ライフサイエンスコーパス: sternotomy

1 y bypass, circulatory arrest, and non-median sternotomy).

2 rted in a population at high risk for a redo sternotomy.

3 ports activities, breast implants, or median sternotomy.

4 ss invasive fashion than conventional median sternotomy.

5 st 3 mo after bilateral LVRS done via median sternotomy.

6 same operation through a conventional median sternotomy.

7 and has similar safety outcomes at 1 year to sternotomy.

8 (early CR) or 6 weeks (usual-care CR) after sternotomy.

9 lative to a historical control group without sternotomy.

10 air which demanded urgent lung isolation and sternotomy.

11 exercise training as early as 2 weeks after sternotomy.

12 e managed thoracoscopically, and 1 underwent sternotomy.

13 ot identify any predictors for conversion to sternotomy.

14 parotomy, 2 (1.1%) thoracotomy, and 1 (0.6%) sternotomy.

15 operation group; n=15 571; 59.8%) a previous sternotomy.

16 atients in the study period, 455 had a prior sternotomy.

17 small incisions with complete avoidance of a sternotomy.

18 and effective procedure compared with total sternotomy.

19 Twenty-three percent had prior sternotomy.

20 he aorta underwent CoA bypass through median sternotomy.

21 parotomy (57%), extremity (14%), thoracotomy/sternotomy (12%), angioembolization of the spleen/pelvis

22 ients who underwent either OPCAB with median sternotomy (13 889 patients) or on-pump CABG surgery (35

23 ion in S. aureus PSM of -9.85 cases per 1000 sternotomies (-13.17 to -6.5; P < .0001) in 2005, with a

24 d echocardiographic measurements: robotic vs sternotomy (198 pairs) vs partial sternotomy (293 pairs)

25 After midline sternotomy, 2.3-mm CT fiducial markers were attached to

26 n, P < 0.001) and the presence of a previous sternotomy (29 [59%] versus 51 [36%], P = 0.019) were as

27 s, p < 0.001] and the presence of a previous sternotomy [29 (59%) vs. 51 (36%), p = 0.019] were assoc

28 robotic vs sternotomy (198 pairs) vs partial sternotomy (293 pairs) vs thoracotomy (224 pairs).

29 ry bypass was used (7.6%), 17 conversions to sternotomy (3.8%), and 10 reinterventions for bleeding (

30 y invasive surgery vs. 1.6% for conventional sternotomy; =.4).

31 d surgery, 49 (21 and 109) days for complete sternotomy, 56 (30 and 119) days for partial sternotomy,

32 surgery, 97%, 89%, 93%; and for conventional sternotomy, 93%, 94%, 90%.

33 In comparison with CABG, median sternotomy (98.5% for CABG, 61.1% for staged HCR, and 52

34 ange 22-86) years, with 71% men and 13% redo sternotomy after a previous cardiac procedure.

35 t S-ICD implantation after sternotomy and 30 sternotomy after S-ICD.

36 damage to any lead among those who underwent sternotomy after S-ICD.

37 raining should not start until 6 weeks after sternotomy, although this is not evidence based.

38 men), 166 underwent S-ICD implantation after sternotomy and 30 sternotomy after S-ICD.

39 Fifty-five patients were randomized to sternotomy and 56 to pericardial drainage and wash-out o

40 isks of damage to the S-ICD electrode during sternotomy and adverse interactions with sternal wires r

41 ctivity to 52 weeks in patients undergoing a sternotomy and an earlier recovery of physical activity

42 rrent international practice is to perform a sternotomy and cardiac repair if a hemopericardium is de

43 - Neonatal piglets (3 kg) underwent a median sternotomy and cardiopulmonary bypass, followed by aorti

44 As an alternative to high-risk repeated sternotomy and conventional bypass surgery or catheter-b

45 ccluding sutures was achieved, circumventing sternotomy and coronary artery bypass.

46 Procedures for managing open sternotomy and delayed sternal closure were analyzed ret

47 iteria were age 18-70 years with no previous sternotomy and donation after brain death.

48 In part 1, median sternotomy and its complications, palliative procedures,

49 internal mammary artery bypass grafting via sternotomy and minithoracotomy to completely endoscopic

50 Sternotomy and pleuro-pericardotomy negated all effects

51 leased; b) group 2 (n = 3) animals underwent sternotomy and pleuropericardotomy to prevent an increas

52 valent to those achievable with conventional sternotomy and posterior leaflet repair.

53 patients underwent bilateral LVRS via median sternotomy and stapling resection by the same cardiothor

54 ents had bilateral LVRS performed via median sternotomy and stapling, and 1 patient had unilateral LV

55 lucidated between patients with a history of sternotomy and those without.

56 The two surgical approaches are median sternotomy and video-assisted thoracic surgery.

57 clamping, cardioplegia, and a thoracotomy or sternotomy and, therefore, is associated with significan

58 The association between MIMVS (vs full sternotomy) and race and ethnicity were evaluated using

59 ter surgery), after CR (10 or 14 weeks after sternotomy), and 12 months after randomization.

60 sternotomy, 56 (30 and 119) days for partial sternotomy, and 42 (18 and 90) days for anterolateral th

61 ations (1824 laparotomy, 100 thoracotomy, 30 sternotomy, and 97 combined).

62 and 48.4%) for complete sternotomy, partial sternotomy, and anterolateral thoracotomy, respectively.

63 s allow the avoidance of general anesthesia, sternotomy, and cardiopulmonary bypass, CBIs-including t

64 Four hours later, donor animals underwent sternotomy, and the lungs were flushed with cold modifie

65 (OR=3.5,P=0.001), CHF (OR=2.2, P=0.004), and sternotomy approach (OR=2.3,P=0.002) by multivariate ana

66 Mitral valve (MV) surgery is dominated by a sternotomy approach, with MV repair rates which average

67 een proposed as an alternative to a standard sternotomy approach.

68 h an operative mortality similar to standard sternotomy approach.

69 uperior results than the conventional median sternotomy approach.

70 , with morbidity and mortality comparable to sternotomy approach.

71 ad higher sleep efficiency than those in the sternotomy arm at 12 weeks.

72 cal activity (at 18 weeks) than those in the sternotomy arm.

73 ithoracotomy and 6.1% (10 of 163) undergoing sternotomy at 1 year.

74 ave matched the outcomes of major trials for sternotomy-based procedures.

75 Patients with sternotomies before lead extraction who experienced vasc

76 Sternotomy before or after S-ICD does not confer additio

77 ve, multicenter study of patients undergoing sternotomy before or after S-ICD implantation.

78 compared between patients with a history of sternotomy before transvenous lead extraction and those

79 n 11 (0.5%) patients (81.8%laparotomy, 18.2% sternotomy) before cavitary closure.

80 r confounders (t = -2.15; P = 0.04), whereas sternotomy CABG increased MACCE (HR, 3.9; 95% CI, 1.4-7.

81 ng were compared with a matched group of 100 sternotomy CABG patients using IMA and saphenous veins,

82 ses in-hospital morbidity versus traditional sternotomy CABG.

83 CoA bypass via median sternotomy can be performed with low morbidity and morta

84 tional coronary artery bypass grafting (full sternotomy, cardiopulmonary bypass, and cardioplegic arr

85 Mechanical ventilation, sternotomy, continuous cardiac output (pulmonary artery

86 nts and should be considered whenever repeat sternotomy could prove hazardous.

87 tation may have advantages over conventional sternotomy (CS).

88 CVA, albumin, re-HTx, renal dysfunction, and sternotomies]) derived from these factors stratified sur

89 Surgical incisions have varied from full sternotomy down to percutaneous access only, with less i

90 s equally distributed in patients undergoing sternotomy during pre- or postintervention periods.

91 y was as effective as starting 6 weeks after sternotomy for improving 6-minute walk distance.

92 ized dogs whose chests had been closed after sternotomy for instrumentation.

93 my is a safe, feasible alternative to median sternotomy for selected reoperative mitral valve patient

94 Anesthetized dogs underwent laparotomy and sternotomy for vascular isolation.

95 mp CABG surgery (59044 patients) with median sternotomy from 1997 to 2000 in the state of New York.

96 the 111 patients (0.9%) and this was in the sternotomy group.

97 y-one of the 55 patients (93%) randomized to sternotomy had either no cardiac injury or a tangential

98 MVR via conventional sternotomy has been an established treatment for mitral

99 Reoperative median sternotomy has known risks, including injury to or embol

100 ecause of risks associated with a subsequent sternotomy, immunosuppression, and renal failure.

101 gery was performed in 473 patients, complete sternotomy in 227, partial sternotomy in 349, and antero

102 atients, complete sternotomy in 227, partial sternotomy in 349, and anterolateral thoracotomy in 241.

103 own, South Africa, on performing a mandatory sternotomy in hemodynamically stable patients was that a

104 Minithoracotomy is not superior to sternotomy in recovery of physical function at 12 weeks.

105 horacotomy) compared with median sternotomy (sternotomy) in patients with degenerative mitral valve r

106 the rates of damage to the S-ICD lead during sternotomy, inappropriate shocks from electrical noise d

107 as implanted through a thoracotomy or median sternotomy incision with the aid of partial cardiopulmon

108 ry and danger to viable grafts from repeated sternotomy is minimized, and manipulation of the disease

109 th on the day of intervention, conversion to sternotomy, low cardiac output that required mechanical

110 ocation to receive either minithoracotomy or sternotomy mitral valve repair performed by an expert su

111 Surgeons (STS) algorithm for standard median sternotomy mitral valve surgery.

112 ated to minithoracotomy and 164 allocated to sternotomy, of whom 309 underwent surgery and 294 report

113 ants with congenital heart disease requiring sternotomy often undergo thymectomy to clear the surgica

114 This study evaluates the impact of prior sternotomy on transvenous lead extraction outcomes.

115 patients were randomized to undergo either a sternotomy or a minimally invasive thoracoscopically gui

116 hrombin generation rate did not change after sternotomy or administration of heparin, then rapidly in

117 thoracic disorders that previously required sternotomy or open thoracotomy.

118 rdiopulmonary bypass, aortic cross-clamping, sternotomy or thoracotomy, and cardioplegic cardiac arre

119 g a reliable ASD repair but wishing to avoid sternotomy or thoracotomy.

120 for early mortality were history of previous sternotomy (P = .0003), nonidentical blood type donor (P

121 ted with recurrent infection were history of sternotomy (p = 0.008) and patients treated for sternal

122 %), and 20.7% (-2.4% and 48.4%) for complete sternotomy, partial sternotomy, and anterolateral thorac

123 articipants were consecutive cardiac surgery sternotomy patients recruited from 2 outpatient National

124 The pigs were anesthetized, a medial sternotomy performed and miniature sensors for wall-thic

125 After median sternotomy, pressure transducers were placed in the righ

126 However, conversion to sternotomy, previous cardiac surgery, gender, and histor

127 12 236 sternotomy procedures were analyzed (6370 [52.1%] and 58

128 en heart surgery patients without subsequent sternotomy site infections (n=50) identified as risk fac

129 une 1993, 5 patients contracted N. farcinica sternotomy site infections following open heart surgery

130 dies have compared its results to a standard sternotomy (SS) approach.

131 otomy (minithoracotomy) compared with median sternotomy (sternotomy) in patients with degenerative mi

132 ndergoing cardiothoracic surgery with median sternotomy, the use of a vaccine against S. aureus compa

133 In patients with prior sternotomy, there were no instances of pericardial effus

134 igh-risk patients and in patients with prior sternotomy, this approach would yield superior results c

135 h congenital heart disease for whom repeated sternotomies, thoracotomies, or transvenous systems are

136 clinical trial enrolled patients undergoing sternotomy, thoracotomy, minithoracotomy, and laparotomy

137 When compared with patients with no prior sternotomy, those with prior sternotomy were more likely

138 After a median sternotomy, two pulmonary artery catheters were inserted

139 atients who experienced SVCs or who required sternotomy underlines the need for heart team-led indica

140 repair vs. replacement), operative approach (sternotomy vs. port access), left atrial size or degree

141 he mean intensive care unit (ICU) stay for a sternotomy was 2.04 days (range, 0-25 days) compared wit

142 tarting exercise training from 2 weeks after sternotomy was as effective as starting 6 weeks after st

143 Prior sternotomy was not an independent predictor of clinical

144 In Yorkshire pigs (n=13), a sternotomy was performed and the heart and bilateral ste

145 va thrombosis; in 2 patients, a simultaneous sternotomy was performed for resection of bilateral lung

146 An emergency sternotomy was performed in 1.3% of the patients; howeve

147 Re-sternotomy was undertaken in 897 (50.3%).

148 n hemodynamically stable patients was that a sternotomy was unnecessary and the cardiac injury, if pr

149 In the MV group lower sternotomy was used in 260/474 (55%), right parasternal

150 Conventional sternotomy was used in 843 patients, minimally invasive

151 ar filtration rate <40 mL/min), and >2 prior sternotomies were associated with poor survival after HT

152 s with no prior sternotomy, those with prior sternotomy were more likely to be older, male, and prese

153 lly suspected mediastinitis following median sternotomy were retrospectively identified.

154 nt surgery, multiple procedures, or repeated sternotomy) were preferentially targeted for enrollment.

155 , all without prior myocardial infarction or sternotomy, were studied using gated MPS.

156 t anterior descending artery (LAD) through a sternotomy with conventional coronary artery bypass graf

157 ary artery ligation (n =22) underwent median sternotomy with placement of a perivascular flow probe a

158 Infection of the median sternotomy wound after open heart surgery is a devastati

159 tribute to morbidity and mortality of median sternotomy wound infection and the results of treatment