ライフサイエンスコーパス: speech production

1 s network across primate evolution to enable speech production.

2 nt phase using speech entrainment to improve speech production.

3 orrelated with somatosensory feedback during speech production.

4 ing periods of auditory perception and overt speech production.

5 ferior frontal gyrus, a region implicated in speech production.

6 pecific components of the neural network for speech production.

7 ct provide a rich source of sensory input in speech production.

8 in deformation that would normally accompany speech production.

9 ing rhythm listening, speech perception, and speech production.

10 modulation of activity in SII during normal speech production.

11 d to minimize artifact associated with overt speech production.

12 tion of motor sequences necessary for fluent speech production.

13 motor areas associated with articulation and speech production.

14 ntary spasms in the laryngeal muscles during speech production.

15 h perception for the motor system underlying speech production.

16 al procedures typically lead to worsening of speech production.

17 tal role in the construction of syllables in speech production.

18 ated a frontal-temporal system implicated in speech production.

19 of the vocal tract occurred during internal speech production.

20 rus has long been thought to be critical for speech production.

21 area) as a key region for motor planning of speech production.

22 s effect as evidence for critical centres of speech production.

23 d a novel high-gamma-to-beta coupling during speech production.

24 ral patterns of the oral articulators during speech production.

25 the neural systems that support coherence in speech production.

26 oca's area) of the human brain is crucial in speech production.

27 on is highly demanding on fast adjustment of speech production.

28 gs from 35 neurosurgical participants during speech production.

29 oG) neural recordings during intra-operative speech production.

30 s for understanding both natural and altered speech production.

31 ective suppression of onset responses during speech production.

32 e rarely able to produce and practice fluent speech production.

33 ns of the link between speech perception and speech production.

34 eedback, and modulation of learned voice for speech production.

35 Human frontal cortex plays a crucial role in speech production.

36 ced neural activation in the left IFG during speech production.

37 ion of planum temporale selectively disrupts speech production.

38 aoperative cortical cooling in humans during speech production.

39 t of finer vocal motor control necessary for speech production.

40 ch is commonly seen as a neural correlate of speech production.

41 LMC functionality for finer motor control of speech production.

42 highly learned and uniquely human behavior: speech production.

43 and is activated by auditory feedback during speech production.

44 s of speech perception and motor programs of speech production.

45 al roles, only one of which was activated in speech production.

46 ar-striatal network previously implicated in speech production.

47 mpensate for loss of the left putamen during speech production.

48 r sensory target and state maps during overt speech production.

49 c stimuli that is uniquely suppressed during speech production.

50 ly overlapping networks that are involved in speech production.

51 e during complex voluntary behavior, such as speech production.

52 ntary spasms in the laryngeal muscles during speech production.

53 r different underlying impairments affecting speech production.

54 the increased motor demands associated with speech production?

55 contribution of other variables influencing speech production abilities such as total lesion volume

56 The mechanisms underlying the acquisition of speech-production ability in human infancy are not well

57 positively with the longitudinal recovery of speech production across the two time points (as measure

58 uggested that variability in the recovery of speech production after aphasic stroke may relate in par

59 We hypothesized that the recovery of speech production after left hemisphere stroke not only

60 is redundant with forward prediction during speech production and are therefore suppressed.

61 Phasic activations corresponding to speech production and auditory feedback were observed, b

62 phy to record neural signals across 100 h of speech production and comprehension as participants enga

63 communication is a joint activity; however, speech production and comprehension have primarily been

64 February 2005, we discuss imaging studies of speech production and comprehension in patients with aph

65 s engage in a complex process of alternating speech production and comprehension to communicate.

66 te that the neural activities that reflected speech production and comprehension were broadly distrib

67 these embeddings onto brain activity during speech production and comprehension.

68 In language, semantic prediction speeds speech production and comprehension.

69 n this important brain area involved in both speech production and domain-general cognitive processin

70 to characterize the dynamic relation between speech production and facial expression in children with

71 is revealed that cross-modal coordination of speech production and facial expression was greater when

72 ross-modal coordination between simultaneous speech production and facial expression.

73 bnormal auditory feedback integration during speech production and impaired rhythmic organization of

74 tudy examined the spontaneous rhythmicity in speech production and its relationship to cortex-muscle

75 ortex and parts of the striatum that control speech production and learning.

76 Speech production and perception involve complex neural

77 d cortico-subcortical connections within the speech production and perception network.

78 the temporal lobe are crucially involved in speech production and perception, respectively.

79 rlap between altered dopamine release during speech production and reduced 11C-raclopride binding to

80 During speech production and speech motor learning, speakers' e

81 he auditory system is critically involved in speech production and that the motor system is criticall

82 ity while participants engaged in continuous speech production and were visually cued to stop speakin

83 ft supramarginal gyrus, over and above overt speech production and working memory.

84 to-speech encoding before word articulation (speech production) and speech-to-language encoding post

85 es of speech, the motor commands involved in speech production, and a Direct Realist approach that em

86 d fundamental frequency perturbations during speech production, and a heightened ability to detect di

87 empirical data between the resting state and speech production, and dopaminergic neurotransmission ev

88 peaks to models on the mechanisms underlying speech production, and human-computer interaction framew

89 occurring among brain areas associated with speech production, and white matter tracts that intercon

90 Voice and speech production are critical physiological functions t

91 discoveries have defined how key features of speech production are facilitated by the coordinated act

92 , which we distinguished from a more ventral speech production area centered in area 4p.

93 lose relationship between (left-lateralized) speech production areas and the implementation of top-do

94 t frontal lobe lesions that spared posterior speech production areas in lateral inferior parietal and

95 pecially involving occipital association and speech production areas.

96 aring one's own voice is critical for fluent speech production as it allows for the detection and cor

97 tion on the multidimensionality of connected speech production at both behavioural and neural levels.

98 brain circuits subserving self-regulation of speech production, attention, and emotion.

99 During speech production, auditory processing of self-generated

100 al right hemispheric (RH) lateralization for speech production, based on a previous large-scale scree

101 ansformations between speech-perception- and speech-production-based representations.

102 the human brain and is a critical region for speech production, being larger in the left hemisphere t

103 Noticeable differences in speech production between depressed and nondepressed pat

104 support a modular view of word retrieval in speech production but rather support substantial overlap

105 he left putamen is known to be important for speech production, but some patients with left putamen d

106 and vocal tract movements are linked during speech production by comparing videos of the face and fa

107 rate that neural activity during spontaneous speech production can be predicted from formal analysis

108 view is that oral-motor movements related to speech production cannot influence speech perception unt

109 findings demonstrate that the development of speech production capacity relies on changes in selectiv

110 as suppression of auditory responses during speech production compared with perception, but whether

111 cover neural signals that reliably reflected speech production, comprehension, and their transitions

112 evel of activation within this region during speech production correlated positively with the longitu

113 A speech production deficit was observed in three members

114 holds great promises for people with severe speech production deficits.

115 ility to articulate our thoughts by means of speech production depends critically on the integrity of

116 liminary evidence suggests that treatment of speech production difficulties, even years after stroke,

117 These speech production disorders result in effort, fatigue, p

118 n have greater difficulty with variations in speech production encountered in everyday listening.

119 the relation between hearing loss and human speech production especially where there is consideratio

120 essential to phonological-motoric aspects of speech production, especially syllabic-level speech sequ

121 es of syntactic complexity, lexical content, speech production, fluency and semantic content.

122 During human speech production, for example, phonation from the glott

123 All patients with nonfluent TEP speech production had structural abnormalities of the pr

124 Within the human motor repertoire, speech production has a uniquely high level of spatiotem

125 ic lateralization of neural processes during speech production has been known since the times of Broc

126 Studies of the neural basis for song or speech production have focused almost exclusively on the

127 heard speech sounds with motor programs for speech production; imitation and self-imitation mechanis

128 patients with left frontal damage, long-term speech production impairments (lasting beyond 3 months p

129 ons to left frontal cortex in humans produce speech production impairments (nonfluent aphasia).

130 r left frontal lobe strokes; (ii) persistent speech production impairments after damage to the anteri

131 ii) the prior association between persistent speech production impairments and Broca's area damage ca

132 at training with speech entrainment improves speech production in Broca's aphasia providing a potenti

133 as explore its usefulness as a treatment for speech production in Broca's aphasia.

134 neural activation during natural, connected speech production in children who stutter demonstrates t

135 een few neurophysiological investigations of speech production in children who stutter.

136 to improve the characterization of connected speech production in each variant of primary progressive

137 promise for the use of fNIRS during natural speech production in future research with typical and at

138 studies showing cerebellar activation during speech production in healthy individuals.

139 Here, fMRI was used to investigate extended speech production in healthy older adults.

140 ses to sensory perturbations in reaching and speech production in human participants of both sexes wi

141 brain regions and may thus facilitate fluent speech production in individuals who stutter.

142 We compared the brain response to speech production in L1 and L2 within two functionally-d

143 We found that speech production in L2 was linked to a widespread incre

144 -specific contributions to the difficulty in speech production in L2.

145 o explore auditory-motor interactions during speech production in other human populations, particular

146 al magnetic stimulation (TMS) to investigate speech production in pre-surgical epilepsy patients and

147 ed semantic matching, perceptual matching or speech production in response to familiar or unfamiliar

148 nguage changes may be reflected in connected speech production in the earliest stages of typical Alzh

149 Mean regional brain activation during overt speech production in unlesioned areas was compared with

150 ts, 0.84 for speech perception, and 0.74 for speech production) in comparison with other methods base

151 sensorimotor interaction primarily supports speech production, in the form of a state feedback contr

152 onses over neural regions integral to fluent speech production including inferior frontal gyrus, prem

153 ed speech synthesizer to examine learning of speech production independent of the vocal tract.

154 dioxide levels is among the prerequisites to speech production insofar as speech often induces hypoca

155 During speech production, irrespective of fluency or auditory f

156 Speech production is a complex human function requiring

157 e ability to express thoughts through fluent speech production is a most human faculty, one that is o

158 Fluent speech production is mediated by serially ordering and p

159 multidimensional quantification of connected speech production is necessary to characterize the diffe

160 cite in favor of positing forward models in speech production is not compelling.

161 This response of cortical regions related to speech production is not predicted by the classical mode

162 focus on the precentral gyrus, whose role in speech production is often thought to be limited to lowe

163 tering, atypical functional organization for speech production is present and suggests promise for th

164 ed the crucial role of the frontal cortex in speech production, it has remained uncertain whether the

165 While the frontal cortex is crucial to human speech production, its role in vocal production in non-h

166 Similar to speech production, language produced with the hands by f

167 reflected in the electroencephalogram during speech production, leading up to the time of the event i

168 Variability in TEP voice and speech production may be reflected in differences in int

169 dopaminergic transmission during symptomatic speech production may represent a disorder-specific path

170 al premotor cortex that largely overlapped a speech production motor area centered just posteriorly o

171 rive correlation-based features, a proxy for speech production motor coordination.

172 ected regions comprised nodes of the Bohland speech-production (motor activity regulation), default-m

173 y shows that left WM pathways connecting the speech production network are selectively damaged in nfv

174 ossing white matter (WM) tracts within this "speech production network" is complex and has rarely bee

175 nd drives left-hemispheric lateralization of speech production network.

176 right hemisphere regions outside the classic speech production network.

177 rmined functional and structural large-scale speech production networks.

178 Human speech production obeys the same acoustic principles as

179 and quantitative differences in the impaired speech production observed in aphasic stroke patients.

180 The influence of speech production on speech perception is well establish

181 area damage does not contribute to long-term speech production outcome after left frontal lobe stroke

182 e to surrounding areas by studying long-term speech production outcome in 134 stroke survivors with r

183 The current view is that long-term speech production outcome in patients with Broca's area

184 urce for corollary discharge across multiple speech production paradigms localized to the ventral spe

185 ed also reflected significant differences in speech production patterns.

186 Classical neural architecture models of speech production propose a single system centred on Bro

187 th the inferior parietal lobe, was linked to speech production rather than perception.

188 isphere activations predict chronic aphasia; speech production recovery appears to depend on left fro

189 of auditory speech comprehension, but unlike speech production, recovery of speech comprehension appe

190 how this premotor activity influenced other speech production regions and whether the same neural pa

191 Speech production relies on fine voluntary motor control

192 Hence, the extent to which bilingual speech production relies on unique or shared cortical ac

193 The contribution of insular cortex to speech production remains unclear and controversial give

194 Human speech production requires the ability to couple motor a

195 Speech production requires the precise control of vocal

196 by a disconnection of Broca's area, because speech production scores were worse after damage to the

197 ontrol of movement: From grasping objects to speech production, sensing guides action.

198 the paucity of articulatory motor plans and speech production skills, pre-babbling infants are alrea

199 During speech production, SMG encoded both spoken grasp types a

200 ested that other regions also play a role in speech production, some of which are medial to the area

201 ted to language production (sentential overt speech production-Speech task) and activation related to

202 We argue further that these two speech production subsystems have distinguishable evolut

203 et of acoustic time series representative of speech production subsystems, as well as their univariat

204 Studies of speech production suggest that recovery depends on slowl

205 stem to accurately predict less prototypical speech productions suggests that the efferent-driven sup

206 underactivations and the deactivation of the speech production system.

207 owledged and explained as part of the mature speech production system.

208 Alternative theories target the auditory and speech production systems.

209 in characterizing the effect of COVID-19 on speech production systems.

210 the /e, epsilon, a/ vowels during a separate speech production task.

211 ubject to subject and performance on certain speech production tasks can be relatively preserved in s

212 release during sequential finger tapping and speech production tasks in 15 patients with writer's cra

213 ntrol and feedback gains during reaching and speech production tasks.

214 evaluation, who performed overt and imagined speech production tasks.

215 es in SII/OP1 activity during three familiar speech production tasks: object naming, reading and repe

216 aptation to altered auditory feedback led to speech production that fell into the phonetic range of t

217 of speech motor control suggest that, during speech production, the brain uses an efference copy of t

218 -filter model describes the mechanics behind speech production: the identity of the speaker is carrie

219 hat were correlated positively were those of speech production: the mouth representation in the prima

220 y Synthesis) invoked listeners' knowledge of speech production to explain speech perception.

221 in processing auditory error signals during speech production to maintain fluency.

222 rforming sensory-motor tasks involving overt speech production to show that sensory-motor transformat

223 has been suggested that, analogous to human speech production, tongue movements observed in parrot v

224 hen optimizing room acoustics and developing speech production training.

225 te selective cognitive impairments affecting speech production, visual recall memory and executive fu

226 networks controlling two tasks necessary for speech production: voluntary voice as repetition of two

227 Highly coherent speech production was associated with increased activity

228 Specifically, compared to other tasks, speech production was characterized by the formation of

229 sks (motor movements, speech perception, and speech production), we show that the proposed method con

230 o account for temporal irregularities during speech production, we introduced a non-linear time align

231 ics, phonation duration time, and fluency of speech production were compared between patients with dy

232 substrates for left-hemisphere dominance in speech production were evident at least five million yea

233 tory cortical responses to less prototypical speech productions were less suppressed, resembling resp

234 g impairs the normally effortless process of speech production, which requires precise coordination o

235 the quantity and quality of fluent connected speech production while controlling for other co-factors

236 ogical retrieval) is an essential process in speech production whose neural localization is not clear

237 wel categories and tongue postures in normal speech production with a Bayesian classifier based on th

238 should be included in contemporary models of speech production with a unique role in speech motor pla