ライフサイエンスコーパス: source of infection

1 de hospital mortality was 52% (21-85% across sources of infection).

2 bacteria represent food but also a potential source of infection.

3 ggest that direct transmission was the major source of infection.

4 rug users with skin/wound as the predominant source of infection.

5 pasteurised milk in the past is the probable source of infection.

6 scites that occurs in the absence of a local source of infection.

7 infection, indicating that fowl were not the source of infection.

8 as been hypothesized that animals may be the source of infection.

9 enovirus in the immunosuppressed host as the source of infection.

10 hypervariable VNTR locus, indicates a common source of infection.

11 of the patients had fever with no documented source of infection.

12 water supply was implicated as the probable source of infection.

13 ion must be given to reducing this potential source of infection.

14 al venous catheter and without an underlying source of infection.

15 ar resorts on Lake Malawi is the most likely source of infection.

16 olved with catheter removal, without another source of infection.

17 ltiple diagnostic tests failed to localize a source of infection.

18 harbour potential pathogens and, hence, be a source of infection.

19 either identify infected nodes or detect the source of infection.

20 dence suggests that the gut also serves as a source of infection.

21 , implicating the preterm gut as a potential source of infection.

22 s of patients with bloodstream infections by source of infection.

23 on of EEEV to the organ donor was the likely source of infection.

24 s stratified by age, vaccination status, and source of infection.

25 d virological investigations to identify the source of infection.

26 t the GP surgery did not identify an ongoing source of infection.

27 < 0.001), fever, urinary or skin/soft-tissue source of infection.

28 virus replication and are a potential tissue source of infection.

29 late source, which suggested a non-livestock source of infection.

30 cal course, vaccination status, and possible source of infection.

31 departments for prompt investigation of the source of infection.

32 ns in domestic dogs, often assumed to be the source of infection.

33 hould stimulate clinicians to identify a new source of infection.

34 ents, to determine whether there is a common source of infection.

35 cal transmission has established as the main source of infections.

36 scutaneous implantation is also an important source of infections.

37 c variants great distances from the original sources of infection.

38 those obtained from suspected environmental sources of infection.

39 d with severe sepsis, suggesting alternative sources of infection.

40 as used to interview patients about possible sources of infection.

41 lic gram-negative bacteria, suggesting water sources of infection.

42 PS and fever were evaluated to exclude other sources of infection.

43 rase chain reaction (PCR) to identify common sources of infection.

44 nd patients were interviewed about potential sources of infection.

45 based on similar genotypes indicating common sources of infection.

46 accurately tracking and thus controlling the sources of infection.

47 tal, and the wider community are more likely sources of infection.

48 d identified misclassified transmissions and sources of infection.

49 ce samples, capable of identifying important sources of infection.

50 n of cases of zoonotic infection to putative sources of infection.

51 ases and the number of cases with unobserved sources of infection.

52 ecting conditioned responses to noningestive sources of infection.

53 e need to address maternal and environmental sources of infection.

54 low use of typing information when inferring sources of infections.

55 0.44-0.94 for ventilator-acquired), unknown source of infection (0.66; 0.48-0.92), and suggestion ty

56 dies performed promptly to confirm potential source of infection (1C); administration of broad-spectr

57 8 [1.007-2.319]; p = 0.046), and a pulmonary source of infection (2.063 [1.363-3.122]; p = 0.0001).

58 ntra-abdominal infection was the most common source of infection accounting for 34% of all BSIs.

59 The exact source of infection among travelers to Tioman Island rem

60 ate that Dutch-born MSM were the predominant sources of infections among all Amsterdam MSM who acquir

61 reviewers first identified the ED-diagnosed source of infection and adjudicated the presence and sou

62 ociated with 30-day mortality, while urinary source of infection and early appropriate therapy result

63 h Gram-negative BSI, 75% had a urinary tract source of infection and Escherichia coli was the most co

64 in a subanalysis of patients with high-risk source of infection and in a subgroup excluding catheter

65 ranscriptomic response is independent of the source of infection and includes signatures reflecting i

66 ve patient outcomes by rapidly identifying a source of infection and monitoring the response to treat

67 poultry in the live bird markets removed the source of infection and no further human cases of H5N1 i

68 er abscess in a patient without a well-known source of infection and presenting with left portal vein

69 ation for peritonitis, which obliterates the source of infection and purges the peritoneal cavity, ma

70 Dromedary camels are a likely source of infection and the virus probably originated in

71 be controlled by early identification of the source of infection and timely diagnosis to stop transmi

72 hough infectious fleas might be an important source of infection and transmission via blocked fleas i

73 went 243 PET/CT studies in search of a focal source of infection and were included in the study.

74 hepatitis B virus (HBV) remains a world-wide source of infections and deaths.

75 ked to the outbreak in order to identify the source of infections and prevent additional illnesses.

76 light the challenges of identifying shifting sources of infection and characterizing patterns of inci

77 agnostics may enable early identification of sources of infection and improve outbreak control.

78 To identify sources of infection and risk factors for illness, an ep

79 pread has hampered identification of precise sources of infection and the assessment of the efficacy

80 nosa infections, whereas underlying disease, source of infection, and severity of acute presentation

81 fter adjusting for age, race, comorbidities, source of infection, and severity of illness (adjusted o

82 re most frequently identified as the primary source of infection, and therefore, reduction in E. coli

83 of arrival, weekend or nighttime admission, source of infection, and trainee involvement in care.

84 , factors that influence susceptibility, key sources of infection, and differences in virulence betwe

85 in the incidence of sepsis within all major sources of infection, and males and blacks have greater

86 ibiotics by day 7, median day of transition, sources of infection, and oral antibiotic selection were

87 ce of, and describe the causative organisms, sources of infection, and risk factors for, severe mater

88 0 [95% CI, 1.14-1.72] vs pneumonia) or other source of infection (aOR, 1.67 [95% CI, 1.40-1.97] vs pn

89 te likelihood when cultures from the primary source of infection are unavailable or when prompt initi

90 The urinary tract was the only source of infection associated with a trend toward lower

91 ent and epidemiological risk factors, likely source of infection based on presenting signs and sympto

92 Subjects were assigned 1 of 20 anatomic sources of infection based on clinical diagnosis and/or

93 n epidemic was probably produced by multiple sources of infection because of deficient sanitary condi

94 it is difficult to attribute human cases to sources of infection because there is little epidemiolog

95 enetically-similar HIV infections-the likely source of infection-but only 40% of index cases referred

96 id environments can serve as a reservoir and source of infection by this pathogen.

97 ected observers who independently scored the source of infection (by affected organ system or site),

98 actory and susceptible individuals, a single source of infection can lead to sustained infection in t

99 healthcare disparities, with respect to the source of infection, causal organisms, and chronic comor

100 The source of infection causing persistent lamb losses is th

101 o 8 mg/liter were matched based on pathogen, source of infection, comorbidities, and disease severity

102 lated from culture or detected on the panel, source of infection, days of therapy (DOT) of antifungal

103 patient with a TIPS and no other detectable source of infection despite an extensive search.

104 ts with confirmed infections had a different source of infection diagnosed in the ED versus final adj

105 protection via greater distance from outside sources of infection, due to common features of small-sc

106 re differentially regulated according to the source of infection, enriched for IFN signaling and anti

107 Poultry are the likely source of infection for humans on the basis of sequence

108 t MTBC/M. bovis-infected rhinoceros may be a source of infection for other susceptible animals sharin

109 These individuals might be the source of infection for patients with confirmed MERS who

110 ted oocysts contaminate the environment as a source of infection for people and their livestock.

111 igns of BT, this finding suggests they are a source of infection for sympatric susceptible sheep popu

112 ently infected patient was implicated as the source of infection for three others.

113 tes from humans suggests there may be common sources of infection for both dogs and humans.

114 nt than dogs, both in maintaining CDV and as sources of infection for tigers.

115 phylogenetic analyses, we could identify the source of infection in a replication-competent clone tha

116 er in Los Angeles, California, as a possible source of infection in AIDS and non-AIDS patients.

117 g confirmed the water supply as the probable source of infection in both cases, with the clinical iso

118 They should be suspected as the source of infection in every hemodialysis patient that p

119 e broader community to infer the most likely source of infection in HCP.

120 ginosa pathogen, in particular, is a leading source of infection in hospital settings, with few avail

121 included reactivation of latent virus as the source of infection in immune women have been challenged

122 ause of the retrospective nature and unknown source of infection in most human studies, direct eviden

123 ces in demographics, severity of illness, or source of infection in patients randomized to placebo or

124 that S. aureus colonization could provide a source of infection in patients with bullous pemphigoid,

125 ng and increases the ability to identify the source of infection in school outbreaks.

126 nonhuman primates (NHPs) have represented a source of infection in several outbreaks in humans.

127 ongly suggesting that these animals were the source of infection in the human case.

128 to evaluate blood transfusion as a possible source of infection in the kidney recipient.

129 t Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a frequent source of infection in the neonatal intensive care unit

130 Phylogenetic analysis excluded a common source of infection in this apparent outbreak.

131 lenses and the preservative solution was the source of infection in this outbreak.

132 The premixed ink was the common source of infection in this outbreak.

133 vidence for Atlantic salmon aquaculture as a source of infection in wild Pacific salmon.

134 The results indicate that chicken is a major source of infection in young urban children, although no

135 ection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a common source of infections in burn patients that have impaired

136 his study was designed to elucidate possible sources of infection in an isolated, rural population in

137 is further generalized to allow for multiple sources of infection including external inoculum and hos

138 Several sources of infection, including contamination by air, so

139 e 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2s) were major sources of infection-induced IL-9 production, the adopti

140 The anatomical source of infection is a major determinant of sepsis out

141 ow the epidemic size varies with the initial source of infection is far more complex.

142 Correct classification of the source of infection is important in observational and in

143 After stratification by the source of infection, males (proportionate ratio 1.16, 95

144 and infecting isolates, suggesting that the source of infections may be endogenous host organisms.

145 We recorded initial vital signs, the source of infection, mortality at 28 days, blood lactate

146 ty and 84 staff with SARS-CoV-2 with a known source of infection, most reported a transmission source

147 Household was most often reported source of infection (n = 101 [28.1%]) and home addresses

148 bability that one sampled host is the direct source of infection of another host in a pathogen gene g

149 d skeletal muscle from such birds could be a source of infection of humans and animals.

150 ot common, must be recognized as a potential source of infection of native polycystic kidneys in immu

151 Knowing the source of infection of the index case led to a decrease

152 f infection and adjudicated the presence and source of infection on final assessment.

153 Unsampled cases may act as either a common source of infection or as an intermediary in a transmiss

154 ality for MRSA infection irrespective of the source of infection or MIC methodology (odds ratio [OR],

155 iated with treatment failure irrespective of source of infection or MIC methodology (OR, 2.69; 95% CI

156 econd population emanated from an additional source of infection or the two were transmitted from the

157 urther work to identify and eliminate common sources of infection or determine biologic mechanisms th

158 ive on presentation (p = 0.017) or who had a source of infection other than pneumonia (p = 0.006).

159 re Assessment (p < 0.05) scores, and for the source of infection (p < 0.05).

160 of frequency of various comorbid conditions, source of infection, pathogens and their susceptibility

161 up, was instrumental in swiftly locating the source of infections, preventing further illnesses and d

162 The effect of the source of infection (pulmonary vs. nonpulmonary) on the

163 approaches to account for uncertainty in the source of infection, recall uncertainty, and unobserved

164 rant Salmonella, which are thought to be the source of infection relapse.

165 Although confirming the catheter as a source of infection remains challenging, the Infectious

166 always clear if these reservoirs can act as source of infection resulting in cases of Legionnaires'

167 After adjusting for differences in the source of infection, sex, age, chronic hepatic dysfuncti

168 After adjusting for source of infection, sex, age, nutritional status, histo

169 Infants with bacteremia and no known source of infection should be carefully examined because

170 Anatomic source of infection should be considered in future trial

171 ch that includes transmission from all three sources of infection simultaneously and uses sensitivity

172 f Balamuthia: In trying to locate a possible source of infection, soil and water samples from the chi

173 patients to clean their lenses is a possible source of infections, specimens isolated from the faucet

174 Retrovirus screening of potential sources of infection, such as laboratory research animal

175 al Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae carriage are the source of infection that results in fatal lamb pneumonia

176 we adjusted for several variables including source of infection, the effect of diabetes on the incid

177 rded as insignificant or feared as potential sources of infection, the bacteria living on our skin ar

178 alitative study of bloodstream infections by source of infection to inform the potential development,

179 The role of the blood or skin as a source of infection to sand flies remains unclear, and t

180 ildren or mothers, requires knowledge of the source of infection to the infants.

181 inental virus dissemination and provides the source of infection to trigger devastating disease epide

182 her HIV prevalence (i.e., hotspots) serve as sources of infection to neighboring areas of lower preva

183 l and nasal secretions or feces can serve as sources of infection to other susceptible animals, as ev

184 es performed promptly to confirm a potential source of infection (UG); administration of broad-spectr

185 a case and verify two household cats as the source of infection using repetitive-element PCR (rep-PC

186 Interobserver agreement for classifying sources of infection using Centers for Disease Control a

187 The frequency of reported sources of infection varied by county, but the largest s

188 Agreement regarding the source of infection was 89% (183/206) and 69% (142/206)

189 ratio, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.42-1.08); an unknown source of infection was associated with a greater likeli

190 e antimicrobials after onset of hypotension, source of infection was associated with death after adju

191 The observed diagnostic agreement for source of infection was classified as partial (i.e., mat

192 Although no definitive source of infection was determined from this case, this

193 An unobserved source of infection was estimated to be moderately likel

194 d association between O-antigen type and the source of infection was found.

195 The source of infection was identified as wooden tongue depr

196 sical BCG instillation were selected and the source of infection was investigated.

197 The source of infection was not determined; however, fomite

198 signs of sepsis (five patients), in whom the source of infection was not immediately localized to any

199 e 142 episodes for which a complete match on source of infection was obtained, the interobserver agre

200 erwent (18)F-FDG PET/CT in search of a focal source of infection was performed.

201 d for 27 chains of transmission in which the source of infection was unknown.

202 Further information, such as likely source of infection, was obtained for HTLV-positives.

203 The primary sources of infection were gastrointestinal (58%), intrav

204 fore the first public announcements of local sources of infection were made.

205 pregnancy outcomes in humans although their sources of infection were not determined.

206 The major sources of infection were the lungs (44%) and abdomen (3

207 The most common sources of infection were urine, blood, and lungs, and i

208 however, companion animals are known to be a source of infection, which is one of the main concerns f

209 ic characterisation of individuals acting as sources of infection, which is the aim of this study.

210 The source of infection with the highest standardized hospit

211 Source of infection, with different causative organisms

212 ith that of control subjects, independent of source of infection, with eukaryotic initiation factor 2