コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 pon) and initial portal radiographs (without tampon).
2 tampon and nonwoven fleece for the reference tampon.
3 safe as the nonwoven cover of the reference tampon.
4 subjects who underwent simulation without a tampon.
5 hether subjects were using test or reference tampons.
6 milar levels throughout the cycles with both tampons.
9 copy showed no abnormal findings with either tampon and no changes in vaginal or cervical epithelial
10 cover materials: apertured film for the test tampon and nonwoven fleece for the reference tampon.
11 ed S. aureus-biofilm occurrence in 44 paired-tampon and vaginal-wash-specimens from 18 prescreened wo
12 f menstrual products such as high-absorbency tampons and is caused by Staphylococcus aureus strains t
14 ed by comparing simulation radiographs (with tampon) and initial portal radiographs (without tampon).
15 single-use (sanitary pads, panty liners, and tampons) and reusable (reusable sanitary pads, menstrual
16 (sanitary napkins, locally prepared napkins, tampons, and menstrual cups) during menstruation among a
17 nd were better liked relative to a cardboard tampon applicator or applicators for insertion of medica
19 Comparison of the toilet papers with the tampon applicators studied previously indicates that pre
20 ve rods were significantly different between tampons at the premenstrual visit, when unusually low va
21 t the Daye diagnostic tampon (DDT), a novel, tampon-based self-sampling method, achieves diagnostic a
23 es production of TSST-1 in vitro, and cotton tampons cannot be claimed to be inherently safer on the
28 study demonstrates that the Daye diagnostic tampon (DDT), a novel, tampon-based self-sampling method
30 were randomly assigned to use either a test tampon during cycle 1 and a reference tampon during cycl
31 ference tampon during cycle 2 or a reference tampon during cycle 1 and a test tampon during cycle 2.
32 a test tampon during cycle 1 and a reference tampon during cycle 2 or a reference tampon during cycle
36 (HC2), with kappa higher for swabs than for tampons (for swabs, 81% concordance, with kappa of 0.61;
39 ded trial of patient-assessed twice-per-week tampon insertion or intercourse, all patients received l
40 es that the apertured film cover of the test tampon is as safe as the nonwoven cover of the reference
44 vs no use) of menstrual materials (eg, pads, tampons, or cloth), availability of a private place to w
47 of interest because of the widespread use of tampons, reported to be about 70% of women in the United
50 SS has been associated with menstruation and tampon use, and although it is rare, the effects can be
52 cuff displacement secondary to the contrast tampon was evaluated by comparing simulation radiographs
53 in the group who underwent simulation with a tampon was minimal (< or = 5 mm in each direction) and s