ライフサイエンスコーパス: statistically

1 We then analyzed the polygenic nature of SLE statistically.

2 By statistically accounting for both environmental and gene

3 lated patterns in each CRS were confirmed by statistically adjusting atopy status, smoking history, a

4 umbers of proliferative cells did not differ statistically among the three groups, indicating that th

5 rove emission estimates, we geospatially and statistically analyze 598 direct methane emission measur

6 KHN, sigma and A/C results were statistically analyzed with ANOVA and Tukey tests (alpha

7 All the parameters were statistically analyzed.

8 evaluate its effectiveness in predicting and statistically analyzing the temporal evolution and spati

9 ling for objective socioeconomic status both statistically and by cotwin design after accounting for

10 early and likely was underpowered to find a statistically and clinically important difference in the

11 ented model-fitting techniques that are more statistically appropriate for the nonlinear SH2-pTyr int

12 We introduce a novel approach to statistically assess the non-linear interaction of tide

13 s Bertini, Paramotopy, and alphaCertified to statistically assess the solutions to these equations at

14 iscence after extraction, space closure) was statistically assessed.

15 ny studies is to identify editing sites that statistically associate with treatment (e.g. case versus

16 in (PCT), specifically PCT <0.25 mug/L, were statistically associated with Mp infection.

17 Mp positivity was statistically associated with older age (median, 8.6 vs

18 Clinical characteristics were statistically comparable (P > 0.05).

19 erformed in computational efficiency and was statistically comparable with two R packages, GLMMadapti

20 ents with complete and partial response were statistically comparable.

21 d with a reference method, being the results statistically comparable.

22 ontinuous outcomes and predictor data types, statistically corrects for covariates, and permits stati

23 es, a multi-institutional dataset containing statistically deidentified EHR data for over 21 million

24 Among older patients, RRs were not statistically different for statin (0.82 [0.73-0.91]) an

25 ance, and these fibers exhibit a pattern not statistically different from a random positioning of nuc

26 opter changes in implantation rates were not statistically different from each other (P=0.50).

27 This success rate was not statistically different from patients transferred with B

28 VA changes from baseline to week 24 were not statistically different in the active and control groups

29 distributions from each of the clusters were statistically different.

30 erparts, and their metabolomic profiles were statistically distinguishable from their native relative

31 24)](4-), containing multiple Co-Co bonds to statistically enhance observed rates of PT, promotes PT

32 proaches are mainly focused on searching for statistically enriched dots on a genome-wide map.

33 ate assemblies whose protein annotations are statistically enriched for specific gene ontology catego

34 in four out of five of our experiments were statistically equivalent to zero (P < 0.04).

35 h the national and center levels, accounting statistically for waitlist composition.

36 of extreme decline (or increase) that differ statistically from the majority of population trends.

37 The overall clinical complexity was statistically greater for those treated at sites with ca

38 in contact with the wine, low OTR wood had a statistically higher content in furan compounds (5-hydro

39 Improvement in BCVA (> 0.3 LogMAR units) was statistically higher in the Group 2 (P-value = 0.03).

40 all time points, immunological measures were statistically higher in the JENVAC group.

41 th ACE inhibitors and antidepressants showed statistically higher intake frequency in the periodontit

42 Because the 2 factors are statistically independent, the evidence they provide can

43 017 GHGRP activity data, the study indicated statistically lower national emissions of 1290 [1246-134

44 Global reductions in TBV statistically mediated the observed relationship between

45 nge of mobility inflow across the nation and statistically model the time-varying relationship betwee

46 By statistically modeling the relative risk of an adverse o

47 e top biomarkers from edge feature types are statistically more significantly enriched in the biologi

48 course for DFO of 3-weeks gave similar (and statistically non-inferior) incidences of remission and

49 BCVA differences between patient groups were statistically nonsignificant at 3 (P = .397), 6 (P = .46

50 Statistically, Our method achieves state-of-the-art accu

51 GO terms statistically overrepresented within a set of a large nu

52 racterize and account for spatial dependence statistically, potentially affecting inferences for the

53 that maps the backbone of each amino acid to statistically preferred positions of interacting chemica

54 lled a change point, but there have been few statistically principled methods for determining the exi

55 time of TCMR-free after liver transplant was statistically reduced in high-load VerEpC group (log-ran

56 Furthermore, statistically relevant differences in anthropometric and

57 concentrations of bioactive/toxic analytes: statistically relevant impedance changes are recorded in

58 S1) and LF (wGRS2) diets were computed using statistically relevant SNPs.

59 particle concentrations in order to produce statistically reliable results.

60 sigma specificity, which we combined with a statistically rigorous phylogenetic footprinting pipelin

61 For point mutations, we developed a statistically rigorous strategy for combining significan

62 -order testing-which provides a flexible and statistically robust framework for identifying changes i

63 ent, to our knowledge, the first evidence of statistically robust genetic associations in sporadic hu

64 Here, we present statistically robust relationships between erosion rates

65 Although the primary outcome was not statistically robust to conservative assumptions about m

66 caca mulatta) amygdala spatially defined and statistically separable responses to visual, tactile, an

67 higher in this group, although this was not statistically significant (33.3% vs. 22.8%; P = 0.23).Co

68 ur culture positivity, although this was not statistically significant (95% confidence interval [CI],

69 The derived estimations result in statistically significant ([Formula: see text]) correlat

70 related to physical activity were small, but statistically significant (IM = 2,282 kcal day(-1); SP-1

71 orrelations among the 3 lens dimensions were statistically significant (LV-LT: r = 0.785; P < .001; L

72 urrent state-of-the-art methods, achieving a statistically significant (P < .001) vertebrae identific

73 Cutoffs resulting in statistically significant (P < 0.005) differences betwee

74 caused by physical health problems) remained statistically significant (P < 0.01).

75 een group I (29.4%) and group II (11.8%) was statistically significant (p < 0.05).

76 he difference in speed among all regions was statistically significant (p < 0.05).

77 an 19, IQR 11-28), but this decrease was not statistically significant (P = .0770).

78 CI = 0.6-2.1), but this relationship was not statistically significant (P = .61).

79 between ischemic time and alteplase dose was statistically significant (p = 0.018).

80 is difference in effect estimates by HIV was statistically significant (p = 0.02).

81 cies of inconsistent parts of OS and NPS was statistically significant (P = 0.021).

82 The difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.183).

83 13.2% and 10.0%, respectively, which was not statistically significant (p = 0.202).

84 I, 0.53-1.3]; P=0.448)-a difference that was statistically significant (P interaction, 0.0235).

85 Statistically significant (p<0.001) differences in the u

86 epolizumab was observed, although it was not statistically significant (rate ratio [RR] = 0.56 [95% C

87 ce, and nicotine dependence among users were statistically significant across most sociodemographic s

88 ase were associated with frequent AECRS with statistically significant adjusted odds ratios (aORs) af

89 The only statistically significant adverse event was diuresis in

90 Associations remained statistically significant after adjusting for potential

91 The difference remained statistically significant after adjustment for gestation

92 The same milk samples did not elicit statistically significant agreement with the Lionex-test

93 y to develop MetS, this relationship was not statistically significant among males and females.

94 to 2.1% (P < 0.001), and %HEX increased by a statistically significant amount (0.7%, P = 0.030) in th

95 gible acute toxicity in the rotarod test and statistically significant analgesic effects in the forma

96 There was a statistically significant association between diagnosis

97 We found no statistically significant association between geneticall

98 e study of an adult US population revealed a statistically significant association between sleep dura

99 Nevertheless, a statistically significant association between sugar-swee

100 No statistically significant association was found between

101 alyses adjusted for multiple comparisons, no statistically significant association was found between

102 esult did not show a clinically important or statistically significant association with illicit drug

103 ek to no leisure-time physical activity, and statistically significant associations were determined u

104 No statistically significant associations were observed bet

105 No other statistically significant associations were reported.

106 ssing each grader individually, there was no statistically significant asymmetry in correct grading u

107 Associations were considered statistically significant at a Bonferroni corrected p-va

108 The differences among the 4 groups were statistically significant at P < 0.001.

109 erity in morbidity or mortality failed to be statistically significant because of survey design or be

110 Overall, there were no statistically significant benefits of any intervention i

111 and road/intersection ratio were found to be statistically significant between groups with low and hi

112 his literature, however, have failed to find statistically significant between-study spatial converge

113 We identify a family of large, statistically significant biclique subgraphs in the conn

114 Only Fpocket showed a statistically significant but low magnitude enhancement

115 te that although rhythmic mu stimulation has statistically significant but small effects on the initi

116 stimulant medication was not associated with statistically significant changes in risk of suicide att

117 None of the other wellbeing variables showed statistically significant changes in the adjusted models

118 COVID-19, remdesivir was not associated with statistically significant clinical benefits.

119 23, AHRR, F2RL3, RARA, and 2q37.1), we found statistically significant contributions of Cd to smoking

120 There was a statistically significant correlation between degree of

121 ned nose and throat swabbing and establish a statistically significant correlation between the detect

122 l sites for the FGGT group (P = 0.09), and a statistically significant correlation for the TDT-harves

123 The results indicate that there are statistically significant correlations between Google Tr

124 Statistically significant correlations were found betwee

125 Of the 6 layers, there was a statistically significant decline with age of only the G

126 All but one study reported a statistically significant decrease in the amount of opio

127 On average, we found a statistically significant decrease of 0.05 unit in the p

128 61% of contigs clustering into modules with statistically significant diel periodicity.

129 However, there was a statistically significant difference (p = 0.000012) in t

130 No statistically significant difference (p = 0.332) was fou

131 n under 10 min, and both platforms showed no statistically significant difference (p-value > 0.05).

132 There was no statistically significant difference between behavioral

133 There was no statistically significant difference between cBL and rBL

134 all mean length was 7.40 +/- 3.39 mm, with a statistically significant difference between dentate and

135 pecified secondary end points, none showed a statistically significant difference between groups, inc

136 higher for PET than for CT, but there was no statistically significant difference between HD and non-

137 enopathy and pericardial effusion, showed no statistically significant difference between the MDR-TB

138 aled that the majority of proteoforms having statistically significant difference in abundance betwee

139 y, good vs. intermediate to poor) revealed a statistically significant difference in baseline feature

140 Univariate analysis did not show a statistically significant difference in CSF C4 values be

141 ng variables, PMRT was not associated with a statistically significant difference in disease-free sur

142 There was no statistically significant difference in mortality betwee

143 A statistically significant difference in pregnancy rates

144 There was no statistically significant difference in readmission rate

145 us ligand-free structure performance show no statistically significant difference in structure type v

146 There was no statistically significant difference in survival on pump

147 There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of

148 We did not observe a statistically significant difference in the mean daily c

149 There was no statistically significant difference in the primary end

150 There was no statistically significant difference in the total number

151 There was no statistically significant difference regarding initial d

152 No statistically significant difference was demonstrated be

153 0.74 [95% CI 0.61-0.89]; p=0.0019), with no statistically significant difference with the risk reduc

154 eight women in the placebo group (21.1%) (a statistically significant difference).

155 P < .05 was indicative of a statistically significant difference.

156 However, the number of studies not showing statistically significant differences between CP and AgP

157 There were no statistically significant differences between grafts and

158 CBCT scan analyses showed no statistically significant differences between groups in

159 Histologically, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups

160 respecified secondary end points, there were statistically significant differences for all 9 CGM metr

161 prespecified secondary outcomes, there were statistically significant differences in 3 of 7 binary H

162 riteria with FAF, CFP, and IR, there were no statistically significant differences in baseline area o

163 TTNtv location was not associated with statistically significant differences in baseline clinic

164 No statistically significant differences in composition wer

165 However, there were no statistically significant differences in handgrip streng

166 Statistically significant differences in measurable heal

167 There were no statistically significant differences in other secondary

168 No statistically significant differences in responders were

169 There were no statistically significant differences in urinary or bowe

170 stly in favor of the treatment group, but no statistically significant differences were detected.

171 No statistically significant differences were found in the

172 Statistically significant differences were observed betw

173 There were no other statistically significant differences.

174 Statistically significant distances were detected betwee

175 igation into sub-optimal diets highlighted a statistically significant effect on rumen microbial abun

176 We focused our analyses on studies reporting statistically significant effects of prevention on venou

177 fidence interval, -.14 to -.02]), but had no statistically significant effects on bacteria, viruses,

178 ork Heart Association functional class, with statistically significant effects that were apparent 28

179 Statistically significant effects were not observed for

180 We find a statistically significant enrichment of genome-wide asso

181 Conversely, we find no statistically significant evidence of a higher false dis

182 This revealed that males showed statistically significant expansion of a region of the h

183 of the observed bicliques the neurons share statistically significant expression patterns and morpho

184 Within groups, CV declined in a statistically significant fashion from baseline to month

185 iables; the tests for heterogeneity were not statistically significant for any of these comparisons.

186 Group by time interaction was statistically significant for BVMT-R Learning (F[2, 257]

187 DGF-ESW interaction was statistically significant for graft failure (P=0.04) and

188 physical variables, (b) physical drivers are statistically significant for Pacific cod and walleye po

189 This difference was statistically significant for VSS score (P < 0.0001) and

190 In addition, we found multiple statistically significant gene-phenotype associations th

191 only 1 trial reported on harms and found no statistically significant group differences.

192 After case-mix correction, 2 hospitals had statistically significant higher failure to cure percent

193 in patients with severe ptosis, there was a statistically significant higher rate of success after M

194 data on progression-free survival (PFS), no statistically significant HR was reported for PFS in the

195 ocular pathologies, but both groups showed a statistically significant improvement after surgery comp

196 st cancer with brain metastases (BMs) showed statistically significant improvement in progression-fre

197 For stage III disease, there was a statistically significant improvement in survival with t

198 Statistically significant improvements in 40-m sprint ti

199 There were no statistically significant improvements in insulin sensit

200 inical trials (accuracy > 84% for predicting statistically significant improvements in patient outcom

201 condary structure prediction and resulted in statistically significant improvements in the Q3 accurac

202 Statistically significant improvements were seen in the

203 plicit time in type 2 diabetic subjects were statistically significant in most of the assessed rings

204 Even though the effects were not statistically significant in phylogenetically controlled

205 etween RBC transfusion and mortality was not statistically significant in the above-mentioned subgrou

206 The decline over time in reported cough was statistically significant in the children residing in th

207 A marginally statistically significant in the density of grafted bone

208 No other evaluated factors were found to be statistically significant in the multivariable analysis.

209 th the same professional was recorded, and a statistically significant increase in adherence to the i

210 bRNA reads; however, it does not result in a statistically significant increase in differentially exp

211 pared with standard care alone resulted in a statistically significant increase in the number of vent

212 There was a statistically significant increase in the relative compo

213 ssion of mutant dog SOD1 was associated with statistically significant increased aggregate formation,

214 cal approach was associated with a small but statistically significant increased risk of major surgic

215 By a post hoc analysis, there were no statistically significant increases from week 52 to week

216 Triggering is commonly identified from statistically significant increases in earthquake rate c

217 There were no statistically significant increases in KS rates in any a

218 Though there were no statistically significant increases in KS rates in any d

219 measured on multichannel membranes also show statistically significant increases, with temperatures t

220 utaneous immunotherapy, observing modest and statistically significant induction of desensitization,

221 We observed no statistically significant interactions between PM2.5 exp

222 Statistically significant intervention-related reduction

223 nt characteristics with promoters, including statistically significant local overrepresentation of co

224 insic kinase activity is consistent with the statistically significant longer overall survival times

225 3 [95% CI, 0.75-0.92]), whereas there was no statistically significant mortality reduction with prasu

226 n without those diagnoses, although this was statistically significant only for vaginitis (for vagini

227 We present new findings demonstrating the statistically significant prediction of a wider set of p

228 .8 for requiring TPK (P = .03) but was not a statistically significant predictor of perforation, scar

229 etermined vascularity and septation were not statistically significant predictors.

230 Nine countries had statistically significant pro-rural (significantly highe

231 lity while only Tajikistan and Malawi showed statistically significant pro-urban inequality (p < 0.05

232 ; spleen as reference region) demonstrated a statistically significant reduction (-36.2%) in radiolig

233 nd found that the DUBmut-infected mice had a statistically significant reduction (P < 0.05) in viral

234 Netarsudil did not produce a statistically significant reduction in the risk of stero

235 ating all 6 wk of posttax time points showed statistically significant reductions (-203.7 ounces, 95%

236 C3 inhibition with pegcetacoplan resulted in statistically significant reductions in the growth of GA

237 Results suggest a statistically significant relationship between immediate

238 own that the neurophysiological domain has a statistically significant relationship with the neurodev

239 gs, facial morphological variants, and CNVs, statistically significant relationships were found with

240 Statistically significant risk factors for developing co

241 riate antibiotic therapy in surgical ICUs, a statistically significant risk ratio of 2.59 was calcula

242 hile this facilitates real-time detection of statistically significant Rt changes, inference is highl

243 nt does not appear to be associated with any statistically significant safety concerns in the populat

244 vely, with all pairwise comparisons yielding statistically significant values (P < .001).

245 ised discovery of metabolites that express a statistically significant variance in a two-sample class

246 No statistically significant variation was found for perina

247 wed by HBOC and LS (both with 1 < RR < 2 and statistically significant).

248 egrating these features provided modest, but statistically significant, ability to predict causal var

249 AP after initial active surveillance was not statistically significant, and there was no association

250 hod detected 19 distinct drug exposures with statistically significant, large relative risks indicati

251 Although the difference observed was not statistically significant, the 95% CIs are compatible wi

252 The International Prognostic Index was statistically significant, with low- (0-2 points) and hi

253 esults indicated that sleep disturbances are statistically significant, yet weak, risk factors for su

254 A P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

255 (4.1 kg), though these differences were not statistically significant.

256 A P value < .05 was considered statistically significant.

257 were in the same direction but generally not statistically significant.

258 reated with the drug, the difference was not statistically significant.

259 diarrhea and weight loss, but they were not statistically significant.

260 tioning; however, all relationships remained statistically significant.

261 HR, 1.2 [95% CI, 0.9-1.5]; P = .20) were not statistically significant.

262 weeks a 25% difference between arms was not statistically significant.

263 The difference was not statistically significant.

264 es between prasugrel and ticagrelor were not statistically significant.

265 ank test with a value of p < 0.05 considered statistically significant.

266 verall (P = .30), but the difference was not statistically significant.

267 defects than the 24-2 grid, but this was not statistically significant.

268 (Figure 2F; Poliseno et al., 2010), but not statistically significant.

269 ssociated with lower mortality, although not statistically significant.

270 wing implementation of the Directive was not statistically significant.

271 progression, and from 0.77 to 0.82 for those statistically significantly (P < 0.05) inversely associa

272 rement in relative abundance) for microbiota statistically significantly (P < 0.05) positively associ

273 The statistically significantly associated variables for fat

274 , KHDRBS2-MTRNR2L9, P(BONF) = .039) that was statistically significantly associated with BE/EA risk i

275 lliative care, compared with usual care, was statistically significantly associated with less acute h

276 logical variants; however, MRI findings were statistically significantly associated with the number o

277 fic risk factors, coffee consumption was not statistically significantly associated with the risk of

278 toms, our multi-task learning models perform statistically significantly better than the models train

279 Subgroup analyses by disease state found statistically significantly better vision measurements w

280 d adequate correlation coefficients but were statistically significantly different and highly unpredi

281 Neither miR-21 or miR-221 was statistically significantly different in LV-HF versus LV

282 the overall risk of developing any SPCs was statistically significantly higher for 18 of the 30 FPC

283 C types, and risk of dying from any SPCs was statistically significantly higher for 27 of 30 FPC type

284 r smokers, current and past smokers showed a statistically significantly higher IOP by 0.92 mmHg (95%

285 Males had a statistically significantly higher percentage of MRI fin

286 Patients with postoperative AF had statistically significantly higher risks of subsequent d

287 The feature fusion method statistically significantly outperformed using DCE alone

288 atment, the following measurements decreased statistically significantly: Eczema Area and Severity In

289 ower (p = 0.007) than in Southern Africa for statistically similar exposure rates, demonstrating the

290 is easily computed and broadly applicable to statistically similar models found in phylogenetics and

291 This work demonstrates that statistically sound combination of gene expression data

292 ing to identify the best available evidence, statistically summarized the evidence whenever applicabl

293 Brain aging can be modeled statistically; the so-called "brain-age" paradigm.

294 ensemble's sensory tuning properties relate statistically to its correlated noise patterns is a grea

295 ty status and neural responsivity interacted statistically to predict inflammation.

296 present partially coherent sources that are statistically twisted in the space-frequency and space-t

297 nsive genetic architecture of phenotypes and statistically underpowered due to heavy multiple-testing

298 e flasks, while spatial colony formation was statistically uniform at energies above 7 MeV.

299 ntifying the set of theoretically justified, statistically valid and non-redundant specifications; (2

300 The aim of this paper is to statistically validate the analytical curves of a chroma