ライフサイエンスコーパス: subpleural

1 al fibrotic, subpleural non-fibrotic and non-subpleural.

2 costophrenic angle (80%), apices (60%), and subpleural (57%) sparing.

3 ore of elastin mRNA expression in individual subpleural air spaces showed a positive correlation with

4 ion (I) and end expiration (E) on individual subpleural alveoli by image analysis.

5 erefore limited to alveoli at lung apices or subpleural alveoli under open thorax conditions.

6 thoracotomy incision, in vivo microscopy of subpleural alveoli was performed as the degassed lung wa

7 on with large tidal volumes and limitedly to subpleural alveoli.

8 multi-lobar, bilateral, and it concerns both subpleural and central regions.

9 Conclusions: Subpleural and/or paraseptal fibrosis were not essential

10 und-glass opacities in the peribronchial and subpleural areas of both lungs.

11 halo (48.4%), parenchymal bands (54.8%) and subpleural bands (32.3%).

12 that include ground-glass opacity (GGO) and subpleural bands with concomitant pulmonary function abn

13 A limited predominantly subpleural basal reticular pattern was identified in the

14 c hemodynamics, blood gases, lung pressures, subpleural blood flow (laser Doppler), and alveolar mech

15 ng mechanics and edema the number of injured subpleural cells per alveolus was similar in the three g

16 (-/-) mice, >6-months old, exhibit extensive subpleural cellular accumulation, macrophage, and pneumo

17 were consistent with diffuse B lines (91%), subpleural consolidations (45%), and thickened pleural l

18 oderate (e.g., LUS score 1 Fleiss' k = 0.27; subpleural consolidations Fleiss' k = 0.59).

19 stinct LUS findings (e.g., air bronchograms, subpleural consolidations) may be more suitable for dise

20 -glass opacities (100%), reticulation (83%), subpleural curvilinear lines (62%), parenchymal bands (3

21 ly in a predominantly peribronchovascular or subpleural distribution.

22 tologically by visceral pleural fibrosis and subpleural fibroelastosis.

23 pper lobe-predominant pleural thickening and subpleural fibrosis and histologically by visceral pleur

24 Subpleural fibrosis unique to this form of nanotubes inc

25 re followed through 107 days post-infection, subpleural fibrosis with associated tertiary lymphoid st

26 ion of antifibrotics, of them 18 (75%) had a subpleural fibrotic pattern.

27 ILA were classified as subpleural fibrotic, subpleural non-fibrotic and non-sub

28 cept for the persistence of interstitial and subpleural granulomas that harbor viable cryptococci ins

29 The presence of a rim of subpleural honeycomb change was present in all of the 25

30 cesses and associate with new-onset fibrotic-subpleural ILA.

31 iated with both ILAs (P = 2.6 x 10(-27)) and subpleural ILAs (P = 1.6 x 10(-29)).

32 higher probability of new-onset fibrotic or subpleural ILAs in MESA, and two of these, junctional ad

33 -related proteins with new-onset fibrotic or subpleural ILAs were examined in MESA participants with

34 bability of developing new-onset fibrotic or subpleural interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs).

35 ance, pulmonary histologic findings included subpleural lesions composed of collagen, proliferative f

36 Use of long-needle-path biopsy of subpleural lesions resulted in a higher diagnostic yield

37 luded crazy-paving pattern, fibrous stripes, subpleural lines, architectural distortion, air bronchog

38 cy (87% vs 89%) also improved when comparing subpleural (< or =1.0 cm from pleural surface, n = 30) w

39 opathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) affects the subpleural lung but is considered to spare small airways

40 s radiomics features were extracted from the subpleural lung parenchyma traversed by needle.

41 ; the greatest mean changes were observed in subpleural lung regions in both groups (bexotegrast, -3.

42 Subpleural lung regions were imaged with confocal micros

43 vivo with microscopic resolution, including subpleural lung, and has the potential to improve the di

44 w into enlarged paravertebral lymphatics and subpleural lymphatic plexuses that had incompetent lymph

45 e embedded in the subpleural wall and within subpleural macrophages.

46 ells expressing green fluorescent protein in subpleural microvessels in intact, perfused mouse and ra

47 reased NO generation in endothelial cells of subpleural microvessels in situ occurred between 30 and

48 redominantly peribronchovascular (n = 15) or subpleural (n = 14) distribution.

49 PLC on HRCT (smooth or nodular septal lines, subpleural nodularity, peribronchovascular thickening, s

50 ILA were classified as subpleural fibrotic, subpleural non-fibrotic and non-subpleural.

51 ons; FNAB of 0.8-1.0-cm lesions that are not subpleural offers the best opportunity for success.

52 The UIP guideline criteria of "predominantly subpleural or paraseptal fibrosis" was infrequently repo

53 ollagen staining, less severe fibrotic foci (subpleural, peri-vascular and peri-bronchiolar lesions)

54 ear HTRE1 (rs7744971, P = 4.2 x 10(-8)) with subpleural-predominant ILAs.

55 ion study (GWAS) of ILAs.Methods: ILAs and a subpleural-predominant subtype were assessed on chest co

56 f patients who underwent CT-guided biopsy of subpleural pulmonary nodules measuring up to 2 cm in dia

57 d lungs, which result in selective damage to subpleural pulmonary vessels and primary graft dysfuncti

58 n Case 0269 was observed primarily along the subpleural regions while no alpha activity was seen in t

59 y of many pulmonary diseases that affect the subpleural regions.

60 The combination of a subpleural reticular pattern and lower zone predominance

61 d: 31 of 91 (34%) participants showed subtle subpleural reticulation, ground-glass opacities, or both

62 Bilateral lung involvement, subpleural reticulum, ground-glass opacity, peripheral l

63 Subpleural round consolidations and mediastinal lymphade

64 Subpleural round consolidations, mediastinal lymphadenop

65 etwork and this drainage is different in the subpleural space compared to the intralobular space.

66 er 1-mm increase; P = .002), and presence of subpleural sparing (hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% CI: 0.56, 0.

67 Subpleural sparing and pleural effusion were seen approx

68 Subpleural sparing and pleural effusion were seen in app

69 The presence of subpleural sparing on CT scans enables accurate identifi

70 The presence of subpleural sparing was also evaluated in cases of atelec

71 Subpleural sparing was seen at CT in 38 (95%) of the lun

72 At CT, subpleural sparing was seen in 11 of 14 (79%) and a reve

73 lly multifocal and multilobar, possibly with subpleural sparing.

74 contusions were reviewed for the presence of subpleural sparing.

75 ality that detects microscopic features from subpleural to proximal airways.

76 mation, neutrophils traffic predominantly to subpleural vessels, where their aggregation is directed

77 Nanotubes were embedded in the subpleural wall and within subpleural macrophages.