ライフサイエンスコーパス: staff

1 ts (median age 33 yr; 71% women; 68% nursing staff).

2 home without physical contact with research staff.

3 without the need to correspond with GenBank staff.

4 midwives, and other shift working healthcare staff.

5 out repetitively, and 15 members of hospital staff.

6 g physical therapy as prescribed by facility staff.

7 ensive instrumentation and specially trained staff.

8 anning, barriers, feedback, and education of staff.

9 pital experience for patients, visitors, and staff.

10 t some concerns were raised from the nursing staff.

11 t and high risk of infection to patients and staff.

12 surate radiation exposure to the patient and staff.

13 e more likely to judge that they have enough staff.

14 ons that included masks for dialysis nursing staff.

15 ts of probiotics and prescription by medical staff.

16 beds, and smoking prevalence among hospital staff.

17 mparable to that of symptomatic nonfrontline staff.

18 e likelihood of musculoskeletal disorders in staff.

19 H living unsheltered, and 1.3% (7/548) among staff.

20 to minimize potential risk to operating room staff.

21 (3) enhanced medical surveillance of unwell staff.

22 collaboration with data scientists and other staff.

23 vity that must be carried out by specialized staff.

24 to improving the experience of patients and staff.

25 egrity and without overburdening patients or staff.

26 udied likely to cause stress in patients and staff.

27 19 pandemic to minimise risk to patients and staff.

28 reening symptomatic rather than asymptomatic staff.

29 ms but in household quarantine, and (S3) all staff.

30 ritical for protecting patients and hospital staff.

31 fically N95 respirator availability, and ICU staffing.

32 Semi-structured interviews with hospital staff, 150 h of ward observations and informal conversat

33 d interviews were undertaken with 33 nursing staff, 17 senior nurse managers, 34 patients and 28 fami

34 ions among 25 residents with dementia and 29 staff (42 unique dyads) in 9 nursing homes.

35 ring frontline HCWs (5.2%) with nonfrontline staff (5.5%).

36 cial support for healthcare workers and care staff; (5) build, strengthen and maintain trust; (6) enl

37 ia, nurses, blood bank as well as laboratory staff, a clinical routine was established and 34 NMP cas

38 Among frontline staff, a median of 8 staff illness episodes was seen per

39 se effects of mixed shifts on perceptions of staffing adequacy may be reduced or eliminated by higher

40 Participants and investigators, but not staff administering the vaccine, were masked to vaccine

41 s provided for both clinical and nonclinical staff affected by the profound impact COVID-19 had on ou

42 giving patient names to hospital fundraising staff after asking patients' permission was definitely o

43 c, American Heart Association volunteers and staff aimed to rapidly develop and launch a resource for

44 During informal conversations, most staff also tended to say that they intuitively recognise

45 tive people from interacting with pathway (4 staff and 3 patients).

46 ere prospectively followed alongside medical staff and biobank samples from winter 2018/2019.

47 strained countries with few oncology nursing staff and continuing out-migration of nurses to resource

48 alised care futility is communicated between staff and is used to rationalise becoming unresponsive t

49 ctor intervention, one designed by Institute staff and operated under contract.

50 Patients subjugated their needs to those of staff and other patients, holding back information and r

51 Clinical staff and participants were blind as to which HD-MAP tre

52 r study, and collected qualitative data from staff and patient interviews and practice observation.

53 Study staff and patients were masked to training type.

54 is to evaluate the radiation exposure to the staff and patients when utilising fluoroscopic pulse rat

55 dialysis facilities, including education of staff and patients, screening for COVID-19 and separatio

56 AD insertions to reduce the exposure to both staff and patients.

57 od therapeutic relationships that serve both staff and patients.

58 only from frontline workers such as medical staff and scientists, but from skilled members of the pu

59 nflicts, direct abuse and/or neglect by camp staff and security personnel, and unsafe situations in a

60 l, capacity, and surge potential, as well as staff and subsequent family members exposure to severe a

61 Symptomatic staff and symptomatic household contacts were additional

62 rough the employment of bilingual/bicultural staff and the development of culturally tailored retenti

63 he pandemic, limiting the onsite presence of staff and transitioning to telephonic approaches for don

64 to identify and exclude potentially infected staff and visitors, actively monitor for potentially inf

65 nd with massive changes to the organization, staffing and workload of their teams.

66 cedures delayed/not booked by administrative staff), and 27% of PCCRCs by decision-making factors.

67 ore responsibility to midlevel providers and staff), and enhancing client engagement in primary HIV c

68 imported text, is often authored by support staff, and is often written after the end of a visit.

69 sponsor, the investigators, other study site staff, and patients were masked to patient-level tumour

70 All patients, investigators, study staff, and pharmacists were masked to treatment allocati

71 ship, nurse managers, information technology staff, and physical/occupational therapists) involved in

72 sepsis identification and treatment, educate staff, and report performance data to the state.

73 ell-being of the patient, the operating room staff, and the healthcare system at large.

74 high fidelity to the trial protocol by study staff, and the possibility of overestimating loss to fol

75 Patients, investigators, research staff, and the sponsor study team were masked to a patie

76 ring COVID-19 will protect prison residents, staff, and their communities.

77 Test Kit Support Group, composed of faculty, staff, and trainees across the biotechnology quad at Geo

78 During observations, many staff appeared to and spoke of the ability to 'block' ca

79 ernationally, key workers such as healthcare staff are advised to stay at home if they or household m

80 documentation is primarily valued by nursing staff as a means of protecting themselves through writte

81 y as competent practitioners; and defence of staff as having personal morality.

82 Although there is evidence that staffing assessments made using tools may correlate with

83 locate limited resources and plan their unit staffing assignments to better manage the needs of older

84 programmes for symptomatic and asymptomatic staff at a UK teaching hospital using naso-/oro-pharynge

85 ding testing of asymptomatic and symptomatic staff at Oxford University Hospitals in the United Kingd

86 demic places the health of operating theatre staff at potential risk.

87 ncies, journals, equipment manufacturers and staff at shared imaging facilities are required to impro

88 The stop signal task results of ICU staff at two sites were compared for conventional (in ro

89 Forty-four providers and support staff attended training.

90 y, which is also of concern in England where staff attrition rates are significantly higher than in p

91 reductions in donations and loss of crucial staff because of sickness and public health restrictions

92 lty retaining staff, long shifts for nursing staff (both registered nurses and nursing assistants) wo

93 Each was staffed by a board certified intensivist.

94 s sent to ICU directors describing overnight staffing by residents, fellows, nurse practitioners, and

95 ission-reduction, (B) screening patients and staff, (C) preoperative COVID-19 patient testing, (D) is

96 ted to examine associations between context, staffing, care interventions, nurse outcomes, and pressu

97 15, 2.02) times the number of individuals as staff-cases.

98 Research staff, clinicians, patients, and caregivers were masked

99 ellowship, webinar content and facilitation, staff communication and support, and program organizatio

100 cost levers to adjust service availability, staffing, compensation, benefits, time off, and expense

101 a publicly available resource, CDD curation staff continues to develop hierarchical classifications

102 ates for 49 991, 81 561, and 125 669 medical staff corresponding to years 2009, 2012, and 2015, respe

103 d exposure times between patients and clinic staff, decreased cost per encounter, and increased patie

104 Patient casemix, staff demographics, ward and time variables are included

105 testing staff in household quarantine or all staff, depending on infection levels and testing capacit

106 tandard occupational health for correctional staff during COVID-19 will protect prison residents, sta

107 acilities to best protect their patients and staff during the COVID-19 pandemic.

108 mmunicate a culture of quality improvement), staffing (e.g., lower nurse-to-patient ratios and ready

109 Nursing unit characteristics were RN staffing, education, and experience.

110 n recruitment and retention of mental health staff, employers may consider implementation of 12 h shi

111 tcomes, expenditures, procedural volume, and staff employment.

112 Hospital staff enrolled 6024 adult stroke and transient ischemic

113 operational challenges, ICU surge capacity, staffing, ethics, and maintenance of staff wellness.

114 The sponsor, investigators, other study site staff (except for the unmasked pharmacist), and patients

115 balancing the goals of minimizing healthcare staff exposure for testing that will not change clinical

116 Novel uses of technology to minimize staff exposure to COVID-19 as well as to facilitate fami

117 d that open surgery minimizes operating room staff exposure to the virus, our findings reveal that th

118 ances potential patient risks and healthcare staff exposure with improvement in meaningful clinical o

119 rtcomings are evident across the board, from staffing, facilities for rapid and reliable testing to a

120 isk-based personal protective equipment, (2) staff fever and sickness surveillance, and (3) enhanced

121 th parallel tracks for providers and support staff followed by monthly case conferences.

122 (TTSH) in Singapore has routinely fit-tested staff for high-filtration N95 respirators and establishe

123 nurses-in-charge's reports of having enough staff for quality or leaving necessary nursing care undo

124 s-in-charge reporting that there were enough staff for quality were 14-17% lower than when all shifts

125 For example, the odds of reporting enough staff for quality with between 60-80% long shifts was 15

126 the method of determining appropriate nurse staffing for VHA facilities.

127 oung Lives programme, to train local medical staff from low-resource areas to provide care for AKI, i

128 utbreak is effective in protecting frontline staff from the infection.

129 Half of all seropositive staff had been tested positive by PCR prior to this surv

130 1128/10,034 (11.2%) staff had evidence of Covid-19 at some time.

131 To ensure that these new needs were met, the staff had to be trained and distributed into different a

132 CDD staff has continued to characterize protein families via

133 In relation to staff health, 15% of respondents experienced COVID-19 in

134 Treatment was masked to research staff, health providers, and patients, and continued unt

135 Among frontline staff, a median of 8 staff illness episodes was seen per day; almost 10% (n =

136 ing service pressures exacerbated by nursing staff illness.

137 of service design, and high rates of nursing staff illness.

138 Investigational site staff, implanting physician, and study participant were

139 red and unsheltered and homelessness service staff in Atlanta, Georgia.

140 ance: 1) What is the relationship of the NIH staff in both development and monitoring of large cooper

141 in-person or phone meetings with >50 federal staff in executive and legislative roles, as well as wit

142 smission risk, our modeling suggests testing staff in household quarantine or all staff, depending on

143 vidualised relational work by staff, nursing staff in particular.

144 ectly address the key role of clinicians and staff in promoting portal use.

145 Overnight physician staffing in the ICU has been recommended by the Society

146 66 [1.25-2.21]) and Asian (1.51 [1.28-1.77]) staff, independent of role or working location, and in p

147 s of exposure to patients, allied healthcare staff, industry representatives, and hospital administra

148 fects of the weekly transition of care among staff intensivists on compliance with three evidence-bas

149 uate the impact of transitions of care among staff intensivists on the compliance with evidence-based

150 g hours on short term sickness (< 7 days) on staff is examined.

151 rsing care undone, after controlling for the staffing level relative to demand (shortfall).

152 w best to use tools to identify the required staffing level to meet varying patient need and the cost

153 ident's gender, dementia, functional status, staffing level, or the level of dependency of residents

154 However, it is unclear whether staffing levels are more likely to be perceived as adequ

155 The importance of nurse staffing levels in acute hospital wards is widely recogn

156 Benefits of staffing levels set using the tools appear to be linked

157 and, the extent to which systems can deliver staffing levels to meet such demand is unclear.

158 of long shifts associated with benefits when staffing levels were high relative to current norms.

159 quacy may be reduced or eliminated by higher staffing levels.

160 , and experiences of waiting for care and of staff limiting their time with them served to reinforce

161 e nursing shortages and difficulty retaining staff, long shifts for nursing staff (both registered nu

162 a class should be suspended if 1 student or staff member in it tested positive and that a school sho

163 The staff member most involved in each resident's care indic

164 As of September 9, 2019, a total of 559 staff members at the Department of Health and Mental Hyg

165 Support staff members authored substantial portions of notes; 3,

166 e audit and directly measure the exposure to staff members in simulated procedures.

167 lysis) and anti-nucleocapsid IgG assays, and staff members were followed for up to 31 weeks.

168 h radiation dose to both the patient and the staff members within the room.

169 rofessionals, and American Heart Association staff members.

170 ffice of Nursing Services (VHA ONS) issued a Staffing Methodology (SM) Directive, standardizing the m

171 e volume of publication evidence about nurse staffing methods remains highly limited.

172 The most common physician staffing model was a combination of full-time and part-t

173 ve timely necessary care, and maintenance of staff morale.

174 Hospitals, ICU directors, and ICU staff must devise strategies to overcome the modifiable

175 pants were 479 registered nurses (working as staff nurses, while head nurses and nurse managers were

176 ediated by individualised relational work by staff, nursing staff in particular.

177 me coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) among hospital staff of a Belgian tertiary care center tested over 1 we

178 onic worksheet during telephone calls by the staff of the COVID-19 Lombardy ICU Network.

179 We explored the impact of testing staff on absence durations from work and transmission ri

180 quire a multidisciplinary approach among ICU staff, oncologists, and organ specialists and adoption o

181 s for PDR) interpreted by trained nonmedical staff (ophthalmic graders) to detect reactivation of dis

182 has nursing homes: after being introduced by staff or newly arrived residents, it spreads efficiently

183 performance of providers new to the medical staff or providers who are requesting new privileges.

184 ve productivity by removing one handover and staff overlap.

185 lization, surgeon utilization, idle time and staff overtime hours.

186 Also, all emergency department staff participated in a designated sepsis education befo

187 Staff participation evolved from passive support to prof

188 hange could be facilitated with education of staff/patients by opinion leaders and prenatal counselin

189 ever, an intensive management requiring more staff per patient for positioning coronavirus disease 20

190 ffective dose equivalent values) for medical staff performing or assisting with FGI procedures in 3 r

191 strators were unmasked to treatment; medical staff performing safety and reactogenicity assessments o

192 I, 7.1%-12.8%) accepted hospital development staff performing wealth screening using publicly availab

193 Forty-three cases were performed by 1 staff physician and 57 cases were performed by 6 cornea

194 The most senior in-house physician was a staff physician in 12 of 60 ICUs (20%), a Critical Care

195 ct of transitions of care between individual staff physicians on evidence-based processes of care for

196 residents, fellows, nurse practitioners, and staff physicians, as well as duty duration, clinical res

197 Staff positive utterances and resident positive and nega

198 nute was associated with increased number of staff positive utterances per minute when residents did

199 nute was associated with increased number of staff positive utterances per minute, especially when re

200 terances (p=.030), the interaction effect of staff positive utterances with food type (p=.027), and t

201 verbal variables: the interaction effect of staff positive utterances with resident positive utteran

202 Study staff preferred one of the prototypes over the others an

203 A robust staff protection and health surveillance system that is

204 workers to evaluate the effectiveness of the staff protection and surveillance strategy in TTSH, a 16

205 lant, while centers with a higher patient-to-staff ratio were more likely to do so (OR: 1.011.031.04)

206 variously, hospital closures, furloughing of staff, refusals of treatment, and attempts to profit by

207 ncounters were done in shelter residents and staff, regardless of symptoms.

208 ts of operation and the need for specialized staff remain major hurdles for laboratories with limited

209 In all but one of the six countries studied, staff reported that nursing home residents were restrain

210 if specimen pooling and testing by research staff represent acceptable solutions to expand screening

211 d, 4) collaborative teamwork is required, 5) staff require specific skills or experience, 6) patient

212 cognised but evidence for tools to determine staffing requirements although extensive, has been repor

213 w of the major approaches to assessing nurse staffing requirements and identify recent evidence in or

214 heduling combines individual flexibility and staffing requirements in shift work.

215 ades of research on tools to determine nurse staffing requirements is largely uninformative.

216 lead to dramatically different estimates of staffing requirements.

217 While the importance of staff-resident (dyadic) interactions during mealtime is

218 a more efficient or effective use of a given staff resource.

219 portunities and rapidly become recognized by staff, resulting in inflation in performance.

220 In 322 nursing homes, staff returned questionnaires regarding 1384 deceased re

221 data was measured and digitally recorded by staff routinely required to do so.

222 g from two protective mechanisms: defence of staff's professional identity as competent practitioners

223 Testing all staff (S3) changes the risk of workplace transmission by

224 ate measures are required to keep laboratory staff safe while producing reliable test results.

225 esearch process such as bedside and research staff safety, infection control, the informed consent mo

226 ct of structured family rounds on family and staff satisfaction, showing limited improvement in satis

227 We linked data on staffing schedules for each unit from the Critical Care

228 rooms for influenza-like illnesses, altering staff scheduling in anticipation of surges, and securing

229 Staff scientists at NCBI analyze user-submitted data in

230 observations and informal conversations with staff, scrutiny of medical and nursing documentation, an

231 ther factors such as logistical constraints, staff shortages, and reallocation of resources during th

232 d to severe financial pressures resulting in staff shortages, increased workloads, and work-related s

233 We tested for interactions between staffing shortfall and the proportion of long shifts.

234 Although including interactions between staffing shortfalls and the proportion of long shifts di

235 priate measures to reduce risk to healthcare staff should be implemented when considering intraoperat

236 ifference-in-Difference) are used to compare staff sickness rates before and after the implementation

237 nese factory workers and American university staff, small adjustments to people's experience of parti

238 d dedicated advanced practice providers that staffed some or all their ICUs.

239 with organ recovery and transplant clinical staff, specialized sample labeling and handoff, and prio

240 on N95 respirators and established Web-based staff surveillance systems.

241 on prevention and control measures including staff testing may help prevent hospitals from becoming i

242 eless, applying PP is time consuming for ICU staffs that are at risk of mental of physical exhaustion

243 To secure the safety of students and staff, the Ministry of Education in Taiwan established g

244 The risk to healthcare staff through use of surgical energy devices is unknown.

245 ences, passion for ID, and working with IDSA staff to advance the programs and initiatives of IDSA on

246 evidence base for methods to support nursing staff to develop and maintain good therapeutic relations

247 er various barriers, including reluctance of staff to have difficult conversations about race or othe

248 ral particles and exposure of operating room staff to infection.

249 otivational messaging and support from study staff to maximize adherence to the training.

250 procally, the adoption of VADR frees GenBank staff to spend more time on services other than checking

251 tial since this will help frontline clinical staff to stratify patients with increased confidence.

252 y within a hospital setting is difficult for staff to understand and to respond to.

253 Tools generally attempt to match staffing to a mean average demand or time requirement de

254 The assumption that staffing to meet average need is the optimal response to

255 quire highly capital intensive machinery and staff training is more accessible; thus the use of a rhe

256 uous patient monitoring during the infusion, staff training on management of adverse effects, and att

257 tal cleaning bundle targeting communication, staff training, improved cleaning technique, product use

258 ng 285 VHA facilities were included in nurse staffing trends analyses, while acute and critical care

259 el interrupted time series analyses of nurse staffing trends and the rates of two healthcare-associat

260 raining needed to be improved to accommodate staff turnover.

261 such as through regular training, audits and staff updates.

262 ants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) by study staff using a computerised randomisation system.

263 Staff vaccine uptake was similar (~55%).

264 None of the staff was found to be infected with COVID-19.

265 A subset of PEH and staff was screened for symptoms.

266 programme and using existing facilities and staff, we did a prospective feasibility study at five pr

267 13.8 mSv; n = 6218) were similar to those of staff wearing two badges (median, 7.1 mSv; interquartile

268 pacity, staffing, ethics, and maintenance of staff wellness.

269 rates for facility residents, visitors, and staff were 54.5%, 50.0%, and 6.0%, respectively.

270 Measurement staff were blinded to allocation.

271 Participants and staff were blinded to group assignment.

272 participants and other clinical and research staff were blinded to treatment allocation.

273 Radiation exposure estimates to patient and staff were calculated.

274 Most hospital staff were found to hold contradictory views: that calli

275 Patients, investigators, and clinical staff were masked to patient allocation until after stat

276 Patients, investigators, and site staff were masked to the treatment assignment.

277 aged by a clinician compared to nonclinician staff were over 6 times more likely to be referred to th

278 s of the new modified technique by frontline staff were overwhelmingly positive.

279 A total of 10 583 staff were placed on hospitalwide fever and sickness sur

280 Covid-19 intensive care unit staff were relatively protected (0.44 [0.28-0.69]), like

281 PEH and staff were tested for SARS-CoV-2 by reverse transcriptio

282 Patients, clinicians, and research staff were unaware of the trial group assignments throug

283 agement, and support in motivating frontline staff who can work with agency as a team.

284 included additional support from nonclinical staff who monitored their progress in the online program

285 Background Staff who perform fluoroscopically guided interventional

286 , investigators, participants, and the study staff who provided the study drugs, assessed the outcome

287 staff) who vomited and infected considerably more second

288 isk of HIV infection in the opinion of study staff, who applied a uniform definition of low-risk guid

289 Hospitals staff with 12-hour and other shift work patterns to acco

290 ire data provided on potential risk-factors, staff with a confirmed household contact were at greates

291 oV-2, while not preventing transmission from staff with asymptomatic infection.

292 multipronged approach to protect and monitor staff with potential COVID-19 exposures: (1) risk-based

293 g the tools appear to be linked to increased staffing with no evidence of tools providing a more effi

294 This potentially isolates/quarantines many staff without SARS-CoV-2, while not preventing transmiss

295 cluded in the model were the number of years staff worked as a caregiver, and resident age, gender, a

296 d sickness surveillance, with 1524 frontline staff working in COVID-19 areas under close surveillance

297 Higher rates of Covid-19 were seen in staff working in Covid-19-facing areas (22.6% vs. 8.6% e

298 n the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in staff working in the healthcare sector within a small ge

299 ifficult to develop and sustain, and nursing staff would arguably benefit from evidence-based support

300 We also found that while staff would talk about strategies for identifying need,