ライフサイエンスコーパス: tanning

1 e of epidermal pigmentation after UV-induced tanning.

2 Ever and past-year exposure to indoor tanning.

3 to melanocyte-stimulating hormone, inducing tanning.

4 , knowledge, and behaviors related to indoor tanning.

5 ps recruited using factors related to indoor tanning.

6 mparably high rates of sunbathing and indoor tanning.

7 fy PGC-1 coactivators as regulators of human tanning.

8 sun-protective behaviors and decrease indoor tanning.

9 tem into the hemolymph and initiates cuticle tanning.

10 -alanine and dopamine used in insect cuticle tanning.

11 NBAD as cross-linking agents during cuticle tanning.

12 tial processes of wing expansion and cuticle tanning.

13 compassing the irradiation period, decreased tanning.

14 he most relevant mechanisms involved in skin tanning.

15 ed in the skin regardless of pigmentation or tanning.

16 t response indistinguishable from UV-induced tanning.

17 on factors, sunbathing vacations, and indoor tanning.

18 g facilities, as well as payment options for tanning.

19 f skin cancer and 12-month history of indoor tanning.

20 llow campus cash cards to be used to pay for tanning.

21 st off-campus housing facilities with indoor tanning (96%) provide it free to tenants.

22 ted with red hair colour, fair skin and poor tanning ability (denoted as RHC variants), are associate

23 confidence interval (CI): 0.90, 1.09), skin tanning ability (for dark tan vs. no tan, multivariable-

24 ligo risk was higher among women with better tanning ability (hazard ratio = 2.59, 95% confidence int

25 ity to sunlight exposure (P = .006) and poor tanning ability (P = .003) were associated with a higher

26 ted with red hair color, fair skin, and poor tanning ability (RHC trait), are more prone to melanoma;

27 rs117132860 is also associated with tanning ability and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (c

28 n hair color, eye color, number of sunburns, tanning ability and number of non-melanoma skin cancers

29 y history; and sun exposure history, such as tanning ability and number of severe sunburns experience

30 ci in the PGC-1beta gene that correlate with tanning ability and protection from melanoma in humans.

31 te, Fitzpatrick skin types IV through VI, or tanning ability of rarely or never burns.

32 c White, Fitzpatrick skin types IV to VI, or tanning ability of rarely or never burns.

33 Poor or no tanning ability was more strongly associated with SCC am

34 evus density, freckling density, hair color, tanning ability, adult sunburns, family history, other c

35 skin pigmentation by using hair color, skin tanning ability, and skin reaction to prolonged sun expo

36 me 1 as a novel locus highly associated with tanning ability, and we confirmed this association in 87

37 Age, sex, skin color, tanning ability, hormonal status in women, current smoki

38 ne survey on phenotypic factors (hair color, tanning ability, nevus density, family history), sun exp

39 Overall, these tanning ability-related loci are similar to the hair col

40 creased the risk of SCC associated with poor tanning ability.

41 its tanning response is comparable to human tanning after exposure to ultraviolet radiation (UVR).

42 s for the brown color caused by the "sunless tanning" agent dihydroxyacetone in self-tanning products

43 35 individuals who were without makeup, self-tanning agents and/or recent intensive UV exposure.

44 port are candidates for use as cosmeceutical tanning agents.

45 t radiation from natural sunlight and indoor tanning, although there are several subtypes that are no

46 Additionally, indoor tanning among female students was associated with using

47 The prevalence of indoor tanning and frequent indoor tanning were examined as wel

48 lleles of MC1R are associated with decreased tanning and increased melanoma risk, which has been attr

49 Sex-specific associations for indoor tanning and melanoma by anatomic site were examined.

50 inal study of the association between indoor tanning and melanoma in a large cohort of Norwegian wome

51 and sex-specific associations between indoor tanning and melanoma to determine if these trends could

52 lpha and burs beta), responsible for cuticle tanning and other developmental processes in insects.

53 ting PKC activity in vivo selectively blocks tanning and reduces basal pigmentation in the epidermis

54 f a dose-response association between indoor tanning and risk of melanoma and supports the hypothesis

55 The association between indoor tanning and skin cancer is particularly strong among tho

56 r tanning and the association between indoor tanning and sunburn among US high school students.

57 d to further reduce the prevalence of indoor tanning and sunburn and thus prevent future cases of ski

58 Indoor tanning and sunburns, particularly during adolescence an

59 amine the trends in the prevalence of indoor tanning and the association between indoor tanning and s

60 Participant responses to tanning and the dermatologist-determined FST were not si

61 isk prediction model, with a focus on indoor tanning and the melanocortin 1 receptor gene, MC1R.

62 sed behavioral interventions decrease indoor tanning and ultraviolet exposure.

63 lternatives to ultraviolet radiation induced tanning and whether encouraging these options leads to a

64 mone bursicon, which is required for cuticle tanning and wing expansion after eclosion.

65 bacterial sodium channel NaChBac also blocks tanning and wing expansion and leads to depletion of bur

66 uded here showed that in addition to cuticle tanning and wing expansion reported previously, Tcrk is

67 ut NCCAP, but not in NCCAP-c929, also blocks tanning and wing expansion, we conclude that neurotransm

68 con release into the hemolymph together with tanning and wing expansion.

69 added ever-indoor tanning, burns from indoor tanning, and MC1R (AUC = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.74, 0.81).

70 receptor involved in pigmentation, adaptive tanning, and melanoma resistance.

71 se A (PKA), regulates pigmentation, adaptive tanning, and melanoma resistance.

72 sists of avoiding direct sunlight and indoor tanning, and photoprotection (sunscreen and sun-protecti

73 aled significant associations of skin color, tanning, and sun protection use with various single-nucl

74 c Cr pollution resulted from electroplating, tanning, and the chemical industry.

75 The odds ratios for ease of burning and tanning appeared unbiased.

76 e bursicon and its receptor regulate cuticle tanning as well as wing expansion after adult eclosion.

77 women younger than 40 years initiated indoor tanning at a younger age (16 vs 25 years, P < .001) and

78 res, including appearance motivation, indoor tanning attitudes and norms, and intention to tan indoor

79 , the findings highlight that in addition to tanning bed avoidance, it is critical to emphasize sun p

80 for whom next-generation sequencing data and tanning bed exposure history were available were include

81 previous findings on the damaging effects of tanning bed exposure on women, particularly young women.

82 evaluate the relationship between access to tanning bed facilities and melanoma incidence.

83 parities in melanoma incidence and access to tanning bed facilities exist.

84 gland county-level melanoma incidence rates, tanning bed facilities location, demographic data, socio

85 Subjects who used a tanning bed had parathyroid hormone concentrations 18% l

86 Subjects who used a tanning bed had serum 25(OH)D concentrations 90% higher

87 certain whether subjects who regularly use a tanning bed have higher 25(OH)D concentrations than do s

88 We conclude that tanning bed radiation induces melanoma by increasing the

89 Subjects who use a tanning bed that emits ultraviolet B radiation (290-315

90 The regular use of a tanning bed that emits vitamin D-producing ultraviolet r

91 ns of melanoma in patients with quantifiable tanning bed usage and performed exome sequencing of mela

92 ronger policy initiatives designed to reduce tanning bed use among young women.

93 nce for a dose-response relationship between tanning bed use and the risk of skin cancers, especially

94 Compared with tanning bed use at ages 25 to 35 years, we found a signi

95 We sought to evaluate the risk effect of tanning bed use on skin cancers among teenage and young

96 skin cancer, it is already clear that indoor tanning bed use represents an avoidable risk factor for

97 The association of tanning bed use with TMB was modeled using inverse proba

98 and the etiology of melanoma associated with tanning bed use, we described the patterns of melanoma i

99 The melanocytes in skin from tanning bed users had higher mutation burdens and higher

100 Tanning bed users have a significantly increased risk of

101 Tanning bed users were more likely to have melanoma on b

102 xposed to ultraviolet B (UVB) radiation in a tanning bed wearing a 1-piece bathing suit for 10 minute

103 entrations than do subjects who do not use a tanning bed.

104 than do subjects who do not regularly use a tanning bed.

105 t compelling evidence that early exposure to tanning beds advances the date of diagnosis of melanoma

106 previous evidence of the negative effects of tanning beds and provides further justification for stro

107 nd sun exposure in childhood and exposure to tanning beds are important preventable risk factors.

108 from the sun and from the widespread use of tanning beds by populations residing in areas of norther

109 he US reveal extensive sunburning and use of tanning beds in adolescents and adults.

110 cancer for an incremental increase in use of tanning beds of four times per year during both periods

111 ion between melanoma incidence and access to tanning beds, adjusting for confounding factors.

112 nm), which is also the primary component of tanning beds.

113 omponent of the radiation in sunlight and in tanning beds.

114 Strong links between indoor tanning behavior and skin cancer have been demonstrated

115 ntention to tan indoors, frequency of indoor tanning behavior in the past year, and indoor tanner typ

116 -quality educational interventions to change tanning behavior, particularly among women, people with

117 ntion to tan indoors and frequency of indoor tanning behavior.

118 h communications to prevent and deter indoor tanning behavior.

119 he roles of UV radiation exposure and indoor tanning behaviors on skin cancer risk are explored here.

120 te whether skin cancer prevalence and indoor tanning behaviors vary by sexual orientation in the gene

121 is highly associated with outdoor and indoor tanning behaviors.

122 scale may further advance research on indoor tanning beliefs and can guide health communications to p

123 al outcomes (medication use, sun protection, tanning booth use, and blood glucose testing) estimates

124 ificantly improved when we added ever-indoor tanning, burns from indoor tanning, and MC1R (AUC = 0.77

125 sinase, have been proposed to participate in tanning, but proof of the true identity of the enzyme(s)

126 The strongest OR for indoor tanning by anatomic site was for melanomas arising on th

127 Excessive sun tanning can result in addictive behavior.

128 The effects of UVR on the skin include tanning, carcinogenesis, immunomodulation, and synthesis

129 the United States, the prevalence of indoor tanning decreased from 15.6% (95% CI, 13.7%-17.6%) in 20

130 students, the adjusted prevalence of indoor tanning decreased from 26.4% in 2009 to 20.7% in 2011.

131 Indoor tanning, defined as any use, first age of use, and total

132 at initiation of indoor tanning, duration of tanning-device use, and dose response with melanoma risk

133 don exposure and lung cancer, and the use of tanning devices and melanoma.

134 vacations and were more likely to use indoor tanning devices.

135 melanoma, but it remains unclear how indoor tanning drives melanomagenesis.

136 associations of age at initiation of indoor tanning, duration of tanning-device use, and dose respon

137 esults suggest that the Comprehensive Indoor Tanning Expectations (CITE) Scale provides a reliable an

138 le), there was no association between indoor tanning exposure and TMB after adjustment for demographi

139 alculated for melanoma in relation to indoor tanning exposure for men and women by diagnosis or refer

140 Indoor tanning exposure history, tumor characteristics, demogra

141 This cohort study suggests that indoor tanning exposure, while known to increase risk of melano

142 ediction model incorporating MC1R and indoor tanning extends the work of other skin cancer risk predi

143 e association between average travel time to tanning facilities and county-level melanoma incidence r

144 Of the 125 colleges, 48.0% had indoor tanning facilities either on campus or in off-campus hou

145 policy aimed at decreasing access to indoor tanning facilities has the potential to reduce melanoma

146 Presence of tanning facilities in off-campus housing was significant

147 Frequency of indoor tanning facilities on college campus and in off-campus h

148 Presence of on-campus tanning facilities was significantly associated with enr

149 1-minute increase in average travel time to tanning facilities within 30 minutes travel time thresho

150 nt association between ever-use of an indoor tanning facility and an increased risk of basal cell car

151 icularly strong among those who first used a tanning facility in early adulthood.

152 As of August 2012, 13 states had no tanning facility statute or regulation for minors.

153 yacetone, the browning ingredient in sunless tanning formulations, reacts with amino acids in the out

154 To examine the association between indoor tanning frequency and behaviors related to skin cancer p

155 e: To examine the association between indoor tanning frequency and behaviors related to skin cancer p

156 terature exist in young adults and by indoor tanning frequency.

157 Despite declines in the prevalence of indoor tanning from 2009 to 2015 among high school students nat

158 Examination of subscales across the 3 indoor tanning groups also revealed significant (P < .001) diff

159 le that by Smith et al. with MC1R and indoor tanning had an AUC of 0.69 (95% CI: 0.63, 0.75).

160 hree-quarters of those who engaged in indoor tanning had experienced at least 1 sunburn.

161 Although indoor tanning has been suggested to be more common among sexua

162 Teenage use of indoor tanning has reached epidemic proportions.

163 ears or older, with 31.5% engaging in indoor tanning in 2011, and among non-Hispanic white female stu

164 male students, with 29.3% engaging in indoor tanning in 2011.

165 elanoma risk and examined the role of indoor tanning in age at melanoma diagnosis.

166 icon (r-bursicon) heterodimer led to cuticle tanning in both species.

167 e used to summarize the prevalence of indoor tanning in different age categories.

168 e stimulation of cAMP signaling in vitro and tanning in neck-ligated blowflies.

169 olleges had the highest prevalence of indoor tanning in off-campus housing facilities (67.7%).

170 asizes the value of both genotype and indoor tanning in skin cancer risk prediction in young people,

171 n treatments produced less erythema and more tanning in skin type IV.

172 est a potential mechanism for differences in tanning in subjects with different skin types.

173 upporting the notion that yellowing precedes tanning in the aging process, which is paralleled by fra

174 Prevalence of indoor tanning in the past year from 2009 to 2015 and its assoc

175 ion proportional attributable risk of indoor tanning in the United States, Europe, and Australia for

176 anoma cases each year attributable to indoor tanning in the United States, Europe, and Australia.

177 ng catalyze larval, pupal, and adult cuticle tanning in Tribolium.

178 complex belief systems that underlie indoor tanning in young women is a crucial first step in develo

179 d hMC5R, and increases pigmentation (sunless tanning) in a cultured, three-dimensional skin model.

180 nburn was not associated with melanoma after tanning inability was adjusted for.

181 complex sets of beliefs that underlie indoor tanning, including positive (motivational) and negative

182 ed by a powerful special interest group: the tanning industry.

183 d linear regression to examine age of indoor tanning initiation in relation to age at diagnosis.

184 Indoor tanning is a known carcinogen, but the scope of exposure

185 Indoor tanning is a likely factor for the steeper increase in m

186 Indoor tanning is associated with an increased risk of skin can

187 Indoor tanning is associated with increased risk of melanoma, b

188 Indoor tanning is common among high school students.

189 Exposure to indoor tanning is common in Western countries, especially among

190 Ultraviolet-light (UV)-induced tanning is defective in numerous 'fair-skinned' individu

191 lnerability to the harmful effects of indoor tanning is greater at a younger age.

192 Skin tanning is one such dynamic response that maintains geno

193 Tanning is one such mechanism in humans, but tanning onl

194 The data further suggest that tanning is part of a p53-mediated adaptive response of m

195 Indoor tanning is prevalent among young adults and women and is

196 Importance: Indoor tanning is prevalent among young adults and women and is

197 ic can be expected to continue unless indoor tanning is restricted and reduced.

198 Indoor tanning is widespread among young adults in the United S

199 irradiation from such artificial sources as tanning lamps can result in severe pain and inflammation

200 To grade each tanning law, we developed a uniform scoring system with

201 onsistencies that exist among states' indoor tanning laws.

202 us WNT16 for physical measures, and the skin tanning locus MC1R and smoking behaviour locus CHRNA3 fo

203 he body warm, provides information about the tanning materials and techniques.

204 suggests that regular or early use of indoor tanning may increase melanoma risk.

205 P < .001) and reported more frequent indoor tanning (median number of sessions, 100 vs 40, P < .001)

206 yperpigmentary conditions in a guinea pig UV-tanning model.

207 ase in melanin production (commonly known as tanning) occurs is not well understood.

208 ) is typically followed by the expansion and tanning of a new one.

209 istologically, whereas ultraviolet B-induced tanning of light-skinned swine was inhibited using these

210 ht on the immediate pigmentation and delayed tanning of melanocompetent skin; the results were compar

211 nal molt, coordinates the plasticization and tanning of the initially folded wings with behaviors tha

212 cyte-stimulating hormone, is known to induce tanning of the skin.

213 It triggers the sclerotization (tanning) of the insect cuticle.

214 Reducing the availability of indoor tanning on and around college campuses is an important p

215 olleges had the highest prevalence of indoor tanning on campus (26.9%), whereas Southern colleges had

216 d specifically focus on the impact of indoor tanning on children.

217 Tanning is one such mechanism in humans, but tanning only occurs post-exposure to UVR.

218 Cuticle tanning (or sclerotization and pigmentation) in inverteb

219 A comprehensive scale assessing indoor tanning outcome expectations was developed.

220 58.4%) of those who did not engage in indoor tanning (P < .001).

221 f industrial applications, including leather tanning, paper production, textile dyeing, and as colora

222 Modulators of the UV-tanning pathway include sunscreen agents, melanocortin 1

223 This result gives clues on the tanning phenomenon carried out by polyphenols on nitroge

224 Moreover, women who started indoor tanning prior to 30 years of age were 2.2 years (95% CI:

225 ues about the culture that created it, since tanning processes are often specific to certain indigeno

226 Dihydroxyacetone (DHA), found in sunless tanning products and electronic cigarette aerosol, induc

227 seases) and cosmeceutically (e.g., to design tanning products with potential to reduce skin cancer ri

228 less tanning" agent dihydroxyacetone in self-tanning products.

229 Here it is shown that, in addition to tanning, pTpT induces a second photoprotective response,

230 uded 25,861 students who answered the indoor tanning question.

231 e participants' responses to the burning and tanning questions could not be classified using standard

232 es increased with skin types associated with tanning rather than burning, although trend analysis sho

233 en the timing of when women initiated indoor tanning relative to diagnosis.

234 mong high school students nationwide, indoor tanning remains commonplace among certain subgroups, esp

235 than half of respondents engaging in indoor tanning reported frequent use of the devices.

236 tage genome-wide association study (GWAS) of tanning response after exposure to sunlight in over 9,00

237 wide signals identified in a recent GWAS for tanning response indicates that there is a substantial o

238 man pigment induction and modulation, as its tanning response is comparable to human tanning after ex

239 lor additive for the production of a sunless tanning response on skin.

240 melanocortin 1 receptor (MC1R) mediates the tanning response through induction of cAMP and downstrea

241 e physiological role of ATP in mediating the tanning response to solar UVR.

242 hese changes could be detected even before a tanning response was clinically visible.

243 role of intercellular MSH signalling in the tanning response, and suggest a clinical strategy for to

244 after ultraviolet irradiation as part of the tanning response, the major recognized photoprotective r

245 to UV irradiation as part of the UV-induced tanning response, we show that while the microphthalmia-

246 pathologic pigmentation and thus mimics the tanning response.

247 ion are shown to involve p53 "mimicking" the tanning response.

248 t mice, is associated with absence of the UV-tanning response.

249 ic factors influencing skin pigmentation and tanning response.

250 nd keratinocytes to stimulate the protective tanning response.

251 ator assessment using sun burning and/or sun tanning responses, ethnicity, hair, and eye color.

252 radiation dermal insult and subsequent skin tanning, result in a shift in expression from MC1R in fa

253 dicted weakened AHR binding to the risk/poor-tanning rs117132860-A allele, and allele-preferential AH

254 The availability of tanning salons on or near college campuses has not been

255 contacted them by telephone inquiring about tanning services.

256 creased with increasing cumulative number of tanning sessions (for highest tertile of use vs. never u

257 iation, and most of the output of artificial tanning sources.

258 Sunbeds were mainly used in tanning studios (74.9%), and many users had never been a

259 which may also provide information about the tanning technique and aging behavior.

260 ported higher rates of sunbathing and indoor tanning than Spanish-acculturated Hispanics.

261 of skin cancer cases attributable to indoor tanning, these findings highlight a major public health

262 nce intervals for the relationship of indoor tanning to melanoma risk and linear regression to examin

263 these trends could be due to greater indoor tanning use among younger women.

264 Artificial tanning use is prevalent among adolescent girls and like

265 ry, eye color, hair color, and likeliness of tanning versus burning at a young age.

266 Among female and male students, indoor tanning was associated with other risk-taking behaviors,

267 In 2015, indoor tanning was associated with sunburn in the adjusted mode

268 Indoor tanning was available on campus in 12.0% of colleges and

269 The prevalence of indoor tanning was greater among female, older, and non-Hispani

270 Indoor tanning was highest among female students aged 18 years

271 Development of facultative pigmentation (tanning) was important to populations settling between r

272 lvement of these types of enzymes in cuticle tanning, we performed RNA interference experiments to de

273 Records reporting a prevalence of indoor tanning were eligible for inclusion.

274 alence of indoor tanning and frequent indoor tanning were examined as well as their association with

275 Decreases in indoor tanning were found among male (from 6.7% in 2009 to 4.0%

276 The main motivations for tanning were relaxation and increased attractiveness.

277 ant bursicon induces both wing expansion and tanning, whereas synthetic eclosion hormone induces only

278 and least negative perceptions about indoor tanning, while nontanners had the most negative and leas

279 ne polygenic risk scores (PRSs) for smoking, tanning, white blood cell counts, and educational attain

280 es of bursicon actions in regulating cuticle tanning, wing expansion, and as yet unknown functions.

281 We discuss indoor tanning, with special emphasis on the potential addictiv

282 me or always when out in the sun; any indoor tanning within the last year; any TBSE ever.