戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 d the enhanced vegetation index (a proxy for soil moisture).
2  of mortality by 40% compared to LSM-modeled soil moisture.
3 ities and positive or nonlinear responses to soil moisture.
4 iomass, with resulting indirect feedbacks on soil moisture.
5 l surface temperature, available soil N, and soil moisture.
6 y the response of photosynthesis to changing soil moisture.
7  N sink, limiting NO emissions under optimal soil moisture.
8 eflecting greater differences in soil pH and soil moisture.
9 lowground biomass, MBC, soil temperature and soil moisture.
10 ronmental signals, including temperature and soil moisture.
11 armer air temperatures, and higher levels of soil moisture.
12 ern Mediterranean, adding to the drawdown of soil moisture.
13 a resulting voltage shift in the presence of soil moisture.
14 linearly with fertilization, temperature and soil moisture.
15 naturally fluctuating evaporative demand and soil moisture.
16 ments with respect to temperature, light and soil moisture.
17 es are increasingly unable to utilize pulsed soil moisture.
18 growth dynamics during drought and return of soil moisture.
19 l decline under changing light intensity and soil moisture.
20 roundwater connections, a primary control on soil moisture.
21 n by 31%, predominantly driven by changes in soil moisture.
22 arming, likely via an associated decrease in soil moisture.
23 s include LAI, downward solar radiation, and soil moisture.
24 ulting in alternative stable states (ASS) of soil moisture.
25  cm) promoted increased ALTs, whereas deeper soil moisture (11-16 cm) acted to modify the impact of t
26  linear increase in the duration of elevated soil moisture (2-22 days) with increasing event size.
27 tterns of water demand reflected in variable soil moisture across space and time.
28 mites and nematodes increased with available soil moisture across the CEMG, within individual ecosyst
29 e report the first potentiometric sensor for soil moisture analysis by bringing in the concept of Gal
30 g aberration conditions often encountered in soil moisture analysis.
31 ly reduced levels of transpiration, conserve soil moisture and are highly drought tolerant but show l
32                     Spatial heterogeneity in soil moisture and conspecific density were the predomina
33 hile, constraining the immediate increase in soil moisture and drying out over the following months,
34 opical drylands is well constrained, whereas soil moisture and ecological droughts, which drive veget
35 pensated by the accelerated drying trends of soil moisture and enhanced ET, leading to an acceleratio
36 grass was maximized under conditions of high soil moisture and evaporative demand, and may be reduced
37 t saturating functions of enzyme activity to soil moisture and extracted half saturation and maximum
38 ntiguous United States using remotely sensed soil moisture and gauge-based precipitation observations
39                              When projecting soil moisture and groundwater, on the other hand, the hy
40 d CO(2) treatment interacted with antecedent soil moisture and had significantly greater effects on f
41 h droughts" accompanied by extreme heat, low soil moisture and high evapotranspiration (ET), occurred
42 apotranspiration, thereby reducing available soil moisture and impairing soil fertility.
43 ollowed by the contributions from decreasing soil moisture and increasing ET.
44 nd N loss in the early decomposition stages, soil moisture and legacy effects of initial differences
45 d magnetite in forest soils due to increased soil moisture and lower pH.
46 nt, DT; drought intolerant, DI), manipulated soil moisture and measured EMF community structure and s
47 that environmental conditions, in particular soil moisture and nitrate, select for distinct denitrifi
48  the soil microbiome responded to changes in soil moisture and nutrient conditions and to determine w
49 usality to estimate the relationship between soil moisture and occurrence of subsequent precipitation
50 n the nonlinear response of carbon fluxes to soil moisture and on land-atmosphere interactions.
51              Stomatal responses to humidity, soil moisture and other factors that influence plant wat
52 res but the degree of response may depend on soil moisture and other local factors.
53 ed the stomatal conductance, which preserved soil moisture and plant fitness under drought.
54 r Mississippi basin that gradually builds up soil moisture and reduces the basin's infiltration capac
55 gest that ground-nesting reptiles can assess soil moisture and respond by adjusting the depth of the
56 s in the amount of precipitation reduced the soil moisture and Rs by -12% and -6%, respectively, but
57         Overall, our synthesis suggests that soil moisture and Rs tend to be more sensitive to increa
58 rmalized to 28% below the ambient level, the soil moisture and Rs values decreased by an average of -
59 lobal models; however, within certain biomes soil moisture and soil carbon emerge as dominant predict
60            This phenomenon rapidly increased soil moisture and stimulated microbial carbon (C) cyclin
61 ; experimental set-up; direct measurement of soil moisture and temperature during the study period; a
62 ransects from the road, we found declines in soil moisture and temperature, thaw depth, shrub height,
63 CH4 and DIC at three depths in the soil, and soil moisture and temperature.
64 ient were most clearly related to changes in soil moisture and temperature.
65 eproduces the scale invariance properties of soil moisture and test the approach against 1-km aircraf
66 strate that strong negative coupling between soil moisture and vapor pressure deficit occurs globally
67 tremes such as cooccurring soil drought (low soil moisture) and atmospheric aridity (high vapor press
68 nts: accumulated degree-days, growing-season soil moisture, and days of snow cover.
69 -year record of tree growth (n = 200 trees), soil moisture, and ecosystem C balance at the Morgan-Mon
70      The impacts of sea-surface temperature, soil moisture, and leaf area index are quantified and fo
71 recruitment based on vapor pressure deficit, soil moisture, and maximum surface temperature.
72 spiration response to event size, antecedent soil moisture, and post-event vapor pressure deficit.
73 fference Vegetation Index (NDVI), antecedent soil moisture, and temperature but these models provided
74 ese data to observations of water potential, soil moisture, and vapor pressure deficit over 2 yr in t
75 ensitivity to carbon dioxide concentrations, soil moisture, and vapor pressure deficit, the impact of
76 ies of monthly meteorological, hydrological, soil moisture, and vegetation droughts from 1981 to 2013
77 e state, stomatal conductance, soil texture, soil moisture, and water table depth.
78 annual and seasonal signal to noise (S/N) in soil moisture anomalies do not change significantly by l
79 l variability in precipitation, we find that soil moisture anomalies significantly influence rainfall
80  onset of warm temperatures and depletion of soil moisture are all likely to occur earlier in the yea
81                 Decreasing transpiration and soil moisture are associated with decreasing leaf delta(
82                           While increases in soil moisture are generally associated with increased mi
83                  Global estimates of surface soil moisture are provided by satellite sensors, but at
84  arrived during assays and increased surface soil moisture around all plants.
85 ong our ER models revealed the importance of soil moisture as a driving variable, likely through its
86 d longleaf pine savannas along a gradient of soil moisture availability (mesic, intermediate and xeri
87 totrophic respiration; and the impact of low soil moisture availability on plant processes.
88 ained from stable isotopes did not vary with soil moisture availability, potentially indicating remob
89 r future climate change scenarios is reduced soil moisture availability.
90 sed substantially after >10 years of reduced soil moisture availability.
91  determine community responses to changes in soil moisture availability.
92 well they each capture variation in WUE with soil moisture availability.
93 l be conditional on topographically mediated soil moisture availability; (ii) in extreme drought year
94     Previous work has explored the impact of soil-moisture availability on past carbon-flux variabili
95 ding best explained as a plastic response to soil moisture, because differences in both the mean and
96                                              Soil moisture behaviour in most models is constrained by
97       Existing earth system models represent soil moisture but simplify groundwater connections, a pr
98                     Grazing had no effect on soil moisture, but wetter soils retarded root decomposit
99 a pseudoacacia seedlings under the same mean soil moisture, but with different drought frequency caus
100                              The increase in soil moisture by hydraulic redistribution significantly
101                       First, the annual mean soil moisture by the end of the 21st century shows stati
102 gnitude of microbial functional responses to soil moisture can be predicted from historical climate a
103                                              Soil moisture can feed back on rainfall through the impa
104                     ABSTARCT: Constraints on soil moisture can guide agricultural practices, act as i
105 ses of terrestrial net biome productivity to soil-moisture changes, and find that soil-moisture varia
106 d age, fire weather conditions, ecozone, and soil moisture class.
107             Based on in-situ measurements of soil moisture collected in agricultural plots during 198
108 athogen metabolic rates; and changing spring soil moisture conditions and thus pathogen growth rates
109 e change on vegetation when assessing future soil moisture conditions in water-limited ecosystems.
110 k (Quercus robur) saplings under wet and dry soil moisture conditions to (18) O-depleted water vapour
111 le wetting patterns interact with antecedent soil moisture conditions to alter pore-scale, core-scale
112                             Then the initial soil moisture conditions were restored, and a mixed comm
113                              Irrespective of soil moisture conditions, conversion of wetlands to crop
114 al connectivity scale length (ICSL) based on soil moisture conditions, developed to represent hydrolo
115                                              Soil moisture constrains the activity of decomposer soil
116 hose for classical stress indicators such as soil moisture content (r = 0.51) or stomatal conductance
117  of short-term C mineralization than current soil moisture content in these soils.
118            Results showed that (a) change in soil moisture content was linearly correlated to change
119 e removed, a close relationship of g(1) with soil moisture content was observed.
120 associations between bacterial diversity and soil moisture content, C:N ratio, and Ca, Mg, PO(4)(3-)
121                                              Soil moisture content, soil organic carbon, soil availab
122 mined mainly by microbial biomass carbon and soil moisture content.
123 des were applied to goosegrass maintained at soil moisture contents (VMC) of < 12%, 12 to 20%, or > 2
124 emperature effects, we know little about how soil moisture contributes to successful hatching and par
125                                              Soil moisture declined significantly in 8% of the area.
126                                       Before soil moisture declined to zero, inoculated plants germin
127 , for the entire severe drought period after soil moisture declined to zero.
128 ke severe droughts and heatwaves because low soil moisture decreases both evaporation and plant trans
129                                However, when soil moisture decreases, a higher proportion of old soil
130 , Mg, Zn, Cu, and B increased in response to soil moisture deficiency.
131 al traits and genes that affect responses to soil moisture deficit in the TSUxKAS mapping population
132                                    Following soil moisture deficit that is maintained for several yea
133 osphere coupling, associated with persistent soil moisture deficit, appears to intensify surface warm
134 following more than 12 years of experimental soil moisture deficit, via a through-fall exclusion expe
135 rought-induced mortality following long-term soil moisture deficit.
136 n feedback acts to amplify precipitation and soil moisture deficits in most regions.
137 ore rhizomatous graminoids and forbs, higher soil moisture demands, sharing the syndrome of dominant
138 maize ET (7-11%; P < 0.01) along with lesser soil moisture depletion, while H increased (25-30 W m(-2
139 producing the scale invariance properties of soil moisture derived from hydrologic simulations at hyp
140 en in the presence of clouds, of proxies for soil moisture derived from the amplitude and phase conte
141 escribes the primary differences between the soil moisture desorption and the adsorption processes by
142 al heat flux, relative humidity, wind speed, soil moisture differences and air temperature; the relat
143 l observed in semiarid savannas; patterns of soil moisture display islands whose size, for moisture t
144 logic models can close the loop of satellite soil moisture downscaling for local applications such as
145 eaf Area Index (LAI)) and ground-based data (soil moisture, downward solar radiation, precipitation a
146  and magnitude of soil microbial response to soil moisture due to historical climate may be remarkabl
147 n yield, probably due to the preservation of soil moisture during drought periods.
148 rmation suggests the requirement of adequate soil moisture during flowering and seed formation stages
149  due to the extreme snowfall inducing higher soil moisture during spring thaw.
150   An enhanced dependence of forest growth on soil moisture during the late-20th century coincides wit
151 tion, nitrogen cycle, carbon allocation, and soil moisture dynamics in current ecosystem models.
152 stion, I coupled a plant uptake model with a soil moisture dynamics model to explore the environmenta
153 esistivity imaging (ERI) was used to monitor soil moisture dynamics to a depth of 9 m in a grassland,
154 th lowered resilience resulting in shifts in soil moisture dynamics.
155  was much steeper than literature values for soil moisture effects on photosynthesis and stomatal con
156 vels but also the yield variability, whereas soil moisture enhancements improved the yield stability.
157 ater and light within a continuously varying soil moisture environment.
158 om the space-time probabilistic structure of soil moisture, estimated over the range of rainfall obse
159 itability for oceanographic applications and soil moisture estimation, microwave remote sensing obser
160 reasingly, we understand the vital role that soil moisture exerts on the carbon cycle and other envir
161 nduct a systematic observational analysis of soil moisture feedbacks on propagating MCSs anywhere in
162 vegetation model to diagnose the controls of soil moisture feedbacks to drought.
163 , richness, and diversity), temperature, and soil moisture for 3 years.
164 tter polyphenols, decomposer communities and soil moisture for litter C and N loss at different stage
165 h period, and enhanced wheat compensation of soil moisture for maize growth after wheat harvest, comp
166 -ring-based reconstructions of heatwaves and soil moisture for the past 260 years reveal an abrupt sh
167 lter the soil environment through changes in soil moisture, frequently resulting in soil saturation,
168 hanging CO2, including direct use of P-E and soil moisture from ESMs, is needed to reduce uncertainti
169 TMI2 treatment weakened wheat competition of soil moisture from maize strip during wheat growth perio
170 pared with a control model with an empirical soil moisture function, the profit maximization model im
171  find that calibrating models with parabolic soil moisture functions can improve predictive power ove
172  and nosZ showed a U-shape relationship with soil moisture; further insight into biotic mechanisms un
173 nteractions and biomass while manipulating a soil moisture gradient and reducing consumer pressure.
174 tween fitness and biofilm production along a soil moisture gradient.
175 n accelerated litter decomposition, elevated soil moisture, greater soil nutrient heterogeneity, and
176 t California with severely reduced snowpack, soil moisture, ground water, and reservoir stocks, but t
177                                    Predicted soil moisture, groundwater depth and leaf area index agr
178     By the time of the second peak, however, soil moisture had dropped to anomalously low levels in t
179 t CO(2) exchange in winter and spring, while soil moisture has a primary control on net CO(2) exchang
180 s positively associated with areas of higher soil moisture, higher nitrate and higher annual denitrif
181  to alleviate the water stress caused by low soil moisture, hydraulic resistance in the xylem and the
182 apor pressure deficit, and increased surface soil moisture in higher diversity communities.
183 e use dendroecology to elucidate the role of soil moisture in modifying the relationship between clim
184 er in rooting depth, with grasses exploiting soil moisture in shallow layers while trees have exclusi
185 mation on the spatio-temporal variability of soil moisture in the vadose zone is important to assess
186 n facilitated the efficient use of available soil moisture in wheat.
187                                We found that soil moisture increased under deepened winter snow in ea
188 ances of mite and nematode trophic groups as soil moisture increased within individual ecosystems, wh
189 antly in response to deeper thaw and greater soil moisture induced by Soil warming.
190                                              Soil moisture influences fluxes of heat and moisture ori
191                                      Because soil moisture integrates temperature and precipitation d
192 , we separate the impacts of temperature and soil moisture into direct effects and indirect effects t
193 nt season when vegetation is desiccated, and soil moisture is high.
194           The inferred temporal evolution of soil moisture is remarkably consistent between independe
195           Specifically, we find that surface soil moisture is scale invariant over regimes extending
196 r of the tree clusters, the power law of the soil moisture islands is transformed into a power law wi
197 onditions (arid-humid) and limiting factors (soil moisture, leaf area, energy).
198  that summer precipitation and the resulting soil moisture level also strongly influenced the soil wa
199 ons under naturally varying temperatures and soil moisture levels were remarkably insensitive in term
200 ) among species at 0.06 and 0.042 m(3) m(-3) soil moisture levels.
201                     Our results suggest that soil moisture limitation can offset the effect of warmin
202  summer drought due to lengthened periods of soil moisture limitation.
203 tors of the Mediterranean coast; and earlier soil moisture maxima have led to earlier winter floods i
204   The lack of significant effects of eCO2 on soil moisture, microbial biomass, or activity suggests t
205 e a minimalist plant hydraulics model with a soil moisture model and, for the first time, translate r
206 idence supports our findings from historical soil moisture monitoring at a long-term upland hydrologi
207 f environmental factors, including levels of soil moisture, nitrate, chloride, and labile organic car
208 ment is constantly changing due to shifts in soil moisture, nutrient availability and other condition
209 canopy were subjected to different levels of soil moisture, nutrient supply and intramorph and interm
210                                  The greater soil moisture of the inoculated plants allowed greater p
211 there was a strong influence of rainfall and soil moisture on community composition at the species le
212 biosphere models to represent the effects of soil moisture on stomatal conductance yielded unrealisti
213 ut this was not strongly linked to shifts in soil moisture or DOC.
214 t permafrost sites, to a greater degree than soil moisture or temperature could explain.
215                                              Soil moisture, organo-Al, and reactive Fe explained most
216 on agricultural drought by analyzing surface soil moisture outputs from CMIP5 multi-model ensembles (
217 imates of current and future temperature and soil moisture over decadal timescales.
218                                      Surface soil moisture plays a crucial role on the terrestrial wa
219  Specifically, we found stem growth stops at soil moisture potentials of -0.47 MPa for larch and -0.6
220 ure-driven responses are further mediated by soil moisture, precipitation, and carbon supply and regi
221                             In addition, the soil moisture-precipitation feedback acts to amplify pre
222 re, we show that the resolution of satellite soil moisture products can be increased to scales repres
223 les and influenced the temporal evolution of soil moisture profiles; and (c) juniper encroachment low
224  processes are largely dependent on distinct soil moisture pulses.
225 ially if coupled to snow drought and earlier soil moisture recession, but summer precipitation change
226                            Couplings between soil moisture, redox fluctuations, and lignin breakdown
227 files), restrict uptake of water to conserve soil moisture (reduced hydraulic conductance, narrow met
228  variety of ways (reduced precipitation, low soil moisture, reduced streamflow, etc.), but relatively
229 and recovery, we applied a 6 wk experimental soil moisture reduction to seven tree species followed b
230                         The incorporation of soil moisture regenerated by precipitation, or green wat
231 sitivity of soil respiration under different soil moisture regimes.
232 t will respond to variation in vegetation or soil moisture remains unknown.
233 irect and indirect climate change effects on soil moisture requires better understanding.
234 ive deficit, resulting in record low shallow soil moisture reserves.
235 A, using LSM-modeled and topography-mediated soil moisture, respectively.
236 , within individual ecosystems, increases in soil moisture resulted in decreases to nematode communit
237 ted moderate summer drought decreased winter soil moisture retention by ~10%.
238 and humidity increases enough to offset poor soil moisture retention, climate-related changes to prod
239 rmalized to 28% above the ambient level, the soil moisture, Rs, and the temperature sensitivity (Q10)
240  and biophysical drivers (i.e., temperature, soil moisture, sap flux).
241 rough carbon assimilation) and indirect (via soil moisture savings due to stomatal closure, and chang
242  hydrological responses (evapotranspiration, soil moisture, seasonal and annual streamflow, and water
243                  Unlike the state of the art soil moisture sensors, a signal derived from the propose
244            Watering increased season-average soil moisture similarly across sites.
245                          Even though surface soil moisture (SM) is often cited as a key control varia
246 icantly positively correlated with rainfall, soil moisture (SM), the carbon to nitrogen ratio (C/N ra
247 bles relevant to diffusion into soils (i.e., soil moisture, snow depth, snow density).
248  quantified pre- and postdeluge responses in soil moisture, soil respiration, and canopy greenness, a
249  diffusive gas transport to explain observed soil moisture, soil temperature, and soil CO(2) concentr
250 e global scale by linking global datasets of soil moisture, soil temperature, primary productivity, a
251 hesis that realistic land conditions such as soil moisture/soil temperature (SM/ST) can significantly
252 r), wind speed (m/s), relative humidity (%), soil moisture (%), solar radiation (W/m(2)), specific hu
253  a strong link between dry line dynamics and soil moisture state.
254 stence of drought induced alternative stable soil moisture states (irreversible soil wetting) in upla
255 we found that plants transmit information on soil moisture status through their influence on the vapo
256  role of other environmental factors such as soil moisture stress are not fully understood and are th
257 this study was to investigate the effects of soil moisture stress during reproductive stage on seed q
258 rved mean LAI and LAI seasonality across the soil moisture stress gradient maximised NCE, and were th
259  seasonal dynamics and leaf traits vary with soil moisture stress.
260      Plants were subjected to five levels of soil moisture stresses at flowering, and yield and quali
261 re nearly unresponsive to antecedent shallow soil moisture, suggesting reduced shallow absorbing root
262 well explained by a critical balance between soil moisture supply and atmospheric demand representing
263                                              Soil moisture, temperature, pH, carbon : nitrogen (C : N
264                            The reductions in soil moisture tended to be greater in more humid areas.
265 significantly taller, and maintained greater soil moisture than controls.
266 rs associated with climate change, including soil moisture (theta), vapor pressure deficit (D), and a
267  the annual plant community at all levels of soil moisture through reductions in microclimatic stress
268                                              Soil moisture, through changes in soil %O2 saturation, d
269 200-year tree-ring reconstructions of summer soil moisture to demonstrate that the 2000-2018 SWNA dro
270 ests, due to higher sensitivity of grassland soil moisture to rainfall.
271 heterogeneity in three environmental factors-soil moisture, understory light, and conspecific neighbo
272 ic moisture demand and depleting the shallow soil moisture upon which aspens rely.
273 r harvesting contexts, which includes direct soil moisture uptake by plants and rainwater harvested a
274 vity to soil-moisture changes, and find that soil-moisture variability and trends induce large CO(2)
275                    However, the influence of soil-moisture variability and trends on the long-term ca
276                  Subseasonal and interannual soil-moisture variability generate CO(2) as a result of
277                                              Soil-moisture variability reduces the present land carbo
278 e, e.g. temperature, and land surface, e.g., soil moisture, variables as predictors of TOC concentrat
279 t demographic tradeoffs driven by short-term soil moisture variation act as a mechanism to allow mult
280 es of carbon exchange were more sensitive to soil moisture variation in grassland than shrubland, suc
281 draulics and topographic convergence-induced soil moisture variation to land surface models (LSM) can
282                                              Soil moisture was computed in a thin upper layer and an
283  predicting plant hydraulic safety loss from soil moisture was developed using field measurements and
284 The megadrought-like trajectory of 2000-2018 soil moisture was driven by natural variability superimp
285                                              Soil moisture was found to be a main factor in regulatin
286 with age when nonnative biomass was high and soil moisture was low.
287 ate increased to 2.54 km m(-2) degrees C(-1) Soil moisture was negatively correlated with fine-root g
288  respiration at all sites during months when soil moisture was not limiting.
289                                              Soil moisture was significantly higher in aspen stands a
290 High 2002 summer temperature and low shallow soil moisture were most associated with the spatial patt
291 iven by precipitation-induced changes in the soil moisture, whereas changes in the soil temperature h
292 al limiting factor for land carbon uptake is soil moisture, which can reduce gross primary production
293 ivity of gross primary productivity (GPP) to soil moisture, which improves the model agreement with o
294         We focus on respiration responses to soil moisture, which remain unresolved in ecosystem mode
295 atively lower canopy temperatures and higher soil moisture, which uncoupled the negative effects of h
296 ummer air temperature, soil temperature, and soil moisture, while browning occurred most often at col
297 icated that aspens generally utilize shallow soil moisture with little plasticity during drought stre
298            We argue that models should treat soil moisture within a three-dimensional framework empha
299 patterns occur along fine-scale gradients of soil moisture within four individual ecosystem types (me
300 de of that range of depths to achieve higher soil moisture would also generally create cooler conditi

 
Page Top