ライフサイエンスコーパス: skin prick test

1 o standard diagnostic methods (ImmunoCAP and skin prick test).

2 nd ELISA inhibition, basophil activation and skin prick test.

3 t basophils and elicit positive responses in skin prick tests.

4 he patient's allergic triggers or performing skin prick tests.

5 en Asthma Study completed questionnaires and skin prick tests.

6 Atopy was assessed by using skin prick tests.

7 s: all had negative results for aeroallergen skin prick tests.

8 Atopy was assessed using skin prick tests.

9 gg allergy was primarily determined by using skin prick tests.

10 n observed pasteurized raw egg challenge and skin prick tests.

11 85; P = 0.02), and with similar findings for skin prick tests.

12 and 6 years by specific IgE assessments and skin prick tests.

13 inical examinations including serum IgEs and skin prick tests.

14 saline challenge tests, questionnaires, and skin prick tests.

15 ystematic reintroduction analysis but not by skin-prick tests.

16 ldren were examined for eczema and underwent skin prick testing.

17 en patients assigned to immediate or delayed skin prick testing.

18 pic status were determined by spirometry and skin prick testing.

19 ted for more detailed assessments, including skin prick testing.

20 ng a rat basophil leukaemia cell line and by skin prick testing.

21 ed with IL-31 and NaCl (negative control) by skin prick testing.

22 s underwent a clinical examination including skin prick testing.

23 of rhinitis but without positive results on skin prick testing.

24 ent report, clinical examination, and repeat skin prick testing.

25 ly to attend research clinics and consent to skin-prick testing.

26 pecific IgE was 10.1% (95% CI: 9.4-10.8) and skin prick test 2.7% (95% CI: 2.4-3.0), food challenge p

27 Of the 1430 children with a valid skin prick test, 228 (16%) were positive (more boys (20%

28 with parental face-to-face interviews and/or skin prick testing, 238 (10.4%) were eligible for a DBPC

29 iagnostic testing, 47.3% was assessed with a skin prick test, 39.9% with a serum specific IgE test, a

30 gE/4 allergens: OR = 1.81, 95% CI 0.80-4.24; skin prick test/4+ allergens: OR = 2.27, 95% CI 1.34-3.9

31 was determined using serum-specific IgE and skin prick testing against a panel of five fungi.

32 nates, and allergic disease was evaluated by skin prick test and clinical examination at 12 months of

33 tolerant to food challenge, 159 negative on skin prick test and food challenge).

34 le NSAID in history were tested first with a skin prick test and if negative challenged with the culp

35 ergen sources, and latex was tested by using skin prick test and ImmunoCAP.

36 without systemic IgE-sensitisation tested by skin prick test and serum allergen-specific IgE (sIgE) d

37 Skin prick test and sIgE display moderate agreement, but

38 nical-demographic questionnaire, spirometry, skin prick test and specific IgE were evaluated yearly.

39 tratified for eczema status and test method (skin prick test and specific IgE).

40 to diagnose food allergy, when compared with skin prick test and specific IgE.

41 Atopy was detected by skin prick test and/or serum specific-IgE in patients wi

42 pplied for selected cases where the history, skin prick test and/or specific IgE are not definitive f

43 intervention (structured allergy history and skin prick testing and appropriate advice on allergy avo

44 gy intervention (structured allergy history, skin prick testing and appropriate allergy avoidance adv

45 Morphine skin prick testing and basophil activation were diminish

46 s defined as one or more positive results on skin prick testing and clinically relevant symptoms of r

47 olerant (ST), or food allergic (FA) based on skin prick testing and food challenge at 12 months of ag

48 stic correlates included end point titration skin prick testing and measurement of CM-specific IgE an

49 vited for a standardized physician exam with skin prick testing and parental interview at age 2 years

50 IgE sensitization tests, such as skin prick testing and serum-specific IgE, have been use

51 and aeroallergens was determined by means of skin prick testing and specific IgE measurement.

52 re, taking a structured allergy history with skin prick testing and tailored advice on allergy avoida

53 tic sensitivity to 65% compared with 20% for skin prick tests and 46% ImmunoCAP using kiwi extract.

54 nonallergic subjects (group 4) by performing skin prick tests and APTs with rBet v 1 and hypoallergen

55 Skin prick tests and basophil activation test using cetu

56 Skin prick tests and basophil activation tests with N, P

57 re, taking a structured allergy history with skin prick tests and giving tailored advice on allergy a

58 6 months, 18 months, 4 years, and 6 years by skin prick tests and IgE measurements.

59 Associations with allergic diseases, skin prick tests and lung function assessed at 12 and 18

60 ed with questionnaire, clinical examination, skin prick tests and measurements of specific IgE.

61 Clinic evaluation, which consisted of skin prick tests and OFC where eligible, was undertaken

62 ge 2 years, infants had FS/FA screening with skin prick tests and oral food challenges.

63 At 6.5 years, paediatricians performed skin prick tests and parents reported asthma and AD symp

64 icipants underwent a standardized interview, skin prick tests and pulmonary function tests.

65 reened 5276 infants (74% participation) with skin prick tests and sensitized infants underwent food c

66 Skin prick tests and sIgE were performed in 529 children

67 ust mites was diagnosed longitudinally using skin prick tests and specific IgE measurements at (1/2),

68 icult, because of the limited sensitivity of skin prick tests and specific IgE tests to meat extracts

69 were 58% (95% CI 49-67) and 49% (40-58%) for skin prick tests and specific-IgE.

70 ergenicity of Ory c 3 was confirmed by using skin prick tests and the basophil activation assay.

71 formed consent; evidencing of an allergen by skin prick tests and/or serum-specific IgE dosages; bein

72 A larger wheal on the skin-prick test and a lower ratio of peanut-specific IgG

73 e markers measured, small wheal diameters on skin-prick testing and increases in egg-specific IgG4 an

74 We performed skin-prick tests and basophil degranulation tests using

75 thma, atopy (grass, house dust mite, and cat skin prick test) and atopic vs. non-atopic asthma at the

76 ondary outcomes were desensitization, peanut skin prick test, and specific IgE and specific IgG4 meas

77 In addition to clinical history, skin prick test, and specific IgE determination, BAT can

78 nical-demographic questionnaire, spirometry, skin prick test, and specific IgE to aeroallergens were

79 Specific IgE values, skin prick test, and T-cell subsets of STAT3-HIES patien

80 minth Opishorchis felineus and specific IgE, skin prick testing, and atopic symptoms in Western Siber

81 e an interviewer-administered questionnaire, skin prick testing, and measurement of lung function fro

82 similar in children positive and negative on skin prick testing, and were not appreciably altered by

83 Questionnaires, skin prick tests, and basophil activation assays were pe

84 ecific immunoglobulin E-antibodies in serum, skin prick tests, and double-blind, placebo-controlled f

85 ecific inhalation challenge to argan powder, skin prick tests, and immunoblotting analysis.

86 te use of testing (specific IgE measurement, skin prick tests, and oral food challenges), and the tim

87 food-allergic sensitization were measured by skin prick tests, and physician-diagnosed inhalant and f

88 Patients underwent skin prick tests, and received 0.1ml of influenza vaccin

89 who had undergone objective OFCs, concurrent skin prick tests, and specific IgE tests.

90 d by IgE (aOR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.57, 0.91) and skin prick test (aOR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.50, 0.86).

91 e positive ELISA results correlated with the skin prick test areas with the whole body and the setae

92 Children completed skin prick testing at age 1 year.

93 ldren (5-17 years old) with asthma underwent skin prick tests at baseline and had clinical data colle

94 In two patients who showed positive skin prick test but negative for challenge test, titer o

95 sensitization (FAS) was identified by using skin prick tests conducted between 1 and 18 years of age

96 Identical ISAAC questionnaire and skin prick test data were collected and compared at 10 y

97 or more completed a questionnaire and had a skin prick test for atopy.

98 A skin prick test for poly-gamma-glutamic acid (PGA) which

99 Our skin prick test for several kinds of edible jellyfish su

100 Participants underwent skin prick testing for house dust mite, cat, grasses and

101 Skin prick testing for peanut sensitization was performe

102 Food-specific serum IgE and skin prick tests for egg, soy, peanut, and cross-reactan

103 rkers outperformed allergen-specific IgE and skin prick tests for predicting OFC outcomes.

104 gogastroduodenoscopies (EGDs), biopsies, and skin-prick tests for food and aeroallergens.

105 lected at age 12 months: food sensitization (skin prick test >/= 2 mm) and allergy (oral food challen

106 white specific IgE (sIgE) levels in serum or skin prick test has been shown to be a poor predictor of

107 is, using the standard methodology (history, skin prick test, IgE assay).

108 Morphine skin prick testing, ImmunoCAP assays for allergen-specif

109 uch as family history (50.2%) and conducting skin prick testing in non-high-risk children (43.9%).

110 hensive set of recommendations on the use of skin prick tests in allergic rhinitis-conjunctivitis and

111 to determine whether C+ assayed by means of skin prick tests influenced AR symptom severity in contr

112 IgE sensitization was assessed by skin prick test (inhalant allergens) and specific IgE le

113 -of-function samples, we performed histamine skin prick tests, investigated the contribution of STAT3

114 Skin prick testing is available in only half of the case

115 in and/or gastrointestinal symptoms only and skin prick test < 8 mm) are considered for home-based mi

116 Skin prick testing, lung function tests, exhaled nitric

117 post-bronchodilator spirometry (n = 1,389), skin prick testing, lung volumes, and diffusing capacity

118 Skin prick tests, measurements of specific IgE to peanut

119 Skin prick test (n = 51) and ImmunoCAP (Thermo Fisher) (

120 Inclusion criteria included a positive skin prick test of 6 mm or more (wheal diameter, above t

121 ract, which was determined with the use of a skin-prick test--one consisting of participants with no

122 including detection of milk-specific IgE (by skin prick test or serum assay), diagnostic elimination

123 ly relevant sensitizations are elucidated by skin prick testing or by the determination of specific I

124 nly 4 predictors of the original model: sex, skin prick test, peanut sIgE, and total IgE minus sIgE.

125 shed, using 6 predictors: sex, age, history, skin prick test, peanut specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE)

126 aluation, milk-specific IgE levels, and milk skin prick test performed at enrollment, 6 months, 12 mo

127 Two hundred eighty-one children had valid skin prick tests performed, and 14% (39/281) were atopic

128 Primary outcomes were recent wheezing, skin prick test positivity (SPT), and allergen-specific

129 wanted to measure geographical variation in skin prick test positivity and assess whether it was exp

130 Geographical variation in the prevalence of skin prick test positivity in Europe is unlikely to be e

131 re fitted for allergic sensitization (either skin prick test positivity or serum-specific IgE >/= 0.3

132 Skin prick test positivity to any one of the measured al

133 for food allergy by standardized interviews, skin prick tests, prick-to-prick tests and ImmunoCAP.

134 n of pricking in the apple on prick-to-prick skin prick test (PTP) results.

135 The main outcome was atopy defined as skin prick test reaction >/=3 mm.

136 Associations of NVAS and atopy (defined as skin prick test reaction of >/=3 mm) were analysed using

137 Skin prick test reactions to pollen elicited larger weal

138 ion between a chronic helminth infection and skin prick test reactivity even in a developed country.

139 e reactions to peanut were reported in 1.5%, skin prick test reactivity in 2.0%, and IgE sensitizatio

140 py was measured by specific IgE in serum and skin prick test reactivity to aeroallergens.

141 studies demonstrated that exercise increases skin prick test reactivity to and bioavailability of the

142 Total IgE, grass pollen-specific IgE, and skin prick test reactivity to grass pollen were all redu

143 o 2.45 +/- 0.24 (P = .001) and a decrease in skin prick test reactivity to house dust mite from 7.0 +

144 All pollen-specific IgE and >90% of skin prick tests remained positive 7 days and 3 months a

145 children with eczema, wheeze, or a positive skin prick test response before ending exclusive breast-

146 SAFS (n = 38) was defined as specific IgE or skin prick test response positivity to Aspergillus fumig

147 with greater airway hyperresponsiveness and skin prick test response positivity.

148 ible mold at age 1 year and child's positive skin prick test response to aeroallergens and molds at a

149 ID-independent anaphylaxis to LTPs, positive skin prick test response to LTPs, and serum LTP IgE.

150 Peanut skin prick test responses and peanut- and Ara h 2-specif

151 PPOIT was associated with reduced peanut skin prick test responses and peanut-specific IgE levels

152 Skin prick test responses and specific IgE levels agains

153 in Childhood2000 birth cohort by using both skin prick test responses and specific IgE levels.

154 At year 1, skin prick test responses and wheat- and omega-5 gliadin

155 tifiable by using routinely available peanut skin prick test responses or specific IgE levels, but th

156 risk of atopic wheeze, total IgE levels, and skin prick test responses to cockroach.

157 serum total IgE levels, specific IgE levels, skin prick test responses to common aeroallergens, and I

158 ves with allergic disease) but with negative skin prick test responses to common allergens at randomi

159 Positive skin prick test responses to outdoor allergens at baseli

160 th a history of ragweed allergy and positive skin prick test responses to ragweed were randomized and

161 Histamine skin prick test responses were diminished in patients wi

162 exposure and sensitization (as determined by skin prick test responses) was analyzed in more than 100

163 ith peanut- and Ara h 2-specific IgE levels, skin prick test responses, basophil activation, and TH2

164 eanut but have peanut-specific IgE, positive skin prick test responses, or both represents a signific

165 to peanut (>/=0.35 kU/L) had negative peanut skin prick test responses.

166 Atopy was defined as a positive skin prick test result (>=3 mm) and/or a positive specif

167 random sample of participants with negative skin prick test results attended a hospital-based food c

168 asing their judgment on clinical history and skin prick test results before and after obtaining the I

169 Overall, clinical allergy and skin prick test results complied with the specific IgE r

170 th antivenoms and cetuximab induced positive skin prick test results in patients with sIgE to alpha-g

171 Based on available clinical data and skin prick test results, 922 (73%) patients would have b

172 Skin prick test, s-IgE and CRD to hazelnut, peanut, PR10

173 higher IgG4 values (P = .001) and lower egg skin prick test scores (P = .0002) over time and a lower

174 In contrast to positive skin prick tests, SE-IgE was more common in smokers (<15

175 among M+ participants tracked the following skin prick test sensitization statuses: M+P+C- > M+P+C+

176 dence of "atopic eczema," "any positive SPT [skin-prick test]," "sensitization to egg," and "sensitiz

177 atients were classified by clinical history, skin prick test/serum specific IgE (sIgE), and nasal all

178 A skin-prick test showed positive reactions for Inavir inh

179 Skin prick test, sIgE measurements, and assessment of al

180 Skin prick test, specific IgE determinations, DBPCFC and

181 Clinical data, skin prick tests, specific IgE to aero- and food allerge

182 co-factor enhanced food allergy, assessed by skin-prick tests, specific IgE and oral challenges.

183 al interview combined with blood collection, skin prick tests, spirometry with bronchodilation, and e

184 We sought to develop skin prick test (SPT) and allergen-specific IgE (sIgE) t

185 Food-specific serum IgE, skin prick test (SPT) and atopy patch test (APT) to food

186 wheeze in last year, atopy assessed both by skin prick test (SPT) and by the measurement of allergen

187 ine release test (HR) (RefLab ApS, Denmark), skin prick test (SPT) and intradermal test (IDT).

188 Skin prick test (SPT) and measurement of serum-specific

189 g the basophil activation test (BAT) and the skin prick test (SPT) and measuring the levels of peanut

190 in had the highest AUC (0.79), comparable to skin prick test (SPT) and sIgE to soy extract (0.76 and

191 Skin prick test (SPT) and specific IgE (sIgE) are often

192 sought to determine the association between skin prick test (SPT) and specific IgE (sIgE) to egg pro

193 ized nonallergic (n = 25) children underwent skin prick test (SPT) and specific IgE (sIgE) to peanut

194 or urticaria upon CHX exposure and positive skin prick test (SPT) and/or positive CHX ImmunoCAP test

195 ercise, were all negative.The results of the skin prick test (SPT) for Citrus unshiu and specific IgE

196 lergic sensitization was determined based on skin prick test (SPT) of five mites, three molds, and ni

197 dence of nut specifc IgE shown by a positive skin prick test (SPT) or specific IgE (sIgE) test.

198 ng cows' milk-specific IgE antibodies (IgE), skin prick test (SPT) reactivity and double-blind, place

199 pecific IgE against aeroallergens (sIgE) and skin prick test (SPT) reactivity for the most common loc

200 Atopy was measured based on skin prick test (SPT) reactivity to 9 allergens at 36 mo

201 Skin prick test (SPT) reactivity to grass, cypress, oliv

202 Infants with a skin prick test (SPT) response to egg white (EW) of less

203 action to egg, milk, or both with a positive skin prick test (SPT) response to the trigger food and/o

204 lergy, milk allergy, or both with a positive skin prick test (SPT) response to the trigger food and/o

205 nd 4 years of age and develop thresholds for skin prick test (SPT) results and specific IgE (sIgE) le

206 ping peanut allergy, and the implications of skin prick test (SPT) screening before peanut introducti

207 Skin prick test (SPT) sensitivity to house dust mite all

208 protein levels in household dust and peanut skin prick test (SPT) sensitization and likely allergy.

209 nfantile atopic dermatitis and preceding egg skin prick test (SPT) sensitization, we found a strong a

210 six dog allergens (Can f 1-6) in commercial skin prick test (SPT) solutions and to determine individ

211 Allergic sensitization was determined by skin prick test (SPT) to 17 aeroallergens.

212 of 5276 one-year-old children who underwent skin prick test (SPT) to 4 food allergens and those with

213 A total of 433 patients with positive skin prick test (SPT) to birch pollen were analyzed rega

214 Atopy was assessed by skin prick test (SPT) using inhalant and food allergens.

215 eczema, egg allergy, or both but 0-mm peanut skin prick test (SPT) wheal responses (n = 542); group I

216 opic dermatitis (AD) and a positive egg/milk skin prick test (SPT), but no known PNA.

217 fe (EQ-5D) health questionnaire, spirometry, skin prick test (SPT), exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), smel

218 Patients with CMA and/or RA underwent skin prick test (SPT), intracutaneous test (ICT), and, w

219 y to aeroallergens with and without positive skin prick test (SPT), respectively.

220 and responsiveness of mast cells in vivo by skin prick test (SPT).

221 R) Rapid results were compared with those of skin prick test (SPT).

222 , they underwent physical examinations and a skin prick test (SPT).

223 Children were skin prick tested (SPT).

224 tern blot and IgE-ELISA were complemented by Skin Prick Testing (SPT) and mediator release assay to d

225 Commercial allergen extracts for allergy skin prick testing (SPT) are widely used for diagnosing

226 Skin prick testing (SPT) in combination with the clinica

227 Skin prick testing (SPT) is an important step in the dia

228 Skin prick testing (SPT) is fundamental to the practice

229 orm beta lactam testing with 17% undertaking skin prick testing (SPT) only, 77% SPT followed by intra

230 Skin prick testing (SPT) was conducted using standard pr

231 ng hay fever, eczema, food allergy, positive skin prick testing (SPT), or elevated allergen-specific

232 evaluated in a basophil activation assay and Skin Prick Testing (SPT).

233 and allergen-specific IgE (sIgE) and perform skin prick testing (SPT).

234 to seeds of oilseed rape and turnip rape in skin prick tests (SPT) and open food challenges.

235 Skin prick tests (SPT) and specific IgE (sIgE) against f

236 Conjunctival provocation tests (CPT), skin prick tests (SPT), BAT, and sIgE determination incl

237 Skin prick tests (SPT), specific-IgE (sIgE), component-r

238 l visits including structured interviews and skin prick tests (SPT).

239 y against common allergens was determined by skin prick tests (SPT); specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE)

240 CFC; <=500 mg of peanut protein), a positive skin-prick test (SPT) result (>=5 mm wheal diameter abov

241 ed risk factors for atopy (allergen-specific skin prick test [SPT] reactivity and IgE [asIgE] sensiti

242 measures of allergic sensitisation (such as skin-prick test [SPT] and serum specific IgE [sIgE]) whe

243 All subjects with skin prick tests (SPTs) for birch pollen conducted durin

244 ich they answered a questionnaire, underwent skin prick tests (SPTs) for common aeroallergens, and pr

245 ants completed a questionnaire and underwent skin prick tests (SPTs) to egg, peanut, cow's milk, fish

246 were invited to a parental questionnaire and skin prick tests (SPTs) to ten airborne allergens, and 2

247 ous reactions was obtained, and standardized skin prick tests (SPTs) using finely ground tree-nut sol

248 erial 10-fold dilutions of milk protein, and skin prick tests (SPTs) were performed to commercial mil

249 Skin prick tests (SPTs) were performed to gain attention

250 logical work-up included a detailed history, skin prick tests (SPTs) with IVIP, and basophil activati

251 e following outcomes at age 2 years: eczema, skin prick tests (SPTs), increased allergen-specific IgE

252 7 with mollusc tolerance) were studied using skin prick tests (SPTs), specific IgEs (sIgEs) and SDS-P

253 on who initially had negative results on the skin-prick test, the prevalence of peanut allergy at 60

254 e in peanut-specific basophil activation and skin prick test titration compared with nonresponders.

255 iral culture for varicella-zoster virus, and skin prick test to common food and animal allergens were

256 icipants aged 18 to 65 years with a positive skin prick test to Dactylis glomerata pollen were expose

257 r anaphylaxis related to NSAID, (3) positive skin prick test to foods and/or specific IgE to food all

258 easonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) and positive skin prick test to grass and olive pollens and evaluate

259 ty reaction after peanut ingestion, positive skin prick test to peanuts, and positive by double-blind

260 ample of 5276 one-year-old infants underwent skin prick testing to peanut, egg, sesame, and cow's mil

261 d cohort study of 5276 infants who underwent skin prick tests to 4 allergens, including egg.

262 ohort were also more likely to have positive skin prick tests to cabbage, lettuce and mustard and sen

263 by questionnaire, clinical examination, and skin prick tests to common allergens.

264 Subjects with positive skin prick tests to GOS (n = 30, 6.2%) underwent basophi

265 d via structured questionnaire and underwent skin prick tests to GOS.

266 ciation between 10 loci and specific IgE and skin prick tests to individual allergens and poly-sensit

267 Because of the low sensitivity of skin prick tests to meat, we studied the possibility to

268 clinically confirmed fish allergy underwent skin prick tests to salmon and catfish.

269 Twelve-month-old infants were skin prick-tested to common food allergens, and sensitiz

270 ths for scorings of symptoms and medication, skin prick testing, total IgE, specific IgE, and Der p 1

271 Moreover, a skin prick test using the crude extract was positive for

272 Furthermore, a skin prick test using the same reagent showed a positive

273 Skin prick tests using wheat extract were performed on 3

274 Skin prick test was a better predictor for hazelnut alle

275 Provided consent, a skin prick test was performed, and history of allergic s

276 The skin prick test was positive for raw pork and beef.

277 A skin prick test was used to ascertain atopy.

278 In addition, skin prick testing was performed to six study foods (cow

279 Atopy was defined as any skin prick test weal to common aeroallergens >/=4 mm.

280 easurements of eczema, asthma, rhinitis, and skin prick tests were available for all follow-ups.

281 Skin prick tests were carried out at ages 4, 10, and 18

282 In both cases, skin prick tests were negative for suspected seafoods.

283 Food-specific serum IgE measurements and skin prick tests were performed before initiating the di

284 n, IgE inhibition, ImmunoCAP inhibition, and skin prick tests were performed using samples from selec

285 Skin prick tests were performed with commercial pollen e

286 Skin prick tests were performed with pollen extracts.

287 Lung function, airway reversibility and skin prick tests were performed.

288 His skin prick tests were positive, with a result of 2+to fr

289 Skin prick tests were used to identify sensitization to

290 E 33.3 kUA /l (7.2-120.2), and median peanut skin prick test wheal 11.3 mm (6.5-18)]; four experience

291 od challenges (OFCs) to egg, irrespective of skin prick test wheal sizes.

292 The negative predictive value of skin prick test with peanut extract and peanut butter an

293 grass pollen allergic individuals underwent skin prick testing with allergen alone, allergen plus Be

294 subjected to topical cowhage provocation and skin prick testing with histamine and assessed for diffe

295 dditional healthy controls were subjected to skin prick testing with histamine.

296 meat, we studied the possibility to perform skin prick tests with cetuximab, which carries the alpha

297 Blinded, quadruplicate skin prick tests with concentrate and three serial half-

298 Skin prick tests with purified rAed a 3 and Ae. aegypti

299 llenges with standardized doses of rMal d 1, skin prick tests with recombinant allergens, and measure

300 with respiratory or cutaneous symptoms were skin-prick tested with GB extract.