ライフサイエンスコーパス: tap water

1 +/- 0.2 versus 4.1 +/- 0.2 mEq/L in rats on tap water).

2 strogenic activity was found in the filtered tap water.

3 Elk River and 15% of the state population's tap water.

4 nd also to maintain consumers' confidence in tap water.

5 ed to the determination of zinc in foods and tap water.

6 in neighbourhoods having a higher access to tap water.

7 g(2+), most common heavy metal ions found in tap water.

8 ing to the complexity of the ions present in tap water.

9 etection (LOD) was determined to be 1 muM in tap water.

10 in pools were much higher than in the input tap water.

11 3.9 ng/L, respectively, but not in the input tap water.

12 to grow in fluoride concentrations found in tap water.

13 rent from the DBP concentrations in the cold tap water.

14 using various bacterial DNAs in drinking and tap water.

15 LC-ICPMS/MS in Austrian surface, ground, and tap water.

16 four times higher than that found in regular tap water.

17 ion to determine the risk of Q fever through tap water.

18 he determination of Hg(2+) concentrations in tap water.

19 onmental samples, such as, serum, urine, and tap water.

20 ne liposomes and produced photochemically in tap water.

21 er, simulated water reference materials, and tap water.

22 of gastrointestinal illness attributable to tap water.

23 13 mg x kg(-1) x d(-1) in drinking water) or tap water.

24 000 microplastics for those who consume only tap water.

25 ing water, while the control group was given tap water.

26 es of 80-127% from human urine and canal and tap water.

27 led water as well as low levels of iodate in tap water.

28 nary protein excretion as rats that received tap water.

29 nasogastric tube, followed by 5 to 10 mL of tap water.

30 h the strongest reported odor intensities in tap water.

31 or 2 consecutive days, followed by 2 days of tap water.

32 e arsenic could reduce its exposure risks in tap water.

33 e release of nanoparticulate silver into the tap water.

34 ormation, and dissolved Pb concentrations in tap water.

35 ter pollutant 17beta-estradiol in buffer and tap water.

36 mixing the medication, activated carbon, and tap water.

37 mydomonas reinhardtii algal cells (algae) in tap water.

38 ective and is able to quantify diclofenac in tap water.

39 ea americana), were identically labeled with tap water.

40 t affected by the presence of common ions in tap water.

41 outbreak of M. abscessus linked to hospital tap water.

42 and approximately 60-90% for purged AOX from tap water.

43 mutagenic, respectively, than corresponding tap waters.

44 ment brought samples more closely similar to tap waters.

45 s higher than its concentration in the input tap water (1-6 ng/L).

46 alth Organization-permitted level of lead in tap water (10 ppb; WHO, 2017), and fifteen times lower t

47 were acutely rehydrated by giving access to tap water 2 h before experiments, inhibition of the PVN

48 spectrometry-based method to detect ricin in tap water, 2% milk, apple juice, and orange juice.

49 Whilst washing with the control tap water (28mug/L As) reduced the concentration of As i

50 Flushing reduced tap water 4-methylcyclohexanemethanol (4-MCHM) concentra

51 lar NaCl (500 mosmol l(-1)), 27 responded to tap water (5 mosmol l(-1)) and 20 and 19 responded to ma

52 Among samples of hospital ice and tap water, 63% were positive for RGM, 50% of which were

53 detect low concentrations of VX in preserved tap water 91 days after spiking suggests applicability o

54 In tap water, a low limit of detection of 0.1 nM for ENRO w

55 ations were estimated during pregnancy using tap water analyses and modeling.

56 d to triplicate 1 L samples of a chlorinated tap water and a chlorinated indoor pool water.

57 mally distributed chromium concentrations in tap water and calculating MEM confidence intervals for t

58 Bacteriophages MS2 were spiked in tap water and concentrated with the new CUF-MAF concentr

59 than 100 cells/mm3, the association between tap water and cryptosporidiosis was even stronger (odds

60 has been applied for the analysis of spiked tap water and fish samples showing good recovery percent

61 Optimized method was applied to tap water and food samples after microwave digestion met

62 Tap water and HOC spike in Suwannee River NOM were used

63 real water samples was demonstrated in local tap water and in effluents of sewage plants.

64 is observed between reduced availability of tap water and increased incidence of suspected cholera i

65 For (90)Sr determination, tap water and milk powder samples were distributed among

66 7 x 10(-8) and 9.04 +/- 0.45 x 10(-9) in the tap water and milk powder samples, respectively.

67 time to determine FQs in real samples, i.e. tap water and milk, without any prior concentration step

68 fied MBs, and E. coli could be quantified in tap water and milk.

69 en to detect analyte in real samples such as tap water and milk.

70 Using synthetic tap water and new lead pipes, we developed a set of lead

71 his system is capable of detecting Hg(2+) in tap water and pond water.

72 ian arsenic concentrations measured in NHBCS tap water and previously published for formula powder, f

73 r was checked by the BMK detection in spiked tap water and real water samples.

74 the real sample analysis of Hg(2+) in fish, tap water and river water.

75 Samples of pure Cu and Fe oxidized in tap water and salty water, respectively, were studied in

76 earers should avoid exposing their lenses to tap water and should empty their cases and use fresh len

77 WGS and SNP analyses identified the tap water and the bottle of graywash tattoo ink as the s

78 died whether this interaction could occur in tap water and thus confer enteric viruses protection aga

79 enses for orthokeratology, storing lenses in tap water and topping off remained significant exposures

80 Arsenic concentration in household tap water and urine samples were measured using inductiv

81 Legionella, and Escherichia coli O157:H7 in tap water and wastewater.

82 ials fed either chlorinated or chloraminated tap water and were sampled at water ages ranging from 1

83 We measured THM4 and 21 unregulated DBPs in tap waters and laboratory-treated source waters from two

84 hical distributions of the isotope ratios of tap waters and the assumption of a "continental supermar

85 icated bottle of graywash tattoo ink, 2 from tap water, and 4 from skin biopsies) were indistinguisha

86 water were similar to the TCAA levels in the tap water, and a slight reduction was observed after the

87 t reaction matrices such as distilled water, tap water, and different bacterial growth media were tes

88 e water microbiology was most divergent from tap water, and each step of treatment brought samples mo

89 was effectively used to detect ERY in serum, tap water, and milk samples with exceptional sensitivity

90 been found to effectively capture lead from tap water, and partnered with X-ray fluorescence (XRF) s

91 uantitatively determine NG and DNAN in soil, tap water, and river water by using ultrafast LC-MS/MS.

92 of fruit-flavored drinks, the alkalinity of tap water, and the carboxylate content of nanocellulose

93 al water sampled from an industrial area and tap water, and this methodology was compared to stir-bar

94 lic water pipe network, individual household tap water, and urinary THM measurements.

95 trasonic dental scaler units with the use of tap water as a control.

96 Clinicians should be aware of municipal tap water as a potential cause of methemoglobinemia and

97 r frequency, a study of the role of domestic tap water as a potential source of AK was undertaken.

98 s lower when using diluted MFT prepared with tap water as opposed to simulated oil sands process wate

99 nriched water whereas the other set received tap water as the mobile phase water.

100 egarding residential history, consumption of tap water at home, and dietary intake during the pericon

101 sensor performance was firstly examined with tap water at varying DO levels.

102 ies with endemic NTM should consider similar tap water avoidance and engineering strategies to decrea

103 ne the bioaccessibility of Pb particles from tap water, based on the Relative Bioaccessibility Leachi

104 of water (groundwater, artificial seawater, tap water, bay water) indicated that the method has pote

105 hod has been validated using spiked samples (tap water, blood serum, and saliva) and bacteria media (

106 he estimated fraction of AGI attributable to tap-water-borne viruses was between 6% and 22%, dependin

107 ticulate lead (Pb) levels can be measured in tap water, but the hazard linked to particulate Pb inges

108 Tap water can reflect integrated features of regional hy

109 ed for detection Hg(2+) ions from samples of tap waters, carp and saltwater fishes with satisfactory

110 In the infusion brewed with tap water, catechins appeared to be epimerisation from t

111 he spill to understand resident perceptions, tap water chemical levels, and premise plumbing flushing

112 locations, comparisons of PFASs in community tap water collected in the period 2013-2016 with samples

113 centrations and several exposure indicators (tap water concentration, water-use activities, multirout

114 As expected based on variable tap water concentrations and toxicokinetic properties, t

115 Tap water concentrations were measured in the distributi

116 Adenoviruses were common, but tap-water concentrations were low and not positively ass

117 Home tap water consumed as a beverage and dietary supplement

118 ate, total vitamin C intake, and quantity of tap water consumed.

119 Tap water consumption is associated with GII in malfunct

120 If tap water consumption rates gradually decreased over tim

121 d outperformed the Bayesian method if actual tap water consumption rates were systematically overesti

122 iewed published studies that compared direct tap water consumption to consumption of tap water re-tre

123 ap water for arsenic, which we combined with tap water consumption to estimate arsenic exposure throu

124 Tap water consumption was not related to gastrointestina

125 ion was stronger among men with above-median tap water consumption.

126 The process of boiling tap water (containing HAAs) for the preparation of powde

127 e sensors are placed in simulated and actual tap water contaminated by heavy metals.

128 5% iodine water, (3) 0.05% MMI water or, (4) tap water (controls).

129 Three real water samples including tap water, creek water, and river water were analyzed an

130 409 women in early pregnancy to assess their tap water DBP concentrations, water use, other risk fact

131 reen tea leaves were infused separately with tap water, deionised water, spring water, reverse osmosi

132 ntration down to 0.1mg/L is detected in PBS, tap water, deionized water, and bottled water.

133 Drinking or tap water did not show bioactive or toxic compounds, whi

134 timating levels of trihalomethanes (THMs) in tap water during pregnancy and maternal water use and by

135 BTHM concentrations in residential tap water during pregnancy ranged from 0.06 to 7.1 mug/L

136 stems can contribute to Cr(VI) occurrence in tap water, especially in the presence of a trace level o

137 We eliminated tap water exposure to the aerodigestive tract among high

138 loped colitis (F0(DSS)), or non-supplemented tap water (F0(Ctrl)) and hence remained healthy, and of

139 Compared to controls drinking tap water, fetal weight was always reduced by corticoste

140 rious ambient motions, including light wind, tap water flow and normal body movement.

141 stered 5% dextran sulfate (DSS) dissolved in tap water for 5 days followed by a 5-day recovery period

142 1), BR n = 8) or untreated (control, n = 11) tap water for 5 days.

143 We also tested women's home tap water for arsenic, which we combined with tap water

144 d using legacy acid mine drainage liquid and tap water for qualitative and quantitative detection of

145 Group 2 rats (n = 25) received tap water for the same period and served as the control

146 THM concentrations in blood and residential tap water from 150 postpartum women from three U.S. loca

147 used identical methods to collect samples of tap water from 2 cities and measured their levels of cal

148 ath associated with culturable N. fowleri in tap water from a US treated drinking water system.

149 tributable to consuming fecally contaminated tap water from an IWS.

150 The measurements included tap water from different sampling days and from four dif

151 1)) and lead (>5 mug L(-1)) were detected in tap water from some buildings.

152 HgR vaccine was reconstituted in bottled and tap waters from the United States and Europe, and viabil

153 tea also generated H(2)O(2); tea prepared on tap water generated significantly more H(2)O(2) than tea

154 ples (in this case, streamwater, lake water, tap water, groundwater, and mineral water).

155 days of fermentation, the pH of the filtered tap water hard kombucha (TWHK) and deep ocean water hard

156 le keeping a very good limit of detection in tap water, i.e. 0.8ppb.

157 ed for consumption of 0.5 M NaCl solution or tap water in a 2-bottle choice test.

158 linear range of 9-1800 nM (R(2) = 0.982) and tap water in a linear range of 0.18-180 nM (R(2) = 0.99)

159 Calcium levels in the tap water in Beijing were 15-fold higher than in Framing

160 in the UK and supports advice to avoid using tap water in contact lens care routines.

161 s of cryptosporidiosis; however, the role of tap water in endemic disease is unclear.

162 These findings suggest that tap water in high income countries could serve as an imp

163 tive determination of Al(III) and Fe(III) in tap water in the subppb level.

164 ty analysis to examine the potential role of tap water in the transmission of endemic C. parvum infec

165 t % MFT, prepared by diluting 35 wt % MFT in tap water, in terms of the initial settling rate (ISR),

166 His only reported water exposure was tap water; in particular, tap water that was used to sup

167 is AuNPs based technology in minced beef and tap water indicates the possibility of its using in vari

168 red idiosyncratically at high levels in some tap waters, indicating distribution and/or premise plumb

169 imate plasma concentrations corresponding to tap water intake of PFAS.

170 Tap water iodine concentrations were low or undetectable

171 Urinary iodine concentrations and tap water iodine concentrations were measured in June-Ju

172 rofiles were found for the clinical and home tap water isolates.

173 determine the similarity between corneal and tap water isolates.

174 Test results obtained with tap water, lake water and milk samples show that assay p

175 In rats that drank tap water, left kidney GFR averaged (in microliter/min p

176 (1) Results yielded the Tap Water Line in China is delta(2)H = 7.72 delta(18)O +

177 orrected data with precisions of SD-(delta D Tap Water < 34/1000 and accuracy within 11/1000.

178 the spike and recovery trials with seawater, tap water, mineral water, and alcoholic beverages and by

179 We measured arsenic in home tap water (n = 874), urine from 6-week-old infants (n =

180 etected in surface waters and in Barcelona's tap water (NE Spain) which caused consumer complaints.

181 ction (qPCR)-measured enteric viruses in the tap water of 14 Wisconsin communities supplied by nondis

182 s, whereas Ag-b-NPs could be detected in the tap water of two buildings.

183 omochloromethane) were measured in blood and tap water of U.S. adults in the National Health and Nutr

184 lly, 53 mug of copper was released per liter tap water on average.

185 hat O(2)-reducing EABs can grow in unamended tap water on carbon electrodes at + 0.2 V vs. Ag/AgCl.

186 somal dominant PKD were provided with either tap water or 55 mM K3citrate/67 mM citric acid solution

187 so highly selective and can be used in plain tap water or bottled water to test fluoridation levels.

188 Dams drank either tap water or water containing MMI.

189 nses (OR, 8.00; P = 0.04), storing lenses in tap water (OR, 16.00; P = 0.001), and topping off contac

190 g a set of liquid water samples with delta D Tap Water over the range of 39-407/1000 with uncorrected

191 a combination of the 3 tastants, or placebo (tap water) over a period of 60 min.

192 size-selective quantification of Ag-b-NPs in tap water passing through copper pipes.

193 als who consumed [Formula: see text] cups of tap water per day.

194 Tap water perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluoronon

195 rinking water (pH 2.5-2.9) instead of normal tap water (pH 8.4) for several generations, the motor sk

196 when ingested with 16 oz of room temperature tap water, phenylpropanolamine increased SBP by 82+/-2 m

197 Consumers assess their tap water primarily by its taste, odor, and appearance.

198 The analysis of spiked tap water proved the biosensor capability to be used as

199 The biosensor's performance in tap water proves that its detection capability is unaffe

200 levels in environmental water samples (i.e., tap water, rainwater, and seawater) with no sample prepa

201 rect tap water consumption to consumption of tap water re-treated at the point of use (POU) and studi

202 rk City population, the calculated number of tap-water-related cases per year in the non-AIDS subgrou

203 L(-1) in orange juice and 164.2 fg mL(-1) in tap water, respectively, demonstrating at least two orde

204 ained when the platforms in spiked river and tap water, respectively, were evaluated.

205 bly allows to detect PA in real samples like tap water, river water and matchstick.

206 ) and Hg(2+) in environmental water samples (tap water, river water, and lake water).

207 eadspace method was applied to analysis of a tap water sample and a monitoring well sample from a gas

208 Finally, a tap water sample is analyzed for the anions in this stud

209 eloped approach was used to analyze a spiked tap water sample, with good measured recoveries (69-119%

210 in a standard diet, as well as a chlorinated tap water sample.

211 We screened coliform-positive tap water samples (n = 483) from public and private wate

212 pathogen detection from rivers, canals, and tap water samples after simple water pretreatment.

213 reover, the aptasensor was applied in spiked tap water samples and showed good recovery percentages.

214 rovides a direct way to determine mercury in tap water samples at the parts-per-trillion level.

215 e measured concentrations of 15 PFAS in home tap water samples collected in 1989-1990 from 225 partic

216 e rapid measurement of Fe(3+) in mineral and tap water samples demonstrating the real-world applicati

217 780 tap water samples have been collected from 95 cities acr

218 Mineral, spring and tap water samples of different geographical origins (7 c

219 The analytical recoveries from tap water samples of the six regulated PAH varied from 8

220 silver and 25 ng of Ag-b-NPs were present in tap water samples per liter, which resulted in an NP pro

221 Concentrations in tap water samples ranged from 0.07 mug/L to 11.5 mug/L w

222 The stability of VX was determined in five tap water samples representing a range of water quality

223 obtained in buffer solution, minced beef and tap water samples respectively, with a broad detection r

224 he method is demonstrated with deionized and tap water samples spiked with carbamate insecticides.

225 Validation on tap water samples spiked with different concentrations o

226 tion plants from four European countries and tap water samples taken in six countries.

227 00 ng/L, and relative standard deviations in tap water samples were mostly between 0.2 and 30%.

228 preconcentrate target analytes from diluted tap water samples with an enrichment factor of around 80

229 Of tap water samples, 97% showed fecal coliform contaminati

230 In preserved tap water samples, VX recovery was between 81 and 92% of

231 ifying P. aeruginosa and P. fluorescens from tap water samples, which are both opportunistic pathogen

232 neous electroanalysis of three FQs in spiked tap water samples, with recovery values remarkably close

233 he biosensor may be used to detect Cu(2+) in tap water samples.

234 ation of Pb(2+) was successfully measured in tap water samples.

235 speciation analysis of arsenic in river and tap water samples.

236 tion of MC-LR in real samples like serum and tap water samples.

237 ely determined for the first time in 11 real tap water samples.

238 onding dipeptides were detected in authentic tap water samples.

239 n step during drinking water production, all tap waters samples, and two surface waters used for drin

240 n of fluoride in various matrixes, including tap water, seawater, and urine.

241 The sensor was calibrated and tested with tap water, sewage contaminated water, marine water, long

242 resonator is able to detect ZnO NWs in real tap water, showing the potential as ZnO NWs screening pl

243 ite 3, 57%) but varied less markedly than in tap water (site 1, 35%; site 2, 75%; site 3, 68%).

244 national-scale survey of Stable Isotopes in Tap Water (SITW) across China.

245 PAC-Ti(4)O(7) REM was tested with tap water spiked with 0.11 mg L(-1) of nine different HA

246 extracts from soil, hamburger, and finished tap water spiked with VX.

247 impact consumer confidence and perception of tap water still occur and may increase.

248 lected from 3 urban source waters (municipal tap water, streamwater, and wastewater treatment facilit

249 gly, M. salmoniphilum-like was isolated from tap water suggesting that it can be present in the envir

250 s low in Uvira, improving the reliability of tap water supply may substantially reduce the incidence

251 d cholera cases attributable to a suboptimal tap water supply reached 23.2% of total admissions (95%

252 Following a day without tap water supply, the suspected cholera incidence rate i

253 National Children's Study (NCS), about 2000 tap water, surface wipe, and air samples were collected

254 e within the homes varied significantly with tap water temperature and location: 19 (76%) of 25 bathr

255 epimerisation may take place more readily in tap water than in distilled water owing to the complexit

256 isulfides was significantly higher in common tap water than in ultrapure water.

257 water exposure was tap water; in particular, tap water that was used to supply water to a lawn water

258 For the tap water, the digestion efficiency was 47.2% (+/-11.1%

259 Specifically, for a 2 L volume of tap water, the linear range of detection was found to be

260 hough similar conditions are recommended for tap water, this resulted in a tremendous reduction in bo

261 Household tap water THM concentrations ranged between 3-129 mug L(

262 otal exposure metric than did ingestion, but tap water THM concentrations were more predictive of blo

263 U)/ml, were reduced 3- to 5-fold by flushing tap water through the units, but they returned after uni

264 Placebo-treated rats were then given tap water to drink ad libitum, and DOCA-treated rats rec

265 the same surgical procedures but were given tap water to drink.

266 tation (+/+) were fed AIN-76A diet and given tap water to drink.

267 Modeled median contributions of tap water to measured plasma concentrations were: PFOA 1

268 This study estimates the RSC of tap water to overall PFAS exposure among members of the

269 Using tap water to store RGP lenses and topping off solution i

270 f mercuric ions was 0.1 parts per billion in tap water (twenty times lesser than the Environment prot

271 ionized water, commercial bottled water, and tap water under a rotating electrode configuration.

272 Their only reported water exposures were tap water used for household activities, including regul

273 inadequate clearance of chloramine from the tap water used for portable dialysis.

274 ID) for Cd(2+) determination in drinking and tap waters using the Cd-EDTA-BSA-AuNP conjugate as signa

275 Male Sprague-Dawley rats received tap water (vehicle) and 30 mM L-buthionine sulfoximine (

276 ed a significant association between GII and tap water versus POU-treated water consumption (IDR = 1.

277 tings with network malfunction, consumers of tap water versus POU-treated water had increased GII [in

278 of nonregulated DBPs were observed after the tap water was heated for 24 h.

279 nd a slight reduction was observed after the tap water was heated for 24 h.

280 Tap water was less contaminated; any restrictions for ta

281 Beginning in 1995, a sample of tap water was taken from the participants' homes; a tota

282 s in the various natural waters (lake water, tap water, waste water with boric acid, waste water with

283 The SS-LPME method was applied to tap water, well water, lake water, medical wastewater an

284 with low intakes, high intakes of plain and tap water were associated with lower odds of high BPA co

285 was less contaminated; any restrictions for tap water were canceled by April 1, 2011.

286 ontrol study, persons who drank any unboiled tap water were four times more likely than persons who d

287 ted with moistening of culturette swabs with tap water were isolated from a single clinic before coll

288 neighbourhoods with a higher consumption of tap water were more affected by water supply interruptio

289 BQs (0.25 nmol L(-1)) in both pure water and tap water were transformed to other products after UV254

290 thout interferences of pH variations, and in tap water where unknown interferences are present.

291 of detection of 2 x 10(4) CFU/mL in milk or tap water, which compares well with those of state-of-th

292 along with the local shallow groundwater and tap water, which is the treated deep groundwater, and in

293 5 different samples of both minced beef and tap water with 10(3) and 10(4) CFU/mL were 94.7 and 90.4

294 Heating of the tap water with low pH led to a more significant increase

295 For tap water with lower water ages, there were significant

296 ater supplemented with NH(4)(+) (AN+), or by tap water with NO(3)(-) and NH(4)(+) added (FN+), there

297 ted into a device for analysis of nitrate in tap water with standard addition as a single run and mul

298 rent sources (river, lake, coastal water and tap water) with a detection limit of 0.2mg/L - compared

299 (2-nitrophenol and 2,4,6-trichlorophenol) in tap water, with no sample preparation steps.

300 e, up to 38% of the silver mass in products; tap water yielded the lowest amount, </=1.5%.