コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ent domestications from their wild relative (teosinte).
2 ed selection in domesticated and wild maize (teosinte).
3 ent expression levels in maize compared with teosinte.
4 expression in inbred relative to outcrossed teosinte.
5 plant and ear architecture between maize and teosinte.
6 minance in maize compared to its progenitor, teosinte.
7 14 genotypes of the wild ancestor of maize, teosinte.
8 etween specific genes and trait variation in teosinte.
9 as potential targets of natural selection in teosinte.
10 ze landraces and the wild ancestor of maize, teosinte.
11 igating the inheritance of complex traits in teosinte.
12 ad a role in the domestication of maize from teosinte.
13 orphological traits distinguishing maize and teosinte.
14 envelops the kernel in the maize progenitor, teosinte.
15 de deficit of diversity in maize relative to teosinte.
16 ize to that observed in its wild progenitor, teosinte.
17 during the domestication of maize from wild teosinte.
18 to phenotypic differences between maize and teosinte.
19 aracters that distinguish Chalco from Balsas teosinte.
20 are prevalent in Mexican races of maize and teosinte.
21 e architectural difference between maize and teosinte.
22 structure between maize and its progenitor, teosinte.
23 in teosinte for traits that are invariant in teosinte.
24 ive genetic analyses that maize evolved from teosinte.
25 ferences between maize and its wild ancestor teosinte.
26 appear to have improved in maize relative to teosinte.
27 ie the evolutionary divergence of maize from teosinte.
28 ze from colorless kernels of its progenitor, teosinte.
29 ng time between maize and its wild ancestor, teosinte.
30 l yield advantage over the ancestral form of teosinte.
31 t in B73, a modern maize line, but absent in teosinte.
32 tance during the domestication of maize from teosinte.
33 maize and has generally been referred to as teosinte.
34 igher long-term effective population size of teosinte.
35 pared with its highly branched wild ancestor teosinte.
36 n example application to data from maize and teosinte.
37 rted to collect the seeds of the wild grass, teosinte.
38 restored compatibility with Tcb1-s carrying teosintes.
39 draces (LRs) and their wild relatives (WRs), teosintes.
40 , maize, and its closest wild relatives, the teosintes.
41 enic stocks that carry structurally distinct teosinte A1 Sh2 haplotypes (from Z. mays spp. mexicana C
43 s noted in individuals from crosses with two teosinte accessions collected near Valle de Bravo, Mexic
44 nt at low copy number in all maize lines and teosinte accessions examined, and JITA sequences occur i
45 ogenetic analysis of 5,381 diverse maize and teosinte accessions reveals genetic relationships betwee
47 f tb1 is expressed at twice the level of the teosinte allele, suggesting that gene regulatory changes
48 ight linkage was confirmed between Rf3 and 2 teosinte alleles (Rf K-69-6 and Rf 9477) and between Rf3
51 hat hybridization does occur between Spanish teosinte and cultivated maize in Spain, and that current
52 its that are phenotypically invariant within teosinte and for which teosinte is discretely different
53 variance-covariance matrices (G-matrices) of teosinte and maize are quite different, primarily due to
54 generally conserved among populations within teosinte and maize but is radically different between te
55 he data suggest that the differences between teosinte and maize involve, in part, developmental modif
56 fied a strong, nonneutral divergence between teosinte and maize landrace genetic variance-covariance
58 e in situ hybridization to assay 160 diverse teosinte and maize landrace populations from across the
59 ored in a large number of accessions of both teosinte and maize to take a second look at the geograph
61 re moderately conserved among traits between teosinte and maize, while the genetic variance-covarianc
63 sequencing and genomic comparisons to Balsas teosinte and modern maize, we show herein that the earli
64 nome comparisons between varieties of maize, teosinte and other grasses are beginning to identify the
65 the natural variation for complex traits in teosinte and that some of the minor variants we identifi
67 heat, and barley cultivars but was absent in teosinte and wild and landrace accessions of wheat and b
68 rogeny of a testcross between an F(1) of two teosintes and a maize inbred line, we identified cryptic
69 Hybridization or introgression between some teosintes and maize occurs at a low level and appears mo
71 ase in apical dominance in maize relative to teosinte, and a region of the tb1 locus 5' to the transc
72 cis-regulatory divergence between maize and teosinte, and a transposon insertion that inactivates Bx
74 he maize gene pool from its wild progenitor, teosinte, and that only one was incorporated throughout
75 bset of the 24-nt phasiRNA loci in maize and teosinte are already highly expressed at the premeiotic
76 eral studies indicate that some varieties of teosinte are cytologically indistinguishable from maize
77 hat the key traits differentiating maize and teosinte are each under multigenic control, although for
78 vars that are most closely related to Balsas teosinte are found mainly in the Mexican highlands where
80 d feminized whereas the axillary branches of teosinte are long and end in a male inflorescence under
81 long day lengths ZmCCT alleles from diverse teosintes are consistently expressed at higher levels an
82 ld relatives of maize, collectively known as teosinte, are a more varied and representative study sys
83 comparisons of relative protein levels with teosinte as well as by quantitative measurements of mRNA
85 d to approximately 5% the population size of teosinte before it experienced rapid expansion post-dome
86 proliferation, and the transcription factors TEOSINTE BRANCED 1/CYCLOIDEA/PCF 15 (TCP15) and TCP22, w
87 an ortholog of the maize domestication gene TEOSINTE BRANCHED 1 (TB1) and identify 17 coding mutatio
90 Here we show that the miR319-regulated TCP (TEOSINTE BRANCHED 1, CYCLODEA, PROLIFERATING CELL FACTOR
92 plants with altered function of the class I TEOSINTE BRANCHED 1, CYCLOIDEA, PCF (TCP) transcription
93 rovide biochemical and genetic evidence that TEOSINTE BRANCHED 1, CYCLOIDEA, PCF1 (TCP) transcription
95 PKL occupancy significantly overlapped with TEOSINTE BRANCHED 1/CYCLOIDEA/PROLIFERATING CELL FACTORs
96 ns, including those of CINCINNATA-like TCPs (TEOSINTE BRANCHED, CYCLOIDEA and PCF1/2) and members of
97 bberellin (GA) and the microRNA319-regulated TEOSINTE BRANCHED/CYCLOIDEA/PCF (TCP) transcription fact
98 and has been demonstrated to target TCP (for TEOSINTE BRANCHED/CYCLOIDEA/PROLIFERATING CELL FACTORS [
99 stabilizes Arabidopsis CIN (CINCINNATA) TCP (TEOSINTE-BRANCHED, CYCLOIDEA, PROLIFERATION FACTOR 1 AND
100 Whereas some domestication loci, such as teosinte branched1 (tb1) and brittle endosperm2 (bt2), h
103 ral allelic series for complex traits at the teosinte branched1 (tb1) gene in natural populations of
104 TL and molecular analysis suggested that the teosinte branched1 (tb1) gene of maize contributed to th
105 election of a gain of function allele of the teosinte branched1 (tb1) transcription factor that acts
107 shading and is dependent on the activity of teosinte branched1 (tb1), a major domestication locus co
108 tory region of the maize domestication gene, teosinte branched1 (tb1), acts as an enhancer of gene ex
111 he wheat Dormancy-associated (DRM1-like) and Teosinte Branched1 (TB1-like) genes and the reduced expr
112 sum sativum) homolog of the maize (Zea mays) TEOSINTE BRANCHED1 and the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thal
113 ) and analyzed the expression of the sorghum Teosinte Branched1 gene (SbTB1), which encodes a putativ
114 s of BRANCHED1, the pea homolog of the maize TEOSINTE BRANCHED1 gene were quantified in axillary buds
115 maize inflorescences, and, together with the teosinte branched1 gene, it regulates vegetative lateral
117 ba2 mutation suppresses tiller growth in the teosinte branched1 mutant, indicating that ba2 also play
119 tion, we examined nucleotide polymorphism in teosinte branched1, a gene involved in maize evolution.
120 wnregulated genes have promoters enriched in TEOSINTE BRANCHED1, CYCLOIDEA, and PCF (TCP) binding sit
122 Here we show that, inside the buds, the TEOSINTE BRANCHED1, CYCLOIDEA, PCF (TCP) transcription f
123 T and TFL1 activities belong to the TCP (for TEOSINTE BRANCHED1, CYCLOIDEA, PCF) family of transcript
124 is work, we studied the roles of Arabidopsis TEOSINTE BRANCHED1, CYCLOIDEA, PCF15 (TCP15), and relate
125 ted three new putatively SL-related TCP (for Teosinte branched1, Cycloidia, and Proliferating cell fa
126 by separate loci, and that the orthologue of teosinte branched1, the major gene controlling branching
127 llering in multiple maize mutants, including teosinte branched1, Tillering1, and grassy tillers1 In c
128 Five SNPs in the maize domestication gene, teosinte branched1, were significantly associated with e
132 ssay and isolated six class I members of the TEOSINTE BRANCHED1/CYCLOIDEA/PCF (TCP) transcription fac
134 transcription factors (TFs) belonging to the TEOSINTE BRANCHED1/CYCLOIDEA/PROLIFERATING CELL FACTOR (
137 hybrid system, the transcription factor gene TEOSINTE BRANCHED1/CYCLOIDEA/PROLIFERATING CELL FACTOR1-
138 code a new member of the plant-specific TCP (TEOSINTE BRANCHED1/CYCLOIDEA/PROLIFERATING CELL NUCLEAR
140 thetase 4 enzyme that is highly expressed in teosinte, but not in the B73 inbred, in which a deletion
141 s significantly smaller in landraces than in teosintes, but the largest component of GS variation was
142 e populations have facilitated adaptation in teosinte by moving beneficial alleles across the landsca
143 s our previous association mapping effort in teosinte by testing 123 markers in 52 candidate genes fo
144 urse of generating populations of maize with teosinte chromosomal introgressions, an unusual sickly p
145 opment, although genetic tests indicate that teosinte cl alleles are not active during kernel develop
150 Domesticated maize and its wild ancestor (teosinte) differ strikingly in morphology and afford an
151 Maize and its closest wild relatives, the teosintes, differ strikingly in the morphology of their
153 e-copy allele were identified from maize and teosinte diversity panels, indicating that copy number v
154 c analysis indicated that the Mexican annual teosintes divide into two clusters that largely correspo
156 ana depend on Dicer-like 2 (Dcl2) and target Teosinte Drive Responder 1 (Tdr1), which encodes a lipas
159 itor (teosinte) were investigated in a maize-teosinte F2 population through the use of molecular mark
160 , we identified cryptic genetic variation in teosinte for traits that are invariant in teosinte.
162 Here, we use a large dataset of maize and teosinte genomes to reconstruct the origin and evolution
163 s was also assayed in 31 additional maize or teosinte genotypes, resulting in the discovery of 1966 c
165 tions in the maize (Zea mays ssp. mays) gene teosinte glume architecture (tga1) underlie a reduction
167 omestication is controlled by a single gene (teosinte glume architecture or tga1), belonging to the S
168 present in Balsas teosinte, others, such as teosinte glume architecture1 (tga1) and sugary1 (su1), c
170 well-characterized domestication locus tga1 (teosinte glume architecture1), which has long been thoug
171 several other domestication loci, including teosinte glume architecture1, prol1.1/grassy tillers1, a
172 ic-level data from modern landraces and wild teosinte grasses [1, 2], augmenting archaeological findi
173 st a reference panel of modern landraces and teosinte grasses using D statistics, model-based cluster
174 populations of domesticated maize and annual teosinte grow in intimate associate and flower synchrono
175 It was polymorphic among populations of teosinte growing wild, but regularly present in populati
176 ature leaves of nonflowering id1 mutants and teosinte grown under floral inhibitory photoperiods reve
178 ts was detected in at least one of the three teosinte haplotypes and two of these hot spots were not
180 esults suggest local adaptation in maize and teosinte has an intermediate geographic scale, one that
183 he evolution of maize from its wild ancestor teosinte has yet to be found in that poorly studied regi
184 ypic transition that gave rise to maize from teosinte have mainly focused on the analysis of aerial o
185 e assays and sequencing revealed that French teosintes have acquired herbicide resistance via the int
186 ar morphology between domesticated maize and teosinte; however, the effect of tb1 on trait variation
189 f the earliest maize from Tehuacan resembled teosinte in traits important for maize drought adaptatio
192 phylogenetic analyses of the Mexican annual teosintes indicated that ssp. parviglumis diversified in
193 phological traits that distinguish maize and teosinte indicates that they are under the control of mu
197 tric, favouring the introgression of Spanish teosinte into cultivated maize, rather than vice versa.
203 of domesticated maize from its wild ancestor teosinte is a dramatic example of the effect of human se
204 ally invariant within teosinte and for which teosinte is discretely different from its near relative,
206 idization simulations, we infer that Spanish teosinte is of admixed origin, most likely involving Zea
207 However, the direct progenitor of maize, teosinte, is indigenous only to a relatively small range
209 e between maize (Zea mays ssp. mays) and the teosintes, its closest relatives, was utilized as a sour
212 e loci between the three populations of wild teosintes, maize landraces, and maize inbred lines.
213 SNPs segregating among 100 accessions from a teosinte-maize comparison set and among 302 accessions f
215 ably dissimilar to its recent wild ancestor, teosinte, making it an extremely interesting model for t
216 h short and long day lengths, and of a maize-teosinte mapping population under long day lengths.
218 the phenotypic difference between maize and teosinte maps to a 1-kilobase region, within which maize
219 ene-rich region of maize (Zea mays), the Zea teosintes mays ssp. mexicana, luxurians and diploperenni
220 ional varieties and sympatric populations of teosinte mexicana reveals correlated patterns of admixtu
223 ons of maize's closest relatives, the annual teosintes of Mexico, are unreceptive to maize pollen.
225 king sequences of y1, y2 and their maize and teosinte orthologs show local rearrangements and inserti
226 the nucleotide variability present in Balsas teosinte, others, such as teosinte glume architecture1 (
230 single-pollen genome sequencing, we describe Teosinte Pollen Drive, an instance of gene drive in hybr
231 c variation and that introgression from wild teosinte populations appears to have played a role in hi
233 An analogous gene Tcb1-s was found in some teosinte populations but not in sympatric or parapatric
234 plants of each of 22 maize landraces and 21 teosinte populations from Mexico sampled from parallel a
235 the absence of maize, Tcb1-s can increase in teosinte populations without improving their fitness.
236 ze-like tb1 haplotypes are present in extant teosinte populations, and our findings also suggest a mo
240 riously, sequence data show that most of our teosinte samples possess a promoter element necessary fo
243 anthocyanin accumulation are found in Chalco teosinte sheaths whereas Balsas teosinte leaf sheaths ar
244 a 1-kilobase region, within which maize and teosinte show only seven fixed differences in their DNA
247 cross between maize (Zea mays ssp. mays) and teosinte (ssp. parviglumis) was grown for the analysis.
252 d responses were of the same magnitude as in teosinte, suggesting that EOD-FR-mediated mesocotyl resp
253 ity of events are observed in both maize and teosinte, suggesting that these variants predate domesti
254 al-cytoplasm accessions of Mexican maize and teosinte, supports the conclusion that these alleles hav
255 cleotide polymorphism (SNP) data for Spanish teosinte, sympatric populations of cultivated maize and
256 uted to the morphological diversification of teosinte taxa as well as to the domestication of maize.
266 e genetic architecture of trait variation in teosinte, the wild ancestor of maize, and the consequenc
269 vasculature of axillary internodes, while in teosinte, this expression is highly reduced or absent.
270 cessions along an evolutionary transect (two teosinte, three inbred maize lines, and five modern maiz
271 amined the evolution of root phenotypes from teosinte to maize, a transition resulting in reduced nod
272 not only reveal the domestication trace from teosinte to modern maize, but also the footprints of its
273 programmed to develop into tassels (male) in teosinte, to become ears (female) in maize, and (ii) the
274 plasmid found in one source of Zea luxurians teosinte, to the atp9 mitochondrial gene and its 3' flan
275 phenotypic comparison of French and Mexican teosintes under European conditions and showed that only
276 that agricultural selection of domesticated teosinte was underway by 5,400 (14)C years before the pr
279 e contribute to standing variation in Balsas teosinte we conducted association mapping in 584 Balsas
280 he population and ecological genomics of the teosintes we highlight recent advances in the study of m
281 lling ear rank differences between maize and teosinte, we tested whether zfl2 might have been involve
282 nd 6 Rf alleles from different accessions of teosinte were found to be homozygous viable, consistent
283 s between maize and its presumed progenitor (teosinte) were investigated in a maize-teosinte F2 popul
286 (Zea mays subsp mays) was domesticated from teosinte (Z. mays subsp parviglumis) through a single do
289 nally, we detect introgression from the wild teosinte Zea mays ssp. mexicana into maize in the highla
290 rviglumis), but the contribution of highland teosinte (Zea mays ssp. mexicana, hereafter mexicana) to
291 Molecular analyses identified one form of teosinte (Zea mays ssp. parviglumis) as the progenitor o
292 n populations of modern maize, landrace, and teosinte (Zea mays ssp. parviglumis) to estimate epimuta
293 tory gene indeterminate1 (id1), and tropical teosinte (Zea mays ssp. parviglumis) under floral induct
294 the genetic history by which the wild grass teosinte (Zea mays ssp. parviglumis) was domesticated in
297 anched1 (tb1) gene in natural populations of teosinte (Zea mays ssp. parviglumis, Z. mays ssp. mexica
299 tropical/semitropical origins, together with teosinte (Zea mays subspecies parviglumis) and a modern
300 ence that maize was domesticated from Balsas teosinte (Zea mays subspecies parviglumis), a wild relat