.

282 ol plants when plants are transferred from a short-day to a long-day photoperiod, suggesting that TPP

283 igns may precede large seismic events in the short (day-to-months) term.

284 functions of phytochromes in the qualitative short-day tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum cv Maryland Mammoth

285 both day-neutral and photo-period-sensitive (short-day) tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum cv. Hicks).

286 catrienoic acid (18:3n-3) in turnip rape and short day treatment decreased the total oil content in b

287 d not show gonadal regression in response to short day treatment.

288 Low temperature and short day treatments increased the level of 9,12,15-octa

289 Sorghum is a short-day tropical species that exhibits substantial pho

290 vrn1-1 affected the short-day vernalization response of Landsberg erecta and

291 erellin-deficient ga1-3 mutants to flower in short days was paralleled by the absence of LEAFY promot

292 stem growth in one transgenic line grown in short days was reduced by 20%.

293 owering of severe GA-deficient mutants under short days, we propose that PHYB modulates flowering tim

294 ral maintenance in the absence of continuous short days) were transferred from short days to long day

295 productive phase is initiated by exposure to short days when expression of HEADING DATE 3a (Hd3a) and

296 ation and cellular respiration under LDs and short days, whereas HvCEN affected floral homeotic genes

297 represses flower initiation under inductive short days, whereas its silencing causes continuous flow

298 s, floret primordia initiated under long and short days, whereas successful inflorescence development

299 erly elongated hypocotyls specifically under short days while constitutive expression of PCH1 shorten

300 es even when they were reared under long and short days with light:dark cycles.