ライフサイエンスコーパス: soft tissue mass

1 al reaction (38 patients) extending into the soft-tissue mass.

2 ken for inflammatory or malignant sinusoidal soft tissue masses.

3 o received active E+P therapy lost less lean soft tissue mass (-0.04 kg) than did the women who recei

4 imaging was performed to evaluate 17 one and soft-tissue masses (10 malignant, seven benign) in 14 pa

5 intensity) and secondary (ulcer, cellulitis, soft-tissue mass, abscess, sinus tract, cortical interru

6 MO as a differential diagnosis of a growing soft-tissue mass after trauma to avoid unnecessary overt

7 Appendicular lean soft tissue mass (ALM) was assessed by dual energy x-ray

8 significantly reduced both the loss of lean soft tissue mass and the ratio of trunk to leg fat mass

9 predictive value for osteomyelitis; signs of soft-tissue mass and cortical interruption had the highe

10 l soft-tissue lesions that may manifest as a soft-tissue mass and suggests guidelines for subsequent

11 Soft-tissue masses and bone marrow involvement showed is

12 erosis and erosions, osteophytes, paraspinal soft-tissue mass, and decreased disk height.

13 hy (SWE) improves the accuracy of diagnosing soft-tissue masses as benign or malignant compared with

14 osteal osteosarcoma is a broad-based surface soft-tissue mass causing extrinsic erosion of thickened

15 e "comet sign" (adjacent eccentric, tapering soft-tissue mass corresponding to the noncalcified porti

16 differentiating between benign and malignant soft-tissue masses depicted on US images, with performan

17 A focal soft-tissue mass distinct from the ossific matrix was id

18 a cleavage plane, intramedullary extension, soft-tissue mass (distinct from ossified mass), and the

19 Fat-free soft tissue mass, fat mass, and percentage BF were measu

20 ts who underwent sonographic evaluation of a soft-tissue mass followed by biopsy or resection were re

21 uld be included in differential diagnosis of soft-tissue masses found in diagnostic imaging.

22 rine cultures and cultures of the left chest soft tissue mass grew MRSA.

23 nsus regarding the management of superficial soft-tissue masses imaged with US.

24 metastases throughout the lumbar spine and a soft tissue mass in the lower sacral region.

25 Mammography showed nonspiculated soft-tissue masses in 49 tumors.

26 rowing or erosions), vacuum disk, paraspinal soft-tissue mass, joint disorganization, and osseous joi

27 ray energy absorptiometry (DXA)-derived lean soft tissue mass (LSTM) as well as muscle fiber cross-se

28 In the two cases with intra-abdominal soft tissue masses, no preserved original organs were de

29 ttern C (uptake localizing to lymph nodes or soft-tissue masses on CT).

30 oubtedly capable of diagnosing malignancy in soft tissue masses or lymph nodes before these changes b

31 The soft tissue masses showed distinct margins, various inte

32 zation by whole-body PET imaging in a pelvic soft-tissue mass shown on abdominopelvic CT.

33 Paraaortic soft-tissue mass, stranding, and/or fluid was present in

34 le rib lesion and an associated extrapleural soft-tissue mass, suggesting an aggressive process.

35 (CT) of the chest demonstrated a subcarinal soft tissue mass that was inseparable from the esophagus

36 Radiographs showed a broad-based soft-tissue mass that was attached to the cortex (all pa

37 the syrinx is closed through movement of two soft tissue masses, the medial and lateral labia, into t

38 were in direct continuity with the overlying soft-tissue mass (this was rare, occurring in only one p

39 ases were not evident on the CT scan and the soft tissue mass was out of the coverage area of the CT.

40 Subsequent biopsy of the soft tissue mass was performed and histopathology conclu

41 An associated soft-tissue mass was also seen in 19 of 25 cases (76%) a

42 Appearance simulating osteoblastoma without soft-tissue mass was present (seven cases).

43 n five of 45 cases (11%), probably malignant soft tissue masses were identified.

44 88 years), who were referred for biopsy of a soft-tissue mass were prospectively recruited from Decem

45 s with plaque-like confluent retroperitoneal soft-tissue masses were divided into three groups: group

46 Soft-tissue masses were well defined in 91%-100% of case

47 r necrotic osseous lesion with an associated soft-tissue mass, which allows distinction from aneurysm

48 On imaging, a heterogenous soft tissue mass with internal calcific densities was no

49 The presence of an extensive soft-tissue mass with infiltration of adjacent subcutane

50 ogic findings revealed a malignant-appearing soft-tissue mass with paranasal sinus base destruction.

51 ilatation in nine patients and presence of a soft-tissue mass without dilatation in 10 patients.

52 Bulky peritoneal soft-tissue masses without an apparent organ-based prima