ライフサイエンスコーパス: sunscreen

1 he most (86.4% of all visits associated with sunscreen).

2 s soy isoflavones, and even moisturizers and sunscreen.

3 ildren, especially the use of broad-spectrum sunscreen.

4 inoids, which have significant toxicity, and sunscreen.

5 protected by either a physical barrier or a sunscreen.

6 inoids, which have significant toxicity, and sunscreen.

7 ion against cumulative erythema than the UVB sunscreen.

8 , which developed in 1 participant with each sunscreen.

9 likely to be biosynthetic precursors of the sunscreen.

10 t individuals should refrain from the use of sunscreen.

11 t individuals should refrain from the use of sunscreen.

12 ation and using photoprotective clothing and sunscreens.

13 sed by younger children are moisturizers and sunscreens.

14 such as sediment pore water, wastewater, and sunscreens.

15 rds for broad-spectrum coverage to be met by sunscreens.

16 ng some of the additional safety studies for sunscreens.

17 (UV) radiation, including the proper use of sunscreens.

18 ly lower than that achieved by using topical sunscreens.

19 me, air fresheners, and dryer sheets) and in sunscreens.

20 posure is the biosynthesis of small-molecule sunscreens.

21 elanoma and use of the newer formulations of sunscreens.

22 ting step in the synthesis of sinapate ester sunscreens.

23 otective clothing and eyeware in addition to sunscreens.

24 cation of an immune protection factor to all sunscreens.

25 cern for current cinnamate ester-based human sunscreens.

26 ving some nonclinical toxicology studies for sunscreens.

27 found in nature and those used in commercial sunscreens.

28 pectrum, SPF >/=30, and water resistant) for sunscreens.

29 ) is one of the UV filters commonly found in sunscreens.

30 67.1% (ZnO NPs), 77.2% (TiO(2) NPs), 77.1% (sunscreen 1) and 92.4% (sunscreen 2), respectively.

31 (TiO(2) NPs), 77.1% (sunscreen 1) and 92.4% (sunscreen 2), respectively.

32 n and older individuals reported less use of sunscreen (32.7% vs 35.5%; F = 5.36; P = .02) and hats (

33 thema dose, on gluteal skin, with or without sunscreen, 48 h prior to sensitization with dinitrochlor

34 otection practices, including regular use of sunscreen (53.3%, 45.1%, and 38.1%, respectively) and we

35 fish may produce and use this molecule as a sunscreen.(6) We generated a gadusol-deficient mutant ze

36 y assist in explaining discrepancies between sunscreens' abilities to protect against erythema and ph

37 atural product scytonemin (1) functions as a sunscreen, absorbing harmful UV-A radiation.

38 as the potential to be a coral reef-friendly sunscreen active ingredient that can provide broad-spect

39 inistration (FDA) has provided guidance that sunscreen active ingredients with systemic absorption gr

40 dy demonstrated the systemic absorption of 4 sunscreen active ingredients; additional studies are nee

41 study reveals why human NAT1 acetylates the sunscreen additive p-aminobenzoic acid and tobacco smoke

42 ss likely than Chinese participants to apply sunscreen (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.55; 95% CI, 0.41

43 Following sunscreen administration, mice received a single psorale

44 e properties of T-Lite SF, a TiO2-NC used as sunscreen, after weathering in water and under light.

45 ium-dioxide (TiO(2)) nanoparticles (NPs) and sunscreens) against DNA damage.

46 Benzophenone-3 (BP-3) is a sunscreen agent used in a variety of personal care produ

47 hese compounds, which are used in commercial sunscreen agents due to a high absorption in the ultravi

48 e first study to investigate the presence of sunscreen agents in tissue liver of Franciscana dolphin

49 Modulators of the UV-tanning pathway include sunscreen agents, melanocortin 1 receptor activators, ad

50 Neither umbrella nor sunscreen alone completely prevented sunburn.

51 scytonemin is the most common and widespread sunscreen among cyanobacteria.

52 MAAs are widely used as sunscreens, among other uses, but sea hares modify their

53 sunscreen and placebo, discretionary use of sunscreen and 30 mg of beta-carotene, and discretionary

54 t into 4 groups: daily use of broad-spectrum sunscreen and 30 mg of beta-carotene, daily use of sunsc

55 ering yeast to efficiently produce a natural sunscreen and antioxidant presents an avenue for its lar

56 microtopography between 1992 and 1996 in the sunscreen and beta-carotene groups compared with control

57 rts aimed at UV protection, including use of sunscreen and clothing, annual cases of skin cancer cont

58 of sunburn) and alerts (to apply or reapply sunscreen and get out of the sun), hourly UV Index, and

59 ncluding dimethicone, a common ingredient in sunscreen and other cosmetics.

60 lfonic acid, indicating organic compounds in sunscreen and other personal care products as sources of

61 t (UV) radiation filters, given their use in sunscreen and personal-care products and their reported

62 een and 30 mg of beta-carotene, daily use of sunscreen and placebo, discretionary use of sunscreen an

63 g of beta-carotene, and discretionary use of sunscreen and placebo.

64 nin is a brown-black biological pigment with sunscreen and radical scavenging functions important to

65 ol-containing emollient or patch, as well as sunscreen and skin-care products for prevention of skin

66 er butyl methoxydibenzoylmethane, the SPF 15 sunscreen and the UVA filter together, and the lotion ve

67 rn) and alerted users to apply or to reapply sunscreen and to get out of the sun.

68 , the UVA filter, and the combination SPF 15 sunscreen and UVA filter, resulting in increasing degree

69 g paid to prevention through the use of both sunscreens and after sun treatments, many of which conta

70 All subjects routinely used sunscreens and consistent results were obtained in low a

71 tocrylene (OC) is an ingredient used in many sunscreens and cosmetics worldwide.

72 a new proposed rule in 2019 (84.FR.6204) for sunscreens and identified the need for additional safety

73 amin E is included as an antioxidant in many sunscreens and lotions currently on the market.

74 e Sulisobenzone (BP-4) is widely employed in sunscreens and other personal care products.

75 t users of seawater swimming pools may apply sunscreens and other personal-care products containing o

76 Organic ultraviolet (UV) filters are used in sunscreens and other personal-care products to protect a

77 tion of ultraviolet-induced p53 mutations by sunscreens and protection against skin cancer using an e

78 nly used in other consumer products, such as sunscreens and soaps.

79 e review the interplay between UV radiation, sunscreens and the skin, highlighting current controvers

80 lf century, initially as a putative "natural sunscreen" and later as a mediator of photoimmunosuppres

81 automotive lubricants, clothing, deodorants, sunscreens, and cosmetics and can potentially accumulate

82 n consumer products, for example, cosmetics, sunscreens, and electrical devices, has increased tremen

83 ated pigmentary disorders, the proper use of sunscreens, and the treatment of depigmented lesions.

84 cosmetics, personal care products, cleaners, sunscreens, and vinyl products.

85 n a clinical pharmacology unit and examining sunscreen application among healthy participants, all 6

86 Although sunscreen application is the most common modality for su

87 oidance, regular cover-up with clothing, and sunscreen application.

88 indoors were more likely to rarely/never use sunscreen (aPR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.11-1.62), protective clo

89 inoins, hydroxy acids, bleaching agents, and sunscreens are discussed herein.

90 Sunscreens are employed to mitigate the adverse effects

91 against immunosuppression may be improved if sunscreens are formulated to offer equivalent protection

92 Sunscreens are not quite as effective as physical barrie

93 r is ultraviolet radiation from the sun, but sunscreens are often used in a suboptimal manner, compro

94 Sunscreens are widely advocated to protect against skin

95 her genistein nor n-acetyl cysteine acted as sunscreens as they had no effect on ultraviolet-induced

96 UV filter, which is used in the majority of sunscreens as well as other personal care products (PCP)

97 RA did not function as a sunscreen, as determined by quantitating the increase in

98 Physicians mentioned sunscreen at approximately 12.83 million visits (0.07%).

99 However, dermatologists reported mentioning sunscreen at only 1.6% of all dermatology visits.

100 the rate at which physicians are mentioning sunscreen at patient visits is quite low, even for patie

101 ng teachers allow time for students to apply sunscreen at school (47.6%; 95% CI, 42.4%-52.9%).

102 ad teachers allow time for students to apply sunscreen at school, and 11.8% of high schools (95% CI,

103 Few schools made sunscreen available for students to use (13.3%; 95% CI,

104 PF is much more reliable with broad-spectrum sunscreens because SPF with primarily UVB sunscreens is

105 sked parents to ensure that students applied sunscreen before school (16.4%; 95% CI, 12.9%-20.6%).

106 Each sunscreen behaved similarly: at recommended application

107 vestigated the genetic basis for mycosporine sunscreen biosynthesis by the cyanobacterium Nostoc punc

108 with self-reported use of liquid soap (TCS), sunscreen (BP-3), lotion (BP-3 and parabens), and cosmet

109 Moreover, use of SPF >/= 15 sunscreen by all women age 40 to 75 years could potentia

110 People may "compensate" for the use of sunscreen by increasing their time in the sun, which can

111 ble fraction) with general use of SPF >/= 15 sunscreens by women age 40 to 75 years was 18% (95% CI,

112 a novel method to establish the efficacy of sunscreens, by measuring ultraviolet-A-induced free-radi

113 Both physical barriers and sunscreens can partially prevent UV-B effects on nevi.

114 nal care products (PCPs) such as lotions and sunscreens can serve as precursors to form additional HB

115 rall "safe sun strategy" in which the use of sunscreens certainly must be accompanied by other protec

116 UV radiation, some cyanobacteria synthesize sunscreen compounds.

117 Algae and microbes produce a class of sunscreening compounds known as mycosporine-like amino a

118 The "UV sunscreen" compounds, the mycosporine-like amino acids (

119 rsonal care products, toothpastes and select sunscreens contained 1% to >10% titanium by weight.

120 Pretreatment with a photostable UVA/UVB sunscreen containing an antioxidant combination signific

121 filter had no protective effect, whereas, a sunscreen containing both ultraviolet A and ultraviolet

122 skin of our transgenic mice that included: a sunscreen containing octyl methoxycinnamate and benzophe

123 with human activities and use of lotions and sunscreens, containing organic UV-filters, in addition t

124 Sunscreens continue to be a major method of photoprotect

125 l, while applying both NPs and NP-formulated sunscreens could significantly reduce DNA damage, result

126 All sunscreens decreased chloramphenicol acetyl transferase

127 s, and the outgassed vapors from lipstick or sunscreen do not quench polymer fluorescence.

128 e light-induced ROS, suggesting that UVA/UVB sunscreens do not protect the skin from visible light-in

129 lth policy makers facing decisions regarding sunscreen education campaigns and sets the stage for fut

130 at resveratrol-mediated responses may not be sunscreen effects.

131 ential risks; however, optimizing the use of sunscreens, especially among children and adolescents, r

132 ch for evaluating the efficacy of commercial sunscreens even under environmental conditions.

133 ng the summer if they do not diligently wear sunscreens except during beach vacations.

134 These complex natural products may act as sunscreens for the producing organism, thus offering pro

135 odelling the as close to true environment of sunscreen formulas.

136 d DNA breaks when compared with a commercial sunscreen formulation.

137 for optimal protection against skin damage, sunscreen formulations should filter all UV wavelengths,

138 tive ingredients administered in 4 different sunscreen formulations were systemically absorbed and ha

139 ature-inspired UV filters in next generation sunscreen formulations.

140 id the design of new and improved commercial sunscreen formulations.

141 We conservatively estimate that sunscreen from bathers is responsible for an increase of

142 The broad-spectrum sunscreen gave much better protection against cumulative

143 d higher postexposure global scores than the sunscreen group (0.75 vs 0.05; P < .001).

144 es vs 10 of the 40 participants (25%) in the sunscreen group (P < .001).

145 ly sunscreen group than in the discretionary sunscreen group (relative odds, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.59 to 0.

146 The daily sunscreen group showed no detectable increase in skin ag

147 e end of the trial was 24% less in the daily sunscreen group than in the discretionary sunscreen grou

148 ic activation and regression features in the sunscreen group.

149 ncidences in the umbrella group vs 17 in the sunscreen group.

150 reas the low ultraviolet A protection factor sunscreen had an immune protection factor of 15, which w

151 hat the high ultraviolet A protection factor sunscreen had an immune protection factor of 50, more th

152 inally developed to protect against sunburn, sunscreen has been assumed to prevent skin cancer.

153 lar compound called gadusol, whose role as a sunscreen has yet to be tested despite its discovery ove

154 The protective effect of sunscreens has been extensively evaluated in vivo as a m

155 Sunscreens have been shown to give the most effective pr

156 assembly of scytonemin (1), a cyanobacterial sunscreen, have identified beta-ketoacid 2 as an importa

157 Chemicals from sunscreens (i.e., UV filters) accumulate in the sea and

158 PO(4)(3-), and N-NO(3)(-)) from a commercial sunscreen in seawater, and the role of UV radiation in t

159 th body exposure or the number of days using sunscreen in the second and third years of follow-up.

160 ar water.(3) While melanin is the only known sunscreen in vertebrates, it often emerges late in embry

161 sponse were generated either with or without sunscreen in vivo and protection factors were derived fo

162 sting the immunologic protection afforded by sunscreens in human skin.

163 t melanoma and the possible effectiveness of sunscreens in preventing those effects.

164 e high- with low-sun protection factor (SPF) sunscreens in relation to sunbathing habits in a large c

165 There were 6500 products categorized as sunscreens in the Amazon.com, online catalog.

166 titanium dioxide nanoparticles stemming from sunscreens in the suspended matter of the lake using ele

167 protection efficacy conferred by commercial sunscreens, in terms of induction of DNA lesions and cel

168 ver, conflicting reports include claims that sunscreen increases risk for melanoma.

169 The lack of difference between the sunscreens indicates similar action spectra for erythema

170 The systemic absorption of sunscreen ingredients supports the need for further stud

171 Sunscreen is an important part of sun protection to prev

172 ing prospect that nature's selection of UV-B sunscreen is based in part on the inherent quantum mecha

173 um sunscreens because SPF with primarily UVB sunscreens is dependent on time of day and latitude.

174 A clearer picture of the impact of sunscreens is emerging from randomized trials that have

175 ine testing of immune protection afforded by sunscreens is not performed by industry.

176 ion, the time of day or year, and the use of sunscreens, is not understood.

177 protection from cumulative sunburn with two sunscreens labeled SPF 6, but with different UVR-absorbi

178 ch was attributed to a high concentration of sunscreen lotions in a small recirculated water volume.

179 ng/g) were found in skin lotions (including sunscreen lotions), followed by makeup products (284; 22

180 ere applied to the detection of TiO(2) NP in sunscreen lotions, rainwaters, and swimming pool waters.

181 Commonly referred to as "nature's sunscreens," MAAs are usually employed for UV photoprote

182 ultraviolet waveband and whether the use of sunscreens may be useful in preventing melanoma.

183 ng of the photophysics and photochemistry of sunscreen molecules selected by nature could aid the des

184 crop protectant validamycin, and the natural sunscreens mycosporine-like amino acids.

185 alyses, however, are not able to distinguish sunscreen nanoparticles from natural Ti-bearing nanopart

186 ven wild species as a biomonitoring tool for sunscreens occurrence.

187 Because many sunscreens offer protection from ultraviolet (UV) B but

188 Sunscreens partially filter UVB and, therefore, could pa

189 Two milligrams of sunscreen per 1 cm2 was applied to 75% of body surface a

190 lso known as BP-3 or oxybenzone) is added to sunscreens, plastics, and some coatings to filter UV rad

191 development in all the mice treated with the sunscreens plus 1000 kJ ultraviolet B per m2 was 2% and

192 violet B per m2 was 2% and mice treated with sunscreens plus 1500 kJ ultraviolet B per m2 was 15%.

193 Five test sunscreens plus a vehicle control were tested in a "blin

194 ively, but less than 5% of mice treated with sunscreens plus ultraviolet showed evidence of p53 mutat

195 A better understanding of consumer sunscreen preferences would inform dermatologists in the

196 ed immunoprotection afforded by a commercial sunscreen preparation (labeled sun protection factor 15)

197 Sunscreens prevent sunburn and may also prevent skin can

198 de nanoparticle content in 1 g of commercial sunscreen produces rates of H2O2 in seawater of up to 46

199 Sunscreen product was applied at 2 mg/cm2 to 75% of body

200 AVB), a simple boron complex of a commercial sunscreen product, exhibits morphology-dependent emissio

201 Our results demonstrate that sunscreen products are a significant source of metals an

202 Sunscreen products contain UV filters as active ingredie

203 All the studied sunscreen products demonstrated a certain degree of skin

204 itro methodologies used for the selection of sunscreen products for an FDA-sponsored proof-of-concept

205 titanium dioxide nanomaterials released from sunscreen products into the Old Danube Lake (Vienna, Aus

206 The top 1 percentile of sunscreen products on Amazon.com as of December 2015 was

207 tudies detailing the environmental impact of sunscreen products on coastal ecosystems are considered

208 These sunscreen products were also characterized for several f

209 Commercially available sunscreen products were tested to determine the skin abs

210 In this cohort of highly rated sunscreen products, a significant proportion did not adh

211 ic contact reactions to UV filters, personal sunscreen products, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory d

212 Participants were randomized to 1 of 4 sunscreen products, formulated as lotion (n = 12), aeros

213 ed trace metals and inorganic nutrients from sunscreen products.

214 The sunscreen protected against both end-points, which suppo

215 consistently demonstrated that all the test sunscreens protected beyond their designated sun protect

216 Both physical barrier- and sunscreen-protected areas showed some degree of these ch

217 lidates public health campaigns that promote sunscreen protection for individuals at risk of melanoma

218 ry methods for investigating the efficacy of sunscreen protection of epidermal immune function use th

219 port the current trend toward broad-spectrum sunscreen protection.

220 Rare/never use of sunscreen, protective clothing, shade; multiple sunburns

221 ain Outcomes and Measures: Rare/never use of sunscreen, protective clothing, shade; multiple sunburns

222 as the most common diagnosis associated with sunscreen recommendation.

223 usion Use of SPF >/= 15 rather than SPF < 15 sunscreens reduces melanoma risk.

224 times the minimal erythema dose, with either sunscreen, resulted in comparable levels of thymine dime

225 ies of a secondary metabolite, the microbial sunscreen scytonemin, produced by a group of late-succes

226 Participants were randomized to 1 of 4 sunscreens: spray 1 (n = 6 participants), spray 2 (n = 6

227 ; sun-protective behaviors included applying sunscreen, staying under shade, wearing long-sleeved shi

228 have suggested a lack of correlation between sunscreen sun protection factor and protection of the sk

229 the protection afforded by three high factor sunscreens (sun protection factor 20+) that claim ultrav

230 onmentally relevant light source, we applied sunscreens (sun protection factors 15-22) on to the shav

231 ved shirts but less likely to sunburn, apply sunscreen, tan indoors, and receive TBSE than Non-Hispan

232 t complied with European recommendations for sunscreen testing.

233 pression was the observation that applying a sunscreen that contained an ultraviolet B only filter ha

234 Like sunscreens that function by light absorption, the bases

235 ow that the metabolites serve as Lysobacter "sunscreens" that are important for the survival of these

236 Dermatologists recorded the mention of sunscreen the most (86.4% of all visits associated with

237 Scytonemin is a heterocyclic indole-alkaloid sunscreen, the synthesis of which is induced upon exposu

238 acetyl transferase activity with the SPF 15 sunscreen, the UVA filter, and the combination SPF 15 su

239 Failure of the sunscreen to afford comparable protection against both e

240 s and that applying sun protection factor 15 sunscreens to mouse skin before each Kodacel-filtered FS

241 Application of SPF-15 sunscreens to mouse skin before each UV irradiation near

242 nce, there is ever growing use of commercial sunscreens to pre-empt overexposure to UVR.

243 ectrum can be used to predict the ability of sunscreens to protect against UVR-induced cis-UCA format

244 t both end-points, which supports the use of sunscreens to reduce immunosuppression but protection ag

245 as a means of covalently binding UVA and UVB sunscreens to the outer layer of skin to provide long-la

246 regarding the efficacy and photostability of sunscreens to UVA.

247 treatment included use of skin moisturizers, sunscreen, topical steroid, and doxycycline.

248 Thus, we exposed sunscreen-treated sites to four times the minimal erythe

249 Vehicles, AAD, and sunscreen type predicted a higher price per ounce.

250 ers, application of 4 commercially available sunscreens under maximal use conditions resulted in plas

251 the shade, 41.0% vs 33.7%; P = .03) but less sunscreen use (mean days, 28.6% vs 34.5%; P = .048) than

252 was used to estimate the association between sunscreen use (never, SPF < 15, SPF >/= 15) and melanoma

253 Sunscreen use and dietary antioxidants are advocated as

254 ence does not support an association between sunscreen use and melanoma, systemic toxicity or vitamin

255 relationship between ultraviolet exposure or sunscreen use and skin cancer.

256 ement to provide patient education regarding sunscreen use and sun-protective behaviors, the rate at

257 rpose To assess melanoma risk in relation to sunscreen use and to compare high- with low-sun protecti

258 n the basis of 1 fair-quality trial, regular sunscreen use can prevent squamous cell carcinoma, but i

259 Regular sunscreen use during childhood and adolescence can signi

260 sun sensitivity and childhood exposures, and sunscreen use has been promoted for prevention of skin c

261 Epidemiologic studies of sunscreen use have suffered from important methodologic

262 tors/angiotensin receptor blockers, and more sunscreen use in the week, but not the 6 months, before

263 Sunscreen use is a modifiable behavior that can help red

264 Regular sunscreen use retards skin aging in healthy, middle-aged

265 aluating the cost-effectiveness of promoting sunscreen use to prevent actinic keratoses and nonmelano

266 SPF >/= 15 sunscreen use was associated with significantly decrease

267 lation attributable fraction associated with sunscreen use was estimated.

268 tude, time of day, skin pigmentation, aging, sunscreen use, and glass all influence the cutaneous pro

269 Heavy smoking, sunscreen use, and green eye color were associated with

270 lexity of measuring ultraviolet exposure and sunscreen use, and inadequate adjustment for important c

271 sun exposure and were more likely to report sunscreen use, suggesting specific sun exposure profiles

272 Except for regular sunscreen use, the quest for chemoprevention of NMSC in

273 ontroversies and recommendations surrounding sunscreen use.

274 Acculturation was not associated with sunscreen use.

275 an decrease midday sun exposure and increase sunscreen use.

276 of positive associations linking melanoma to sunscreen use.

277 No association was seen between melanoma and sunscreen use.

278 support an association between melanoma and sunscreen use.

279 These results demonstrate that the sunscreens used in this study not only protect mice agai

280 Results Sunscreen users reported significantly more sunburns and

281 hade and wearing sun-protective clothing and sunscreen) using a 5-point Likert scale, duration of out

282 e (39 [17.0%]), educational aid (20 [8.7%]), sunscreen/UV recommendation (19 [8.3%]), calculator (12

283 Here we show that sunscreen (UVA superior, UVB sun protection factor (SPF)

284 Sunscreen was mentioned most frequently to white patient

285 by eye and objectively, and the SPF of each sunscreen was modeled with changes in solar UVR with tim

286 were determined in vitro and showed that the sunscreen was primarily an ultraviolet B absorber, with

287 uary 1, 1989-December 26, 2010) during which sunscreen was recommended.

288 Mention of sunscreen was reported by physicians at 0.9% of patient

289 let radiation wavelengths transmitted by the sunscreen were determined in vitro and showed that the s

290 Commercially available sunscreens were found to have minimal effects on reducin

291 each umbrella compared with that provided by sunscreen with a high sun protection factor under actual

292 y a beach umbrella, and the other using only sunscreen with a sun protection factor of 100.

293 y a beach umbrella or protection provided by sunscreen with a sun protection factor of 100.

294 The sunscreen with high ultraviolet A absorption (ultraviole

295 immune suppression and that a broad-spectrum sunscreen with high ultraviolet A filtering capacity res

296 We lack comparative data on sunscreens with comparable sun protection factors (SPFs)

297 utdoor exposures even if they diligently use sunscreens with sun protection factor (SPF) 15.

298 We assessed the ability of two sunscreens, with different spectral profiles, to inhibit

299 entrations for three individuals having used sunscreen within 5 days prior to sample collection.

300 then increased ultraviolet A filtration by a sunscreen would better protect the immune system during