1 inephrine reuptake inhibitors (126 RCTs in 3
systematic reviews).
2 SPERO (International prospective register of
systematic reviews).
3 und a fall-related injury in older adults: a
systematic review.
4 34 intraocular metastases, were eligible for
systematic review.
5 in the International Prospective Register of
Systematic Reviews.
6 stematic review and to identify pre-existing
systematic reviews.
7 registered with the Prospective Register of
Systematic Reviews.
8 tional trials in epidemiology guidelines for
systematic reviews.
9 ask force prioritized several topics for new
systematic reviews.
10 Thirty-three studies and 2
systematic reviews (
171 studies; 112 574 participants) e
11 tifying anxiety (33 individual studies and 2
systematic reviews;
171 studies total).
12 udies, for a total of 22 included studies (3
systematic reviews,
19 primary studies), which were revi
13 d reviews using A MeaSurement Tool to Assess
Systematic Reviews 2 checklist.
14 A total of 3
systematic reviews,
2 with meta-analyses, and 28 primary
15 onatal life support includes evidence from 7
systematic reviews,
3 scoping reviews, and 12 evidence u
16 The evidence reviews include 16
systematic reviews,
5 scoping reviews, and 1 evidence up
17 Through a
systematic review,
a total of 3979 studies were identifi
18 Systematic reviews addressed higher-priority topics, and
19 This
systematic review aimed to review the literature on inte
20 This
systematic review aimed to understand the challenges fac
21 rison, and outcomes question, we conducted a
systematic review aiming to identify the best available
22 This
systematic review aims to analyze published examples of
23 This
systematic review aims to characterize the evidence rega
24 This
systematic review aims to summarise the current body of
25 the shifting global burden of disease, this
systematic review analyses the evidence from rigorously
26 om 23 African countries were included in the
systematic review and 119 studies were included in the m
27 Fifty studies were included in the
systematic review and 19 in the meta-analysis.
28 ture search, 21 studies were included in the
systematic review and 19 were included in the meta-analy
29 On the basis of our
systematic review and analysis, the EXTRIP workgroup rec
30 We performed a
systematic review and component network meta-analysis to
31 We performed a
systematic review and diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis,
32 A
systematic review and dose-response meta-analyses of pro
33 Although the implementation of
systematic review and evidence mapping methods stands to
34 We conducted a
systematic review and individual level meta-analysis by
35 This
systematic review and IPD analysis of six prospective co
36 We applied the Preferred Reporting Items for
Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of individual partic
37 Herein, we report the first
systematic review and meta-analyses on effects of food t
38 In this
systematic review and meta-analyses, Embase, PubMed, and
39 This
systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to quantify th
40 This
systematic review and meta-analysis compared the efficac
41 This is the first
systematic review and meta-analysis confirming that shif
42 The findings of this
systematic review and meta-analysis indicate that prior
43 We performed a
systematic review and meta-analysis of acquired data to
44 We completed a
systematic review and meta-analysis of current evidence
45 studies and Preferred Reporting Items for a
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test A
46 We conducted a
systematic review and meta-analysis of human interventio
47 We conducted a
systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patien
48 We carried out a
systematic review and meta-analysis of phase II and III
49 We conducted a
systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based
50 The aim was to perform a
systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohor
51 We conducted a
systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studi
52 In this
systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinic
53 We conducted a
systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized contro
54 We performed a
systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized contro
55 We performed a
systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized contro
56 We conducted a
systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized contro
57 acidosis in patients with type 2 diabetes: a
systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized contro
58 tests for detecting SARS-CoV-2 antibodies: a
systematic review and meta-analysis of real-world data.
59 We performed a
systematic review and meta-analysis of studies conducted
60 The objectives were to conduct a
systematic review and meta-analysis of the levels of MP
61 We conducted a
systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature ex
62 In this study, we perform a
systematic review and meta-analysis of the published dat
63 ty of myocardial T2 relaxation times using a
systematic review and meta-analysis of the T2 literature
64 Perform a
systematic review and meta-analysis of vascular complica
65 The aim of this study was to conduct a
systematic review and meta-analysis on GORD prevalence a
66 This
systematic review and meta-analysis revealed that althou
67 the Gastrointestinal (GI) tract cancers in a
systematic review and meta-analysis study.
68 This
systematic review and meta-analysis summarises estimates
69 We did a
systematic review and meta-analysis to aggregate the cli
70 We performed a
systematic review and meta-analysis to assess evidence f
71 We performed a
systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the inc
72 We conducted a
systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the saf
73 We conducted a
systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the afor
74 We performed a
systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the poten
75 We performed a
systematic review and meta-analysis to identify all prog
76 We performed a
systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the s
77 The aim of this
systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the sp
78 The objective of this
systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine how h
79 The objective of this
systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the e
80 In this
systematic review and meta-analysis we searched MEDLINE,
81 We performed a
systematic review and meta-analysis, establishing pooled
82 We conducted a
systematic review and meta-analysis, including 1 cohort
83 Materials and Methods In this
systematic review and meta-analysis, MEDLINE (from 1946
84 In a
systematic review and meta-analysis, we found an increas
85 In a
systematic review and meta-analysis, we found an increas
86 In this
systematic review and meta-analysis, we investigate the
87 In this
systematic review and meta-analysis, we investigated the
88 In this
systematic review and meta-analysis, we observed that tr
89 In this
systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE
90 For this
systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched PubMed,
91 For this
systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched relevan
92 For the
systematic review and meta-analysis, we systematically s
93 Data from six articles were included in the
systematic review and meta-analysis, which included 24 t
94 s combination therapy for type 2 diabetes: a
systematic review and meta-analysis.
95 (BE) after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) through a
systematic review and meta-analysis.
96 after percutaneous coronary intervention: a
systematic review and meta-analysis.
97 nconsistent and has not been summarized by a
systematic review and meta-analysis.
98 rate in couple-based studies by conducting a
systematic review and meta-analysis.
99 patients with established atherosclerosis: a
systematic review and meta-analysis.
100 elines and standard methods for conducting a
systematic review and meta-analysis.
101 nd calcium for the prevention of fracture: a
systematic review and meta-analysis.
102 adication therapy to prevent gastric cancer:
systematic review and meta-analysis.
103 diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction: a
systematic review and meta-analysis.
104 We aimed to conduct a
systematic review and metaanalysis of studies reporting
105 Therefore, a
systematic review and metaanalysis were performed to com
106 We undertook a rapid
systematic review and narrative synthesis of all literat
107 om non-low back, musculoskeletal injuries: a
systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomize
108 In a
systematic review and network meta-analysis of studies t
109 lucose-lowering drugs for type 2 diabetes: a
systematic review and network meta-analysis.
110 The authors conducted a
systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis asses
111 Our
systematic review and safety meta-analysis were register
112 leukaemia related to PARP inhibitors, via a
systematic review and safety meta-analysis, and to descr
113 Systematic review and synthesis of 61 qualitative studie
114 A
systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative
115 erspectives on second-level nursing roles: a
systematic review and thematic synthesis.
116 and updated in 2019 to complete an original
systematic review and to identify pre-existing systemati
117 The review included 20
systematic reviews and 13 additional RCTs.
118 he basis of the best available evidence from
systematic reviews and individual studies.
119 The Preferred Reporting Items for
Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist
120 Manual and the Preferred Reporting Items for
Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) extension
121 factors contributing to the inadequacies of
systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRMAs) published i
122 The Preferred Reporting Items for
Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline for syste
123 Preferred Reporting Items for
Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were fol
124 2018 following Preferred Reporting Items for
Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, includi
125 ccordance with Preferred Reporting Items for
Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.
126 e followed the Preferred Reporting Items for
Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.
127 adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for
Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.
128 Many
systematic reviews and meta-analyses have assessed the e
129 A Preferred Reporting Items for
Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses systematic review w
130 MA guidelines (Preferred Reporting Items for
Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses).
131 to 3 fundamental questions, and based on the
systematic reviews and meta-analyses, makes recommendati
132 Preferred Reporting Items for
Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, or PRISMA, guideli
133 adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines.
134 Topics for which
systematic reviews and new Consensuses on Science With T
135 ed MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Database of
Systematic Reviews and the FDA drug database from incept
136 Systematic-review and meta-analysis of population-based
137 246 randomized controlled trials [RCTs] in 5
systematic reviews)
and with selective serotonin reuptak
138 dies that met our inclusion criteria for the
systematic review,
and 21 studies were included in the m
139 ed the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of
Systematic Reviews,
and Cochrane Central Register of Con
140 r randomized clinical trials, meta-analyses,
systematic reviews,
and observational studies.
141 y design, time frame format and performed 15
systematic reviews,
applying the Grading of Recommendati
142 The 18
systematic reviews comprised 238 unique trials or trial
143 Systematic review conducted in January, 2019 included 38
144 nal Liaison Committee on Resuscitation, only
systematic reviews could result in a new or revised trea
145 This
systematic review described and evaluated psychometric p
146 synthesis of 61 qualitative studies and two
systematic reviews describing older patients' experience
147 This
systematic review endeavored to investigate the effect o
148 his challenge, we are publishing a series of
systematic reviews evaluating the safety and efficacy of
149 iew identified 115 outcomes in 60 trials and
systematic reviews evaluating treatments for children wi
150 This
systematic review follows Cochrane methodology and is on
151 cience by unfiltered inclusion in subsequent
systematic reviews have been identified, and the problem
152 Systematic reviews have been introduced as a more rigoro
153 , assessment of quality, and risk of bias of
systematic reviews have been widely available, some rece
154 Consensus guidelines and
systematic reviews have suggested that cemented fixation
155 he Cochrane Library (Prospective Register of
Systematic Reviews ID: CRD42018117255) was undertaken on
156 The
systematic review identified 114 eligible randomized tri
157 A previous
systematic review identified 115 outcomes in 60 trials a
158 The
systematic review identified 129 outcomes which were map
159 The
systematic review identified 17 eligible trials.
160 The
systematic review identified 19 eligible studies.
161 A
systematic review identified published randomized trials
162 Web of Science, and the Cochrane Database of
Systematic Reviews identified efficacy studies of uncomp
163 Systematic reviews identified prevalence/incidence data
164 This
systematic review identifies and critically evaluates th
165 ess consisted of four phases: (1) an updated
systematic review identifying all previously reported ou
166 Despite the increasing popularity of
systematic reviews in the environmental field, evidence
167 ch topics should be the highest priority for
systematic reviews in the next 1 to 2 years.
168 The
systematic review included 35 publications on VTE prophy
169 Results: The
systematic review included 39 studies (11 tracers).
170 The
systematic reviews included 3 publications from the upda
171 The
systematic review is registered with PROSPERO, CRD420170
172 The aim of this
systematic review is to determine if biological or physi
173 The main limitations of this
systematic review lie in the restriction to published st
174 l, 34 articles (31 primary studies and three
systematic reviews)
met the inclusion criteria.
175 vely defined study selection criteria sought
systematic reviews,
meta-analyses, randomized controlled
176 conduct a literature search, which included
systematic reviews,
meta-analyses, randomized controlled
177 In this
systematic review,
most studies found no association bet
178 The current
systematic review newly included e-cigarettes as a tobac
179 This recommendation is based on a
systematic review of 90 studies (search period, 1980-Jun
180 : To perform the first
systematic review of all available gender-affirming surg
181 We performed a
systematic review of all risk factors associated with sl
182 Consequently, we performed a
systematic review of existing animal models that incorpo
183 We conducted an extensive
systematic review of experiments identifying potential h
184 We conducted a
systematic review of hygiene intervention effectiveness
185 Here, we give a
systematic review of IMAGEN publications since the start
186 macokinetic studies were identified though a
systematic review of literature.
187 We conducted a
systematic review of manuscripts listed in the MEDLINE/P
188 ents undergoing DBS for CCH, identified by a
systematic review of MEDLINE from inception to Febuary 1
189 Materials and Methods A
systematic review of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, the Cochra
190 A
systematic review of Medline, Embase, Web of Science, an
191 (mg kg(-1)) for six species groups though a
systematic review of point prevalence surveys, which ide
192 cts (CHDs) were excluded because of a recent
systematic review of population-based studies of CHD sur
193 We conducted a
systematic review of published data on antimicrobial tre
194 A
systematic review of published literature since 2000 on
195 oach, 4 types of inquiry were employed: 1) a
systematic review of published peer-reviewed and gray li
196 A
systematic review of published peer-reviewed and grey li
197 ASCO convened an Expert Panel to conduct a
systematic review of published phase III randomized cont
198 This study consisted of a
systematic review of PubMed articles screened for ADHD m
199 We aimed to prospectively plan a
systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs)
200 A
systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs)
201 anel made updated recommendations based on a
systematic review of randomized controlled trials from D
202 xamethasone and CPI question, we conducted a
systematic review of RCTs that evaluated the addition of
203 nd chronic kidney disease, complemented by a
systematic review of relevant observational studies.
204 for both planning of prospective studies and
systematic review of reported findings.
205 We conducted a
systematic review of reviews that studied the effect of
206 ed and developing regions, using data from a
systematic review of studies published between January 1
207 ustrialized vs developing), with data from a
systematic review of studies published from 1996 through
208 (IDSA) convened an expert panel to perform a
systematic review of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID
209 This article presents a
systematic review of the data regarding brain inflammati
210 recommendation after evaluating results of a
systematic review of the effectiveness of screening, acc
211 Panel to develop recommendations based on a
systematic review of the literature and a formal consens
212 nd Society of Urologic Oncology to conduct a
systematic review of the literature and develop an evide
213 A
systematic review of the literature collected evidence r
214 A
systematic review of the literature from 2013 to August
215 nderstanding of B cell biology, we present a
systematic review of the literature from both animal mod
216 We performed a
systematic review of the literature from Medline, Embase
217 An Expert Panel was formed, and a
systematic review of the literature on patient-centered
218 We first did a
systematic review of the literature to identify inclusio
219 A
systematic review of the literature was undertaken to pr
220 A
systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis,
221 A
systematic review of the literature, with selected meta-
222 te recommendations based on the results of a
systematic review of the literature.
223 SCO convened an Expert Panel and conducted a
systematic review of the literature.
224 We conducted a
systematic review of the long-term sequelae and health-r
225 evidence-based review of IMH; (2) perform a
systematic review of the management of IMH; and (3) pres
226 ASCO convened an Expert Panel to conduct a
systematic review of the more recently published literat
227 Here, we performed a
systematic review of the most up-to-date literature on t
228 dentified clinical questions and conducted a
systematic review of the published literature on the use
229 We also did a
systematic review of UIA prevalence/prognosis in cohorts
230 is Project database to identify quantitative
systematic reviews of HIV public heath interventions wit
231 This article summarizes the results from
systematic reviews of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
232 The evidence consisted of
systematic reviews of observational data, consensus guid
233 curacy studies of screening instruments; and
systematic reviews of randomized trials of behavioral an
234 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and
systematic reviews of RCTs published from 1966 through O
235 very low quality.Conclusions: The panel used
systematic reviews of the evidence to inform clinical re
236 ed a significant need for frequently updated
systematic reviews of the literature to inform evidence-
237 We conducted
systematic reviews of the literature, screened studies,
238 re were 68 randomized trials included in the
systematic review,
of which 6 (9%) were conducted in a s
239 Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis and
systematic review on GL and graft function, measured by
240 In this survey, we provide a
systematic review on the emerging field of graph convolu
241 es in adults in the outpatient setting and a
systematic review on the predictors of prolonged opioid
242 Accordingly, a
systematic review on this topic will provide the synthet
243 A
systematic review,
one meta-analysis, and 34 additional
244 anel and had no knowledge of the guideline's
systematic reviews or recommendations were recruited to
245 Within the limited studies included in this
systematic review,
PhMT-b via particulate bone grafting
246 predictor of depression among older adults,
systematic reviews point to a lack of longitudinal inves
247 in the International Prospective Register of
Systematic Reviews (
PROSPERO: CRD42018097400).
248 ted, to yield qualitative, mixed methods and
systematic reviews published in English, related to the
249 s and unmet needs, This is not, therefore, a
systematic review,
rather a narrative historical descrip
250 seeks to synthesize the extant literature of
systematic reviews,
scoping reviews, and other related r
251 are difficult to integrate in meta-analyses/
systematic reviews since there is a lack of datasets wit
252 and call on the entire community, including
systematic review specialists, to work towards better ev
253 A significant number of
systematic reviews (
SRs) and meta-analyses (MAs) have ev
254 This
systematic review summarizes all premorbid, illness-rela
255 This
systematic review summarizes the current knowledge linki
256 Mackey and colleagues reported a
systematic review that found high-certainty evidence tha
257 A high-quality
systematic review that was current to May 2016 was adopt
258 We did a
systematic review to analyse the published literature co
259 We conducted a
systematic review to assess the methodological and repor
260 We conducted a
systematic review to describe the frequency of mild, aty
261 We conducted a
systematic review to determine how plant thermal toleran
262 Purpose To perform a
systematic review to evaluate the diagnostic performance
263 We conducted a
systematic review to identify behavioral interventions d
264 We have completed a PRISMA-compliant
systematic review to identify genetic associations that
265 We conducted a
systematic review to identify prognostic factors for VTE
266 SCO convened an Expert Panel and updated the
systematic review to include randomized controlled trial
267 SCO convened an Expert Panel and conducted a
systematic review to update guideline recommendations fo
268 was used to search the Cochrane Database of
Systematic Reviews to identify reviews of patient educat
269 umonia (CAP) guidelines were developed using
systematic reviews to inform every recommendation, as su
270 nt reviewers using the Cochrane Handbook for
Systematic Reviews Tool.
271 This
systematic review updates the current evidence regarding
272 This
systematic review used the GRADE approach to compile evi
273 was assessed by A Measurement Tool to Assess
Systematic Review version 2.
274 A
systematic review was carried out of the existing litera
275 A
systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISM
276 ems for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
systematic review was conducted through September 1, 201
277 A
systematic review was conducted to identify existing FND
278 This
systematic review was initiated to enlighten ophthalmolo
279 This
systematic review was performed according to PRISMA reco
280 A
systematic review was performed following PRISMA guideli
281 This
systematic review was registered at PROSPERO (CRD4201912
282 The aim of this
systematic review was to analyze the evidence regarding
283 The primary objective of this
systematic review was to evaluate existing literature ca
284 The aim of our
systematic review was to investigate the quality of PRO
285 The methodological quality of included
systematic reviews was assessed by A Measurement Tool to
286 atic reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline for
systematic reviews was used, and relevant literature dat
287 In this
systematic review,
we aimed to analyze triggers, various
288 In this
systematic review,
we found a high degree of analytic co
289 In a
systematic review,
we found that SSPs are relatively unc
290 In this
systematic review,
we report the frequency of cognitive
291 On the basis of a
systematic review,
we show that interactions with positi
292 The findings of the
systematic review were consistent with the NCODA patient
293 Original articles, review articles, and
systematic reviews were considered.
294 Systematic reviews were performed for the following topi
295 This
systematic review with meta-analysis compares health- an
296 We performed a
systematic review with meta-analysis of mainly observati
297 Systematic reviews with meta-analyses of randomized cont
298 identified fully published English-language
systematic reviews with or without meta-analyses, report
299 ria and form the evidence base, including 17
systematic reviews with or without meta-analysis and 18
300 If the CORE process had been used, 11
systematic reviews would have been necessary rather than