ライフサイエンスコーパス: subscale

1 1.96 [95% CI 1.1-3.5], p = 0.02, Sequential subscale).

2 State' subscale) and longitudinally ('Trait' subscale).

3 ehavior Checklist Social Withdrawal/Lethargy subscale.

4 the negative affect 11-items TPDS (TPDS-NA) subscale.

5 for Somatoform Symptoms Conversion Disorder subscale.

6 h having less severe burnout on at least one subscale.

7 ignificantly less apathetic on the Emotional subscale.

8 examination or AD assessment scale-cognitive subscale.

9 mitation and dependency of the socioeconomic subscale.

10 g and distance vision of the visual function subscale.

11 One item was removed from the psychosocial subscale.

12 ospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-anxiety subscale.

13 , -21.6 to -1.3; P=0.03) lower for the motor subscale.

14 =35]), but not for the DRSP physical symptom subscale.

15 near vision question of the visual function subscale.

16 l gyrus were correlated with the TFI control subscale.

17 e Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI) relaxation subscale.

18 comparison with the referent KDQOL-36 Burden subscale.

19 e PANSS score driven by the negative symptom subscale.

20 tion" subscale, and 26% on the "achievement" subscale.

21 mented Local Eye and Visual Function symptom subscales.

22 e scale and ranged from 0.77 to 0.88 for the subscales.

23 te Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ25) subscales.

24 , SD = 5.77) were the highest rated workload subscales.

25 with secondary analyses conducted on symptom subscales.

26 elated to Vision (performance-based measure) subscales.

27 clusters and Modified Glaucoma Symptom Scale subscales.

28 t validity were found to be good for the DAS subscales.

29 correlated with a majority of the NEI VFQ-25 subscales.

30 ssed Assessment of Ability Related to Vision subscales.

31 le or any of the disease-specific or generic subscales.

32 alysis resulted in a 21-item scale with five subscales.

33 surgical approach on workload overall and by subscales.

34 s PANSS Negative and General Psychopathology subscales.

35 .44 [11.45] vs 4.42 [8.94]; P < .05) SHPC-18 subscales.

36 significant or showed an effect only on some subscales.

37 7 and 0.41, respectively for WOMAC stiffness subscale, 0.05, 0.57 and 0.53, respectively for WOMAC ph

38 , 0.55 and 0.05, respectively for WOAMC pain subscale, 0.59, 0.47 and 0.41, respectively for WOMAC st

39 5 years; full scale IQ >70; ABC-Irritability subscale 13).

40 -15.5 to 0.9; P=0.08) lower on the cognitive subscale, 14.1 points (95% CI, -22.7 to -5.5; P=0.002) l

41 .55 to 0.86]; p=0.0008), and prostate cancer subscale (18.43 [14.85 to 18.66] vs 14.69 [11.07 to 16.2

42 -2.91 logits, P < 0.001), and socioemotional subscale (-2.63 vs. -2.10 logits, P < 0.001).

43 ional subscales (P < 0.001), visual function subscale (-3.85 vs. -2.91 logits, P < 0.001), and socioe

44 e also noted for the DRSP depressive symptom subscale (42% [SD=22] compared with 22% [SD=32]) and the

45 idence of severe burnout on the "exhaustion" subscale, 44% on the "depersonalization" subscale, and 2

46 22% [SD=32]) and the DRSP anger/irritability subscale (47% [SD=21] compared with 23% [SD=35]), but no

47 Of the Health Survey subscales, 5 of 7 improved significantly.

48 Association class improvement for the AFEQT subscales Activities of Daily Living and Symptoms: 5.1 (

49 zheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) and the Alzheimer's Disease Co-opera

50 eimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog) at week 24 and the Mattis Dementia R

51 ore and higher AD assessment scale cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog) score.

52 zheimer's disease assessment scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog).

53 zheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog; p=0.011) and Mini-Mental State Exami

54 zheimer's Disease Assessment Scale cognitive subscale [ADAS11] over time [p = 0.03, beta +/- standard

55 nd the CTRS-R:S ADHD index and hyperactivity subscale also deteriorated significantly more in the dis

56 ths and Difficulties Questionnaire prosocial subscale (AMD, 0.5; 95% CI, >0.0-0.9).

57 among the SH group and BPRS-E affect-anxiety subscale among the V group significantly predicted aggre

58 ation-level Independent Practice and Support subscale, an NP-PCOCQ subscale, had a significant positi

59 53, respectively for WOMAC physical function subscale and 0.65, 0.99 and 0.12, respectively for VAS p

60 nd Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total and subscale and cognition factor scores.

61 sociated with severe burnout on at least one subscale and higher burnout scores on each subscale and

62 for Somatoform Symptoms Conversion Disorder subscale and Patient Health Questionnaire-15 composite s

63 cial function question of the socioemotional subscale and the better eye VA correlated with driving a

64 The ADHD-RS inattention subscale and the CTRS-R:S ADHD index and hyperactivity s

65 e subscale and higher burnout scores on each subscale and the total inventory.

66 ronic pain syndrome (n = 24, 38%) had higher subscale and total (34.1 vs 14.4, P = .001) symptom scor

67 nstructed to estimate associations between 7 subscales and 1 composite score of PREs and 30-day morbi

68 riginal Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale subscales and previously proposed factor models.

69 tive correlation between 40 Hz ITC and PANSS subscales and total scores under the influence of Delta(

70 ness (SMD = - 0.47, 95% CI - 0.71 to - 0.23) subscales and VAS (SMD = - 0.79, 95% CI - 1.05 to - 0.05

71 perienced around time of assessment ('State' subscale) and longitudinally ('Trait' subscale).

72 R 1.74 [95% CI 1.3-2.4], p < 0.001, Planning subscales) and creche attendance (aOR 1.96 [95% CI 1.1-3

73 Quality-of-Life (Physical and Mental Health subscales) and the Patient Activation Measure.

74 L-36 (Burden, Effects, and Symptoms/Problems subscales), and generic SF-12 measures across groups in

75 2.7 to -5.5; P=0.002) lower for the language subscale, and 11.5 points (95% CI, -21.6 to -1.3; P=0.03

76 on" subscale, 44% on the "depersonalization" subscale, and 26% on the "achievement" subscale.

77 x TOI, items from the FACT-GOG-Neurotoxicity subscale, and a worst pain item from the Brief Pain Inve

78 re-Appearance Scales Body Areas Satisfaction subscale, and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depre

79 Women Scale (SVAWS) physical/sexual violence subscale, and the secondary outcome, male alcohol misuse

80 ificant increase in apathy on the Initiation subscale, and were significantly less apathetic on the E

81 Global Impressions severity and improvement subscales, and patient-reported measures of depression a

82 reastfed for 2-5 mo versus </=1 mo (Learning subscale aOR 2.07 [95% CI 1.0-4.3], p = 0.05).

83 ly associated with the relationship problems subscale at 3 y [incidence rate ratio (IRR): 1.11; 95% c

84 condary outcomes included the CPG disability subscale at 6 mo and the following measured at 6 and 12

85 ttle Angina Questionnaire's angina frequency subscale at baseline and 2 years follow-up.

86 cutoff on the FCR Inventory (FCRI) severity subscale at screening.

87 in favor of the NRCA cohort on several KCCQ subscales at 1 month.

88 positively associated with emotional symptom subscales at both 3 and 5 y.

89 ificant differences in the following OHIP-14 subscales before and after treatment: physical pain (P =

90 zheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (beta = 0.0017, P = 0.01).

91 on portions of the FACT-C (colorectal cancer subscale: beta = 1.04; 95% CI: 0.26, 1.82) and the SF-12

92 significant difference in LLQ scores in any subscale between participants with focal macular damage

93 zheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale, body mass index, alcohol intake and genetic va

94 essed by the Short Form-36 physical function subscale); both were self-rated by patients at 12 weeks

95 and the Clinical Global Impressions severity subscale (CGI-S), respectively, analyzed using a mixed-e

96 r Rehabilitation Evaluation System sexuality subscales, changes in vaginal atrophy using a validated

97 easured by the Checklist Individual Strength subscale (CIS-fatigue) at 4 weeks.

98 Effects on the MATRICS, other PANSS subscales, Clinical Global Impression, and Global Assess

99 Ten of these 11 items were subscale components of bradykinesia.

100 ( P = .018), and from T0 to T1 on three FCRI subscales (coping, psychological distress, and triggers)

101 (6,150)=58.24, p=<.001), for the end of life subscale (country: F(2, 154)=28.23, p<.001; unit: F(6,15

102 0)=25.25, p=<.001), the family communication subscale (country: F(2,154)=15.04, p=<.001; unit: F(6,15

103 Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscales, covering pain, symptoms, activities of daily

104 ch's Alpha between .77 and .92), and for all subscales (Cronbach's Alpha between .79 and .91).

105 26; P = .026), the SF-MPQ-2 neuropathic pain subscale (d = 0.24; P = .036), and SF-MPQ-2 total scores

106 0.61; P = .002), the Present Pain Intensity subscale (d = 0.26; P = .026), the SF-MPQ-2 neuropathic

107 survey and its physical and mental component subscales, days unable to participate in social life, da

108 the Aberrant Behavior Checklist-Irritability subscale declined 47.7% in parent training (from 23.7 to

109 5% CI: -4.4, -0.1, P = .04) and the vitality subscale decreased by 3.5 points (95% CI: -5.6, -1.4, P

110 Each item in the LLQ is designated to 1 of 6 subscales describing functional problems in low luminanc

111 CT-COG] perceived cognitive impairment [PCI] subscale): difference between groups after intervention

112 remained a significant predictor of the LLQ subscales "difficulty with extreme lighting" (P = .0024)

113 ith ED symptom measures overall and with the subscales Drive for Thinness and Body Dissatisfaction de

114 HD reported reduced scores on all NEI-VFQ-25 subscales (each P < 0.001) with the exception of color v

115 ventory, a validated tool comprised of three subscales-emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and a

116 Cronbach's alpha >0.83 for all subscales established strong internal consistency, which

117 The EFA supported 6 subscales (eye pain intensity at 24 hours and 2 weeks, n

118 : F(6,150)=27.38, p=<.001), the family needs subscale (F(2,154)=22.33, p=<.001; unit: F(6,150)=42.45,

119 , p=<.001) but only for units on the process subscale (F(6,150)=8.98, p=<.001.

120 essed with the Checklist Individual Strength subscale Fatigue Severity.

121 us/Quality of Life (GHS/QoL) scale and seven subscales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, physical

122 was a significant difference in all FACT-COG subscales, favoring the intervention.

123 the Sickness Insight in Coping Questionnaire-subscales (fighting spirit, toughness, redefinition, pos

124 Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale with a subscale for anxiety, >/= 8), and 254 (45%) symptoms of

125 Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale with a subscale for depression, >/= 8).

126 a subscale for symptoms of depression and a subscale for symptoms of anxiety, and the Impact of Even

127 Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale with a subscale for symptoms of depression and a subscale for s

128 nd the Profile of Mood States-Brief, Fatigue subscale for the short measure; and constructed two sing

129 e used was a previously validated scale with subscales for dignity and respect, communication and aut

130 d placebo groups in improvement on the Maier subscale from baseline to 12 weeks (treatment effect, 1.

131 factor analysis was applied to 49 phenotypic subscales from 10 measures.

132 ce between groups for the other prespecified subscales from ASPIRE.

133 Multiple subscales from both UPPS-P and BIS showed strong genetic

134 culties on the FACT-Cog total score and four subscales from prechemotherapy to postchemotherapy compa

135 reviously published method of z-transforming subscales from the Memory Functioning Questionnaire, the

136 ur questionnaires, including Safety Emphasis subscales from the Safety Climate Scale, Face-Saving Sca

137 Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale, global assessment and behavioural disturbance

138 ital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Depression subscale, >/= 8) across all studies, using all instrumen

139 Resulting subscales had appropriate targeting.

140 Overall, the subscales had high sensitivity (>/=0.811) but a wide ran

141 t Practice and Support subscale, an NP-PCOCQ subscale, had a significant positive effect on NP role (

142 positive symptom and general psychopathology subscales, HAM-A, and HAM-D than for placebo.

143 The overall scale and subscales have good to excellent internal consistency (C

144 tion questionnaire; range, 0-100; includes 5 subscales, higher scores indicating better satisfaction;

145 For the general satisfaction subscale, improvement at 24 months from baseline was sig

146 Severe burnout was seen on at least one subscale in 55.6%-10% showed evidence of severe burnout

147 Scores were computed for each subscale, in addition to a weighted total mean score.

148 Survey subscales included breast satisfaction, as well as psych

149 zheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale items, 2 Mini-Mental State Examination items, a

150 essment of Cancer Therapy (FACT)-Lung Cancer Subscale (LCS) in the high-dose RT arm at 3 months.

151 he Aberrant Behavior Checklist-hyperactivity subscale (least squares mean from 34.2 to 19.3) compared

152 Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire quality of life subscale), level of anxiety (7-item Generalized Anxiety

153 of ketamine on all three suicidality scales/subscales (linear mixed model, fixed pretreatment effect

154 e SHPC-18, and associations of the 2 symptom subscales (Local Eye and Visual Function) of the SHPC-18

155 ified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor subscale (MDS-UPDRS III) and Beck Depression Inventory (

156 and placebo were observed in scores on most subscales measuring quality of life.

157 Score differences for each of these subscales met criteria for MCID.

158 on Function Questionnaire from each of the 4 subscales (mobility, activity limitation, psychosocial i

159 0002) and lower mean scores in the following subscales: near activities (77 vs. 86; P = 0.004), dista

160 sion." The strongest association was the LLQ subscale of driving with RIT (r =-0.97, P < 0.001).

161 Toronto Alexithymia Scale and Trait Anxiety subscale of State-Trait Anxiety Inventory.

162 pain syndrome scored higher on every single subscale of the 12-item OSDI symptom questionnaire.

163 reward responsivity (the reward sensitivity subscale of the Behavioral Activation Scale) and resting

164 n in symptoms based on the psychotic symptom subscale of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, a Clinic

165 sed the presence of fatigue with the fatigue subscale of the Checklist Individual Strength questionna

166 ef was measured with three scales: the grief subscale of the Core Bereavement Items to assess normati

167 C QLQ-C30), EuroQoL-5D (EQ-5D), and Melanoma Subscale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-

168 The symptom subscale of the Integrated Palliative Outcome Scale for

169 = 10-point decrease in the physical function subscale of the Medical Outcomes Short-Form 36-item ques

170 nd had scores of at least 20 on the negative subscale of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PA

171 (certain can do) of the 8-item communication subscale of the Self-efficacy in End-of-Life Care survey

172 l function measured by the physical function subscale of the SF-36.

173 using a screening instrument (hyperactivity subscale of the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire)

174 s were elevated in the synaesthetes, and one subscale of this measure (attention to detail) placed sy

175 ntal Activities of Daily Living scale, and 3 subscales of community-level social capital: social cohe

176 Separate analyses of each of the component subscales of job control-decision authority and skill di

177 es on gross motor, fine motor, and cognitive subscales of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Dev

178 Coping subscales of the BRIEF COPE, Illness Cognition Questionn

179 Distress/Depression and Anhedonic Depression subscales of the Mood and Anxiety Symptoms Questionnaire

180 These trends also were found in relevant subscales of the NEI VFQ-25.

181 ancer module and chemotherapy and neuropathy subscales of the ovarian cancer module at baseline, afte

182 QOL was assessed using the 4 subscales of the Physical Component Summary (PCS) of the

183 Other subscales of the SDQ were not related to asthma or AD sy

184 We prospectively measured changes in 3 subscales of the SF-36v2 generic health questionnaire (r

185 Improvements in subscales of the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale, the A

186 Multivariable analysis for each of the LLQ subscale outcomes, adjusted for age, included RIT, with

187 zheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (P < 0.001) scores at clinical follow-up.

188 ve NEI-VFQ scores for nearly all traditional subscales (P < 0.001), visual function subscale (-3.85 v

189 Questionnaire social integration and support subscale), pain-related self-efficacy (Pain Self-Efficac

190 son's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) motor subscale (part 3) in the practically defined off-medicat

191 uation of oral health only correlated in the subscale "physical pain."

192 y living, money matters, and self and others subscales, plus five single items.

193 item Profile of Mood States-Brief depression subscale (POMS-B depression subscale; short measure); a

194 ital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Depression subscale prevalence (95% CI) of depressive symptoms at a

195 For the parent questionnaire, 3 subscales (psychosocial, function, and surgery) were evi

196 ed in a questionnaire with three domains (or subscales): QoL for Health & Lifestyle, QoL for Work, an

197 Q and Esterman score were stronger in 7 of 9 subscales (r = -0.14 to -0.25; P < 0.05 for all) than co

198 l Replacement Knowledge Test living donation subscale, R3KT) and religious (Islamic Knowledge of Livi

199 index collected every 3 months (Likert pain subscale range, 0 [no pain] to 20 [extreme pain]; minima

200 pression Scale score greater than 8 for each subscale (range, 0-42; higher scores indicate more sever

201 the Aberrant Behavior Checklist-Irritability subscale (range, 0-45) and the Home Situations Questionn

202 One patient safety subscale, Recognising and responding to remove immediate

203 tems to form a measure comprising 2 distinct subscales reflecting "personal and social" and "physical

204 d 0.89 for the Local Eye and Visual Function subscales, respectively, and remained stable over time.

205 Reward dependence was obtained using the subscale reward dependence of the Tridimensional Persona

206 s d ranging from 0.51 to 2.16 across symptom subscales), reward learning did not change after treatme

207 points; P = .02) and Anger/Irritability DRSP subscale score (1.22 [95% CI, 1.05-1.41] points; P < .01

208 ept p=0.006 at week 32), and FACT-M Melanoma Subscale score (3.62, 2.93, 2.45, 3.39, 2.85, 3.00, and

209 re) and Clinical Global Impressions severity subscale score (CGI-S; key secondary outcome measure) we

210 Primary outcome was the General Health subscale score (Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-For

211 in 36-Item Short Form- physical functioning subscale score (SF-36), and the change in the Berg Balan

212 rrelation with the SCSQ theory of mind (ToM) subscale score even after controlling for working memory

213 Subscale score on the Indian Vision Function Questionnai

214 ent groups in change in the YBOCS obsessions subscale score over time (-0.325 compared with -0.017 po

215 to reflect whether or not the QualCare Scale subscale score should indicate reportable elder abuse an

216 Mean reduction in IPV (via SVAWS subscale score) at 12 months post-baseline was statistic

217 ment from baseline in FACT-An score, anaemia subscale score, and the EQ-5D-5L were reported at all po

218 and physical functioning with short form-36 subscale score, assessed 1 year after randomisation.

219 n PANSS positive and general psychopathology subscale score, Marder positive factor score, PANSS resp

220 in selected white matter ROIs and each BSID subscale score.

221 to T1 on FCRI total ( P < .001) and severity subscale scores ( P = .001), which were maintained at T2

222 eatment options increased perception of care subscale scores (beta = 1.24, P = 0.001), whereas depres

223 Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale cognitive subscale scores (beta = 2.30, P < .001); and faster whit

224 zheimer's Disease Assessment Scale cognitive subscale scores (beta [SE], 0.405 [0.190]; P = .03).

225 nce, adverse effects, and affective reaction subscale scores (beta range 1.06-1.55, all P < 0.05).

226 zheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale scores (longitudinally).

227 41 and r = -0.59, respectively) and with all subscale scores (P < .01).

228 WOMAC pain subscale scores (P = 0.126), physical performance, and d

229 ticipants' baseline NEI VFQ-25 composite and subscale scores are significantly lower compared with 3

230 zheimer's Disease Assessment Scale cognitive subscale scores as a measure of cognitive dysfunction (A

231 .03, 1.20] and the hyperactivity-inattention subscale scores at 5 y (IRR: 1.08; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.14).

232 iated with significant anxiety or depression subscale scores but not with changes in posttraumatic st

233 The majority of study participants had subscale scores consistent with excellent function.

234 e group, the mean SF-36 physical functioning subscale scores decreased from 47.5 (95% CI, 44.3-50.8)

235 lated with baseline NEI VFQ-25 composite and subscale scores of general vision, near activities, role

236 composite scale; and WOMAC function and pain subscale scores respectively.

237 WOMAC function subscale scores were 3.3 points lower in the interventio

238 Subscale scores were compared with those of patients wit

239 FACT-C total and subscale scores were not statistically different by surg

240 es in NEI VFQ-25 composite score and various subscale scores were observed in ocriplasmin-treated pat

241 Anxiety and depression subscale scores were significantly lower in the interven

242 cluding self-maintenance and self-confidence subscale scores, after four weeks of the self-regulation

243 ge in NEI VFQ-25 near and distant activities subscale scores, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA; Ear

244 ociations between biological measures and IQ subscale scores, followed by multivariable regression mo

245 tal score from baseline) and change in PANSS subscale scores, mood, cognition, reproductive hormone l

246 ondary outcomes were WOMAC function and pain subscale scores, physical performance (Short Physical Pe

247 were associated with lower Full Scale IQ and subscale scores, with significant negative associations

248 Improvements were also noted in subscale scores, with the following respective mean chan

249 sures were baseline NEI VFQ-25 composite and subscale scores.

250 producing visual function and socioemotional subscale scores.

251 e 2 groups in their KCCQ overall summary and subscale scores.

252 y demographic and psychosocial predictors of subscale scores.

253 ic color fundus photographs), and NEI-VFQ-25 subscale scores.

254 y of life as measured on SF-36 questionnaire subscale scores.

255 arisons) between FA values and multiple BSID subscale scores.

256 rd of Severity of Problems (DRSP) (total and subscale scores; higher scores indicate most severe prob

257 and Depression Scale anxiety and depression subscales (scores >/= 8 indicating substantial symptoms)

258 All SF-36 subscale-scores were equal to or better than the Swedish

259 Q scores were calculated using a traditional subscale scoring algorithm and a Rasch-refined approach

260 t 12 mo (Chronic Pain Grade [CPG] disability subscale); secondary outcomes included the CPG disabilit

261 tered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 total symptom and subscale severity were examined using correlational anal

262 Brief depression subscale (POMS-B depression subscale; short measure); a single-item Likert measure;

263 5, revealed the "physical and environmental" subscale showed concurrent validity (0.88), whereas the

264 The short POMS-B depression subscale shows an acceptable balance between practical c

265 Scores on each subscale significantly correlated with the NEI-VFQ25 tot

266 ereas scores on the LLQ composite and 5 of 6 subscales significantly decreased (corresponding to less

267 Person-Environment Apathy Rating-Environment subscale (stimulation clarity, stimulation strength, sti

268 Intrusion/re-experiencing and avoidance subscale symptoms drove this relationship.

269 Principal component analysis of 12 subscales taken from seven questionnaires was used to es

270 ified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor subscale than other groups.

271 e same or worse on nearly all vision-related subscales than did patients with diabetic retinopathy, a

272 r VA (r = -0.07 to -0.21) were weaker in all subscales than those with better-eye, average-eye, and b

273 sed on eudaimonic aspects of well-being with subscales that address not only physical functioning but

274 ire 2 (SF-MPQ-2), the Present Pain Intensity subscale (the McGill Pain Questionnaire), and perceived

275 onnaire), pain intensity (CPG pain intensity subscale), the census global health question (2011 censu

276 When compared with the 11 items TPDS-NA subscale, the FOBS validity and accuracy decreased: sens

277 1.06-5.13); with a one unit increase on this subscale, the incidence of the NPs serving as primary ca

278 econdary efficacy measures included the CAPS subscales, the Davidson Trauma Scale, the Positive and N

279 Hcy level, the PANSS general psychopathology subscale, total cholesterol and education (all p < 0.05)

280 ified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor subscale [UPDRS part III]).

281 ); ES = 0.49, p < 0.001) and for the anxiety subscale was -3.01 x 10(-2) (95% CI, -5.09 x 10(-2) to -

282 The model estimate for the depression subscale was -5.36 x 10(-2) (95% CI, -8.27 x 10(-2) to -

283 The POMS-B depression subscale was comparable to the comprehensive CES-D scale

284 ty (0.88), whereas the "personal and social" subscale was demonstrated to have discriminative validit

285 ent in the Profile of Mood States depression subscale was greater at day 1 for the ketamine group com

286 ital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Depression subscale was used most commonly (58%).

287 and specificity for each of the six QualCare subscales was determined.

288 mponent summary and the physical functioning subscale) was significantly worse at long-term than at m

289 range= 0 [worst] to 100 [best]) and selected subscales, we analyzed data in the Outcomes Registry for

290 median (interquartile) scores for these QoV subscales were 29 (15-37), 22 (13-27), and 14 (0-29) for

291 However, when all eight individual emotion subscales were combined into an overall ASR performance

292 is demonstrated that lower scores on all LLQ subscales were correlated with prolonged DA testing (lon

293 Several UPPS-P and BIS subscales were genetically correlated with ADHD (r (g) =

294 Both DSM-IV ADHD symptom subscales were rated 4 times by participants' mothers.

295 The composite NEI-VFQ-25 scale and its subscales were scored 0 to 100, corresponding to poor to

296 ary endpoint pain (P < 0.462), IPQ and SF-36 subscales were seen.

297 The trait anxiety subscales were thus analyzed.

298 Scores on the NEI VFQ-25 composite and its subscales were unchanged between baseline and 3-year fol

299 nificant differences in overall workload and subscales, where the robotic procedures required signifi

300 ating Scale (HAM-D 17-item version and Maier subscale, which focuses on core depression symptoms and