戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 which reduces femur retraction and decreases step length.
2 gait freezing but not background deficits in step length.
3 reflected in a more variable step width than step length.
4 p width was less than the variability of the step length.
5 hm including sagittal plane joint angles and step length.
6 tivity at rest and both walking velocity and step length.
7 alking speeds, balance ability, cadence, and step length.
8 ime and double support time) and 0.049 m for step lengths.
9 ost salient in the trailing leg and at short step lengths.
10 , which can impose a left-right asymmetry in step lengths.
11 dom walk with a heavy-tailed distribution of step lengths.
12 uantized steps" with great variations in the step lengths.
13 for temporal gait parameters and 0.018 m for step lengths.
14 h efficiency: 1) a lognormal distribution of step lengths, 2) motion that is directionally persistent
15 nsion (86 vs 122 Newton meters), and maximal step length (22 vs 27 in.
16 n strength (up to +180%), gait quality (mean step length: +40%) and endurance (mean change in 6-minut
17 lity of inverse square distributions of move step-lengths across a much broader range of resource den
18                                              Step length analysis shows that the molecular junction i
19 nts who experience gait freezing had reduced step length and increased step length variability compar
20 ing velocity, characterized by reductions in step length and prolonged gait cycle time.
21 es of the steps, resulting in an increase in step length and stance duration and a decrease in swing
22 elerometers recorded gait and walking speed, step length and step frequency were determined from raw
23 d to measure the dependence of step speed on step length and the dependence of critical step length o
24 ers showed significant improvements in right step length and time, stride length and time, cadence, a
25                         Here we measured the step length and width variability to determine if waddli
26 e novel features pertaining to paw sequence, step lengths and exploratory touches were accessible thr
27 nd (3) Traveling mode, characterized by long step lengths and turning angles around 0(o).
28 ed: (1) Resting mode, characterized by short step lengths and turning angles around 180(o); (2) Moder
29 e two discrete movement modes with different step lengths and turning angles in a hypothetical ungula
30 rmediate) mode characterized by intermediate step lengths and variable turning angles, and (3) Travel
31 fects of environmental temperature on speed, step length, and cadence during unrestrained walking ove
32 ignificantly increased step width, decreased step length, and elicited larger trunk sway compared to
33  to cued gait and were observed in dual-task step length, and walking speed however was more limited
34 This looping search pattern, in which flight step lengths are typically power-law distributed, provid
35      We also show that walking with positive step length asymmetries, defined by longer steps on the
36 ects, a similar regression approach showed a step length asymmetry in the PD but not control group.
37 rized the effects of step time asymmetry and step length asymmetry on energy cost during steady-state
38 th greater speed differences while preferred step length asymmetry remained constant and nearly symme
39 that more closely approximated magnitudes of step length asymmetry that are observed in clinical popu
40 nt following adaptation led to reductions in step length asymmetry that persisted into an immediate r
41 xplained as a process by which people reduce step length asymmetry to take advantage of the work perf
42     However, our results show that preferred step length asymmetry was not optimal even with extensiv
43 speed-difference conditions, while preferred step length asymmetry was not optimal.
44                                    Change in step length asymmetry was the outcome assessed during ov
45 a range of values of step time asymmetry and step length asymmetry were enforced.
46 cement alone led to no significant change in step length asymmetry, and sometimes produced a non-opti
47 the fast belt which we measure as a negative step length asymmetry, but this asymmetry is reduced wit
48 on alone led to more transient reductions in step length asymmetry.
49 the use of real-time auditory feedback about step length asymmetry.
50 metry, which is the normalized difference in step length between the legs.
51 of a higher self-selected cadence and longer step length both on the paretic and nonparetic limbs.
52 mains unclear why people reduce asymmetry in step lengths, but prefer asymmetry in step times.
53 ng ramp releases at close to Vmax and during step length changes (completed within 250 microseconds),
54 l, chooses a particular step frequency f and step length d=v/f.
55                The power-law exponent of the step length distributions and fractal dimension of traje
56 cal atomic step mobility, thereby increasing step length due to mass transfer between the surface and
57 ection of step duration and the selection of step length during such transient control events were pe
58 al stance time (static balance), and maximal step length (dynamic balance/coordination).
59 s, we assessed young subjects' perception of step length (i.e., inter-feet distance at foot landing)
60 s revealed asymmetries in hind- and forelimb step length in a unilateral PD model, but not in bilater
61  predominant tremor revealed asymmetries for step length in both cohorts and for swing time only in t
62                                              Step length increased and step angle decreased at higher
63 ce than CU (p = 0.014 [velocity], p = 0.003 [step length]), linked to attention and executive functio
64  in balance, postural blood pressure change, step length, lower extremity strength/range of motion, a
65 o characterize autocorrelative properties of step-length movements collated every 3 h for seven free-
66 magnitude of lever swing matches the typical step length of myosin-5 along actin(7).
67 ed how preferred asymmetry in step times and step lengths of healthy human gait is adapted during spl
68           Levy flights are random walks, the step lengths of which come from probability distribution
69 n step length and the dependence of critical step length on supersaturation in precisely controlled s
70 poral gait parameters such as step duration, step length or step speed.
71 teral mechanical perturbations affecting the step length over multiple gait cycles.
72 n postural blood pressure change (p = 0.01), step length (p = 0.004), use of > or = 4 medications (p
73 slower walking speed (both P=0.010), smaller step length (P=0.011 and 0.005, respectively), and highe
74 e vGRFs, slower step frequencies, and longer step lengths (p < 0.05).
75 g could modulate the deficient perception of step length post-stroke, which may contribute to gait as
76 f these models are stable in different speed-step length regimes that overlap with those used by huma
77 h greater speed differences, while preferred step lengths remained constant and nearly symmetric.
78 equency-related spatial analysis of movement-step lengths reveal that rest cycles related to the spat
79 s with small to medium effect sizes for left step length, right step time, stride length and time, ca
80 rticipants (n = 48; 18-33 years) practiced a step length sequence on a treadmill cued by visual stimu
81                            Walking speed and step length significantly increased with all cues after
82 ce (SMD = 0.59, 95% CI 0.02-1.16, P = 0.04), step length (SMD = 0.94, 95% CI 0.35-1.53, P = 0.002), a
83 eater gait variability and phase (p = 0.017 [step length standard deviation], p = 0.001 [double suppo
84 ified with RFE-SVM (mean step velocity, mean step length, step length variability, mean step width, a
85 cult to make generalizations about speed and step length, such difficulties are not present with simp
86  contrasted with the prolonged adaptation in step length symmetry ( approximately 128 strides) as wel
87 r the same time scale as the improvements in step length symmetry, and the magnitude of these improve
88              Adaptation was characterized by step length symmetry, which is the normalized difference
89 d showed greater daily displacement and mean step length than coyotes in less burdened regions.
90 yperbolic law v = L/T, where L is a constant step length that remains unchanged in mutants with adhes
91 he link between lateral tail undulations and step length through the rotation of the pelvic girdle an
92 rnal and seasonal based periodicities in the step-length time series.
93  the means and coefficients of variation for step length, time, width and double support time were ca
94 ts and independently constrained one or both step lengths to be markedly shorter or longer than prefe
95                                              Step length variability at slower speeds and step width
96 eezing had reduced step length and increased step length variability compared to patients without gai
97 increases the persistence of fluctuations in step length variability, and lastly (7) affects mechanic
98 E-SVM (mean step velocity, mean step length, step length variability, mean step width, and step width
99       We found that the active perception of step length was substantially altered following split-be
100 l participants initially walked with unequal step lengths when the belts moved at different speeds, b
101  FoG episodes and a substantial reduction in step length with frequent trembling of the legs during F

 
Page Top