戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 e evolutionary origins and emergence of this syntactic ability.
2  Hindi that investigate whether responses to syntactic agreement violations vary as a function of the
3 oked by unambiguous syntactic violations and syntactic ambiguities.
4                                   Studies of syntactic ambiguity resolution have played a central rol
5 adults read sentences containing a temporary syntactic ambiguity while their eye movements were monit
6 petition-winning approach utilizing word and syntactic analyses by machine learning techniques.
7 priming cannot distinguish between competing syntactic analyses.
8 bution of the left inferior frontal gyrus in syntactic analysis and highlight the functional relation
9 This semantic analysis was contrasted with a syntactic analysis that revealed the small number of com
10  intentions, to lexical/semantic processing, syntactic analysis, and pragmatic integration.
11 ith a few examples from proteomics data, the syntactic and document-centric XML cannot achieve the le
12 ty of sensory modalities because the limited syntactic and grammatical bandpass of the rate distortio
13             In light of recent evidence that syntactic and lexical components of human speech are pro
14 egion, supporting a single source of vWM for syntactic and nonsyntactic tasks.
15  abilities shared with non-human primates to syntactic and pragmatic functions particular to our spec
16 d a word-monitoring task that differentiated syntactic and semantic aspects of sentence comprehension
17 gest that these regions play a role in basic syntactic and semantic composition, respectively.
18 embedded features are then combined with the syntactic and semantic context features using the multip
19 BioIE also provides a brief insight into the syntactic and semantic context of the source-text by loo
20 d pattern language that allows the mixing of syntactic and semantic elements and variable ordering.
21  study, we examined the neural correlates of syntactic and semantic functions using an innovative act
22    The timecourse of the interaction between syntactic and semantic information during sentence proce
23 oken sentences that differentially loaded on syntactic and semantic information.
24 presentation of lower-income countries, poor syntactic and semantic interoperability, absence of clea
25                         The goal is complete syntactic and semantic interoperability.
26 ion for developing psychologically plausible syntactic and semantic theories.
27 us on the neurobiological infrastructure for syntactic and semantic unification.
28 epetition in the context of spared semantic, syntactic, and motor speech abilities.
29                            Human language is syntactic, and signals consist of discrete components th
30 semantic classes, and connection to complete syntactic annotation.
31   Subsequent studies showed that the P600 to syntactic anomalies and ambiguities was modulated by lex
32 , the P600, was reported in association with syntactic anomalies and ambiguities, the story appeared
33 s elicit a posterior bilateral N400, whereas syntactic anomalies elicit a left anterior negativity, f
34 muli: the N400 and the P600 for semantic and syntactic anomalies, respectively.
35  frontal brain regions for both semantic and syntactic anomalies.
36 as more ventral than that corresponding to a syntactic anomaly.
37 e, it offers lesser coverage compared to the syntactic approach.
38  identifying referential relations between a syntactic argument of a predicate and the actual target
39 make rather simplistic assumptions about the syntactic aspect of natural language.
40 h to priming reveals cracks in the facade of syntactic autonomy.
41  and only indirectly contribute to preserved syntactic capacity.
42  others have a proliferation of fine-grained syntactic categories (e.g., Tzeltal); and some languages
43 iological functions, which correspond to the syntactic categories of the CFG.
44  failed to learn the repetition pattern over syntactic categories, even when explicitly instructed to
45 tial transition probability over lexical and syntactic categories, only captured activity in the post
46 they play a consistent role across different syntactic categories.
47 tarted or ended with two words from the same syntactic category (e.g., noun-noun-verb or verb-verb-no
48 inear distance was kept constant, as was the syntactic category of the agreeing elements.
49 se configurations, notably the fact that the syntactic category of the critical word was more predict
50 the laboratory; (b) differed from laboratory syntactic CCGs in other ways that enhanced their conspic
51                                              Syntactic CCGs in the field (a) were more rigidly stereo
52  were more rigidly stereotyped than ordinary syntactic CCGs in the laboratory; (b) differed from labo
53 ousness, in part through exaggeration of the syntactic cephalocaudal pattern; (c) were associated wit
54 he tendency to complete all four phases of a syntactic chain in rigid serial order once the first pha
55 t stereotyped of these grooming patterns, a "syntactic chain," has a particularly stereotyped order t
56          Neurons fired preferentially during syntactic chains compared with similar grooming movement
57 lateral site increased firing by 116% during syntactic chains, compared with only a 30% increase by n
58  neostriatum coded the sequential pattern of syntactic chains.
59 ies-specific sequences of movements, termed "syntactic chains." Neuronal activity of 41% of cells in
60 ept for cases of diffusion, the direction of syntactic change, when it occurs, has been for the most
61 ect multiple representational levels driving syntactic choice.
62 ' signing both appear formulaic with limited syntactic combinations, thereby suggesting a degree of c
63 result might explain why only humans evolved syntactic communication and hence complex language.
64 ax, and the transition from non-syntactic to syntactic communication was an essential step in the evo
65 ts would eliminate two major research areas: syntactic competence in d/Deaf individuals, and language
66  is increased by linguistic factors, such as syntactic complexity and length of utterance, and decrea
67 measures of semantic and lexical content and syntactic complexity best capture the global progression
68 temporal sulcus, another region modulated by syntactic complexity in controls, showed normal modulati
69 ng feature was a reduction across a range of syntactic complexity measures.
70               In noun-adjective expressions, syntactic complexity only modulated activity in the left
71      Samples were analysed using measures of syntactic complexity, lexical content, speech production
72 nding, as well as an abrupt increase in bout syntactic complexity, peaking in the last quintile of a
73 r trends over the three stages of disease in syntactic complexity, semantic and lexical content.
74 e was a reduction in one or more measures of syntactic complexity.
75 nsion of sentences with increasing levels of syntactic complexity.
76  AD patients had significantly less usage of syntactic components and significantly higher usage of l
77 stent with many processing models that posit syntactic composition before semantic composition during
78 tients showed impairments in picture naming, syntactic comprehension and executive function.
79 A, characterized by slow speech and impaired syntactic comprehension and naming, showed atrophy in th
80                    Our findings suggest that syntactic comprehension deficits in primary progressive
81       We found that the individual degree of syntactic comprehension impairment was predicted by left
82 o investigate the functional neuroanatomy of syntactic comprehension in 51 individuals with primary p
83 dictions, including the prediction that that syntactic comprehension problems in Broca's aphasia are
84 tissue volumes and functional responses to a syntactic comprehension task in eight patients with nonf
85 (fluid intelligence and object naming) and a syntactic comprehension task that shows age-related pres
86 e cases, formal testing revealed deficits in syntactic comprehension.
87 earch, a new and controversial theme is that syntactic computations may rely heavily on statistical i
88  role in the neural network that carries out syntactic computations.
89 olving subject-verb sequences, which are not syntactic constituents.
90 mprehension in which sensitivity to multiple syntactic constraints in adulthood emerges as a product
91 on, supporting recent evidence of children's syntactic constructs emerging at 30 months.
92 d nucleotides that give rise to higher order syntactic constructs.
93                                   Finally, a Syntactic Context model and Within-Context-Stem model we
94 g these are the observational and linguistic-syntactic contexts in which words occur.
95 non-binary), we manipulated the semantic and syntactic contexts of word forms to query the organizati
96 e to syntactic preferences, reflecting their syntactic deficit.
97      Damage to these dorsal tracts predicted syntactic deficits after gray matter atrophy was taken i
98 relationship between white matter damage and syntactic deficits in patients with primary progressive
99 rior frontal cortex has been associated with syntactic deficits in primary progressive aphasia in a n
100 , morphological, orthographic, semantic, and syntactic deficits, as well as academic (e.g., reading)
101 uncinate fasciculus--was not associated with syntactic deficits.
102 th reduced functional activity and increased syntactic deficits.
103 formulation, syntactic, semantic, and morpho-syntactic dependencies are all analysable as grounded in
104 archical structure impacts the processing of syntactic dependencies.
105 a brief review of work on context effects in syntactic disambiguation, sketch our account of parsing,
106 le is whether a universal grammar constrains syntactic diversity in human languages.
107  repeatable operation that takes exactly two syntactic elements a and b and assembles them to form th
108 ect or that contained either a semantic or a syntactic error (1 of 2 types of verb agreement errors).
109 ere characterized by slow rate, distortions, syntactic errors and reduced complexity.
110              The validator recognizes common syntactic errors and semantic inconsistencies and report
111  the other two variants, but distortions and syntactic errors were less common than in the non-fluent
112 exhibited normal rate and very few speech or syntactic errors, but showed increased proportions of cl
113 lect those structures during learning or use syntactic features and external tools to detect them.
114 ce is obtained by combining the strengths of syntactic features and supervised classification.
115 Considering the similarities in semantic and syntactic features between RNAs and human language, we p
116 Whatizit) other solutions make use of morpho-syntactic features to better cover the full scope of ter
117                      The genetic code is the syntactic foundation underlying the structure and functi
118 ically designed to unequivocally disentangle syntactic from lexicosemantic aspects of sentence proces
119 ate that components in these models focus on syntactic grammatical relationships and anaphoric corefe
120 esions disrupt the syntax or serial order of syntactic grooming chains without disrupting constituent
121 ion of whole sequences of movements known as syntactic grooming chains.
122 es of the language faculty, both lexical and syntactic, have been claimed to be important for exact c
123 eps, one of which is partly independent from syntactic hierarchy.
124 ciative retrieval influences, style-specific syntactic influences, and constraints on the range of pl
125 and manipulated the presence of semantic and syntactic information apart from the timescale of their
126      These results suggest that semantic and syntactic information are integrated during the earlier
127 speech information to optimize processing of syntactic information but not to sustain acoustic/phonem
128 ark datasets demonstrate that auto-processed syntactic information can be a useful resource for BioNE
129 vious studies have shown that auto-processed syntactic information can be a useful resource to improv
130                              Therefore, such syntactic information is leveraged in an inflexible way,
131  to directly concatenating the embeddings of syntactic information to the input word embeddings.
132 mantics, were sensitive to both semantic and syntactic information with no evidence of specialization
133 aris) is critically implicated in processing syntactic information, whereas the lower portion of the
134 etworks (KVMN) to incorporate auto-processed syntactic information.
135 ing them to prosodic markers of grammatical (syntactic) information during language acquisition, thus
136                          First, it restricts syntactic inquiry to cases were a semantically equivalen
137  to a wealth of new information and enhances syntactic knowledge.
138  between linguistic input and comprehenders' syntactic knowledge; and (2) the role of cognitive facul
139 These regions have been linked previously to syntactic (LATL) and semantic (vmPFC) combinatorial proc
140       In this study, we construct unit-thick syntactic layers of cobaltites within a strongly tilted
141 uring growth to construct formula-unit-thick syntactic layers of ferrimagnetic LuFe2O4 within the LuF
142  instead captured by semantics; however, the syntactic level includes some specification of "missing"
143 rs to have a greater impact, particularly on syntactic level processes.
144 left BA 44, a region that has been linked to syntactic level processing, only for verb repetition.
145 cting the disease group combines significant syntactic, lexical and top n-gram features.
146                   Our models learned several syntactic, lexical, and n-gram linguistic biomarkers to
147                       We consider effects of syntactic, lexical, prosodic, morphological, semantic, a
148  into account orthographical, morphological, syntactic, lexico-semantic and pragmatic term variations
149                Here, we provide evidence for syntactic-like structuring in chimpanzee communication.
150 tive to adults in their detection of initial syntactic misanalysis.
151               Using parsing algorithms, this syntactic model enables the verification of existing con
152 cipital areas respond more to sentences with syntactic movement but do not respond to the difficulty
153 alized and uniquely human aspect of language-syntactic movement.
154 d to a highly specialized aspect of language-syntactic movement.
155                                       Normal syntactic network characteristics were confirmed with st
156  However, a contrasting picture of a broader syntactic network has emerged from neuropsychological st
157 died tau propagation in the left hemispheric syntactic network, which comprises an anterior frontal n
158 eposition was greatest in the 2 nodes of the syntactic network.
159     We propose a new approach that views the syntactic operator of negation as relying on the neural
160 ler elements, but the neuronal basis for the syntactic ordering of actions is poorly understood.
161 ity to dispreferred orders (interpreted as a syntactic P600-like effect).
162 ined by training a machine learning model on syntactic parse trees, which is then used to decide whet
163           To avoid the computational cost of syntactic parsing, and because the boundaries of our pro
164 performing sentence splitting, tokenization, syntactic parsing, and named entity recognition on this
165 t, we used one typical disease risk-specific syntactic pattern (i.e. "D1 due to D2") as a seed to aut
166 ursor is an ancient, endogenously sequenced (syntactic) pattern of cephalocaudal grooming movements (
167 s to reveal, through probabilistic analysis, syntactic patterns that could point the way to eventual
168 ledge to automatically discover D-M-specific syntactic patterns.
169  learning of inflectional markings and basic syntactic patterns.
170                                              Syntactic performance correlated with tissue integrity a
171 emporal gyrus-were correlated with preserved syntactic performance, but unlike the controls, patients
172  transport roles often did not match up with syntactic phrase boundaries, we approached this problem
173 f structural distance (number of intervening syntactic phrases) to the processing of agreement remain
174 s that either aligned or misaligned with the syntactic phrasing in the sentences (initial overt proso
175 n is a head-final language, evidence for the syntactic position of the verb is both rare and indirect
176 t these effects are driven by differences in syntactic predictability between the within-phrase and a
177 e the controls, patients were insensitive to syntactic preferences, reflecting their syntactic defici
178        Combining a miniature language with a syntactic priming paradigm, we examined the neural corre
179 anigan & Pickering (B&P) advocate the use of syntactic priming to investigate linguistic representati
180 -level auditory, and even higher-level music-syntactic processes elicited by irregular events are rel
181                                              Syntactic processes in language build on sensory process
182 egions were associated with motor speech and syntactic processes, anterior and inferior temporal regi
183 x that is distinct from lexical, semantic or syntactic processes.
184 terior temporal cortex, with dorsal foci for syntactic processing and ventral foci for semantic proce
185 ntal and temporal language areas involved in syntactic processing are connected by several dorsal and
186 ghly complex computational processes such as syntactic processing can occur outside the narrow window
187                                 In controls, syntactic processing co-activated left hemisphere Brodma
188                                              Syntactic processing deficits are highly variable in ind
189 thin-network connectivity or responsivity to syntactic processing demands despite gray matter loss an
190                       Our findings show that syntactic processing depends primarily on dorsal languag
191  images of the referent but do not result in syntactic processing difficulties.
192 , and a wealth of research examining adults' syntactic processing during reading, as yet very little
193  amount of research investigating children's syntactic processing during spoken language comprehensio
194 , as yet very little research has focused on syntactic processing during text reading in children.
195  clinical variants and a range of degrees of syntactic processing impairment.
196 to determine which regions were modulated by syntactic processing in each patient, and how the set of
197              These regions were modulated by syntactic processing in healthy controls and in patients
198 pose a specific point of convergence between syntactic processing in language and music.
199 , we aimed to gain a better understanding of syntactic processing in spontaneous production versus na
200  about the relationship between semantic and syntactic processing in the brain.
201 cal role for this region in the breakdown of syntactic processing in this syndrome.
202  are integrated during the earlier stages of syntactic processing indexed by the anterior negativitie
203 eveal that a brain mechanism fundamental for syntactic processing is engaged during the perception of
204 r region or to the connections between them, syntactic processing is impaired.
205                    A longstanding idea about syntactic processing is that it is generally not availab
206  trial-by-trial reaction time as a proxy for syntactic processing load, to determine which regions we
207    This finding opens a new range of complex syntactic processing mechanisms to physiological investi
208 t also by functional disruption of a broader syntactic processing network, comprising left posterior
209 ontal cortex, but also disruption of a wider syntactic processing network.
210 ure based on assemblies for implementing the syntactic processing of language in cortex, which is con
211  of regions recruited was related to whether syntactic processing was ultimately successful or unsucc
212           Behavioural data on three tests of syntactic processing were subsequently collected.
213 ferior frontal cortex (IFC) is important for syntactic processing, and has been shown in many functio
214 ntal gyrus may not itself be specialized for syntactic processing, but plays an essential role in the
215 7 and posterior middle temporal gyrus during syntactic processing, patients activated Brodmann areas
216 amine the effects of semantic information on syntactic processing, the results for normal English sen
217 hich white matter tract(s) are important for syntactic processing, we examined the relationship betwe
218 e role of the left inferior frontal gyrus in syntactic processing.
219 left inferior frontal gyrus is essential for syntactic processing.
220 at these tracts connect regions modulated by syntactic processing.
221  by patients, but did not support successful syntactic processing.
222 dentical brain networks support semantic and syntactic processing.
223 regions engaged in inhibitory control and in syntactic processing.
224 o be associated with initial stages of human syntactic processing.
225 isual cortex of blind adults are involved in syntactic processing.
226 phenomenon is best explained in terms of the syntactic properties of phrases or in terms of syntax-ex
227 ndergone semantic change also have undergone syntactic reanalysis.
228 work (~500 ms); an inferior frontal semantic syntactic reappraisal network (~600 ms); and nodes of th
229 make the central claim that the capacity for syntactic recursion forms the computational core of a un
230 viduals treat symmetry, in both semantic and syntactic regards, much as do learners exposed to a prev
231 strengthen a neural network to process novel syntactic regularities and novel words.
232 o show where linear order is also a relevant syntactic relation.
233 y appear in, including neighboring words and syntactic relations extracted using a shallow parser, ca
234                                              Syntactic relationships among non-adjacent words are a c
235 for mammalian cell differentiation with rich syntactic relationships, existing methods for geneticall
236 al verb repetition led to an increase in the syntactic repetition enhancement effect in language-rela
237  an artificial language learning task with a syntactic repetition paradigm.
238 respected a distinction between semantic and syntactic representation and processes.
239 , Branigan & Pickering's (B&P's) claim that "syntactic representations do not contain semantic inform
240 constructed on the basis of lexically stored syntactic representations, but that other types of struc
241  - with an alternative that does not rely on syntactic representations.
242 hich the neurons are firing which encode the syntactic role, as well as which neurons are firing to s
243 ng of nonrepeaters can selectively learn the syntactic rule or habit of repeating syllables from repe
244  account for this ability through the use of syntactic rules (or generative grammars) that describe t
245 nce involve sequences of actions that follow syntactic rules in which transitions between elements de
246 demonstrate for the first time that abstract syntactic rules transfer anomalously from one language t
247     Our results show that, surprisingly, the syntactic rules underlying probabilistic grooming transi
248 uman language possesses a set of distinctive syntactic rules.
249 phisticated representations of text based on syntactic, semantic and argumentative properties have be
250  We demonstrate that, with such formulation, syntactic, semantic, and morpho-syntactic dependencies a
251 re of the motif pattern, as described by its syntactic specification, with the statistical measure of
252 eraging the effect of previous exposure to a syntactic structure appears to be an inappropriate metho
253 ften used to support complex (or multilevel) syntactic structure are instead captured by semantics; h
254 subserve language comprehension tapping into syntactic structure building and semantic composition by
255  Recent findings show that experience with a syntactic structure has long-term consequences for how t
256 gests a new way of connecting toolmaking and syntactic structure in human evolution, because these te
257 coustic communication, the representation of syntactic structure in the mammalian brain has not been
258 istic theories propose that their underlying syntactic structure involves a tree of nested phrases ra
259 rase structure, the most promising model for syntactic structure is enriched dependency structure, as
260 uely able to retrieve and combine words into syntactic structure to produce connected speech.
261                                   Changes in syntactic structure usually correlate with changes in me
262 ns (and vice versa) without the mediation of syntactic structure, including the "flat structure" that
263 ate, phrase length, articulatory agility and syntactic structure, which are not always impacted in pa
264          Both appear to compute meaning, not syntactic structure.
265 es than in non-grammatical sequences without syntactic structure.
266 a minimalist view of language's hierarchical syntactic structure.
267 tionary theory must explain) is hierarchical syntactic structure.
268 , such as by means of intonation or specific syntactic structures (e.g., it-clefts).
269 strengthen a neural network to process novel syntactic structures and lexical items.
270 vel task that tracks the online SL of simple syntactic structures combined with computational modelin
271 ior temporal cortex, the repetition of novel syntactic structures led to repetition enhancement, wher
272 he relative frequencies with which different syntactic structures occur in the language.
273 urrence of a protein-molecule pair using the syntactic structures of sentences and linguistics theori
274  sentence processing, concerned with how the syntactic structures of sentences are computed, and text
275 o contain strikingly higher rates of complex syntactic structures relative to six baseline genres of
276 ToM reasoning depends upon the possession of syntactic structures such as those that permit the embed
277         We show that the repetition of novel syntactic structures, as well as words in contexts, lead
278 cies resulting from hierarchically organized syntactic structures.
279 aturally uttered sentences matched for their syntactic structures.
280 ults hear a string of nouns and verbs, their syntactic system obligatorily attempts an interpretation
281 nomenon in the domain of language, where the syntactic system prevents listeners from detecting a sim
282       Both the range of biological tasks and syntactic task components can be seen to provide a set o
283 any detailed claims about specific points of syntactic theory.
284  without syntax, and the transition from non-syntactic to syntactic communication was an essential st
285 n given entities and they depend on external syntactic tools.
286 ications in an end-to-end manner without any syntactic tools.
287  ... then) to linguistic inferences based on syntactic transformation of sentences involving ditransi
288            Crucially, the list partakes in a syntactic tree in one case but not the other.
289 mation, which is imperfectly correlated with syntactic units and linguistic classes; (b) the use of f
290 ed open formats, and all submissions undergo syntactic validation and curation in an effort to uphold
291 veral unique design features: (1) leveraging syntactic variations possible in a language and automati
292 guistic complexities-morphological richness, syntactic variations, and diglossia-present significant
293           Moreover, the P600 elicited by the syntactic violation was attenuated in processing Jabberw
294 gativity varied as a function of the type of syntactic violation, suggesting a unique involvement of
295 condition, half of the sentences contained a syntactic violation.
296 olations with the P600 evoked by unambiguous syntactic violations and syntactic ambiguities.
297                          In addition, signed syntactic violations elicited an early frontal negativit
298 er neural activity that was observed only to syntactic violations that were consciously detected.
299 modal distraction task, we demonstrated that syntactic violations that were not consciously detected
300        Animal communication is typically non-syntactic, which means that signals refer to whole situa

 
Page Top