ライフサイエンスコーパス: social adjustment

1 enance treatment for late-life depression on social adjustment.

2 tom distress, interpersonal functioning, and social adjustment.

3 ymptom distress, interpersonal function, and social adjustment.

4 ect sizes increased over time on measures of social adjustment.

5 alcohol abuse, low body mass index, and poor social adjustment.

6 depression, anxiety, global functioning, and social adjustment across 1 year of treatment.

7 reatment failures were characterized by poor social adjustment and a lower body mass index, presumabl

8 mpetence (ie, standardized measures of daily social adjustment and degree of autistic social symptoms

9 increased focus on mouths predicted improved social adjustment and less autistic social impairment, w

10 luding learning difficulties and problems in social adjustment and peer relationships.

11 questionnaires assessing emotional distress, social adjustment, and health behaviors.

12 focused on depression, anxiety, self-esteem, social adjustment, and quality of life.

13 apy reduced depressive symptoms and improved social adjustment, and represents an alternative to phar

14 istress, depression, anger, quality of life, social adjustment, borderline psychopathology, and diagn

15 irically derived trajectories with premorbid social adjustment, diagnosis, and 20-year outcomes were

16 eport assessments of depressive symptoms and social adjustment every 4 weeks.

17 ives than those with late onset, with poorer social adjustment, higher rates of depression, and lower

18 ssion, impulsivity, anxiety, depression, and social adjustment in a multiwave study design.

19 compared symptom outcomes, side effects, and social adjustment in stable schizophrenia outpatients wh

20 Previous analyses of the personal and social adjustment of outpatients with schizophrenia have

21 ocial intervention, continues to improve the social adjustment of patients in the second and third ye

22 ersonal therapy has pervasive effects on the social adjustment of patients with schizophrenia that ar

23 d supportive group therapy for improving the social adjustment of schizophrenic patients living in th

24 ul events, self-regulation of the child, and social adjustment of the child.

25 ul events, self-regulation of the child, and social adjustment of the child.

26 Our results can help promote the social adjustment of young refugees in school and mitiga

27 yle (P=.001), Social Cognition (P=.001), and Social Adjustment (P=.01).

28 ars of treatment on measures of personal and social adjustment; patients who relapsed and restabilize

29 Intelligence is usually normal but social adjustment problems are common.

30 rnalizing, internalizing, substance use, and social adjustment problems.

31 The clinical, functional, social adjustment, quality of life, and satisfaction out

32 ndardized measures of symptoms, functioning, social adjustment, quality of life, and satisfaction wit

33 had positive effects on broad components of social adjustment (role performance) but had few differe

34 ymptom Severity Score (IBS-SSS) and Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS), assessed in the intentio

35 res were correlated at a 0.50 level with the Social Adjustment Scale both pre- and posttreatment, sug

36 index and to a greater degree with both the Social Adjustment Scale global score and the Inventory o

37 r supportive group therapy on two of the six Social Adjustment Scale II cluster totals examined (pers

38 bation were monitored, as were scores on the Social Adjustment Scale II.

39 improvement in CG impairment (0.63 work and Social Adjustment Scale points per week with CGT and 0.3

40 Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey, the Social Adjustment Scale Self-Report, and the Social Adap

41 personal Problems Circumplex Version and the Social Adjustment Scale Self-report.

42 The Social Adjustment Scale was administered every 3 months

43 variance in changes in functioning (Work and Social Adjustment Scale), changes in IBI-D captured 83%

44 Global Assessment of Functioning Scale, the Social Adjustment Scale, the Longitudinal Interval Follo

45 The primary outcome measures were the Social Adjustment Scale-II and the Quality of Life Scale

46 tly better overall social functioning on the Social Adjustment Scale-Self-Report (P =.01), significan

47 Postpartum Adjustment Questionnaire and the Social Adjustment Scale-Self-Report relative to women in

48 om Inventory, Beck Depression Inventory, and Social Adjustment Scale.

49 entory of Complicated Grief and the Work and Social Adjustment Scale.

50 ment, and scored at least 10 on the Work and Social Adjustment Scale.

51 sults of this study largely suggest positive social adjustment several years after diagnosis and trea

52 n greater improvement in certain measures of social adjustment than supportive group therapy.

53 and psychotherapy is more likely to maintain social adjustment than treatment with either alone.

54 py had only one positive effect on patients' social adjustment, the personal adjustment (residual sym

55 anxiety, other mental-disorder symptoms, and social adjustment were measured by self-report at baseli

56 e and interpersonal psychotherapy maintained social adjustment, which declined in those receiving mon

57 recovering from depression would have better social adjustment with medication and interpersonal psyc