戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ons and shape the course of evolution within symbioses.
2  nitrogen metabolism and plant-microorganism symbioses.
3 ns elusive, but may be linked to mycorrhizal symbioses.
4  more targeted studies in other host-microbe symbioses.
5  renowned for establishing complex microbial symbioses.
6 ng crosskingdom signaling and host-bacterial symbioses.
7 nfection and development of rhizobial and AM symbioses.
8 ntly the best understood of all host-microbe symbioses.
9 nce regulation of nodulation in actinorhizal symbioses.
10  raw material for natural selection in coral symbioses.
11 robial nutrition, and host health in diverse symbioses.
12 ation or decoding of calcium-spiking in both symbioses.
13 onal stage in the evolutionary succession of symbioses.
14 fering with plant carbon allocation and root symbioses.
15 osition is not required for establishment of symbioses.
16 hway shared by the rhizobial and mycorrhizal symbioses.
17 ce of chemically prolific bacteria living in symbioses.
18 nificance of the biodiversity of mycorrhizal symbioses.
19 emodeled by pathways remaining from previous symbioses.
20  required for the establishment of these two symbioses.
21 nt role in the establishment of plant-fungal symbioses.
22 oles that they play in other, better-studied symbioses.
23 al adaptation in arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) symbioses.
24 le is known of their function in mutualistic symbioses.
25 cteria are highly adapted to engage in these symbioses.
26 ralizing host defense responses to establish symbioses.
27   Little is known about the establishment of symbioses.
28 own transport activities in these beneficial symbioses.
29 del system to understand mutually beneficial symbioses.
30 s are required for both bacterial and fungal symbioses.
31 esis of infectious disease and in beneficial symbioses.
32 ranscriptional reprogramming facilitates the symbioses.
33 the molecular foundations of human-bacterial symbioses.
34 mportance of the encoded protein in multiple symbioses.
35 t in stabilizing a wide range of mutualistic symbioses.
36  rapid evolutionary changes in host-pathogen symbioses.
37 agement of one of the world's most important symbioses.
38 ole in osmoregulation during legume/rhizobia symbioses.
39 o recruit luminous bacteria into light organ symbioses.
40 d not previously been known to exist in such symbioses.
41 the N2-fixing efficiency of Rhizobium-legume symbioses.
42 cell cycle in novel cnidarian-dinoflagellate symbioses.
43 to understanding the homeostasis of obligate symbioses.
44 asis and even suggest a role in plant-fungus symbioses.
45 ing the developmental process of mutualistic symbioses.
46 nitrogen acquisition through ectomycorrhizal symbioses.
47 rovisioning by ants in nonfarming generalist symbioses.
48 ling, mirroring the evolution of specialized symbioses.
49 dinoflagellate and other eukaryote-eukaryote symbioses.
50 nuclear Ca(2+) signalling that extend beyond symbioses.
51 we test this hypothesis in ant/plant farming symbioses.
52 ut also for rhizobia-legume and actinorhizal symbioses.
53  drivers of the global distribution of major symbioses.
54 ions about their function in specific lichen symbioses.
55 ssential for nodulation and rhizobia-soybean symbioses.
56 chemical defense in the evolution of complex symbioses.
57 ories of the evolution of host-microorganism symbioses.
58 e (PHB), in maintaining the Rhizobium-legume symbioses.
59 te change through the establishment of novel symbioses.
60           There is not one but many ambrosia symbioses.
61  of substrates known to power chemosynthetic symbioses.
62 agonism-to-mutualism transition in heritable symbioses.
63 lants and other photosynthetic organisms and symbioses(3,4), but there has yet to be any direct link
64 he persistence of the two fungal lineages in symbioses across the evolution of land plants.
65                 In cnidarian-Symbiodiniaceae symbioses, algal endosymbiont population control within
66 methanogenic archaea, and their interspecies symbioses allow complex metabolisms for the volumetric r
67 the natural ecology of these amoeba-bacteria symbioses along the pathogen-mutualist spectrum.
68 ty generates evolved geographic structure in symbioses among plants and soil organisms.
69                      Mutualisms that involve symbioses among specialized partners may be more stable
70 curs in nonpathogenic bacteria, facilitating symbioses, among other things.
71 odel plant for the analysis of plant-microbe symbioses and for addressing questions pertaining to leg
72 pated connections between disturbance, coral symbioses and heat stress resilience reveal multiple pat
73 view the current state of knowledge of these symbioses and highlight important avenues for future stu
74 racterizing the global distribution of these symbioses and identifying the factors that control this
75 ogy, photosynthetic pathway, nitrogen-fixing symbioses and life histories have relied on either expli
76 thesis that many other ants also had similar symbioses and lost them.
77  is a new variant among reported root nodule symbioses and may reflect an unusual nitrogen transfer p
78 ght on the evolution of plant-cyanobacterium symbioses and may suggest a route to establish productiv
79 ese results highlight the powerful role that symbioses and plant defense play in driving tree growth
80 e results to both the evolution of Wolbachia symbioses and proposed applied strategies for the use of
81 ary origin of major egalitarian transitions, symbioses, and for top-down engineering of microbial com
82 tic algae (Symbiodinium spp.) - unless these symbioses are able to adapt to global warming, bleaching
83                        Ectomycorrhizal (ECM) symbioses are among the most widespread associations bet
84            Because the best studied obligate symbioses are ancient, it is especially challenging to i
85                         Coral-dinoflagellate symbioses are defined as mutualistic because both partne
86                                    Microbial symbioses are essential for the normal development and g
87                                              Symbioses are evolutionarily pervasive and play fundamen
88                                         Most symbioses are horizontally acquired, i.e., they begin an
89                                         Both symbioses are initiated upon the perception of rhizobium
90 rboring natives, and suggests that these new symbioses are maladapted.
91                                 Actinorhizal symbioses are mutualistic interactions between plants an
92 in global ecology and biogeochemical cycles, symbioses are poorly characterized in open ocean plankto
93 t novel associations, which suggest that the symbioses are probably more widespread than conventional
94                  While most animal-bacterial symbioses are reestablished each successive generation,
95 des a powerful system to elucidate how these symbioses are regulated.
96 iple, it has been suggested that mycorrhizal symbioses are the stable derivatives of ancestral antago
97 buscular or ectomycorrhizal fungi, and these symbioses are thought to represent plant adaptations to
98             Furthermore, naturally occurring symbioses are typically complex, in which multiple symbi
99                         Beneficial bacterial symbioses are ubiquitous in nature.
100                                    Microbial symbioses are ubiquitous in nature.
101                         Eukaryotic-bacterial symbioses are ubiquitous in nature.
102                               Host-microbial symbioses are vital to health; nonetheless, little is kn
103                                              Symbioses are widespread in nature and occur along a con
104                        Ecologically relevant symbioses are widespread in terrestrial arthropods but b
105                   N(2)-fixing cyanobacterial symbioses are widespread in the oceans, even more widely
106                 Plants that form root-nodule symbioses are within a monophyletic 'nitrogen-fixing' cl
107 sire to harness the power of plant-microbial symbioses, are we ignoring the possibility of precipitat
108                                  Mycorrhizal symbioses arose repeatedly across multiple lineages of M
109 abitat partitioning among the chemosynthetic symbioses at hydrothermal vents and illustrate the coupl
110 icit quantitative understanding of microbial symbioses at the global scale, and demonstrates the crit
111                                        These symbioses became more beneficial with rising [CO2], but
112                                              Symbioses between animals and microbes are often describ
113                                              Symbioses between bacteria and eukaryotes are ubiquitous
114                                              Symbioses between cnidarians and symbiotic dinoflagellat
115                 Ocean warming is causing the symbioses between cnidarians and their algal symbionts t
116                 Coral reefs are sustained by symbioses between corals and symbiodiniacean dinoflagell
117                                              Symbioses between eukaryotes and unicellular organisms a
118                          The significance of symbioses between eukaryotic hosts and microbes extends
119 ntified at least five independent origins of symbioses between herbivorous ants and related Rhizobial
120                                              Symbioses between insects and microbes are ubiquitous, b
121                                              Symbioses between metazoans and microbes are widespread
122                 Although 'black smokers' and symbioses between microorganisms and macrofauna attract
123                                              Symbioses between nitrogen (N)(2)-fixing prokaryotes and
124 ommunities on the one hand, and facilitating symbioses between organisms on the other, is only just b
125 f ecosystems, particularly by disrupting the symbioses between reef-building corals and their photosy
126 mportant in establishing and maintaining the symbioses between roseobacters and phytoplankton.
127                                  Mutualistic symbioses between scleractinian corals and endosymbiotic
128 sis signaling pathway that is shared in both symbioses but also modulate innate immune responses.
129 ired for the establishment of legume-microbe symbioses by generating nuclear and perinuclear Ca(2+) s
130 even in predominantly vertically transmitted symbioses by stabilizing the cooperative association ove
131              It is our hope that mycorrhizal symbioses can be effectively integrated into global chan
132 servations demonstrating that Epichloe-grass symbioses can modulate grassland ecosystems via both abo
133 , intracellular bacteria and highlights that symbioses can provide access to otherwise elusive microb
134 nce and conjecture that coral-dinoflagellate symbioses change partnerships in response to changing ex
135        In contrast to terrestrial and marine symbioses characterized to date, the symbiont reported i
136                   Arbuscular mycorrhiza (AM) symbioses contribute to global carbon cycles as plant ho
137  various trophic levels (cyanobacteria, root symbioses, cycad seeds, cycad flour, flying foxes eaten
138  deep-sea hydrothermal vents, chemosynthetic symbioses dominate the biomass, contributing substantial
139 s on host cells and do not produce effective symbioses, emphasizing the importance of understanding t
140             The recent recognition that many symbioses exhibit daily rhythms has encouraged research
141 aquatic environments, diverse cyanobacterial symbioses exist with autotrophic taxa in phytoplankton,
142 gence of biological complexity, yet how such symbioses first form is unclear.
143 karyotes and encourages exploration of other symbioses for drug discovery and better understanding of
144 mportance to sustainable agriculture are the symbioses formed between more than 80% of terrestrial pl
145 establishment of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) symbioses, formed by most flowering plants in associatio
146     This symbiosis bears some resemblance to symbioses found in freshwater ecosystems.
147  conflict may have precluded these wild-type symbioses from rising to ecological dominance.
148 ecruited during the evolution of root nodule symbioses from the already existing arbuscular mycorrhiz
149  of the genes required for nodulation and AM symbioses from the two model legumes, Medicago truncatul
150 understanding the mechanistic basis of these symbioses has been lack of genetic manipulation tools, f
151                               These kinds of symbioses have arisen frequently in animals; for example
152          Our findings imply that belowground symbioses have been central to the evolutionary assembly
153  their resident microorganisms because these symbioses have been the focus of significant empirical w
154                                          ECM symbioses have evolved 36 times in Agaricomycetes, with
155                        Ectomycorrhizal (ECM) symbioses have evolved a minimum of 78 times independent
156           All known marine examples of these symbioses have involved either centric diatom or haptoph
157  legume genes required for nodulation and AM symbioses have their putative orthologs in nonlegumes.
158 equencing show great promise for studying EM symbioses; however, metatranscriptomic studies have been
159  known to play a role in marine invertebrate symbioses; (iii) the potential use of hydrogen as an ene
160 he relative fitness of trees with AMF or EMF symbioses in a Bornean rain forest containing species wi
161 e to bleaching, highlighting the benefits of symbioses in a changing climate.
162 genus that forms nitrogen-fixing root-nodule symbioses in a wide range of woody Angiosperms, is accom
163 ermine the consequences of these facultative symbioses in Acyrthosiphon pisum (the pea aphid) for vul
164 ltiple gains of actinorhizal nitrogen-fixing symbioses in angiosperms may have been associated with i
165 ips, and ecology of underground plant-fungal symbioses in modern terrestrial ecosystems by revealing
166 us, and little is known about most N2-fixing symbioses in natural ecosystems(12).
167 uestions pertaining to the evolution of root symbioses in plants.
168  in the disassociation of algal-invertebrate symbioses in response to elevated temperature.
169 ke by reducing root grazing but forming more symbioses in the rhizosphere.
170                            While co-obligate symbioses, in which hosts rely on multiple nutrient-prov
171                                    Microbial symbioses, in which microbes have either positive (mutua
172  mechanisms and consequences of multipartite symbioses, including consortia in which multiple organis
173 cies' physiological functions in mutualistic symbioses increased the range of suboptimal environmenta
174       In terrestrial environments, N2-fixing symbioses involve multicellular plants, but in the marin
175                                 Host-microbe symbioses involving bacterial endosymbionts comprise som
176                  Aphids maintain mutualistic symbioses involving consortia of coinherited organisms.
177                                     Obligate symbioses involving intracellular bacteria have transfor
178 ties, especially to certain insect-bacterium symbioses involving likewise host peptides for manipulat
179 ajor concern in understanding the ecology of symbioses involving microorganisms arises in the effecti
180 egies for maintaining the stability of these symbioses is less clear.
181 ical component in the establishment of these symbioses is nuclear-localized calcium (Ca(2+)) oscillat
182          A defining facet of tick-Rickettsia symbioses is the molecular strategy employed by each par
183                      A core vulnerability in symbioses is the need for coordination between the symbi
184 logical importance, but evolution of farming symbioses is thought to be restricted to three terrestri
185   A major challenge in the study of obligate symbioses is to understand how they arise.
186 ns, whether in shared ecosystems or intimate symbioses, is fundamentally altering our understanding o
187 model legume used widely for studies of root symbioses, it is apparent that the phosphate transporter
188                                        These symbioses, known as lichens, are one way for fungi to me
189 work demonstrates that similar to other root symbioses, L. bicolor uses the CSP for the full establis
190                                       Insect symbioses lack the complexity and diversity of those ass
191                      To form nitrogen-fixing symbioses, legume plants recognize a bacterial signal, N
192 ost intriguing and visible manifestations of symbioses - lichens - may arise.
193 st-microbe interaction; for example, several symbioses like the squid-vibrio light organ association
194                                  Mycorrhizal symbioses link the biosphere with the lithosphere by med
195                                 Why are some symbioses lost over evolutionary time whereas others bec
196 ter clades, suggesting that the evolution of symbioses may act as a key innovation at local phylogene
197      Knowledge of intraspecific variation in symbioses may aid in understanding the ecology of widesp
198                                              Symbioses may be important mechanisms of plant adaptatio
199  molecular insights into mammalian-microbial symbioses may be revealed amid the complexity of the int
200 iversity of microcystins suggest that lichen symbioses may have been an important environment for div
201       The mechanisms involved in N(2)-fixing symbioses may involve more interactions beyond simple ex
202 imate biological nitrogen fixation of legume symbioses not only in laboratory experiments.
203  plants, but in the marine environment these symbioses occur with unicellular planktonic algae.
204                                              Symbioses of bacteria with fungi have only recently been
205 cance of bacterial communities and bacterial symbioses of corals.
206 e diversity, and recently proposed bacterial symbioses of corals.
207 In contrast, the nitrogen-fixing root nodule symbioses of plants with bacteria evolved more recently,
208 ndently given rise to at least four obligate symbioses, one in nematodes and three in insects, and th
209 host ecology has retained archosaur-specific symbioses over geologic time.
210     To establish compatible rhizobial-legume symbioses, plant roots support bacterial infection via h
211                     In mutualistic ant-plant symbioses, plants host ant colonies that defend them aga
212                                 Host-microbe symbioses play a critical role in the evolution of biolo
213 he near-term may disrupt the many ecological symbioses present in terrestrial ecosystems.
214                                    Described symbioses primarily involve heterotrophic protists, incl
215                         For many coral-algal symbioses, prolonged episodes of thermal stress damage t
216 hylogenetic relationships of insect-bacteria symbioses provides the opportunity to assess the effects
217 ion of host cell responses in both AM and RN symbioses, reflecting common mechanisms for plant cell r
218                                         Both symbioses rely on partially overlapping genetic programm
219 ary patterns of actinorhizal nitrogen-fixing symbioses remain unclear to date.
220 hemical cycles, cyanobacterium-phytoplankton symbioses remain understudied and poorly understood.
221        The establishment of rhizobium-legume symbioses requires the bacterial synthesis of oligosacch
222 iscovery of nitrogen-fixing Rhizobium-legume symbioses, researchers have dreamed of transferring this
223 es in the environment of the Campeche Knolls symbioses revealed that these are present at high concen
224                    In legume nitrogen-fixing symbioses, rhizobial nod genes are obligatory for initia
225                                  Root nodule symbioses (RNS) allow plants to acquire atmospheric nitr
226                                  Mutualistic symbioses shape the evolution of species and ecosystems
227                     The finding that the two symbioses share common signaling components in legumes s
228                       Interestingly, the two symbioses share overlapping signaling pathways in legume
229                            Additionally, HMA symbioses show stronger signals of phylosymbiosis and co
230 ological settings and invertebrate-bacterial symbioses similar to those of both western Pacific and A
231 carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur cycles) and via symbioses since many novel organisms exhibit restricted
232  can be adapted to multiple Rhizobium-legume symbioses, soil types, and environmental conditions to p
233                          In legume-Rhizobium symbioses, specialised soil bacteria fix atmospheric nit
234                               In mutualistic symbioses, such as division of labor, both parties can g
235  these microarray data with those from other symbioses, such as germ-free/conventionalized mice and z
236                              In antagonistic symbioses, such as host-parasite interactions, one popul
237              Early views on the evolution of symbioses suggested that all long-term, intimate associa
238 ctional differences between the plant-fungal symbioses tested, providing new insights into the functi
239    Fungi and plants have engaged in intimate symbioses that are globally widespread and have driven t
240 ates the range from mutualistic to parasitic symbioses that plants form with diverse organisms, as we
241 ect"), but disfavored in certain mutualistic symbioses (the "Red King effect").
242 ion is thought to be favored in antagonistic symbioses (the "Red Queen effect"), but disfavored in ce
243                           In legume-rhizobia symbioses, the bacteria in infected cells are enclosed i
244                 In rhizobia-leguminous plant symbioses, the current model of nitrogen transfer from t
245 xamines a model system for the study of such symbioses, the light organ association between the bobta
246               In the case of EPS II-mediated symbioses, the reduction in invasion efficiency results
247                                      In both symbioses, the specialized host membrane that surrounds
248                       In cyanobacteria-plant symbioses, the symbiotic nitrogen-fixing cyanobacterium
249 opmental trajectory of horizontally acquired symbioses through the study of the binary squid-vibrio m
250 epends on the ability of reef-building coral symbioses to adapt or acclimatize to warmer temperatures
251 ogical strategies that enable chemosynthetic symbioses to colonize oligotrophic environments.
252 foundly influence the response of reef coral symbioses to major environmental perturbations but may u
253 f facultative and obligate interactions from symbioses to pathogenicity.
254 rative analyses on 106 unique host-bacterial symbioses to test for correlations between symbiont func
255  teemed with organisms that coordinate their symbioses using chemical signals traversing between the
256 udy finds that two independent protist-algae symbioses utilize convergent patterns of nutrient exchan
257                                        These symbioses vary in the extent of their permanence in and
258 mbrane lipids, and 2-MAG in rhizobia-soybean symbioses via the RAML-WRI-FatM-GPAT-STRL pathway, which
259 e and distinct from previously characterized symbioses, where multiple microbial partners have associ
260 s is best understood in beneficial bacterial symbioses, where partner fidelity facilitates loss of ge
261 s ammonium is contributed by legume-rhizobia symbioses, which are initiated by the infection of legum
262 rk architecture of below-ground plant-fungus symbioses, which are ubiquitous to terrestrial ecosystem
263 al survival in the world's warmest reefs are symbioses with a newly discovered alga,Symbiodinium ther
264                                         Root symbioses with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and rhizobia
265 pteran suborder Auchenorrhyncha show complex symbioses with at least two obligate bacterial symbionts
266 any insect groups depend on ancient obligate symbioses with bacteria that undergo long-term genomic d
267  initiation, development, and maintenance of symbioses with beneficial mycorrhizal fungi and nitrogen
268 a: Mollusca) are a family of clams that form symbioses with chemosynthetic gamma-proteobacteria.
269 egative bacterium that forms nitrogen-fixing symbioses with compatible leguminous plants via intracel
270  for lichen-forming fungi that form obligate symbioses with cyanobacteria.
271 ome bacterial metabolites may be specific to symbioses with eukaryotes and encourages exploration of
272           However, little is known about how symbioses with extracellular symbionts, representing the
273  aphid-Buchnera association and other insect symbioses with intracellular microorganisms.
274 e family of caridean shrimp, largely live in symbioses with marine invertebrates of different phyla.
275  inherent to these regions in part thanks to symbioses with microorganisms, and yet these microbial s
276 ts are able to establish mutually beneficial symbioses with microorganisms.
277 ed by marine bacteria that engage in dynamic symbioses with microscopic algae.
278      Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) form symbioses with most crops, potentially improving their n
279               Most plants, for example, form symbioses with mycorrhizal fungi, whose limited dispersa
280 alacturonide or flg22 treatment and the root symbioses with nitrogen-fixing rhizobia and arbuscular m
281 Leguminous plants can enter into root nodule symbioses with nitrogen-fixing soil bacteria known as rh
282                Legumes engage in root nodule symbioses with nitrogen-fixing soil bacteria known as rh
283                                     Obligate symbioses with nutrient-provisioning bacteria have origi
284 s, and as such, these arthropods have formed symbioses with nutrient-supplementing microbes that faci
285 hanced secondary metabolism might facilitate symbioses with phylogenetically diverse hosts.
286 avourable light environments to establishing symbioses with plants and fungi.
287                     Many microorganisms form symbioses with plants that range, on a continuous scale,
288 me Agaricomycetes enter into ectomycorrhizal symbioses with plants, while others are decayers (saprot
289 a and Mucoromycotina fungal groups that form symbioses with plants.
290                                 Legumes form symbioses with rhizobial bacteria and arbuscular mycorrh
291 ogen deficiencies in the soil, legumes enter symbioses with rhizobial bacteria that convert atmospher
292 s of nitrogen stress, leguminous plants form symbioses with soil bacteria called rhizobia.
293 ma proteobacteria that form entomopathogenic symbioses with soil nematodes.
294 utrition through nitrogen-fixing root nodule symbioses with soil rhizobia.
295 capacity to fix atmospheric nitrogen through symbioses with soil-borne microorganisms.
296 rbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi, which form symbioses with the roots of the most important crop spec
297 ungi (AMF) have formed intimate, mutualistic symbioses with the vast majority of land plants and are
298 ngi (order Glomales), which form mycorrhizal symbioses with two out of three of all plant species, ar
299 cter clade of Alphaproteobacteria that forms symbioses with unicellular eukaryotic phytoplankton, suc
300 s to predict the distribution of belowground symbioses worldwide, the sequence and timing of plant su

 
Page Top