戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1  COPD and 26 with chronic bronchitis (normal spirometry).
2 uninfected participants was determined using spirometry.
3 ion of previous chest CT findings and normal spirometry.
4                Lung function was assessed by spirometry.
5 y adopted technical standards for conducting spirometry.
6      No safety concerns were associated with spirometry.
7 iratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) was measured by spirometry.
8 ation of reversible airway obstruction using spirometry.
9 nt prebronchodilator and post-bronchodilator spirometry.
10  Study, we examined 7,225 with COPD based on spirometry.
11             Lung function was assessed using spirometry.
12 rs and instruction on how to self-administer spirometry.
13 ymptoms were invited for post-bronchodilator spirometry.
14 tionnaires and lung function was measured by spirometry.
15 ed with hospital-based and weekly home-based spirometry.
16 previously identified in analyses of COPD or spirometry.
17 F%p) from baseline to week 52, measured with spirometry.
18  determination of carbon monoxide uptake and spirometry.
19 olume loops, and at 10 and 16 years by using spirometry.
20  performance and interpretation of workplace spirometry.
21  chest radiography, only 2296 (33%) also had spirometry.
22                Lung function was measured by spirometry.
23 tion associated with stable and/or improving spirometry.
24  inhomogeneity with greater sensitivity than spirometry.
25 rch were found to have good correlation with spirometry.
26 seline over 24 weeks, measured by daily home spirometry.
27 bumin-induced asthma model by using invasive spirometry.
28 rn was higher than that in those with normal spirometry (12.4% [35/282] vs. 6.0% [24/399], P = 0.003)
29  (diet, exercise, blood pressure monitoring, spirometry), 13%-23% for immunosuppressants and other me
30 onse to bronchodilator inhalation (58%) than spirometry (33%).
31 uality-of-life assessments, polysomnography, spirometry, 6-minute-walk distance, dropouts, compliance
32                                     Repeated spirometry, 6MWD, and peripheral blood T-cell cytokine r
33 types remained normal for GLI-defined normal spirometry across GOLD spirometric categories.
34           The larger dimensionality of 3D MR Spirometry advantageously allows the extraction of origi
35 acity (FVC) of less than 0.70 as assessed by spirometry after bronchodilator use.
36 etermination has been limited by reliance on spirometry alone to assess disease severity in predomina
37 e of onset and duration of symptoms, and (i) spirometry and (ii) small airway involvement measured by
38                            Clinical history, spirometry and blood samples were obtained from pigeon f
39                                              Spirometry and bronchodilator testing were done at basel
40                                              Spirometry and chest high-resolution computed tomographi
41 health survey that included a questionnaire, spirometry and clinical examination by a physician blind
42 12, and 18 months (respiratory symptoms) and spirometry and CO (ppm) in exhaled breath measurements.
43 expectedly present in ex-smokers with normal spirometry and CT findings.
44 ficients (ICCs), and their associations with spirometry and CT measurements of 15th percentile attenu
45  reference sources are updated with data for spirometry and diffusing capacity published since prior
46                                              Spirometry and full-lung CT-derived measures of total lu
47                           Subjects performed spirometry and had fraction of exhaled nitric oxide valu
48                                              Spirometry and health status (as assessed by St.
49 (FEV(1)) reversibility Materials and Methods Spirometry and hyperpolarized (3)He MRI were evaluated i
50 nd prebronchodilator and post-bronchodilator spirometry and hyperpolarized (3)He MRI.
51 vessels in 2014-2017 with postbronchodilator spirometry and inspiratory chest CT to quantify percent
52 ciated with AR2 that were not discernible by spirometry and is useful for graft monitoring after a lu
53 rican Thoracic Society guidelines using both spirometry and lung volumes.
54       We studied 3851 subjects who underwent spirometry and methacholine challenge tests both at base
55 s without respiratory diseases who underwent spirometry and MostGraph-01 from January to October 2014
56 ing history, >/=10 pack-years), we evaluated spirometry and multiple phenotypes, including dyspnea se
57 roved HIPAA-compliant protocol and underwent spirometry and plethysmography, completed the St George'
58                  Patients are monitored with spirometry and routine surveillance transbronchial biops
59 unction and atopic status were determined by spirometry and skin prick testing.
60           Weekly outpatient oscillometry and spirometry and surveillance biopsies at Weeks 6 and 12 w
61 ection of pulmonary exacerbations using home spirometry and symptom monitoring would result in slower
62 arly intervention arm subjects measured home spirometry and symptoms electronically twice per week.
63                                    Screening spirometry and tests of diffusing capacity might be bene
64 of bronchodilator response measured by using spirometry and the global imaging metric percentage vent
65 healthy patients who did not smoke underwent spirometry and two separate 1.5-T MR imaging examination
66 val) adults with persistent asthma underwent spirometry and were administered the A-IQOLS, other asth
67 participate, of whom 588 provided acceptable spirometry and were analysed.
68 Communities study participants who underwent spirometry and were asked about lung health (1987-1989)
69  measured lung function (plethysmography and spirometry) and airway hyper-reactivity (AHR; methacholi
70 ymptoms, rescue medication use, and baseline spirometry) and morbidity (school absences and unschedul
71 lth-related quality-of-life assessments, the spirometry, and 6-minute-walk distance results improved
72 en of chronic respiratory symptoms, abnormal spirometry, and air pollution exposures in adults in rur
73 ed using the Asthma Control Questionnaire-5, spirometry, and biomarker measurements (Fe(NO) and perip
74 oup and control subjects had symptom scores, spirometry, and bronchoalveolar lavage before and after
75 ulse oximetry (SpO(2) ), arterial blood gas, spirometry, and contrast-enhanced echocardiography (CE).
76 inistered to participants, chest tomography, spirometry, and examination of induced sputum.
77  connective tissue disease (CTD) serologies, spirometry, and high-resolution computed tomography ches
78           CMV viral load, serologies, serial spirometry, and mortality were recorded from medical rec
79 hronic obstructive pulmonary disease, normal spirometry, and normal airways responsiveness, and had s
80 ratory Health Survey provided serum samples, spirometry, and questionnaire data about respiratory and
81  with home peak flow and symptom monitoring, spirometry, and serial bronchial challenge tests, and th
82 g Initiative (GLI-2012) reference values for spirometry are appropriate for children in sub-Saharan A
83               Important aspects of workplace spirometry are discussed and recommendations are provide
84     RATIONALE: Accurate reference values for spirometry are important because the results are used fo
85                 Computed tomography (CT) and spirometry are the mainstays of clinical pulmonary asses
86                       Most studies have used spirometry as the primary assessment of airway obstructi
87 ealed from the researchers who performed the spirometry assessments.
88 a on clinical history, physical examination, spirometry, asthma control test, and doctor's diagnosis
89 children, recording respiratory symptoms and spirometry at 12 and 18 years.
90  a prospective birth cohort study, performed spirometry at 8 and 16 years and IOS at 16 years of age.
91 Stockholm, Epidemiological Survey) performed spirometry at age 16 years.
92 went inspiratory and expiratory chest CT and spirometry at baseline and 5-year follow-up.
93 ricted the sample to participants with valid spirometry at two or more exams.
94 ake were randomized, and 345 (89%) completed spirometry at week 24.
95                                     Standard spirometry, atopy traits, blood eosinophilia, and urinar
96       We subdivided participants with normal spirometry based on respiratory-related impairment (6-mi
97 ad no specific sex association, intermediate spirometry, BDR, BHR, more significant BTS step therapy
98 ung index cases to reduce bias, and compared spirometry between 70 SZ and 46 MM/MS individuals (contr
99  had the following assessments: Feno levels, spirometry, blood samples analyzed for hemoglobin, white
100 estimating equations adjusting for childhood spirometry, body mass index, age, and sex.
101 patients with asthma were characterized with spirometry, body plethysmography, impulse oscillometry,
102            We assessed all participants with spirometry, body plethysmography, impulse oscillometry,
103 combinations of physiological tests, such as spirometry, body plethysmography, impulse oscillometry,
104 e-matched healthy control subjects underwent spirometry, body plethysmography, multiple-breath inert
105                                      Data on spirometry, bronchial responsiveness, respiratory sympto
106                             We also measured spirometry, bronchodilator reversibility, and FeNO at fo
107 ma had positive results for all three tests (spirometry, bronchodilator reversibility, and FeNO).
108            COPD can be diagnosed early using spirometry, but spirometry use is only recommended in sy
109 rcent predicted FVC measured by clinic-based spirometry, change in percent predicted DLco, change in
110 ndardized procedures for diagnostic testing, spirometry, chest computed tomography, respiratory cultu
111 monoxide was tested and volunteers underwent spirometry, chest x-ray study, and a bronchoalveolar lav
112 oor microbiomes of patients with asthma with spirometry, clinical, and endotype parameters.
113 tives: To determine the effect of SZ-AATD on spirometry compared with a normal-risk population and to
114                                              Spirometry data were analyzed from 1,082 schoolchildren
115          Full montage home sleep testing and spirometry data were analyzed on 6,173 participants of t
116 ographics, clinical, and post-bronchodilator spirometry data were collected at an in-person study vis
117                                 Standardized spirometry data were collected at the baseline examinati
118       We included 2,250 participants who had spirometry data, 2,557 with full-lung computed tomograph
119 ged 39 years and older, white, had available spirometry data, and had complete data for phenotypes an
120 pe was related to 1989, 1995, 2001, and 2014 spirometry data.
121 determine the effect of smoking cessation on spirometry decline (n = 60) and plasma anti-neutrophil e
122 ents were more likely to have rapid-onset of spirometry decline (P = 0.05) and lower FEV1% predicted
123 smoking alone is not associated with greater spirometry decline in SZ-AATD, suggesting that cessation
124 ing or AAT concentrations, predicted greater spirometry decline.
125 with greater lung function decline, incident spirometry-defined COPD, and incident COPD-related event
126 .0011), and 15% increased hazard of incident spirometry-defined moderate-to-severe COPD (95% CI, 2-31
127                        Although both LCI and spirometry discriminated health from disease, only the L
128 hough the type of ventilatory defect on best spirometry does not predict survival, failure to achieve
129 termine the association of variables on best spirometry during the first year after bilateral LT with
130 king history, 44.3 pack-years), we evaluated spirometry, dyspnea (modified Medical Research Council g
131                                     PI(MAX), spirometry, endurance time, and maximal diaphragm descen
132 ine recipient, donor, and surgical data; all spirometry evaluations; acute cellular rejection (ACR) e
133                           GLI-defined normal spirometry, even when classified as respiratory impairme
134 ratory flow (PEF), and when stable underwent spirometry every 3 months, and completed the St. George'
135 ts (ages 17-93 years) completed 70 228 valid spirometry exams.
136                      Children also underwent spirometry, exhaled nitric oxide, allergy skin testing t
137                                              Spirometry, FeNO, ACQ and AQLQ were significantly better
138  XIII (FXIII), NO in exhaled breath (FENO ), spirometry (FEV1 ) and eosinophil count (EOS) in 36 pati
139 and Asthma Symptom-Free Days questionnaire), spirometry (FEV1), rescue medication use, asthma deterio
140  preserved pulmonary function as assessed by spirometry (FEV1:FVC >/=0.70 and an FVC above the lower
141             Among 630 children who completed spirometry, FEV1:FVC was less than 70% in ten (2%) child
142 ective was to investigate the progression of spirometry findings over 2 years in HIV+ adolescents on
143          Lower airflow values are present by spirometry for prepubertal boys than for age-matched gir
144         Education and provision of incentive spirometry for unmonitored patient use does not result i
145                                   Results of spirometry, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (Feno), mann
146 g 5,100 participants with GLI-defined normal spirometry, GOLD identified respiratory impairment in 1,
147 st that among adults with GLI-defined normal spirometry, GOLD may misclassify normal phenotypes as ha
148                           Relative to normal spirometry, graded associations with respiratory-related
149                                     Although spirometry has limited sensitivity for detecting small-a
150                     Standardized measures of spirometry, hemodynamics, functional capacity, and marke
151 low BDR and BHR, impaired but non-obstructed spirometry, high symptom frequency and highest smoking p
152  Vero and pulmonary function was assessed by spirometry in 432 PLWH from the Copenhagen Comorbidity i
153                       GLI established normal spirometry in 5,100 patients (50.3%), mild COPD in 669 (
154  assessed, and lung function was measured by spirometry in children at age 6-12 years.
155 a vasoocclusive crisis, and use of incentive spirometry in patients hospitalized for a vasoocclusive
156                    Measurement of daily home spirometry in patients with IPF is highly clinically inf
157 uction; however, the test characteristics of spirometry in the diagnosis of asthma are not well estab
158 ever, the evidence for the role of incentive spirometry in the prevention of postoperative atelectasi
159 Overall, the phenotype of GLI-defined normal spirometry included normal adjusted mean values for dysp
160 tween exposure in different time windows and spirometry indexes were analyzed by linear regression an
161 wi, using American Thoracic Society standard spirometry, internationally validated respiratory sympto
162 uding mailed screening questionnaires before spirometry is a cost-effective way to identify undiagnos
163                                              Spirometry is effort dependent and only provides a singl
164                                              Spirometry is the cornerstone of monitoring allograft fu
165                                  Background: Spirometry is the most common pulmonary function test.
166                                              Spirometry is the reference standard for diagnosing and
167                                              Spirometry is today the gold standard technique for asse
168 physema on CT among patients without COPD on spirometry is warranted.
169 alpha1 antitrypsin deficiency emphysema than spirometry is, so we aimed to assess the efficacy of aug
170                      Postoperative incentive spirometry (IS) is a ubiquitous practice; however, littl
171              With 3D Magnetic Resonance (MR) Spirometry, local ventilation can be assessed by MRI any
172 showed no specific atopy association, normal spirometry, low BDR, BHR and symptom severity.
173  reporting format in test-specific units for spirometry, lung volumes, and diffusing capacity that ca
174 ite the lack of between-group differences in spirometry, lung volumes, and left ventricular ejection
175                                              Spirometry, lung volumes, exhaled nitric oxide levels, a
176 s inherently support lung ventilation, 3D MR Spirometry may open a new way to non-invasively explore
177 eathing exercises, with or without incentive spirometry, may help counteract postoperative decreased
178 nalysed in all patients with a post-baseline spirometry measurement.
179 ch treatment group had a valid post-baseline spirometry measurement.
180 king part in the UK Biobank who had provided spirometry measurements and information on smoking.
181  had provided acceptable post-bronchodilator spirometry measurements and information on use of solid
182 ectories among participants with two or more spirometry measurements between ages 11 and 32 years.
183  particularly their impulse oscillometry and spirometry measurements, and group 2 participants also h
184 xamined the association with current asthma, spirometry measures, and related atopic traits.
185 lationships between primary cooking fuel and spirometry measures, as raw values, Global Lung Initiati
186                                              Spirometry measures: forced expiratory volume in 1 secon
187 ening, the following tests were carried out: spirometry, methacholine and mannitol challenge, exhaled
188 sthma and healthy control subjects underwent spirometry, methacholine challenge, and bronchoscopy, an
189               For those with normal baseline spirometry (n = 12,039), we found an excess of lung canc
190 bset of offspring by using blood samples and spirometry (n = 410 [45%]) and a questionnaire (n = 641
191   The 5-year outcome data were available for spirometry (n = 697), cough (n = 722), and dyspnea (n =
192       In a subset of patients with available spirometry (n=2540), higher RV ejection fraction and mas
193                                              Spirometry, occupational endotoxin exposure, and smoking
194 ur applications and respiratory symptoms and spirometry of children living in an agricultural communi
195  for 347 children at 7 y of age and measured spirometry on a subset of 279.
196 , and performed pre- and post-bronchodilator spirometry on eligible participants.
197  However, many centers monitor patients with spirometry only because of the risks and insensitivity o
198 CT (at full inspiration and expiration), and spirometry or plethysmography were performed during a 2-
199                                              Spirometry outcomes were compared with those of African
200 ry was highly correlated with hospital-based spirometry over time.Conclusions: The results of this fi
201      We investigated the correlation between spirometry parameters and respiratory impedance, and ass
202     Subjects with restrictive or obstructive spirometry pattern at baseline were excluded.
203 -3 times/week for >=1 hour) with restrictive spirometry pattern at follow-up (defined as a postbronch
204 were at lower risk of developing restrictive spirometry pattern over 10 years.
205 3% of participants had developed restrictive spirometry pattern.
206 al activity and the incidence of restrictive spirometry pattern.
207 omics) were found to be associated with poor spirometry performance and a lower diffusing capacity fo
208 ature vectors also presented with comparable spirometry performance, and were separable by varying de
209                                              Spirometry performed in the work setting should be part
210                                  Domiciliary spirometry permits more frequent measurement of FVC than
211 onic obstructive pulmonary disease underwent spirometry, plethysmography, diffusing capacity of carbo
212 ory biomarkers and lung function assessed by spirometry pre- and post-ART initiation.
213 of individuals with Preserved Ratio Impaired Spirometry (PRISm) will develop airflow obstruction, but
214 tegorized as having preserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm).
215 ndpoints were change in FVC measured by site spirometry, proportion of patients who had a more than 5
216                         FEV1, measured using spirometry, provides a straightforward, widely available
217                                   To develop spirometry reference equations for adult Hispanic/Latino
218 linical practice, use of background-specific spirometry reference equations may provide more appropri
219 e the high burden of respiratory disease, no spirometry reference values for African children are ava
220    The home monitoring program included home spirometry, reporting of symptoms and side effects, pati
221                                              Spirometry, respiratory symptom tests, and flow cytometr
222                                              Spirometry results and modified Hoehn and Yahr disease s
223 rt that screening and supplying smokers with spirometry results improves smoking cessation rates.
224 ificant improvements in IOS outcomes but not spirometry results occurred after chronic dosing with fo
225 /or sputum neutrophils and macrophages, lung spirometry results, and concurrent asthma medications (a
226                     Impulse oscillometry and spirometry results, which were used to assess dysfunctio
227 inded to HTLV-1 status, clinical records and spirometry results.
228 l activity in subjects detected with COPD by spirometry screening.
229                                      Current spirometry should be compared with previous tests.
230                                         Home spirometry showed excellent correlation with hospital-ob
231          Clinical-demographic questionnaire, spirometry, skin prick test and specific IgE were evalua
232        A clinical-demographic questionnaire, spirometry, skin prick test, and specific IgE to aeroall
233 nt, metabolic rate measurement, capnography, spirometry, sleep pattern analysis, and biometrics.
234 t, fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (Fe(NO)) spirometry, sputum induction, and gave a blood sample.
235 NO2 and after adjusting for race and season (spirometry standardized by age, height, and sex), NO2 le
236 sues that previous American Thoracic Society spirometry statements did not adequately address with re
237 current technical capabilities.Methods: This spirometry technical standards document was developed by
238 dence related to the following: training for spirometry technicians; testing posture; appropriate ref
239 born between 2003 and 2009) for whom a valid spirometry test was recorded for the child.
240 relation between the results from a standard spirometry test, forced expiratory volume in one-second
241 ere temporary residence, inability to take a spirometry test, hospital treatment of cardiovascular co
242 sthma verification algorithm on the basis of spirometry testing and a methacholine challenge test aga
243      A subgroup of 930 individuals underwent spirometry testing at age 50 years.
244 h airflow limitation (70.6%) had no previous spirometry testing or diagnosed pulmonary disease.
245                                              Spirometry testing was completed and the pre-bronchodila
246                                              Spirometry testing was used to measure lung function and
247 ning and feedback can improve the quality of spirometry testing.
248                      We analyzed 3567 normal spirometry tests with available AEX values, performed on
249 cts of the performance and interpretation of spirometry that are particularly important in the workpl
250 ngs challenge the proposed cutoff values for spirometry, the order in which the lung function tests a
251                         BEC donors completed spirometry to measure lung function.
252 ed validated questionnaires and administered spirometry to participants.
253 d to update the 2005 technical standards for spirometry to take full advantage of current technical c
254                                 We also used spirometry to test BHR to acetylcholine (PC20Ach).
255 ould not recommend the addition of incentive spirometry to the current standard of care in this resou
256             After baseline prebronchodilator spirometry, to identify the presence of airflow limitati
257 can be diagnosed early using spirometry, but spirometry use is only recommended in symptomatic smoker
258 n the definition based on pre-bronchodilator spirometry (using post-bronchodilator measurements from
259 insic skin Aging) and airflow obstruction by spirometry, using the ratio of forced expiratory volume
260                    The adverse events (AEs), spirometry values, and rescue medication required for AE
261 ected by intraindividual variability in home spirometry values, which prevented application of the pr
262 ly characterized by clinical questionnaires, spirometry, volumetric inspiratory and expiratory comput
263 dicted median change in FVC measured by home spirometry was -87.7 mL (Q1-Q3 -338.1 to 148.6) in the p
264                                              Spirometry was also conducted on a subset.
265  in clinical care and interventional trials; spirometry was also conducted.
266              More severely impaired baseline spirometry was associated with a lower likelihood of imp
267     CO in exhaled breath at the same time as spirometry was associated with lower lung function [aver
268                                         Best spirometry was calculated as the average of 2 highest me
269                                         Best spirometry was calculated as the average of 2 highest me
270 ion, expressed as the FEV1 slope in mL/year; spirometry was done annually during follow-up for up to
271 ive parameters, significant correlation with spirometry was found with the qualitative scoring for em
272                                   Home-based spirometry was highly correlated with hospital-based spi
273 redicted mean change in FVC measured by site spirometry was lower in patients given pirfenidone than
274 bstruction assessed from post-bronchodilator spirometry was not associated with use of solid fuels fo
275         Prebronchodilator/postbronchodilator spirometry was performed at baseline and 6 and 12 months
276               At the end of each study week, spirometry was performed by trained physicians, and the
277                            Prebronchodilator spirometry was performed for a cohort of 7-year-old Tasm
278                                              Spirometry was performed up to 3 times per participant (
279                                              Spirometry was performed using standardized methods with
280                                        Daily spirometry was recorded by 50 subjects for a median peri
281                    In 15/16 episodes of AR2, spirometry was stable or improving in the weeks leading
282       Clinical assessment and hospital-based spirometry was undertaken at 6 and 12 months, and outcom
283 cally diverse cohort of subjects with normal spirometry, we computed by both regression and ANN model
284 s and participants unable to be tested using spirometry were excluded.
285                   Only patients with COPD on spirometry were included.
286 evisions to the 2005 technical standards for spirometry were made, including the addition of factors
287     Cumulative tobacco smoking histories and spirometry were obtained at ages 18, 21, 26, 32, and 38
288 Questionnaire data, HIV status, and standard spirometry were obtained from 1,059, 933, and 749 partic
289                            Anthropometry and spirometry were obtained in children aged 6 to 12 years
290                           Blood sampling and spirometry were performed before and up to 48 hours afte
291 A respiratory questionnaire and standardized spirometry were performed with post-bronchodilator measu
292                                      PEF and spirometry were recorded in 186 cases and 160 control su
293 s (including prescreening questionnaires and spirometry); whether screening for COPD improves the del
294 re group) by use of impulse oscillometry and spirometry, which are easy to use, is meaningful given i
295 ned with blood collection, skin prick tests, spirometry with bronchodilation, and exhaled nitric oxid
296  sensitivity and AUC values when compared to spirometry with bronchodilation.
297                          COPD was defined by spirometry with the 2017 Global Initiative for Chronic O
298        Lung function measurement by means of spirometry with the raised-volume thoracoabdominal compr
299 ned by the presence of airflow limitation on spirometry, yet subjects with COPD can have marked diffe
300                                              Spirometry z-scores were derived using the GLI-2012 pred

 
Page Top