戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1  approaches that mitigate the risks posed by tamsulosin.
2 aract surgery after the use of alfuzosin and tamsulosin.
3 plus tamsulosin, 0.4%; tolterodine ER, 0.5%; tamsulosin, 0%; and placebo, 0%).
4 ventions: Ciprofloxacin, 500 mg twice daily; tamsulosin, 0.4 mg once daily; a combination of the 2 dr
5 catheterization was low (tolterodine ER plus tamsulosin, 0.4%; tolterodine ER, 0.5%; tamsulosin, 0%;
6                                              Tamsulosin 400 mug and nifedipine 30 mg are not effectiv
7 assigned by a remote randomisation system to tamsulosin 400 mug, nifedipine 30 mg, or placebo taken d
8 herapy, including alpha-adrenergic blockers (tamsulosin), 5alpha-reductase inhibitors (finasteride),
9 edications including alpha-blockers (such as tamsulosin), 5alpha-reductase inhibitors (such as finast
10 nst prostate tumor epithelial cells, whereas tamsulosin, a sulfonamide-based alpha1-adrenoceptor anta
11 eptor antagonists, doxazosin, terazosin, and tamsulosin, against prostate cancer cell growth.
12  symptomatic LUTS/BPH: terazosin, doxazosin, tamsulosin, alfuzosin and silodosin.
13                                              Tamsulosin, alfuzosin slow release and silodosin do not
14 with urinary symptoms is alpha-blockers (eg, tamsulosin, alfuzosin; DeltaNIH-CPSI score difference vs
15 arkinson disease when compared with users of tamsulosin, an a1 adrenergic receptor antagonist of a di
16 ularly prevalent among patients treated with tamsulosin, an alpha-1A blocker prescribed for the treat
17                                Although both tamsulosin and alfuzosin significantly increase the risk
18   We studied 15 and 25 patients administered tamsulosin and alfuzosin, respectively, as well as 25 co
19 ted the association between alpha1-ARAs like Tamsulosin and increased surgical risks for patients und
20 e treatment and placebo (p=0.78), or between tamsulosin and nifedipine (p=0.77).
21 cluded that the smooth muscle relaxant drugs tamsulosin and nifedipine assisted stone passage for peo
22 strong association exists between the use of tamsulosin and the occurance of intraoperative floppy ir
23 rease awareness of the risks associated with tamsulosin, and educational initiatives have fostered th
24 vir led to increased exposures of doxazosin, tamsulosin, and/or quetiapine, resulting in additional a
25 eriods before and after the first reports of tamsulosin-associated IFIS.
26             For example, alpha-blockade (eg, tamsulosin) combined with 5alpha-reductase inhibition (e
27       Patients receiving tolterodine ER plus tamsulosin compared with placebo experienced significant
28       Patients receiving tolterodine ER plus tamsulosin demonstrated significant improvements on the
29                            Ciprofloxacin and tamsulosin did not substantially reduce symptoms in men
30 ract surgical adverse events over time among tamsulosin-exposed and non-tamsulosin-exposed patients a
31 f cataract surgical complications among both tamsulosin-exposed and non-tamsulosin-exposed patients d
32 s over time among tamsulosin-exposed and non-tamsulosin-exposed patients adjusting for patient-, surg
33 ations among both tamsulosin-exposed and non-tamsulosin-exposed patients declined between 2003 and 20
34 tments to decrease adverse event rates among tamsulosin-exposed patients.
35 evere IFIS was noted in 34.3% (24/70) of the tamsulosin eyes and in 16.3% (7/43) of the alfuzosin eye
36 gest that treatment with tolterodine ER plus tamsulosin for 12 weeks provides benefit for men with mo
37 weeks, compared with 307 (81%) of 378 in the tamsulosin group (adjusted risk difference 1.3% [95% CI
38 eters were reduced significantly only in the tamsulosin group (by 1.09+/-0.31 mm [P=.001] and by 0.89
39 y reduced by 0.70+/-0.20 m/s (P=.001) in the tamsulosin group and by 0.54+/-0.18 m/s (P=.004) in the
40               A total of 226 eyes (70 in the tamsulosin group, 43 in the alfuzosin group, and 113 in
41 er stimulation (5.23+/-2.42%, P=.035) in the tamsulosin group.
42 poptosis in a dose-dependent manner, whereas tamsulosin had no effect on prostate cell growth.
43                   However, prior research on tamsulosin has suggested that it may in fact potentiate
44                        Patients treated with tamsulosin have a higher risk of wound dehiscence after
45 ilar indications (minoxidil for alopecia and tamsulosin hydrochloride for BPH); comparing finasteride
46 tiomers 20, 23, and 24 were less potent than tamsulosin in inhibiting contractions of rat prostate ti
47 omatic benign prostatic hyperplasia, such as tamsulosin, increase the risk of surgical complications
48 s was reversed by the alpha(1)-AR antagonist tamsulosin, indicating its dependence on bladder neck SM
49                                              Tamsulosin is associated with intraoperative floppy iris
50                                              Tamsulosin is more potent than alfuzosin in inducing IFI
51 tdilation pupil dynamics, demonstrating that tamsulosin is more potent than alfuzosin in inducing int
52 but much more selective at alpha(1a)-AR than tamsulosin (K(i) = 0.13 nM, alpha(1b)/alpha(1a) = 14.8,
53 t against Parkinson disease, but rather that tamsulosin may in some way potentiate Parkinson disease
54 ein-coupled receptor (GPCR) modulation using tamsulosin, metoprolol, and bromocriptine coadministrati
55  4 mg of tolterodine ER (n = 217), 0.4 mg of tamsulosin (n = 215), or both tolterodine ER plus tamsul
56 losin (n = 215), or both tolterodine ER plus tamsulosin (n = 225) for 12 weeks.
57 nistering an alpha-1A-adrenergic antagonist, Tamsulosin, on urodynamics.
58 ofloxacin (P = 0.15) or tamsulosin versus no tamsulosin (P > 0.2).
59 eiving placebo (P<.001), 146 (71%) receiving tamsulosin (P=.06 vs placebo), or 135 (65%) receiving to
60                                              Tamsulosin remains an important risk factor for cataract
61  172 men (80%) receiving tolterodine ER plus tamsulosin reported treatment benefit by week 12 compare
62 % confidence interval [CI] = 157.53-402.02), tamsulosin (ROR = 171.44, 95% CI = 143.12-205.36), and c
63 oxazosin (DOX; 0.01-1.0 mg/kg b.wt./day), or tamsulosin (TAM; 0.05-0.25 mg/kg b.wt./day) were injecte
64 vere IFIS statistically was more likely with tamsulosin than with alfuzosin (P = 0.036).
65       Among patients not recently exposed to tamsulosin, the risk of surgical adverse events also dec
66                    Among patients exposed to tamsulosin, the risk of surgical adverse events decrease
67  ability of doxazosin and terazosin (but not tamsulosin) to suppress prostate cancer cell growth in v
68 ns, and iris hook use was similar in the two tamsulosin treated group.
69  conventional repeated eyedrops regiment for tamsulosin treated patients.
70 ence interval: 1.24-11.67, P = .0194) in the tamsulosin-treated group.
71 se sponge on perioperative pupil diameter in tamsulosin-treated patients undergoing elective cataract
72 -dilation PD was significantly reduced after tamsulosin treatment (P < .001).
73 were performed twice firstly before starting tamsulosin treatment and secondly at the 3rd month of ta
74                                              Tamsulosin treatment does not change the iris SMR thickn
75 n treatment and secondly at the 3rd month of tamsulosin treatment.
76  (P = .001) were reduced significantly after tamsulosin treatment.
77                        Patients treated with tamsulosin underwent subgroup analysis.
78 % CI, 1.06-3.05) and for patients with prior tamsulosin use (odds ratio, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.09-3.69).
79                Carefully taking a history of tamsulosin use before cataract surgery is advised so tha
80 omplex cataract surgery and those with prior tamsulosin use had significantly higher odds of unplanne
81 y combined with another intraocular surgery, tamsulosin use) and surgeon-related factors (low surgica
82                  Patients were classified as tamsulosin users (n = 45,380), terazosin/alfuzosin/doxaz
83 80).RESULTSIncidence of Parkinson disease in tamsulosin users was 1.53%, which was significantly high
84 oxacin versus no ciprofloxacin (P = 0.15) or tamsulosin versus no tamsulosin (P > 0.2).
85 mia was also observed with desmopressin when tamsulosin was the comparator (HR 12.10; 95% CI 6.54, 22
86  OCT1 was less stereoselective, although (R)-tamsulosin was transported by OCT1 with higher apparent
87                   As a sensitivity analysis, tamsulosin was used as the comparator rather than oxybut
88                               Patients using tamsulosin were dilated either with mydriatic-cocktail s
89 ve agonist oxymetazoline, and the antagonist tamsulosin, with resolutions range from 2.9 angstrom to