コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ase Control and Prevention respiratory virus surveillance data.
2 nt class and latent transition models to HIV surveillance data.
3 on are underexplored due to lack of national surveillance data.
4 for real-time estimation of AVR fitness from surveillance data.
5 months of pre- and post-vaccine introduction surveillance data.
6 odels with vital death records and influenza surveillance data.
7 imple method for estimating AVR fitness from surveillance data.
8 to estimate sparse Markov networks from AMR surveillance data.
9 luenza viruses was described using virologic surveillance data.
10 ue cohort-specific prevalence, using disease surveillance data.
11 S. influenza season with the help of digital surveillance data.
12 (STM) from nine years of Australian disease surveillance data.
13 rameters and true herd-level prevalence from surveillance data.
14 al biases and underreporting inherent in the surveillance data.
15 and plan treatment adherence programs using surveillance data.
16 31, 2007, by linking national laboratory and surveillance data.
17 using GeoSentinel surveillance data or other surveillance data.
18 demiology of cholera in Togo, using national surveillance data.
19 from the continuous capture of institutional surveillance data.
20 9-2010 were analyzed using enhanced national surveillance data.
21 ssion intensity of future epidemics by using surveillance data.
22 ysis using only Arizona-specific outcome and surveillance data.
23 CRC, inflammatory bowel disease, or without surveillance data.
24 s are still hindered by the lack of reliable surveillance data.
25 bacterial nosocomial pathogens using routine surveillance data.
26 much lower than expected from epidemiologic surveillance data.
27 y risks, yet there are a paucity of national surveillance data.
28 open-source, laboratory-confirmed influenza surveillance data.
29 ever incidence estimates from facility-based surveillance data.
30 ent global epidemiology, we analyzed measles surveillance data.
31 ws and epidemiological national and regional surveillance data.
32 D rates in 4 age groups that agree well with surveillance data.
33 mediate levels, a ubiquitous pattern seen in surveillance data.
34 cephaly not available in routinely collected surveillance data.
35 useholds, health systems, and reliability of surveillance data.
36 Lack of lipid, fibrosis, or HCC surveillance data.
37 nities is poorly understood owing to limited surveillance data.
38 demia-CDI coinfection using population-based surveillance data.
39 ng SR, epidemiological national and regional surveillance data.
40 ons warrants an evaluation of post marketing surveillance data.
41 d are difficult to measure using traditional surveillance data.
42 o account for underascertainment in sentinel surveillance data.
44 on of adults with CHD and the development of surveillance data across the life span to provide empiri
46 mmunications & community engagement, disease surveillance & data analysis, technical quality & capaci
47 amics of SARS-CoV-2 using publicly available surveillance data and (2) infer estimates of SARS-CoV-2
48 ood levels, and use them in conjunction with surveillance data and a data assimilation method to fore
49 s conducted using routinely collected health surveillance data and chloroplatinate exposure data.
50 A virus subtype can be seen in US influenza surveillance data and differ between prepandemic and pan
52 partmental model to synthesise evidence from surveillance data and epidemiological and behavioural st
54 for interpreting clinical and public health surveillance data and for the design and implementation
56 djunct treatment for severe malaria using US surveillance data and reviewed the literature to update
58 ort study based on the linkage of laboratory surveillance data and the Danish Civil Registration Syst
59 understood owing to the absence of reliable surveillance data and the simplistic approaches underlyi
60 We quantified the links between mosquito surveillance data and the spatiotemporal patterns of 3,8
61 t fully capture uncertainty due to imperfect surveillance data and uncertainty about the transmission
62 ose derived from traditional epidemiological surveillance data and with those reported for prior outb
63 ational parasite movement, utilize real time surveillance data, and relax the steady state assumption
64 ogy can aid in the interpretation of disease surveillance data, and the results can potentially refin
65 llated WHO country burden estimates, routine surveillance data, and tuberculosis prevalence surveys f
67 High-quality, comprehensive, and real-time surveillance data are essential to reduce the burden of
72 anisms to ensure timely and complete cholera surveillance data are reported to the national level sho
76 Trends were compared to provincial Chlamydia surveillance data by time-series analysis, using the cro
77 , tailoring these models to certain types of surveillance data can be challenging, and overly complex
79 We considered how participatory syndromic surveillance data can be used to estimate influenza atta
80 ngs demonstrate that participatory syndromic surveillance data can be used to gauge influenza attack
83 lyses identified unobserved risk patterns in surveillance data, characterized high-risk MSM, and quan
86 om routine, standardized, inpatient clinical surveillance data collected between 2015 and 2018 from 4
87 from routine standardised inpatient clinical surveillance data collected between 2015 and 2018 from 4
90 eal-time--two weeks earlier than traditional surveillance data collected by the U.S. Centers for Dise
93 lyze syndromic, virological, and serological surveillance data collected in England in 2009-2011 and
95 aths through generating causes of death from surveillance data combined with innovative diagnostic an
96 m which accommodates a wide range of disease surveillance data comprising any combination of recorded
100 za virologic, hospitalization, and mortality surveillance data during 2000-2017 were analyzed for coh
105 ate recommended standards for the use of HAI surveillance data for external facility assessment to en
106 sed the challenges associated with using HAI surveillance data for external quality reporting, includ
107 where available and validated using national surveillance data for incidence of NAFLD-related HCC.
108 and Prevention's Emerging Infections Program surveillance data for invasive community-associated MRSA
109 active population-based and laboratory-based surveillance data for invasive GBS disease conducted thr
111 We analyzed Emerging Infections Program surveillance data for invasive S. aureus (SA) infections
113 edictability based on high-quality influenza surveillance data for Israel; the model fit is corrobora
114 ing study, we adjusted routine malariometric surveillance data for known biases and used socioeconomi
115 observational cohort study, we used national surveillance data for meningococcal serogroup W and sero
117 e Cost and Utilization Project and influenza surveillance data for regions encompassing these states.
121 rs and >/=65 years) and scaled by laboratory surveillance data for viral types and subtypes, in the p
125 extracted prospectively acquired Australian surveillance data from 2 studies nested within the Paedi
126 nessee Emerging Infections Program Influenza Surveillance data from 2006 to 2016 and the concurrent T
130 We performed a retrospective study on HIV surveillance data from 5226 adult cases in Los Angeles C
133 ic analysis of HIV genetic sequence data and surveillance data from a US population of men who have s
137 plements a Bayesian model using strain-typed surveillance data from both human cases and source sampl
138 xamined national population-based meningitis surveillance data from Burkina Faso using two sources, o
139 tious Diseases and Epidemiology Network, and surveillance data from Buruli ulcer control programmes i
141 sease (GBD) Study 2016, national surveys and surveillance data from China, and qualitative data.
147 We calibrated the model to match the HIV surveillance data from LAC across a 10-year period, star
148 ation in West Africa, we collected influenza surveillance data from ministries of health and influenz
151 d through application to bovine tuberculosis surveillance data from Northern and the Republic of Irel
157 d active population and laboratory-based IPD surveillance data from the Centers for Disease Control a
159 nal and regional) with traditional influenza surveillance data from the Centers for Disease Control a
163 Jan 1, 2010, to Dec 31, 2017, and mortality surveillance data from the South African National Popula
165 Using a stochastic model fit to seasonal flu surveillance data from the United States, we find that s
167 ity for 125 countries using laboratory-based surveillance data from the WHO's FLUNET database and com
170 extracted prospectively acquired Australian surveillance data from two studies nested within the Pae
176 d potential for discovery using existing IAV surveillance data.IMPORTANCE Wild aquatic birds are the
182 e of chronic shedding was only apparent when surveillance data included at least two outbreaks and th
187 ct and analyze mortality and hospitalization surveillance data is needed to rapidly establish the sev
188 -risk schools, as identified by school-level surveillance data, may experience substantial caries-pre
190 trospective analysis of population-based IPD surveillance data of the general population residing in
191 An annual update of antimicrobial resistance surveillance data of uropathogens may permit targeted tr
192 ral Brong Ahafo region in Ghana, we combined surveillance data on 11,274 deliveries with quality of c
194 and characteristics of infections, national surveillance data on diagnoses in England and Wales from
198 lign with those derived from epidemiological surveillance data on MERS and Ebola, underscoring the im
201 We fit Poisson harmonic regression models to surveillance data on RRV, BFV, and dengue (from 1993, 19
202 other settings using analogous, multiseason surveillance data on self-reported ILI together with sep
203 ailability of weekly Web-based participatory surveillance data on self-reported influenza-like illnes
204 ing serotypes emphasizes the urgent need for surveillance data on serotype distribution and serotype-
210 e available literature and the postmarketing surveillance data, proposed a clinically based grading o
213 V Synthesis Model, to multiple data sources (surveillance data provided by Public Health England and
214 CV was developed using data synthesized from surveillance data, published literature, expert opinion,
215 ld were identified from prospective clinical surveillance data recorded routinely at four referral ho
216 ffects logistic regression models to routine surveillance data recording the presence of poliomyeliti
222 , children were matched with NC kindergarten-surveillance data representing school-level mean untreat
223 nking the mortality database to the national surveillance data set and the Scottish Morbidity Record.
224 ortance, we analyzed a longitudinal mosquito surveillance data set from Connecticut (CT), United Stat
225 sed inference schemes to analyze the largest surveillance data set of Shigella sonnei in the United S
227 uartile from administrative data, use of the surveillance data set resulted in performance grades of
228 s to transplant varied by step, and national surveillance data should be collected on early transplan
230 atistical framework for integrating multiple surveillance data sources to evaluate the adequacy of tr
231 performed in routine clinical practice; and surveillance data suffer from confounding problems commo
232 ccine development has been unsuccessful, but surveillance data suggest that outer membrane vesicle me
235 red (April-May and September-November), with surveillance data suggesting locally acquired infections
236 ata on antiretroviral therapy or viral load, surveillance data suggests that a small proportion of me
237 the potential to generate rich epidemiologic surveillance data that will be widely accessible to mala
239 cohort study linked South Carolina HIV case surveillance data to 3 statewide healthcare databases.
242 tion of chikungunya in 2015, by using active surveillance data to correct reported dengue case data f
244 spital service with national epidemiological surveillance data to describe the use of surgical proced
247 analyzed characteristics of cases from 2016 surveillance data to evaluate the utility of laboratory
248 ddition to providing high-quality laboratory surveillance data to help guide disease control, elimina
249 developed methods to aggregate county-level surveillance data to inform provincial-level analysis, a
250 on and academic scientists, these models use surveillance data to make quantitative predictions regar
252 resolution can be combined with longitudinal surveillance data to test hypotheses about routes and dr
253 cation months of ventilator-associated event surveillance data to the National Healthcare Safety Netw
254 a multidecade, continental-scale approach of surveillance data to understand trends of seasonal IAV s
255 In this study, we use all available U.S. surveillance data to: 1) fit a set of mathematical model
256 ission, informed by detailed behavioural and surveillance data, to assess the effect of seven differe
261 from vital registration, verbal autopsy, and surveillance data using the Cause of Death Ensemble Mode
263 artin on pages 368-9.)Using population-based surveillance data, we analyzed antiviral treatment among
266 strict to state influenza-like illness (ILI) surveillance data, we measured its effect on community l
270 e data used by ALERT are routinely collected surveillance data: weekly case counts of laboratory-conf
277 al-level administrative data sets and active surveillance data were joined to estimate influenza-asso
284 hia Department of Public Health and enhanced surveillance data were used to determine where individua
285 boratory-confirmed influenza hospitalization surveillance data were used to examine the association b
287 METHODS AND Routinely-collected hospital surveillance data were used to undertake a pragmatic com
288 rably according to whether administrative or surveillance data were used, suggesting that administrat
289 ate was 0.15% (95% CI, 0.13% to 0.17%); when surveillance data were used, the rate was 2.0% (CI, 1.8%
292 ictions from 12 years of empirical influenza surveillance data, which are far sparser and more coarse
293 Following recent release of time-stamped surveillance data, which better reflects real-time opera
294 trol and Prevention's influenza-like illness surveillance data with aggregated prescription data.
295 clude hybrid systems that couple traditional surveillance data with data from search queries, social
296 echanistic framework to integrate individual surveillance data with geolocation data and aggregate mo
298 dministrative data) or examined adults (from surveillance data) with at least 1 stage II or greater H
300 de conjugate vaccine GBS6 was designed using surveillance data yielded by whole-genome sequencing of