コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 patients were commenced on entecavir and/or tenofovir.
2 mL/min and sensitivity to emtricitabine and tenofovir.
3 ir, emtricitabine, tenofovir alafenamide, or tenofovir.
4 n nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor tenofovir.
5 de reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) is tenofovir.
6 locations were tested for emtricitabine and tenofovir.
7 cistat (150 mg), emtricitabine (200 mg), and tenofovir alafenamide (10 mg) daily or continued therapy
8 to receive either emtricitabine (200 mg) and tenofovir alafenamide (25 mg) tablets daily, with matche
9 udy using darunavir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (D/C/F/TAF) 800/150/200/10 mg is a
10 udy using darunavir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (D/C/F/TAF) 800/150/200/10 mg is a
11 elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide (n=111 [66%]) or tenofovir disopro
12 omly assigned and received emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide (n=2694) or emtricitabine and teno
13 assigned to bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide (n=316) or dolutegravir, abacavir,
14 potency of subcutaneous (SubQ) administrated tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) and emtricitabine (FTC) load
15 and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) have also proved effective i
16 ing tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) with tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) improves renal tubular marke
17 udy assessed the penetration and efficacy of tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) in the male genital tract (M
19 d nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) was decreased for some of th
20 d from monomers that incorporate an ARV drug tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) with degradable linkers that
21 that tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and tenofovir alafenamide (TAF), drugs with excellent safety
24 soproxil fumarate (TDF)/emtricitabine (FTC), tenofovir alafenamide (TAF)/FTC, abacavir (ABC)/lamivudi
25 cobicistat 150 mg, emtricitabine 200 mg, and tenofovir alafenamide 10 mg, which was taken once per da
26 bictegravir 50 mg, emtricitabine 200 mg, and tenofovir alafenamide 25 mg (the bictegravir group) or c
27 bictegravir 50 mg, emtricitabine 200 mg, and tenofovir alafenamide 25 mg (the bictegravir group) or d
28 with co-formulated emtricitabine 200 mg and tenofovir alafenamide 25 mg (the dolutegravir group), ea
29 ed to once-daily oral fixed-dose combination tenofovir alafenamide 25 mg and emtricitabine 200 mg, an
30 bictegravir 50 mg, emtricitabine 200 mg, and tenofovir alafenamide 25 mg or coformulated dolutegravir
31 bictegravir 50 mg, emtricitabine 200 mg, and tenofovir alafenamide 25 mg, or coformulated dolutegravi
34 l development include novel oral agents (eg, tenofovir alafenamide and islatravir [also known as MK-8
35 egravir co-formulated with emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide as a fixed-dose combination is rec
36 t the use of bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide as a safe, well tolerated, and dur
37 data support bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide as a safe, well tolerated, and dur
38 data support bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide as a safe, well tolerated, and dur
40 erability of bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide compared with co-formulated dolute
41 erability of bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide compared with dolutegravir plus co
42 contrast, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and tenofovir alafenamide conferred potentially cardioprotec
43 nt (327 with bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide fixed-dose combination [bictegravi
44 Switching to rilpivirine, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide from efavirenz, emtricitabine, and
48 seven participants in the emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide group (0.16 infections per 100 per
49 325 in the dolutegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide group (difference -1.9%, -7.8 to 3
51 elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide group and -0.10% (3.39) in the ten
52 elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide group and -0.73% (3.21) in the ten
53 er mL in the bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide group and 265 (84%) of 315 in the
54 er mL in the bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide group and 273 (84%) of 325 in the
55 elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide group and one (2%) participant in
56 elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide group did not receive treatment an
57 pants in the bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide group versus five (2%) of 315 in t
58 f 2694 participants in the emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide group vs 49 [2%] of 2693 participa
59 h matched placebo tablets (emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide group), or emtricitabine (200 mg)
60 elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide group; and bronchitis (six [11%]),
61 elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide group; and one (2%) in the tenofov
63 rmulation of rilpivirine, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide has recently been approved, and we
64 ofovir disoproxil fumarate to one containing tenofovir alafenamide in participants aged 60 years and
65 elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide in virologically suppressed people
67 onsisting of bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide is recommended for treatment of HI
71 ted an elvitegravir-cobicistat-emtricitabine-tenofovir alafenamide single-tablet regimen for human im
72 tients given bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide than in those given dolutegravir,
74 contrast, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and tenofovir alafenamide treatment gave rise to greater pop
75 of darunavir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide versus continuing a regimen of boo
76 re prophylaxis (PrEP) with emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide versus emtricitabine and tenofovir
77 f 320 in the bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide versus six (2%) of 325 in the dolu
78 nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors, tenofovir alafenamide was associated with more weight ga
79 coformulated bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide was non-inferior to a dolutegravir
80 At week 144, bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide was non-inferior to both dolutegra
81 At week 96, bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide was non-inferior to dolutegravir,
82 0% had completed 96 weeks) emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide was non-inferior to emtricitabine
84 and either tenofovir disoproxil fumarate or tenofovir alafenamide), with a third regimen (efavirenz
86 dy 2 (327 to bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide, 325 to dolutegravir, emtricitabin
87 r with elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide, abacavir/dolutegravir/lamivudine,
88 dy 1 (314 to bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide, and 315 to dolutegravir, abacavir
89 1 participants were randomly assigned to the tenofovir alafenamide, emtricitabine, and dolutegravir g
91 eek 96, 276 (79%) of 351 participants in the tenofovir alafenamide, emtricitabine, and dolutegravir g
92 gain was substantial (7.1 kg [SD 7.4] in the tenofovir alafenamide, emtricitabine, and dolutegravir g
93 he clinically approved antivirals, including tenofovir alafenamide, emtricitabine, sofosbuvir, ledipa
94 tions with the backbone of emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide, might provide an advantage to pat
95 1) adults to bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide, or dolutegravir 50 mg given with
99 ty, while tenofovir disoproxil fumarate- and tenofovir alafenamide-treated cells and EMP displayed hi
105 i-log variability typical of biopsy data for tenofovir and other topical microbicides, results sugges
107 ally, we find that although viruses from the tenofovir arm were 2-fold less infectious, they replicat
108 hymidine analogue mutations, M184V/I and the tenofovir-associated DRMs K65R and K70E/Q/G/N/T accounte
109 tis B virus (HBV) coinfected adults starting tenofovir-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) in Zambia,
112 and other anaerobic bacteria, which depleted tenofovir by metabolism more rapidly than target cells c
114 quantified tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and tenofovir concentrations in cervicovaginal fluid, tenofo
115 ng adherence at week 24, the proportion with tenofovir concentrations in the hair reflecting at least
116 is delta virus (HDV) viral loads (VL) during tenofovir-containing antiretroviral therapy among patien
120 etion, and the primary adherence outcome was tenofovir diphosphate (TFV-DP) concentrations >=700 fmol
122 n differential accumulation of intracellular Tenofovir diphosphate (TFV-DP) in different cell types,
126 llowing daily oral PrEP (emtricitabine 200mg/tenofovir diphosphate 300mg) among pregnant and postpart
128 rvicovaginal fluid, tenofovir in plasma, and tenofovir diphosphate, the active metabolite, in cervica
130 ylaxis program for Kenyan women, we detected tenofovir-diphosphate in 61% (125/201) of randomly selec
131 ovir-induced toxicity in vitro and show that tenofovir-diphosphate incorporation by PrimPol is depend
133 The active metabolite of tenofovir prodrugs, tenofovir-diphosphate, inhibited the incorporation of dA
134 73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.56-0.96), tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (0.68, 95% CI 0.49-0.95),
135 Any plaque was negatively associated with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (0.71, 95% CI 0.51-0.99).
136 ee-drug regimen of dolutegravir (50 mg) plus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (300 mg) and emtricitabine
137 namide group), or emtricitabine (200 mg) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (300 mg) tablets daily, wi
139 similar to that seen with oral emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (94.0%; 55.1%-99.2%).
141 Background therapies were emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (FTC/TDF) in P007; abacavi
145 among participants receiving efavirenz with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (p=0.001) but not those re
146 enofovir prodrugs - TAF (TAF-based group) or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) (TDF-based group) -
147 a 3-arm randomized, pharmacokinetic study of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) 300 mg/emtricitabine
148 y randomized to the efavirenz /emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and dolutegravir/emt
150 the NAPs REP 2139 or REP 2165 combined with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and pegylated interf
151 ed drug combinations have been marketed, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and tenofovir alafen
153 ose DOR at 100 mg, lamivudine at 300 mg, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) at 300 mg (DOR/3TC/T
155 emtricitabine (FTC) resistance and increased tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) susceptibility.
157 d, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) use from 28 weeks ge
158 ravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine (E/C/F) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) who switched to E/C/
160 2a for 96 weeks and combination therapy with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) would increase hepat
162 s and hospital admission by use of the NRTIs tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)/emtricitabine (FTC),
164 0 mg; once-daily oral fixed-dose combination tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 300 mg and emtricitabine 2
165 or once-daily oral fixed-dose combination of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 300 mg, emtricitabine 200
166 ) ritonavir (RTV) or standard of care (SOC) (tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 300 mg, emtricitabine 200
167 AD from the DOR groups (DOR/lamivudine [3TC]/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate [TDF] or DOR [100 mg daily
168 ciated with noncalcified/mixed plaque, while tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and efavirenz were negativ
169 ry of Food and Drug Safety in Korea approved tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine (TDF/FTC
170 disoproxil fumarate monotherapy or combined tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine and whet
171 effect in a context that also includes oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine as an op
172 eness of the new product in addition to oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine as compa
173 tonavir-boosted atazanavir plus coformulated tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine once a d
174 acquisition, the protective efficacy of oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine relies o
175 ent film colour), and lamivudine tablets and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine tablets
178 iated with less renal and bone toxicity than tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and might improve the long
182 -six CHB patients who started treatment with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate at a public hospital in Et
184 inferior efficacy to daily emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for HIV prevention, and th
185 namide was non-inferior to emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for HIV prevention, as the
187 and 15 participants in the emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate group (0.34 infections per
188 r alafenamide group and -0.10% (3.39) in the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate group (between-group diffe
189 r alafenamide group and -0.73% (3.21) in the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate group (difference 2.04% [1
190 namide group and one (2%) participant in the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate group had an adverse event
195 lafenamide was superior to emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in all six prespecified bo
196 pen-label study of rilpivirine/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in ART-naive HIV controlle
197 ty, pharmacokinetics, and acceptability of a tenofovir disoproxil fumarate intravaginal ring used con
198 or the prevention of HIV infection with oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate monotherapy or combined te
199 reased risk of HIV infection, PrEP with oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate monotherapy or tenofovir d
200 transcriptase inhibitors: emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate or abacavir and lamivudine
201 ravir combined with emtricitabine and either tenofovir disoproxil fumarate or tenofovir alafenamide),
204 eived one dose of study drug and were on the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate regimen before screening w
206 days 14 and 28 compared with baseline in the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate ring group but not the pla
209 d finding of ulcerations is specific to this tenofovir disoproxil fumarate ring or generalisable to o
210 V negative were randomly assigned (3:1) to a tenofovir disoproxil fumarate ring or placebo ring.
211 ility of switching from a regimen containing tenofovir disoproxil fumarate to elvitegravir, cobicista
212 nsity of switching from a regimen containing tenofovir disoproxil fumarate to one containing tenofovi
213 d tenofovir alafenamide to emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate was established if the upp
214 afenamide from efavirenz, emtricitabine, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate was non-inferior in mainta
216 improved renal and bone safety compared with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate when used for HIV treatmen
217 n (efavirenz combined with emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate) previously recommended by
218 de was associated with more weight gain than tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, abacavir, or zidovudine.
219 ses of CAB LA, 6 received oral emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, and 10 were untreated.
221 citabine, and dolutegravir group, 351 to the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, emtricitabine, and dolute
222 group, 275 (78%) of 351 participants in the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, emtricitabine, and dolute
223 and dolutegravir group; 4.3 kg [6.7] in the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, emtricitabine, and dolute
224 dolutegravir group, and 2.3 kg [7.0] in the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, emtricitabine, and efavir
225 bine, and dolutegravir group, and 351 to the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, emtricitabine, and efavir
227 wer among infants exposed from conception to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, emtricitabine, and efavir
228 up, and 258 (74%) of 351 participants in the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, emtricitabine, and efavir
229 the antiretrovirals abacavir sulphate (ABC), tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, or tenofovir alafenamide.
230 al ring that releases the tenofovir prodrug, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, provided 100% protection
232 cells and EMP had greater TF activity, while tenofovir disoproxil fumarate- and tenofovir alafenamide
233 t the magnitude of benefit of PrEP with oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-based therapy to reduce th
234 copies per mL), aged 60 years or older, on a tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-containing regimen and wer
235 oninferior and potentially safer option than tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-emtricitabine (F/TDF) for
236 lights the importance of expanding access to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-sparing regimens in resour
243 phylaxis (PrEP) interventions worldwide, yet tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) fo
244 P utilization as the number of people taking tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine for HIV prev
245 ed ART-naive participants were randomized to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine plus atazana
246 s who lost bone mineral density (BMD) during tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine preexposure
247 tenofovir disoproxil fumarate monotherapy or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine was associat
248 HIV in Kampala, Uganda, and receiving daily tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/lamivudine were recruited.
249 enrollment, participants received daily oral tenofovir disoproxil fumurate and emtricitabine for HIV
250 e-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in the form of tenofovir-disoproxil-fumarate/emtricitabine is being imp
253 avir-boosted darunavir plus raltegravir plus tenofovir-emtricitabine or tenofovir plus lamivudine), a
255 dolutegravir (MONCAY trial), or to continue tenofovir/emtricitabine + a third agent or switch to ten
257 HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with oral tenofovir/emtricitabine is an effective means of decreas
258 pies/mL) in individuals prescribed primarily tenofovir/emtricitabine/efavirenz in rural KwaZulu-Natal
260 0.91-2.13), mostly on fixed-dose combination tenofovir/emtricitabine/efavirenz, presence of both nonn
261 ecommended for children aged 2-17 years, and tenofovir for those aged 12-18 years, a conservative app
263 erence up to 72 weeks, and concentrations of tenofovir in hair samples from individuals reporting HIV
264 ovir concentrations in cervicovaginal fluid, tenofovir in plasma, and tenofovir diphosphate, the acti
266 We established a possible role of PrimPol in tenofovir-induced toxicity in vitro and show that tenofo
267 h perspective, the benefits of transition to tenofovir, lamivudine, and dolutegravir for all substant
268 in all people on ART, including switching to tenofovir, lamivudine, and dolutegravir in those current
269 to be averted with use of a policy in which tenofovir, lamivudine, and dolutegravir is used in all p
272 ned viral failure on first-line therapy with tenofovir plus a cytosine analogue (lamivudine or emtric
273 r-boosted darunavir, raltegravir, and either tenofovir plus emtricitabine or tenofovir plus lamivudin
275 raltegravir plus tenofovir-emtricitabine or tenofovir plus lamivudine), and D (best available NRTIs
276 , and either tenofovir plus emtricitabine or tenofovir plus lamivudine), C (ritonavir-boosted darunav
278 eatment with DTG combined with either of two tenofovir prodrugs (TAF and TDF) showed noninferior effi
279 tricitabine (FTC) and DTG plus either of two tenofovir prodrugs - TAF (TAF-based group) or tenofovir
283 t-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) based-on tenofovir (TDF) and/or lamivudine (3TC) in a real-world
285 hepatitis B core antibody (qAnti-HBc) during tenofovir (TDF) treatment and assess their ability to pr
286 dine (3TC), and the nucleotide RTI inhibitor tenofovir (TDF), show efficacy in blocking K103 RT.
289 ained release profiles of the key metabolite tenofovir (TFV) in skin and plasma over a 50-day period.
290 n seminal plasma (SP) and blood plasma (BP), tenofovir (TFV) in SP and BP, and TFV-diphosphate (dp) i
293 otal plasma concentrations of EVG, TDF, TAF, tenofovir (TFV), and HIV RNA levels were measured at bas
295 ral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) based on tenofovir to HIV-negative pregnant and post-partum women
297 imPol-knockdown strain was hypersensitive to tenofovir treatment, indicating that PrimPol protects ag
300 inhibiting low dose infection with the drug tenofovir, which interferes with initial infection, and