コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ratio = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.33, 1.5 for regular snoring).
2 sons say that they "don't know" whether they snore.
3 eport behavioral problems among children who snore.
4 refreshing sleep; and 33% reported that they snored.
5 e back were directly associated with regular snoring.
6 ren with mild OSA from children with primary snoring.
7 , long sleep duration (>=9 hours/night), and snoring.
8 greater odds of mild OSA rather than primary snoring.
9 sleep traits and obesity and are largest for snoring.
10 , sleep disturbance, daytime sleepiness, and snoring.
11 eatment options were found to reduce primary snoring.
12 al congestion is a risk factor for apnea and snoring.
13 the basis of either sleep apnea or habitual snoring.
14 ren had obstructive apnea and 21 had primary snoring.
15 ess and standardized questionnaires assessed snoring.
16 nd 23% of the variability in self-reports of snoring.
17 l index or self-reported history of habitual snoring.
18 ng and 1.55 (95% CI: 1.42, 1.70) for regular snoring.
19 rted in 810 children (6.8%), and nonhabitual snoring (1-2 nights per week) was reported in 4058 child
20 Overall, 9.7% of patients endorsed frequent snoring, 12.2% sleep problems, and 34.4% insufficient sl
21 ted global sleep disturbance, 30.6% endorsed snoring, 24.3% sleep <6 hrs/night, and over half screene
23 There was a significant correlation between SNoRE 3.0 questionnaire scores and polysomnography data
24 a moderate positive correlation between the SNoRE 3.0 scores and the CADES scores (rho = 0.625, p <
25 per week; OR = 2.06 (95% CI: 1.01, 4.31) for snoring 3 or more times per week), particularly for term
28 Of 23 dyads randomized to MAD, 21 people who snore (91%) were rated by the sleeping partner as a resp
29 reports distinguished children with primary snoring (AHI <1; 311 patients [67.8%]) from children wit
32 ere 1.29 (95% CI: 1.22, 1.37) for occasional snoring and 1.55 (95% CI: 1.42, 1.70) for regular snorin
33 scriminating between 13 subjects with no EDS/snoring and 21 patients with EDS and snoring were identi
34 hful waiting or adenotonsillectomy for mSDB (snoring and an obstructive apnea-hypopnea index <3) betw
35 lling 459 children aged 3 to 12.9 years with snoring and an obstructive apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) le
36 cant genetic correlation between obesity and snoring and between obesity and excessive daytime sleepi
38 It is unknown whether children with primary snoring and children with mild obstructive sleep apnea (
39 association between parent-reported habitual snoring and cognitive performance was substantially atte
42 covariates, the positive association between snoring and CVD was attenuated but remained statisticall
43 om these data that self-reported symptoms of snoring and daytime sleepiness in older men have a genet
46 etes showed a consistent association between snoring and diabetes within the categories of these vari
48 opulation were similar to those for frequent snoring and included: male sex, higher Body Mass Index,
49 e identified an association between habitual snoring and lower cognitive performance in children.
50 the PATS randomized clinical trial, primary snoring and mild OSA were difficult to distinguish witho
52 ial where children aged 3 to 12.9 years with snoring and mild oSDB (Obstructive Apnea-Hypopnea Index
54 AUP) has been used as a treatment option for snoring and obstructive sleep apnea for almost three dec
56 nce interval (CI): 1.16, 1.27 for occasional snoring and odds ratio = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.33, 1.5 for reg
60 The authors examined the association between snoring and risk of hypertension in a cohort of 73,231 U
62 ty (U3P) has been advocated for treatment of snoring and sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome (SAHS), but of
63 napping, ease of getting up in the morning, snoring and sleep apnoea) among 450,000 participants fro
64 gh for the most part the genetic variance in snoring and sleepiness was nonoverlapping with the genet
65 subjects may disavow knowledge of their own snoring and suggest that future studies consider the "do
67 I motoneurons is common during sleep causing snoring and, in serious cases, airway obstruction that i
68 on of a previously used sleep questionnaire (SNoRE) and determined criterion validity in companion do
69 sed surrogate information to define SDB (eg, snoring) and were based on small clinic populations, or
71 g and maintaining sleep, unrefreshing sleep, snoring, and the presence of physician-diagnosed sleep d
72 time below 90% oxygen saturation; history of snoring; and presence of hypertension, defined as restin
73 eating soil (ARR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.13-1.85), snoring (ARR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.27-1.76), and being landle
75 tems addressed the presence and frequency of snoring behavior, waketime sleepiness or fatigue, and hi
76 lly sweetened beverages), physical activity, snoring, binge eating, and earlier puberty were positive
77 p-disordered breathing (SDB) (i.e., habitual snoring but not frequent obstructive breathing events) r
78 absence of obstructive sleep apnea (primary snoring), but few studies have examined the efficacy of
80 useful clinical adjunct to the evaluation of snoring children, with more accurate identification of t
85 sighs, severe dysphonia, severe dysarthria, snoring, cold hands and feet, pathological laughter and
86 osed on the basis of characteristic history (snoring, daytime sleepiness) and physical examination (i
87 rity for menopausal women with complaints of snoring, daytime sleepiness, or unsatisfactory sleep.
88 sleep apnea or >/= 2 hallmarks of OSA: loud snoring, daytime sleepiness, witnessed apnea, and hypert
89 based on the ABCD dataset, the prevalence of snoring declined over time; snoring in adolescents was a
91 noring index (SI, expressed as the number of snoring events per hour measured on an acoustic analytic
92 in, discomfort to breathe, and cough or loud snoring), excessive daytime sleepiness, and reduced vigo
95 core was also seen across five categories of snoring frequency, from 6.4 (4.2) in current nonsnorers
96 Measurements and Main Results: The habitual snoring group had significantly smaller airway volumes t
97 eener assessing infant bed sharing, frequent snoring (>=3 nights/week), perceived sleep problems, ins
99 roximately 150 million individuals in the US snore in the absence of obstructive sleep apnea (primary
100 he prevalence of snoring declined over time; snoring in adolescents was associated with problem behav
108 cale ranging from 0 to 10) and the objective snoring index (SI, expressed as the number of snoring ev
116 an independent effect of snoring or whether snoring is simply a marker for obstructive sleep apnea.
118 gical mechanism underlying this association, snoring may help clinicians identify individuals at high
120 and abdominal effort, oxygen saturation, and snore), nine features were extracted and weighted to der
123 clampsia (OR = 1.72 (95% CI: 1.09, 2.73) for snoring once or twice per week; OR = 2.06 (95% CI: 1.01,
124 have examined the efficacy of treatments for snoring or evaluated the effect of snoring in sleeping p
125 ether this reflects an independent effect of snoring or whether snoring is simply a marker for obstru
127 m the Pediatric Adenotonsillectomy Trial for Snoring (PATS) study, a multicenter, single-blind, rando
128 m the Pediatric Adenotonsillectomy Trial for Snoring (PATS), a multicenter, randomized, single-blinde
129 f the Pediatric Adenotonsillectomy Trial for Snoring (PATS), a randomized clinical trial where childr
131 e waves in the UA, similar to those found in snoring, produce reflex inhibition of inspiratory motor
134 slightly attenuated the risk (for occasional snoring, RR = 1.41 (95% CI: 1.22, 1.63); for regular sno
135 RR = 1.41 (95% CI: 1.22, 1.63); for regular snoring, RR = 2.03 (95% CI: 1.71, 2.40); p for trend < 0
136 ed, we evaluated the correlation between the SNoRE scores and the Canine Dementia Scale (CADES, which
137 ary outcome measures included the subjective snoring severity (SS, measured on a visual analogue scal
141 ose with anxiety had higher odds of being in Snoring & sleep apnea cluster and Poor sleep quality and
142 d HIV duration were associated with being in Snoring & sleep apnea cluster, while age (OR = 1.027, 95
144 ng and support the large-scale evaluation of snoring sound characters as markers of surveillance and
146 p, CCA-IMT was significantly correlated with snoring sound energies of 0-20 Hz (r = 0.608, p = 0.036)
147 obstruction detected by either DISE or mean snoring sound intensity (301-850 Hz), and AHI could sign
148 ignificantly, inversely correlated with mean snoring sound intensity (301-850 Hz; OR, 0.84, 95% CI 0.
149 ficantly, positively associated with maximal snoring sound intensity (40-300 Hz; odds ratio [OR], 1.2
150 study recruited 36 OSAHS patients for 6-hour snoring sound recordings during in-lab full-night polyso
154 a head-positioning pillow (HPP) could reduce snoring sounds in patients with mild-to-moderate positio
156 dy aimed to investigate associations between snoring sounds, obstruction sites, and surgical response
159 ered breathing (SDB), which includes primary snoring through to obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSA
160 ith no significant change in the relation of snoring to ESS score after adjustment for RDI in multiva
163 ir sleeping partner who underwent 4 weeks of snoring treatment was conducted at an academic medical c
165 ciated with risk of diabetes (for occasional snoring vs. nonsnoring, relative risk (RR) = 1.48 (95% c
166 ence interval (CI): 1.29, 1.70); for regular snoring vs. nonsnoring, RR = 2.25 (95% CI: 1.91, 2.66);
167 omposite score among children who habitually snored was significantly lower compared with children wh
169 , waist circumference, and other covariates, snoring was associated with a significantly higher preva
170 alyses adjusted for age and body mass index, snoring was associated with risk of diabetes (for occasi
172 g partners who reported that their partner's snoring was either very much improved or much improved (
175 ggregation parameter, but parental report of snoring was positively associated with TRAP aggregation
176 uestionnaire (gender, obesity, age, and loud snoring), was developed and subsequently validated, with
178 is best for individual patients with primary snoring, weighing convenience, adverse effects, and cost
179 no EDS/snoring and 21 patients with EDS and snoring were identified by receiver operator curve analy
180 was accompanied by a virtual elimination of snoring, which fell from 16.5 +/- 3.0% of total sleep ti
181 enter Pediatric Adenotonsillectomy Trial for Snoring, which included children aged 3 to 12 years rand
182 ore effective than CAPT for treating primary snoring, while both treatment options were found to redu
184 this cohort study analyzing associations of snoring with cognitive test scores and problem behaviors
186 The largest-magnitude association was of snoring with the CBCL Total Problems scale among adolesc
188 included a convenience sample of people who snore without sleep apnea and their sleeping partner who
189 otonsillectomy in children who have habitual snoring without frequent obstructive breathing events (m
190 vere sleep apnea, and self-reported habitual snoring without PDSA (HS), a surrogate for mild sleep ap