戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ecundity and high, early mortality (type-III survivorship).
2  recurrence, palliative care, and quality of survivorship.
3 ne profiling could help understand long-term survivorship.
4 status and health-related quality of life in survivorship.
5 operative complications, and is prevalent in survivorship.
6 s influence species ranges due to effects on survivorship.
7 omes and similar lung cancer-specific 5-year survivorship.
8 ubstantial subgroup, CIPN persists long into survivorship.
9  can be favorably altered to promote healthy survivorship.
10 et breast cancer treatment and breast cancer survivorship.
11 avigation during breast cancer treatment and survivorship.
12 sed on improving breast cancer treatment and survivorship.
13 n and reducing coral recruitment, growth and survivorship.
14  of focus from relapse detection to improved survivorship.
15 on health-related quality of life (HR-QL) in survivorship.
16 s, which are evident during treatment and in survivorship.
17 ead to excess morbidity and mortality during survivorship.
18 ial biobehavioral pathway relevant to cancer survivorship.
19 nterventions across the entire trajectory of survivorship.
20  late-life, and this pattern associated with survivorship.
21 -Related Fatigue and the NCCN Guidelines for Survivorship.
22 urdles, which will ultimately improve cancer survivorship.
23 re essential components of colorectal cancer survivorship.
24 severity of psychological morbidity in early survivorship.
25 is known about immune health during extended survivorship.
26 duced parasitoid success and increased aphid survivorship.
27 al orientation on cancer, from prevention to survivorship.
28 t registries that can track lifetime implant survivorship.
29 ing focus on the quality of long-term cancer survivorship.
30 s reproduction and another that reduces tree survivorship.
31 ities for understanding and enhancing sepsis survivorship.
32 m unsafe hospitals could potentially improve survivorship.
33 e treatment and up to 33% of patients during survivorship.
34 ical findings and their association with EVD survivorship.
35  are fundamental measures in prostate cancer survivorship.
36 h BC from diagnosis through treatment and in survivorship.
37 erships, which are central to cardiac arrest survivorship.
38 terest in accessing the quality of long-term survivorship.
39 o reduce a negative impact on the quality of survivorship.
40 f all stages from diagnosis up to 5 years of survivorship.
41 e diagnosis and is based on the condition of survivorship.
42 ern California cohort study of breast cancer survivorship (2006-2009).
43 30 minutes or less in the initial (61 v 54), survivorship (27 v 26), and end-of-life (310 v 286) phas
44 in conjunction with prevention (3) or cancer survivorship (4), and no grant addressed emotional seque
45  interactions with brood experienced greater survivorship, a trend not present in queenright subcolon
46 ian embryology, life history strategies, and survivorship across the Cretaceous-Paleogene mass extinc
47 the relationship of MRI assessment of CRM to survivorship after adjusting for preoperative covariates
48                     Prior studies of patient survivorship after an intensive care unit (ICU) stay sug
49 he ability of the bee microbiome to increase survivorship against selenate challenge.
50 uman populations, changing mean fertility or survivorship alone requires unprecedented alterations.
51  the annual excess economic burden of cancer survivorship among recently diagnosed cancer survivors w
52 nation results in a drastically reduced host survivorship and a diminished capacity to degrade pectin
53 esophageal cancer have resulted in increased survivorship and a focus on health-related quality of li
54  aortic dissection (AD) has led to increased survivorship and a population of individuals at risk for
55             Purpose The prevalence of cancer survivorship and chronic health conditions is increasing
56 n QOL from time of BC diagnosis to long-term survivorship and compared QOL in long-term survivors to
57 minary data support the concept that microbe survivorship and diversity are partially dependent upon
58                         We tracked C. ohlone survivorship and estimated fecundity for three years.
59 tes" enhance lifetime fitness by trading off survivorship and fecundity at different life stages.
60                 In addition to difference in survivorship and fecundity, an asynchrony of adult emerg
61 ance and thereby bestows fitness benefits in survivorship and fecundity.
62 f the issues surrounding provision of cancer survivorship and follow-up care in the USA and discuss p
63  replication stress and increase cancer cell survivorship and growth potential.
64 ed the strength of relationships between EVD survivorship and health outcomes using linear regression
65 valid estimates of parameters such as vector survivorship and host feeding rates.
66 entiating PCPs' level of expertise in cancer survivorship and how such expertise could be used.
67 - and wind-dispersed species reduced Artemia survivorship and hyphal growth of Fusarium during the im
68                                    As cancer survivorship and life expectancy for cancer patients imp
69 ctive patient management plan that maximizes survivorship and quality of life.
70  to understand the forces that inhibit coral survivorship and recovery.
71 patients and families on the complexities of survivorship and recovery.
72 n play an integral role in colony behaviour, survivorship and their relationship.
73 s of the HIF pathway, but still shows robust survivorship and transcriptional response to hypoxia.
74 tment, after treatment with curative intent (survivorship), and after diagnosis with metastatic disea
75         Plant roots determine carbon uptake, survivorship, and agricultural yield and represent a lar
76 om diagnosis through curative treatment into survivorship, and metastatic disease and end-of-life car
77 e compared daily activity (feeding) rhythms, survivorship, and reproduction in six replicate populati
78 se factors and colorectal or prostate cancer survivorship are getting more compelling.
79                   These factors reduce chick survivorship as they cannot metabolize saline water, whi
80  Fast alleles increase ethanol tolerance and survivorship at all temperatures tested.
81 t the group level--certain ratios yield high survivorship at some sites but not others.
82         This review will also address cancer survivorship because it closely relates to PROs.
83                 Interestingly, the Cardinium survivorship benefit was not evident when Wolbachia was
84 ship immediately following release, retained survivorship benefits during 1 and 6 months of continued
85 unds are unlikely to be affected by possible survivorship bias in the data, and are consistent with m
86                                 "slow-grower survivorship bias") and of young, slow-growing trees (cf
87                         To address potential survivorship bias, we fitted Markov models to the distri
88    Antibiotic exposure resulted in decreased survivorship, both in the hive and in laboratory experim
89 rgeted therapies is projected to enhance CLL survivorship but can impose a substantial financial burd
90 y have the potential to improve outcomes and survivorship, but findings from prospective trials are n
91   We evaluated the economic burden of cancer survivorship by estimating excess costs among cancer sur
92                    This aspect promotes high survivorship by limiting exposure to predation and envir
93 ounding of the National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship by representatives from 20 organisations wh
94           Training and knowledge specific to survivorship care and coordinated care between PCPs and
95 e review some of the challenges to providing survivorship care and discuss efforts to prioritize the
96               Ten physician-perceived cancer survivorship care barriers/concerns were compared betwee
97 (MOs) regarding breast and colorectal cancer survivorship care beyond 5 years after treatment.
98 n Society of Clinical Oncology Breast Cancer Survivorship Care Guideline is to provide recommendation
99        The American Cancer Society (ACS) HNC Survivorship Care Guideline was reviewed for development
100                    ASCO endorsed the ACS HNC Survivorship Care Guideline, adding qualifying statement
101 SCO Expert Panel determined that the ACS HNC Survivorship Care Guideline, published in 2016, is clear
102 d and tasked with drafting the Breast Cancer Survivorship Care Guideline.
103 mendations from the 2014 ACS Prostate Cancer Survivorship Care Guidelines are clear, thorough, and re
104 merican Cancer Society (ACS) Prostate Cancer Survivorship Care Guidelines were reviewed for developme
105        ASCO endorses the ACS Prostate Cancer Survivorship Care Guidelines, with a number of qualifyin
106  implementation of recommended breast cancer survivorship care in the intervention group, compared wi
107        High-quality, well-coordinated cancer survivorship care is needed yet barriers remain owing to
108 ychosocial support, and preferred models for survivorship care may improve psychosocial care delivery
109 les County public hospitals into an RCT of a survivorship care nurse counseling session coupled with
110 ess the impact of an automatically generated survivorship care plan (SCP) on patient-reported outcome
111 20.0% of primary care providers (PCPs) had a survivorship care plan (SCP).
112 ese findings have important implications for survivorship care planning and patient education.
113                                              Survivorship care planning should involve discussions be
114 OR], 1.73; 95% CI, 1.22 to 2.44) and discuss survivorship care planning with survivors (OR, 2.02; 95%
115 ians' (PCPs) reports of provision of written survivorship care plans (SCPs) and discussion of survivo
116 olled trial (RCT) of treatment summaries and survivorship care plans coupled with a nurse counseling
117 on of individualized treatment summaries and survivorship care plans to patients and their health car
118 n To our knowledge, this is the first RCT of survivorship care plans to show benefits in clinical out
119 of information from oncology-based care (eg, survivorship care plans), and not as active members of t
120 ve function must be included in clinical and survivorship care plans.
121 ntinuing education, explicit guidelines, and survivorship care plans.
122 ncologists and 1,020 PCPs was surveyed about survivorship care practices with survivors.
123                                              Survivorship care recommendations and provider responsib
124 4%) reported always/almost always discussing survivorship care recommendations with survivors, fewer
125 ivorship care plans (SCPs) and discussion of survivorship care recommendations with survivors.
126            Guidelines and models for general survivorship care routinely address psychosocial needs,
127 y of programmes to increase access to needed survivorship care services and health equity.
128         Efforts to clarify provider roles in survivorship care to patients may be effective in improv
129  is also an important component of long-term survivorship care with older patients.
130 ondarily on patient adherence to recommended survivorship care, among a low-income population of brea
131 ntion and diagnosis, in shared follow-up and survivorship care, and in end-of-life care.
132  implementation of recommended breast cancer survivorship care, for example, treatment of depression
133 s contribute to this underprovided aspect of survivorship care, including lack of provider training a
134 he integration of psychosocial services into survivorship care.
135 rs, improve outcomes, and prove the value of survivorship care.
136 tion of and patient adherence to recommended survivorship care.
137 nternet-based virtual visit as components of survivorship care.
138 M) laid out its bold vision of comprehensive survivorship care.
139 tigate them may substantially improve cancer survivorship care.
140 hould be more effectively managed as part of survivorship care.
141 ltidisciplinary, collaborative head and neck survivorship care.
142 mmunity care and advocacy services to cancer survivorship care; these services were often overlooked
143  = 170), recruited during visits to a cancer survivorship clinic and primary care, completed self-rep
144                                   The NP-led survivorship clinic model, with increased guidance for P
145                    Risk-based education in a survivorship clinic significantly increases awareness of
146 r therapy-related complications at T0 (first survivorship clinic visit) and at T1 to T5 (subsequent v
147          The impact of education provided in survivorship clinics on survivors' understanding of thei
148                                       During survivorship, cognitive, emotional, role, and social fun
149 C, which was a much less severe reduction in survivorship compared with the effect of B. bassiana inf
150             The MoM THR had slightly shorter survivorship compared with the MoP THR (adjusted hazard
151 tion of plastics by larval fish could reduce survivorship, compounding threats to fisheries productiv
152 tment, and impact of this largely unexamined survivorship concern.
153 , such as AIs, should be high of the list of survivorship concerns for clinicians that treat HL.
154 ooled data from the California Breast Cancer Survivorship Consortium for 3 population-based case-cont
155 ed impairment in VO(2peak) across the entire survivorship continuum.
156  the last 50,000 years, the human population survivorship curve has experienced a shift from one of c
157  of drift between populations with different survivorship curves and that survivorship curves are use
158  with different survivorship curves and that survivorship curves are useful predictors of the sensiti
159 esis reflects the general trajectory of host survivorship curves: as a host cohort ages, availability
160                                        Field survivorship data, combined with estimates of selection
161 of cancer prevention, followed by diagnosis, survivorship, detection, and cancer treatment.
162 O2 ], and semidiurnal pH fluctuations on the survivorship, development, and size of early life stages
163 ore likely (95% CI, 5.74 to 14.82) to report survivorship discussions with survivors.
164 d oncologists were associated with increased survivorship discussions with survivors.
165 vior of P. argus and may result in decreased survivorship due to impaired shelter selection or other
166 ome of the most complex challenges of cancer survivorship due to many late effects (eg, second malign
167                     The prospects for better survivorship during future contacts are good provided mo
168 care spending by phase of care (ie, initial, survivorship, end of life).
169                             This anticipated survivorship experience highlights the importance of col
170 f parent distress may improve overall family survivorship experiences following childhood cancer.
171      To characterize patients' treatment and survivorship experiences, we reported the tumor features
172  perturbation without jeopardising their own survivorship, female leopards apparently "hedge their be
173 ects of oil on marsh periwinkle movement and survivorship following exposure to oil.
174 n programs, thereby improving the quality of survivorship for the pediatric medulloblastoma populatio
175 evaluate the cross-sectional associations of survivorship from any, non-sex-related, and sex-related
176 ancers, but there was no association between survivorship from breast and prostate cancers and elevat
177             There was no association between survivorship from breast and prostate cancers and elevat
178 ing insight into attainable patient-centered survivorship goals for sexual recovery after radical pro
179 LTP-inducing stimuli increased the long-term survivorship (>14 h) of individual new spines.
180 his guideline adaptation is part of a larger survivorship guideline series.
181                  The current state of cancer survivorship guidelines is also discussed.
182                                              Survivorship guidelines should address cardiovascular co
183  was used to evaluate the effect that cancer survivorship had on the risk of developing CVD, adjusted
184                      The specialty of cancer survivorship has been developing and growing since the m
185                              Although cancer survivorship has extended, rates of durable response of
186 ed to high pCO(2) had greater settlement and survivorship immediately following release, retained sur
187     Significantly, we also found that embryo survivorship in a current pregnancy was negatively relat
188 llus clausii) highly predictive of long-term survivorship in both discovery and validation cohorts.
189 o high conditions was maintained despite the survivorship in both treatments declining in continued e
190 th large femoral heads, and inferior implant survivorship in other patients, particularly women.
191 igher antibody response in mice and enhanced survivorship in PEP settings compared to rRABV.
192  current pregnancy was negatively related to survivorship in the prior pregnancy, clearly demonstrati
193 ct of dietary intake and dietary patterns on survivorship in those with frailty is yet to be examined
194 ttention should be given to long-term cancer survivorship in young adults with colon cancer because t
195 was chosen to compare fitness (fecundity and survivorship) in the presence and absence of parasitism.
196       Likewise, addressing the challenges of survivorship, including secondary prevention of long-ter
197                                Conclusion HL survivorship is associated with a substantive risk of a
198 mplete, national study demonstrates that ICU survivorship is associated with higher 5-year mortality
199                The economic impact of cancer survivorship is considerable and is also high years afte
200 d fertility-related communication throughout survivorship is essential, because treatment-indicated r
201  the long-term consequences of critical care survivorship is essential.
202 sceptible to climate change stress, as their survivorship is often limited by the most vulnerable par
203 are experiences to quality of life in cancer survivorship is poorly understood.
204 al settlement, and postsettlement growth and survivorship, is critical to the persistence and resilie
205            Efforts to address this important survivorship issue have been encouraged by reports of th
206 nvisioned an organisation that would address survivorship issues and include friends, family, and car
207                                    Long-term survivorship issues are also being evaluated in this pat
208 icles focusing on PROs, quality of life, and survivorship issues in oncology trials are highlighted,
209 ity preservation, cardiovascular health, and survivorship issues, along with a need for better cure r
210 that served as covariables were Knowledge of Survivorship Issues, Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Physi
211 ully automated weekly modules covering early survivorship issues.
212 2063; R(2) = 0.16706; P = 0.002) and reduced survivorship (Log-rank [Mantel-Cox] test, Chi-square = 3
213                                   Prosthetic survivorship may depend on characteristics of the implan
214            In this Series paper, we assessed survivorship models that have been described in the lite
215  gave a new and powerful voice to the cancer survivorship movement that demanded a call to action.
216 s with colon cancer because they likely face survivorship needs that are distinct from those of their
217 ritical nutrients associated with growth and survivorship, nitrogen and phosphorus.
218 ances in multimodal therapy yielded a 5-year survivorship of 80%, MB still accounts for the leading c
219                             We monitored the survivorship of bees following antibiotic treatment in o
220 ens, Phoma sp. and Fusarium sp., and reduced survivorship of brine shrimp, Artemia franciscana, acros
221 p with gene expression and may be related to survivorship of duplicated genes.
222 absorption and malnutrition are prevalent in survivorship of esophageal and stomach cancer.
223 her temperatures and lower humidity, reduces survivorship of indoor-resting mosquitoes and may have c
224  infected thrips, and significantly improved survivorship of infected thrips.
225                                              Survivorship of larvae was unaffected by low pH, low [O2
226 s richness alone can suppress the growth and survivorship of multiple species of corals (Porites cyli
227                      However, the growth and survivorship of nursery-reared outplanted corals are hig
228 redirected to increasing female fertility or survivorship of offspring.
229 etaining leaves underlie the performance and survivorship of seedlings in deeply shaded tropical fore
230 in (1) the number, (2) the size, and (3) the survivorship of the offspring.
231 timated propagule pressure, germination, and survivorship of these taxa, and we used the estimates to
232 solated by differences in flowering time and survivorship on soils containing high concentrations of
233 om diagnosis through treatment and long-term survivorship or end of life.
234 atient navigation in improving treatment and survivorship outcomes in women with breast cancer.
235 ns about systemic therapy and assessments of survivorship outcomes.
236 P < .001) and significantly worse event-free survivorship (P < .0001).
237 g issues of health promotion and prevention, survivorship, palliation, and bereavement.' Supportive c
238 st conditions remained high even in the late survivorship period (5-10 years after cancer diagnosis).
239                       Worry in the long-term survivorship period was higher among those with unmet ne
240 tient counseling during the surveillance and survivorship phases of care.
241 ants and mothers are projected forward using survivorship probabilities to estimate survivors at the
242 uroblastoma, patients in a thoracic oncology survivorship program, and participants in a lung cancer
243 ent could be incorporated into breast cancer survivorship programmes and delivered by trained breast
244 sures to facilitate broad comparisons across survivorship programmes and thorough and systematic eval
245 omprehensive and high-quality evaluations of survivorship programmes are needed, including assessment
246 e base regarding the effectiveness of cancer survivorship programmes is inadequate.
247                                              Survivorship programmes tend to evaluate their effective
248 es of assessment measures for currently used survivorship programmes, discuss the rationale for and p
249 ation to prevention, screening, therapy, and survivorship programs.
250 ce points toward a potential shift in marine survivorship, rather than local, river-specific factors.
251 ecific prevention, screening, treatment, and survivorship recommendations.
252  from behavioural observations and for pupal survivorship (related to performance), showing that both
253  blood feeding significantly increased adult survivorship relative to nontransgenic sibling controls.
254 active Akt, had no significant difference in survivorship relative to nontransgenic siblings.
255 e inquilines and their descendants had lower survivorship, relative to more diffuse lineages.
256 at the evidence overrepresents breast cancer survivorship research and is sparse for prostate and col
257                                              Survivorship research in the cooperative group setting,
258 th stage IIIA disease after 3 and 5 years of survivorship, respectively.
259                                Incorporating survivorship results into a mechanistic species distribu
260 cation strategies reflect trade-offs between survivorship risk and subsequent fitness benefits and ar
261 esponding to difficult emotions, coping with survivorship, running a family meeting, and transitionin
262 d professionals allied to medicine providing survivorship services caring for adults after cancer tre
263  uninterrupted health insurance coverage for survivorship services in young adulthood.
264 tion of care from pediatric to adult-focused survivorship services may help meet the unique medical,
265 nces the desiccation phenotype by increasing survivorship, shifting the niche space, and reducing the
266 cancer survivors in late treatment and early survivorship stages.
267                                 For example, survivorship studies of deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatu
268  Prostate Cancer Comparative Effectiveness & Survivorship Study, a population-based cohort of 881 pat
269  cancer survivors participating in a general survivorship survey completed an additional breast cance
270 ns), and not as active members of the cancer survivorship team.
271 er infection, which was substantially poorer survivorship than that of corresponding healthy individu
272 8 titled "Understanding and Enhancing Sepsis Survivorship." The goals were to identify gaps and limit
273 ntification of higher-risk groups to promote survivorship through emerging improvements in cognitive
274 k demonstrates a novel mechanism of enhanced survivorship through increased Akt signaling in the fat
275 e number is a remarkably strong predictor of survivorship to adulthood.
276  patients with cancer from diagnosis through survivorship to end of life.
277 resurfacing only resulted in similar implant survivorship to other surgical options in men with large
278 oviding insight into the human experience of survivorship, to obtain interest from hospital administr
279 oral evolution in the context of a fecundity/survivorship trade-off.
280  on an individual's resource utilization and survivorship trajectory in the United States is not clea
281 el to address sexual dysfunction in a cancer survivorship treatment setting.
282 olomide chemotherapy has increased long-term survivorship, treatment failure and rapid tumor recurren
283 chloroplasts, decreased chlorophyll and zero survivorship under cold stress.
284 l tissue conferred beneficial effects on fly survivorship under normal and stress conditions.
285 t 111 and 122, substantially increases adult survivorship upon cardiac glycoside exposure.
286 n disorders on prostate cancer treatment and survivorship warrants further study, because both condit
287                                      The THR survivorship was assessed according to cement type and b
288                             In A. stephensi, survivorship was increased by 15% to 45%, while in Ae. a
289            A significant decrease in tadpole survivorship was observed at 209 mug/g while there was a
290  copper on sperm DNA damage and early larval survivorship was synergistically increased under OA cond
291 ad little effect on the galler-abundance and survivorship were not affected, and gall volume changed
292 tection, often further reduced fecundity and survivorship when enemy challenged, and resulted in cons
293 The bumble bee microbiome slightly increases survivorship when the host is exposed to selenate, but t
294 hest reproductive output suffered the lowest survivorship, whereas lineages founded by a mixture of d
295                    The benefit was increased survivorship, which in turn increased male production fo
296 plants and identifying thresholds of drought survivorship will improve forecasts of forest and agroec
297 o et al. evaluated the association of cancer survivorship with subclinical myocardial damage, as asse
298 sought to evaluate the association of cancer survivorship with subclinical myocardial damage, as asse
299                                    Offspring survivorship within a pregnancy was affected by the size
300 ditions dictate food availability and govern survivorship, yet little is known about the habitat pref

 
Page Top