ライフサイエンスコーパス: skinfold

1 percentile, waist:hip circumference, sum of skinfolds).

2 the sum of two skinfolds, and the sum of six skinfolds.

3 the total phenotypic variation in extremity skinfolds.

4 nd adiposity was estimated from thickness of skinfolds.

5 e, birth weight, percent fat mass and sum of skinfolds) and newborn metabolic traits (cord glucose an

6 ex, midarm muscle circumference, and triceps skinfolds), and functional status (handgrip strength and

7 serum albumin; and weight, body mass index, skinfold, and arm muscle area were significantly and inv

8 Mid-upper-arm circumference, triceps skinfold, and immune function all increased significantl

9 -age z-score, waist-to-height ratio, triceps skinfold, and midupper arm circumference.

10 rcumference, ratio of subscapular to triceps skinfolds, and DXA-derived trunk FMI.

11 Percent body fat, sum of two skinfolds, and sum of six skinfolds shared similar growt

12 fat, abdominal circumference, the sum of two skinfolds, and the sum of six skinfolds.

13 adding BMI, waist-to-height ratio and total skinfolds (anthropometry trio) as continuous variables t

14 tured 149 lesions and 175 unaffected control skinfold areas from 65 adult HS patients.

15 rted skin microbiota shifts in unaffected HS skinfolds as well.

16 g HMEC-1 cells and also in vivo using dorsal skinfold assays.

17 icknesses of the subjects were measured with skinfold calipers and the buttocks circumference with a

18 Because skinfolds can more accurately estimate body fatness than

19 he panniculus carnosus (PC) muscle of dorsal skinfold chamber (DSC) preparations in mice.

20 mmary tumor (MCaIV) grown in a murine dorsal skinfold chamber and in normal tissue controls.

21 The dorsal skinfold chamber animal model indicated that both side b

22 cinoma (LS174T) were implanted in the dorsal skinfold chamber in C3H and severe combined immunodefici

23 Moreover, with the use of a dorsal skinfold chamber model and multiphoton fluorescence reso

24 oscopy of C6 glioma xenografts in the dorsal skinfold chamber model revealed that SU6668 treatment su

25 The dorsal skinfold chamber model was used to study the subcutaneou

26 by intravital microscopy applying the dorsal skinfold chamber model.

27 ging of cutaneous inflammation in the dorsal skinfold chamber revealed unaffected leukocyte rolling o

28 16F10 melanomas growing in the murine dorsal skinfold chamber showed that the number of functional, d

29 We used a dorsal skinfold chamber to measure microvascular stasis (vaso-o

30 the cranial window and day 10 in the dorsal skinfold chamber, respectively.

31 n of generalized Shwartzman reaction, dorsal skinfold chamber-equipped mice were challenged twice wit

32 mary adenocarcinomas implanted in the dorsal skinfold chamber.

33 her in the cranial window than in the dorsal skinfold chamber.

34 ient mice: the cranial window and the dorsal skinfold chamber.

35 0 and 1000 microns, were implanted in dorsal skinfold chambers inserted on Beige nude/xid mice.

36 wis lung carcinoma (LLC) implanted in dorsal skinfold chambers of nude mice.

37 gen measurements in mice with chronic dorsal skinfold chambers or cranial windows.

38 the NLRP3 inhibitor CY-09 into mouse dorsal skinfold chambers resulted in an improved revascularizat

39 embryonic stem cells) grown in murine dorsal skinfold chambers.

40 fold thicknesses [model 1: height (in m) and skinfold-corrected upperarm, thigh, and calf girths (CAG

41 dy fatness than can BMI, it is possible that skinfolds could be useful in monitoring secular trends i

42 ist-to-height ratio, skinfold thickness, and skinfold-derived percentage fat mass (P < 0.05) but not

43 , waist-to-height ratio, skinfold thickness, skinfold-derived percentage fat mass, BIA-derived percen

44 tion of percentage body fat (%BF) by using a skinfold equation or densitometry to categorize subjects

45 Agreement between the skinfold equations and UWW, based on deviations from mea

46 quadratic, three linear, and two logarithmic skinfold equations was compared with body fat estimated

47 e purpose of this study was to compare seven skinfold equations with underwater weighing (UWW) for es

48 ndex (BMI z), sum of subscapular and triceps skinfolds, fat mass index (FMI), and body fat percentage

49 The mean triceps skinfold, for example, increased by 2 mm through 2003-20

50 NF1) is characterized by cafe-au-lait spots, skinfold freckling, and cutaneous neurofibromas.

51 tational age], high infant adiposity [sum of skinfolds >90th percentile for gestational age], and cae

52 in men and correlated only with subscapular skinfolds in women.

53 ous traits, as follows: D7S514 and extremity skinfolds (LOD = 3.1), human carboxypeptidase A1 (HCPA1)

54 kg/m(2); FMI 4.7 (+/-3.5) kg/m(2) and sum of skinfold measurements 4.9 (+/-2.7) cm.

55 Weight, girth, and skinfold measurements were taken at the time of the inte

56 he percentage of body fat was measured using skinfold measurements, and the Medical Outcomes Short Fo

57 bertal stages in all 3 races by both DXA and skinfold measurements.

58 ; height adjusted fat mass (FMI), and sum of skinfold measurements.

59 average method) could be used in lieu of the skinfold method for categorizing subjects who are not ob

60 ly estimated by fusing the densitometric and skinfold methods, respectively.

61 These rare taxa of normal skinfold microbiota were associated with lesions indepen

62 d with measures of newborn adiposity (sum of skinfolds model 3 Z-score 7.356, P = 1.90x10(-)(1)(3), a

63 ight ratio (OR = 1.74 [1.39-2.17]) and total skinfolds (OR = 2.02 [1.60-2.55]) showed the strongest a

64 iation with either body mass index or sum of skinfolds (p < 0.001 for both models) but not with the o

65 BMI (P = 3.6 x 10(-5)), 0.039 SD, in sum of skinfolds (P = 1.7 x 10(-7)), and 0.022 SD in waist circ

66 th, age, sex of infant, height, BMI, triceps skinfold, parity, post-birth resumption of menstrual per

67 sis of BMI cutoffs do not follow closely the skinfold percentile reference channels across age, espec

68 The age- and sex-standardized skinfold percentiles and z scores will be appropriate fo

69 In conclusion, the skinfold prediction equations evaluated in this study we

70 hydration status; expedient methods such as skinfold predictions will be more resistant to such effe

71 0), waist circumference (r = 0.203), triceps skinfold (r = 0.197), fat tissue index (r = 0.150), seru

72 34 x sex) + (0.32 x weight) + (0.38 x biceps skinfold) (R2 = 0.84, P < 0.001, SEE = 4.85).

73 p ratio, although the subscapular-to-triceps skinfold ratio was slightly but significantly (P < 0.001

74 body mass index, and subscapular-to-triceps skinfold ratio).

75 significantly with the subscapular/ triceps skinfold ration in women only.

76 Nevertheless, there are no current skinfold reference data for US children and adolescents.

77 dy fat, sum of two skinfolds, and sum of six skinfolds shared similar growth patterns, with strong di

78 early CF, 0.34 SDS (0.11, 0.57)] and sum of skinfolds [short BF, 1.83 mm (0.05, 3.61); early CF, 2.7

79 Adiposity outcomes were child BMI and sum of skinfolds (SSF), and candidate eating behavior moderator

80 mparable overestimation in girls with a high skinfold sum was 6 percentage points.

81 skin, characterized by recurrent or chronic skinfold suppurative lesions with a high impact on quali

82 age of body fat was determined by the sum of skinfolds technique.

83 s index (weight (kg)/height (m)2) and sum of skinfolds (tests for linear trend: p < 0.001).

84 her BMI (% difference 21%, 95%CI 18 to 24%), skinfold thickness (% difference 34%, 95%CI 26 to 42%),

85 with white Europeans, UK Indians had higher skinfold thickness (% difference 6.0%, 95%CI 1.5 to 10.7

86 -0.25 mm; 95% CI: -0.44, -0.06), subscapular skinfold thickness (-0.20 mm; 95% CI: -0.33, -0.06), and

87 0.04, 1.25) and a reduction in mean triceps skinfold thickness (-0.25 mm; 95% CI: -0.44, -0.06), sub

88 unrelated to BMIz (95% CI, -0.21 to 0.26) or skinfold thickness (95% CI, -0.42 to 1.45) for 89 GG gen

89 al [CI], -0.73 to -0.17]; P = .002), triceps skinfold thickness (intervention vs control change: 14.5

90 difference: 0.06 +/- 9.6%), but not between skinfold thickness (mean difference: 6.33 +/- 12.3%) or

91 weight had greater energy intake (P = 0.02), skinfold thickness (P = 0.0001), and leptin concentratio

92 t (P = 0.0001), weight (P = 0.0001), triceps skinfold thickness (P = 0.001), and arm muscle circumfer

93 ary outcome was infant fat mass estimated by skinfold thickness (SFT) measurements at 4 body sites at

94 mography (ADP) and formulas based on triceps skinfold thickness (TSF) and bioelectrical impedance ana

95 ee mass, midupper arm circumference, triceps skinfold thickness [which allowed for the derivation of

96 dependent variables and increased adiposity (skinfold thickness above the 85th percentile) were explo

97 tion was estimated by using a combination of skinfold thickness and bioelectrical impedance measureme

98 Fat distribution was determined by skinfold thickness and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry

99 and triceps (beta, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.03-0.15) skinfold thickness and higher odds of living with overwe

100 % per z-score unit; 95%CI: -2.06,0.16%), and skinfold thickness and LTL (-0.10% per z-score unit; 95%

101 elated with changes in mass per unit length, skinfold thickness and serum albumin concentration, but

102 ght-for-length, body fat, fat-free mass, and skinfold thickness at 12 mo.

103 Moreover, maternal height, weight, and skinfold thickness at 6 and 9 mo of pregnancy were posit

104 Maternal skinfold thickness at 9 mo of pregnancy and maternal hei

105 rtain degree of independence between BMI and skinfold thickness at the upper extremes of the BMI dist

106 : 0.40 (weight at week 37, kg)+ 0.16 (biceps skinfold thickness at week 37, mm) + 0.15 (thigh skinfol

107 fold thickness at week 37, mm) + 0.15 (thigh skinfold thickness at week 37, mm)-0.09 (wrist circumfer

108 taff measured children's weight, height, and skinfold thickness before and up to 1 year after lockdow

109 d the highest predictive value of any single skinfold thickness compared with DXA fat.

110 tage of energy from protein and fat, triceps skinfold thickness during pregnancy, and infant birth we

111 Biceps skinfold thickness had the highest predictive value of a

112 Furthermore, midlife triceps skinfold thickness has been found to be positively assoc

113 ere both positively associated with midthigh skinfold thickness in children.

114 of low SES but exhibited the lowest BMIz and skinfold thickness in contexts of high SES.

115 uch that they exhibited the highest BMIz and skinfold thickness in contexts of low SES but exhibited

116 waist circumference, weight, and subscapular skinfold thickness in men; in women, these associations

117 anthropometric indices when estimating waist skinfold thickness measures.

118 -energy X-ray absorptiometry, the Pennington skinfold thickness model, and the Pennington density mod

119 in BMI of 0.14 kg/m2 (SE 0.03) and in sum of skinfold thickness of 0.62 mm (0.17) for black girls, an

120 8 (95% CI, -0.47 to -0.09) and a decrease in skinfold thickness of 0.95 (95% CI, -1.77 to -0.12) mm,

121 was followed up until young adulthood, when skinfold thickness was measured.

122 Triceps skinfold thickness was not related to early infant feedi

123 Maternal triceps skinfold thickness was significantly inversely related t

124 tely active girls, changes in BMI and sum of skinfold thickness were about midway between those for a

125 BMI and sum of skinfold thickness were assessed annually, whereas habit

126 f 5106 students, height, weight, and triceps skinfold thickness were measured at 9 (baseline) and 11

127 mference, waist : hip ratio, and subscapular skinfold thickness were measured or calculated by a stan

128 , the REE before transplantation and triceps skinfold thickness were positively associated and the cu

129 nt, retroperitoneal fat mass and subscapular skinfold thickness were significantly higher in pwWD off

130 ed cross-sectional MUAC and triceps (triceps skinfold thickness) data from 32,952 US children aged 1-

131 rence, biceps/triceps/subscapular/suprailiac skinfold thickness) were conducted in both cohorts; bioe

132 t or fat (ie, has either a high BMI or large skinfold thickness).

133 irect measurements of fat mass (bioimpedance/skinfold thickness).

134 1.70) higher sum of subscapular and triceps skinfold thickness, and 0.17 kg/m(2) (95% CI: -0.02, 0.3

135 Height, weight, bone age, pubertal status, skinfold thickness, and arm circumference were assessed.

136 easurements included weight, height, triceps skinfold thickness, and arm muscle circumference.

137 ion: dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), skinfold thickness, and bioimpedance analysis (BIA).

138 body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, skinfold thickness, and body fat mass in 1,301 children

139 Data on weight, height, age, skinfold thickness, and body impedance were used in publ

140 res for child height, body mass index, total skinfold thickness, and head circumference (beta = 0.24

141 t circumference (WC), waist-to-height ratio, skinfold thickness, and percentage total fat (bioimpedan

142 atio (WHR), waist circumference, subscapular skinfold thickness, and ratio of triceps to subscapular

143 st/hip circumference, waist-to-height ratio, skinfold thickness, and skinfold-derived percentage fat

144 istance was strongly related to BMI, triceps skinfold thickness, and waist circumference, and this re

145 x, mid-arm muscle circumference, and triceps skinfold thickness, as well as serum levels of inflammat

146 Percentage body fat was estimated from skinfold thickness, bioelectrical impedance analysis (BI

147 rth through childhood), waist circumference, skinfold thickness, blood pressure, and serum lipid, lep

148 with other clinical indexes such as triceps skinfold thickness, body mass index, body weight, and su

149 In forward-regression analysis, subscapular skinfold thickness, body weight, triceps skinfold thickn

150 Subscapular skinfold thickness, but not triceps skinfold thickness,

151 prospective assessment of body composition (skinfold thickness, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry), c

152 Values derived from use of BIA and skinfold thickness, estimated by using the Jackson-Pollo

153 ignificantly lower than fat mass measured by skinfold thickness, even though fat mass measurements by

154 al level, high body mass index, high triceps skinfold thickness, increasing level of disability, wint

155 change in weight, kg)+ 0.07 (change in thigh skinfold thickness, mm)-6.13 (r2 = 0.73).

156 lar skinfold thickness, body weight, triceps skinfold thickness, sex, and height2/resistance estimate

157 waist circumference, waist-to-height ratio, skinfold thickness, skinfold-derived percentage fat mass

158 s as an indicator of immunostimulation; (ii) skinfold thickness, to estimate subcutaneous fat stores

159 to assess body composition: measurements of skinfold thickness, total body water by deuterium oxide,

160 nfancy (4-6 months, n = 104), and adiposity, skinfold thickness, triglycerides, and insulin in childr

161 score, BMI percentile, body fat percentage, skinfold thickness, waist circumference, or prevalence o

162 ht), midupper arm circumference, and triceps skinfold thickness, was compared among feeding groups.

163 scapular skinfold thickness, but not triceps skinfold thickness, was positively associated with colon

164 ickness, and ratio of triceps to subscapular skinfold thickness, we recruited 48 normotensive African

165 Triceps skinfold thickness, when substituted for the sum of skin

166 e explained up to 52.2% of variance in waist skinfold thickness, while a combined regression model us

167 the change in relative weight and in triceps skinfold thickness-two indicators of obesity.

168 at the same level of waist circumference or skinfold thickness.

169 sed: BMI, fat mass, waist circumference, and skinfold thickness.

170 Similar results were apparent for sum of skinfold thickness.

171 ity status with changes in BMI and in sum of skinfold thickness.

172 oups on the basis of measurements of triceps skinfold thickness.

173 ody mass index, body weight, and subscapular skinfold thickness.

174 d body mass index z score (BMIz) and triceps skinfold thickness.

175 ns of dual-emission x-ray absorptiometry and skinfold thickness.

176 however, had increased truncal-to-peripheral skinfolds thickness ratios.

177 elation of circumference (waist and hip) and skinfold-thickness (subscapular and triceps) measurement

178 (DXA), bioelectrical impedance analysis, and skinfold-thickness analysis.

179 Fatness determined by using skinfold-thickness and bioelectrical impedance analysis

180 All skinfold-thickness and circumference measures, waist-hip

181 independent methods (bioimpedance, multiple skinfold-thickness assessment of whole-body composition,

182 New equations that are based on skinfold-thickness combinations from African children pr

183 nderestimated by approximately 10% when this skinfold-thickness equation is used.

184 ntage fat mass (%FM) predicted by using each skinfold-thickness equation was compared with the criter

185 One circumference equation and one skinfold-thickness equation yielded the smallest residua

186 on of percentage body fat with the Slaughter skinfold-thickness equations (PBF(Slaughter)) is widely

187 etermine the agreement between 8 widely used skinfold-thickness equations and a 4-compartment criteri

188 Although skinfold-thickness equations are widely used to estimate

189 s to determine the accuracy of the Slaughter skinfold-thickness equations.

190 mately 19% of the subjects were missing >/=1 skinfold-thickness measurement.

191 ty was greatest for DXA, followed by BIA and skinfold-thickness measurement.

192 23.98) to be higher than those derived from skinfold-thickness measurements (mean: 21.05) and BIA (m

193 on in children, we evaluated the accuracy of skinfold-thickness measurements (with the Slaughter et a

194 F was observed for fat-free mass assessed by skinfold-thickness measurements and total body water (P

195 , respectively) and for fat mass assessed by skinfold-thickness measurements and total-body electrica

196 comparison with national reference data and skinfold-thickness measurements were converted to z scor

197 uations, which are based on triceps and calf skinfold-thickness measurements), bioelectrical resistan

198 Skinfold-thickness measurements, circumferences, body co

199 e of the training and errors associated with skinfold-thickness measurements, the advantages of BMI s

200 The skinfold-thickness measurements, waist-to-height ratio,

201 tors for those subjects with greater triceps skinfold-thickness measurements.

202 ing to body fat stores determined by triceps-skinfold-thickness measurements.

203 tly recommended for predicting body fat from skinfold-thickness measures in prepubescent children of

204 he LMS method was used to derive 10 smoothed skinfold-thickness percentile reference curves and to ge

205 on and age, weight, body mass index, triceps-skinfold-thickness percentile, midupper arm circumferenc

206 hanges in body mass index (BMI; in kg/m(2)), skinfold-thickness ratio (subscapular-to-triceps), waist

207 /y) greater change in subscapular-to-triceps skinfold-thickness ratio and a 0.8 cm/y (95% CI: 0.1, 1.

208 del R2 and SEE were not as strong as for the skinfold-thickness technique.

209 Several widely used skinfold-thickness- or circumference-based equations wer

210 s between 28 metabolites and neonatal sum of skinfold thicknesses (13 amino acid-related, 4 non-ester

211 d marginally predicted changes in the sum of skinfold thicknesses (at 6 mo: 14.7 +/- 7.5 mm/unit log

212 Maternal sum of skinfold thicknesses (beta = 0.80 [95% CI, 0.30-1.30] pe

213 ighter (-0.6 SD [-0.9, -0.3]) and have lower skinfold thicknesses (e.g. -14% [-24%, -3%] suprailiac),

214 ilution (n = 81), densitometry (n = 62), and skinfold thicknesses (n = 85).

215 ropean offspring birth weight, fat mass, and skinfold thicknesses (P < 0.05).

216 up, and we observed significant increases in skinfold thicknesses (P </= 0.022 for all).

217 ether the sum of the triceps and subscapular skinfold thicknesses (SF sum) is more strongly related t

218 from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), skinfold thicknesses (SFTs), bioelectrical impedance ana

219 asured by the sum of subscapular and triceps skinfold thicknesses (SS + TR) and risk of obesity (body

220 sessed by the sum of subscapular and triceps skinfold thicknesses (SSF) from birth to 3 years, aggreg

221 In the 65 boys with a sum of skinfold thicknesses (subscapular- plus triceps-skinfold

222 t circumference, body mass index, and sum of skinfold thicknesses (triceps, subscapular, and supraili

223 mula included mainly limb circumferences and skinfold thicknesses [model 1: height (in m) and skinfol

224 on between SGA birth and adiposity outcomes (skinfold thicknesses and bioelectrical impedance measure

225 ar disease (CVD) risk factors are related to skinfold thicknesses and body mass index (BMI) among chi

226 indicators of body fatness were the sum of 5 skinfold thicknesses and body mass index (BMI; in kg/m(2

227 and other clinical measurements (individual skinfold thicknesses and body mass index) for the assess

228 y composition was determined with the use of skinfold thicknesses and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometr

229 5), indicating that BIA and FFM derived from skinfold thicknesses are better correlated with each oth

230 Weight, length, and 4 skinfold thicknesses as an indicator of adiposity were m

231 The sum of the triceps plus subscapular skinfold thicknesses averaged 28.6+/-7.0 mm in boys and

232 reference curves for triceps and subscapular skinfold thicknesses by using the same national samples

233 Skinfold thicknesses cannot be used to assess changes in

234 ur results indicate that it is unlikely that skinfold thicknesses could be used to monitor trends in

235 All body circumferences and skinfold thicknesses examined were significantly greater

236 Median skinfold thicknesses for children considered overweight

237 Skinfold thicknesses have long been considered important

238 e-height velocity and weight gain, increased skinfold thicknesses in late pregnancy (28 wk) and early

239 s in levels of BMI, waist circumference, and skinfold thicknesses in men in the United States from 19

240 iac, subscapular, thigh, calf, and abdominal skinfold thicknesses of the subjects were measured with

241 r, those studies all used body mass index or skinfold thicknesses to measure obesity and did not alwa

242 The best combination of skinfold thicknesses to predict body fat in African prep

243 ce imaging [MRI], and truncal and peripheral skinfold thicknesses using calipers).

244 The sum of skinfold thicknesses was greater in females than in male

245 the trunk region, abdominal and subscapular skinfold thicknesses were 30-40% greater in the Hispanic

246 Maternal weight, height, and triceps skinfold thicknesses were determined at 6 and 9 mo of pr

247 At birth, neonatal triceps and subscapular skinfold thicknesses were measured by trained research p

248 for-age in detecting overweight when average skinfold thicknesses were used as the standard, but no d

249 nfold thicknesses (subscapular- plus triceps-skinfold thicknesses) >/= 50 mm, PBF(Slaughter) overesti

250 ht, height, waist/hip circumferences, 4-site skinfold thicknesses) and HbA1c z-scores with dysglycemi

251 ometric measures included body mass index, 4 skinfold thicknesses, and 4 body circumferences.

252 easurements of BMI, body circumferences, and skinfold thicknesses, and a random subgroup of 5,568 had

253 r arm circumference, subscapular and triceps skinfold thicknesses, and change in height-for-age, weig

254 FFM was based on skinfold thicknesses, and estimated with the regression

255 gestational weight gain, and maternal sum-of-skinfold thicknesses, and increased physical activity.

256 to height ratio, and subscapular and triceps skinfold thicknesses, and obesity, which was defined usi

257 anthropometric variables (weight, height, 4 skinfold thicknesses, and waist girth), dual-energy X-ra

258 The best formulas use skinfold thicknesses, bioelectrical impedance, and a 4-c

259 All formulas for estimating body fat from skinfold thicknesses, body density, or impedance perform

260 o, abdominal height, triceps and subscapular skinfold thicknesses, body mass index, and conicity inde

261 dilution (H(2)18O), bioelectrical impedance, skinfold thicknesses, corporal diameters, and circumfere

262 -childhood and early adolescent BMI z score, skinfold thicknesses, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (

263 Skinfold thicknesses, girths, body fat by hydrodensitome

264 ater weighing (densitometry), measurement of skinfold thicknesses, isotope dilution (H(2)(18)O), and

265 d thickness, when substituted for the sum of skinfold thicknesses, performed nearly as well in women

266 Ethnicity, sum of central skinfold thicknesses, ratio of polyunsaturated to satura

267 Waist and thigh girths, rather than skinfold thicknesses, should be considered for use in lo

268 entrations were associated with the sum of 4 skinfold thicknesses, waist and hip circumferences, ethn

269 dy mass index, percentage body fat, sum of 6 skinfold thicknesses, waist circumference, and total, su

270 t circumference, and triceps and subscapular skinfold thicknesses.

271 relation with body mass index and the sum of skinfold thicknesses.

272 is of the average of triceps and subscapular skinfold thicknesses.

273 the sum of central to the sum of peripheral skinfold thicknesses.

274 on was assessed by bioimpedance analysis and skinfold thicknesses.

275 ed levels of PBF(DXA) in children with large skinfold thicknesses.

276 the body fatness of children who have thick skinfold thicknesses.

277 ngle examiner measured weights, heights, and skinfold thicknesses.

278 triceps site but similar median subscapular skinfold thicknesses.

279 and -0.02 mm (-0.79 to 0.75) for subscapular skinfold thicknesses; and -0.02 standard deviations (-0.

280 hether there were similar secular trends for skinfolds (triceps and subscapular), BMI, and waist circ

281 emity strength, and significant decreases in skinfolds, triglyceride, and very-low-density lipoprotei

282 aded by BMI, waist-to-hip ratio, subscapular skinfold, triglycerides, HDL, homeostasis model assessme

283 n vasculature was confirmed using the dorsal skinfold vascular window model.

284 Triceps skinfold was lower only in hepatocellular patients (cont

285 9-2010 was 1 higher, but mean levels of both skinfolds were 5-10% lower.

286 nd waist circumference (7-8%), but trends in skinfolds were markedly different.

287 ring warm regions (eg, flexural surfaces and skinfolds) were identified in 4 patients.

288 asation in four tumor types using the dorsal skinfold window chamber model.

289 Using the dorsal skinfold window chamber system, we have demonstrated for

290 Hamsters implemented with a skinfold window chamber were given an intravenous inject

291 CID mice bearing HCT116 xenografts in dorsal skinfold window chambers (DSWC) were imaged by direct po

292 tal microscopy of tumors grown within dorsal skinfold window chambers.

293 Multipoint analysis of abdominal skinfold with an LOD of 2.68 showed signals in the same

294 ody fat, fat-free mass z scores, and triceps skinfold z scores decreased with therapy.

295 an the control group of reducing the triceps skinfold z-score by at least 0.1 (hazard ratio: 1.40, 95