コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ressure of 35 cm H2O when implemented in the supine position).
2 ntervals for 40 mins with the patient in the supine position.
3 nown polyps underwent CT colonography in the supine position.
4 y different between group II and controls in supine position.
5 a 3.5-MHz transducer with the subject in the supine position.
6 lavage followed by injurious ventilation in supine position.
7 tly (p > .05) different when measured in the supine position.
8 gic change in the prone position than in the supine position.
9 healthy young volunteers were studied in the supine position.
10 mages are gathered when the infant is in the supine position.
11 cts had synchronous breathing at rest in the supine position.
12 fold in the prone position compared with the supine position.
13 All participants were buried in a supine position.
14 derneath the pelvis, with the patient in the supine position.
15 age acquisition was performed in prone, then supine position.
16 rdant HFpEF if they met criteria only in the supine position.
17 e upright position and reduce the IRP in the supine position.
18 in the attenuated IOP change from seated to supine position.
19 ] years) was used only for ICP comparison in supine position.
20 ncreased an additional 2.8 mmHg lower in the supine position.
21 spine were performed in each patient in the supine position.
22 od pressure by 20 mm Hg after sitting from a supine position.
23 JVs and/or vertebral veins in the sitting or supine position.
24 aphs, and 12 had scoliosis persisting in the supine position.
25 ns of at least 16 hours or to be left in the supine position.
26 an the superior quadrant (P = 0.0186) in the supine position.
27 TS (n=15) and healthy controls (n=13) in the supine position.
28 d until the cornea was level with floor; and supine position.
29 ow (Doppler ultrasound) were measured in the supine position.
30 obtained with patients in the prone and the supine position.
31 an pressures than respective controls in the supine position.
32 p period, all measurements were taken in the supine position.
33 itting position and 3.4 +/- 0.6 mm Hg in the supine position.
34 band >=40 in and/or >=D cup) in the prone vs supine positions.
35 ins of recording time in both supine and non-supine positions.
36 ups: ureteroscopy and ECIRS in the prone and supine positions.
37 ation underwent MRI in both left lateral and supine positions.
38 anced depth imaging in upright (sitting) and supine positions.
39 inus ICP) was calculated for the sitting and supine positions.
40 a clearance were superior in the lateral and supine positions.
41 nd with the Tono-Pen in both the sitting and supine positions.
42 d IOP changes upon awakening in habitual and supine positions.
43 rements of IOP were taken in the sitting and supine positions.
44 thy young adults in both the sitting and the supine positions.
45 eter with the volunteers in both sitting and supine positions.
46 lso compared after turning between prone and supine positions.
47 ial pressure (MAP) in the upright seated and supine positions.
48 and their respiratory status after resuming supine positioning.
49 membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) compared with supine positioning.
50 in every lead vector: 33 (66%) failed in the supine position, 12 (24%) failed in the standing positio
52 Of 36 patients who met HFpEF criteria in supine position, 18 (50%) did not meet criteria in uprig
57 eement for overall as well as supine and non-supine positions across varying clinical cutoffs of the
60 ge, 60 years; age range, 18-95 years) in the supine position and 34 women (mean age, 53 years; age ra
61 n in the participants after 5 minutes in the supine position and 5 minutes in the sitting position du
64 was evaluated (POLAR system) at rest in the supine position and during M-RSA and expressed in time d
66 -minute baseline period with subjects in the supine position and then during 45 minutes of head-up ti
67 ositions were significantly greater than the supine position and were also significantly different fr
70 recumbent positions, IOP was measured in the supine position, and right and left lateral decubitus po
71 ardiopulmonary baroreceptor loading with the supine position appeared to cause a greater reliance on
73 t rest and during a plantarflexor MVC in the supine position at a knee angle of 90 deg and at ankle a
74 Patients underwent thin-section CT in the supine position at full inspiration at enrollment (basel
78 ndard 10-second, 12-lead ECG acquired in the supine position at the Mayo Clinic ECG laboratory betwee
80 ed Valsalva manoeuvre with leg elevation and supine positioning at the end of the strain should be co
81 piratory mechanics was first assessed in the supine position, at zero end-expiratory pressure, and th
82 ressure of 35 cm H2O when implemented in the supine position before randomization, positive end-expir
90 more desquamation in patients treated in the supine position compared with prone (72 of 182 [39.6%] p
91 l impedance tomography recording was made in supine position, daily and repeated just before and just
92 lf of patients who met HFpEF criteria in the supine position did not meet the criteria in the upright
93 by VV-ECMO, prone positioning compared with supine positioning did not significantly reduce time to
94 sterior direction, which was observed in the supine position, disappeared in the standing position.
96 g the 16-hour diurnal/wake period and in the supine position during the 8-hour nocturnal/sleep period
98 e taken in both the sitting position and the supine position during the light/wake period but only in
99 positioning for 3 days only and to avoid the supine position during the night for a minimum of 1 week
101 laboratory every 2 hours in the sitting and supine positions during the 16-hour diurnal/wake period
102 Subjects were studied in the upright and supine position, during acute zero gravity (parabolic fl
103 Intraocular pressure was measured in the supine position every 2 hours, using a pneumatonometer.
112 s independent of FGR pregnancy, meaning that supine positioning has an additive effect of reducing fe
113 difficulty breathing that was exacerbated by supine positioning; he had not had any obvious anteceden
114 e measurements vary according to standing vs supine position in adults, and fasting and bladder voidi
115 pared to the left lateral position, maternal supine position in late pregnancy is associated with red
118 ight of the risks associated with the use of supine positioning in critically ill and mechanically ve
119 wledge emphasises the importance of avoiding supine positioning in late pregnancy, particularly for v
120 CT colonography was performed in prone and supine positions in 180 patients with polyps or risk fac
121 have been conducted to compare the prone and supine positions in acute respiratory distress syndrome,
122 plications of MPS obtained in both prone and supine positions in patients with perfusion defects on s
123 sthetized and submerged horizontally, in the supine position, in 100 degrees C (37 degrees C for cont
124 d-end elevation position (THE pre-prone), in supine position just before turning prone (Tsupine pre-p
125 mbined with having a FGR pregnancy, maternal supine position leads to 15 times greater odds of stillb
126 venous pressure increased from the seated to supine position (mean [SD], seated: -2.3 [2.0] vs supine
128 age of collapsed dependent lung areas in the supine position, monitoring by electrical impedance tomo
129 additional resting D.SPECT recording in the supine position (n = 40) or in the sitting position with
132 as measured using a Perkins tonometer in the supine position on 58 eyes and upright on a subset of 8
134 ing (MRI) to quantify the effect of maternal supine position on maternal-placental and fetoplacental
138 segments with attenuation artifacts than the supine position (on average, 1.10 +/- 1.01 vs. 1.90 +/-
139 s with SSc spectrum disorders exercised in a supine position, on a lower extremity cycle ergometer.
140 uations, patients were observed to be in the supine position only 0.45%, residual volume of >200 mL w
141 ther positioned in (a) the standard prone or supine position or (b) the lateral decubitus position wi
145 amplitudes, assessed on panograms, than the supine position (P < 0.001); and fewer segments with att
148 ghteen mongrel dogs were anesthetized in the supine position, paralyzed, and mechanically ventilated
150 stress syndrome (ARDS), the use of prone and supine positioning procedures (PP) has been associated w
151 s, which are taken while the patient is in a supine position, provide new opportunities to evaluate s
154 blood flow was studied in 21 piglets in the supine position randomized to three different groups: a
155 increasing number undergoing surgery in the supine position rather than just the classical prone tec
157 us -17+/-11 degrees, P=.04); that is, in the supine position, RR interval changes appeared to lead ar
158 ventilator group, animals were randomized to supine positioning (S) or rotational positioning with al
159 expectations, however, cardiac pacing in the supine position significantly reduced arterial pressure
160 12-18 measurements were performed either in supine position (SP) or in prone position (PP), if Pa o2
162 nteroposterior direction were greater in the supine position than in standing position (all p values
167 tween change in systolic blood pressure from supine position to standing and 4-year mortality rates (
168 e supine position using room air, and in the supine position using a room air and (129)Xe mixture.
169 rteen healthy volunteers were studied in the supine position using concurrent UES and esophageal mano
170 the sitting position using room air, in the supine position using room air, and in the supine positi
173 g device that recorded the time spent in the supine position was attached to patients' forehead after
174 ponse to deep breathing and to standing from supine position) was correlated with esophageal function
178 The mean outflow facility in the sitting and supine positions were 0.30 +/- 0.31 microL/mL/mm Hg and
180 e-volume curve of the lungs (obtained in the supine position) were also used as end-point variables.
181 res were similar to control pressures in the supine position, whereas patients with baroreflex failur
182 n as measured by conventional spirometry (in supine position), which reduced measured FEV(1) (2.70 0.
183 ardiogram as they were lying still in a semi-supine position while watching an emotionally neutral vi
184 duced by HCl inhalation: pigs studied in the supine position with a low PEEP (5 +/- 3 [mean +/- SD] c
186 seated position, (3) passive exercise in the supine position with the leg above the heart, and (4) pa
187 and 48 degrees (SD 12 degrees ) while in the supine position, with a mean difference of 11 degrees (S
189 mogeneous from dorsal to ventral than in the supine position, with more homogeneously distributed str
190 kerlike position comparatively to sitting or supine positions, with a notably lower rate of attenuati
191 phy was performed with patients in prone and supine positions, with colonic segmental distention asse