コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 for combination to denosumab vs denosumab to teriparatide).
2 rom bisphosphonates to denosumab, as well as teriparatide.
3 eosarcoma has been reported in a woman using teriparatide.
4 hosphonate therapy may blunt the efficacy of teriparatide.
5 < 0.001) in patients treated with 20 mug/day teriparatide.
6 ratory end point) for abaloparatide than for teriparatide.
7 gains in hip BMD that were not observed with teriparatide.
8 atment attenuates the bone-forming effect of teriparatide.
9 eases of 4.1% with alendronate and 7.1% with teriparatide.
10 e combination group (4.2% [3.0]) than in the teriparatide (0.8% [4.1], p=0.0007) and denosumab (2.1%
11 did total-hip BMD (combination, 4.9% [2.9]; teriparatide, 0.7% [2.7], p<0.0001; denosumab 2.5% [2.6]
12 ants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive teriparatide 20 mug (standard dose) or 40 mug (high dose
13 re randomly assigned to receive 24 months of teriparatide (20 mg daily), denosumab (60 mg every 6 mon
16 tal surgery and received daily injections of teriparatide (20 mug) or placebo, along with oral calciu
17 allocated to either 8 weeks of subcutaneous teriparatide (20 ug/day) or placebo injections, in addit
19 mbination group (9.1%, [SD 3.9]) than in the teriparatide (6.2% [4.6], p=0.0139) or denosumab (5.5% [
26 assessed outcomes of periodontal surgery and teriparatide administration in vitamin-D-sufficient and
27 a preplanned extension of the denosumab and teriparatide administration study (DATA), in which 94 po
31 randomly assigned to receive, in addition to teriparatide and 1000 IU cholecalciferol, 1800 mg calciu
33 nt with parathyroid hormone analogs (such as teriparatide and abaloparatide) and sclerostin inhibitor
39 thyroid hormone, used clinically as the drug teriparatide) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (7-36) (GLP-1(
42 s increased in both groups, as expected with teriparatide, but the increases in the 2 calcium groups
43 assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive 20 mug teriparatide daily, 60 mg denosumab every 6 months, or b
44 se originally assigned to denosumab received teriparatide (denosumab to teriparatide group), and thos
45 % [95% CI 5.3-7.9]) than in the denosumab to teriparatide group (2.8% [1.3-4.2], p=0.0002), but had t
46 p (9.1% [6.1-12.0]) than in the denosumab to teriparatide group (4.9% [2.2-7.5]; p=0.0447 for teripar
47 ctures occurred in 25 (4.0%) patients in the teriparatide group and 38 (6.1%) in the risedronate grou
48 occurred in 28 (5.4%) of 680 patients in the teriparatide group and 64 (12.0%) of 680 patients in the
49 occurred in 30 (4.8%) of 680 patients in the teriparatide group compared with 61 (9.8%) of 680 in the
53 ewer new vertebral fractures occurred in the teriparatide group than in the alendronate group (0.6% v
54 t the lumbar spine had increased more in the teriparatide group than in the alendronate group (7.2+/-
55 sumab group, and p=0.41 for the denosumab to teriparatide group vs the combination to denosumab group
56 nosumab group; p=0.0099 for the denosumab to teriparatide group vs the combination to denosumab group
57 ents in the romosozumab group and 209 in the teriparatide group were included in the primary efficacy
58 mosozumab group compared with 12 (6%) in the teriparatide group with adverse events leading to invest
59 enosumab received teriparatide (denosumab to teriparatide group), and those originally assigned to bo
60 romosozumab group vs 22 [10%] of 214 in the teriparatide group), hypercalcaemia (two [<1%] vs 22 [10
62 .0% (10.9-17.2) in 27 women the denosumab to teriparatide group, and 16.0% (14.0-18.0) in 23 women in
63 d by -1.8% (-5.0 to 1.3) in the denosumab to teriparatide group, and increased by 2.8% (1.2-4.4) in t
64 atide to denosumab group vs the denosumab to teriparatide group, p=0.30 for the teriparatide to denos
67 ozumab group and -0.6% (-1.0 to -0.2) in the teriparatide group; difference 3.2% (95% CI 2.7 to 3.8;
69 patients exhibited robust BMD increases with teriparatide; however, there was no observed benefit for
71 nt in opposing the anti-apoptotic effects of teriparatide in these cells, thereby maintaining normal
72 arathyroid hormone (PTH) (1-34) (also called teriparatide) in LDLR -/- mice fed diabetogenic diets fo
76 th less severe disease (type I), displayed a teriparatide-induced anabolic response, as well as incre
77 bone resorption while allowing for continued teriparatide-induced bone formation, resulting in larger
78 udy, we showed that denosumab fully inhibits teriparatide-induced bone resorption while allowing for
82 that PTH receptor expression is required for teriparatide-mediated increases in early osteoblast prec
84 gned to 20 mug teriparatide (n=39) or 40 mug teriparatide (n=37), of whom 69 completed at least one p
85 articipants were randomly assigned to 20 mug teriparatide (n=39) or 40 mug teriparatide (n=37), of wh
87 5), a sclerostin monoclonal antibody, versus teriparatide on bone mineral density (BMD) in women with
89 were randomly assigned to receive 20 mug of teriparatide once daily plus oral weekly placebo or 35 m
90 total of 214 patients received 20 microg of teriparatide once daily, and 214 received 10 mg of alend
92 h or imminent risk of fracture, therapy with teriparatide or abaloparatide should be considered; howe
93 vitamin D supplements, and self-administered teriparatide or placebo for 6 wks to correspond with oss
94 observations (eg, oestrogen, calcitonin, and teriparatide) or opportunistic repurposing of existing c
95 0 mug recombinant human parathyroid hormone (teriparatide) or placebo for 18 months in a double-blind
96 or teriparatide to denosumab vs denosumab to teriparatide, p=0.0336 for combination to denosumab vs d
97 ficant impact on CAL and PPD improvements in teriparatide patients at 1 yr, but infrabony defect reso
99 f osteoporosis medications (bisphosphonates, teriparatide, raloxifene, and denosumab) compared with p
100 In DATA-Switch, women originally assigned to teriparatide received denosumab (teriparatide to denosum
101 ores, and if so, to determine the effects of teriparatide (recombinant human parathyroid hormone 1-34
103 vidence that bisphosphonates, denosumab, and teriparatide reduce fractures compared with placebo, wit
105 ncrease, whereas switching from denosumab to teriparatide results in progressive or transient bone lo
109 l improvement was greater in patients taking teriparatide than in those taking placebo, with a reduct
110 studies have shown favorable responses with teriparatide (the biologically active fragment of PTH) a
111 bolic responses in excess of those seen with teriparatide, the only currently available anabolic skel
112 en N-telopeptide (NTx) levels increased with teriparatide therapy (135% +/- 14% and 64% +/- 10% chang
113 Vertebral vBMD and strength improved with teriparatide therapy (18% +/- 6% and 15% +/- 3% change,
114 eous defects was significantly greater after teriparatide therapy than after placebo beginning at 6 m
116 us bone mineral density was unchanged in the teriparatide to denosumab group (0.0% [95% CI -1.3 to 1.
117 p bone mineral density increased more in the teriparatide to denosumab group (6.6% [95% CI 5.3-7.9])
118 k bone mineral density increased more in the teriparatide to denosumab group (8.3% [95% CI 6.1-10.5])
119 n the combination to denosumab group and the teriparatide to denosumab group did not differ significa
120 osumab to teriparatide group, p=0.30 for the teriparatide to denosumab group vs the combination to de
121 ination to denosumab group (p=0.0075 for the teriparatide to denosumab group vs the combination to de
122 or between-group comparisons, p=0.13 for the teriparatide to denosumab group vs the denosumab to teri
123 assigned to teriparatide received denosumab (teriparatide to denosumab group), those originally assig
124 18.3% (95% CI 14.9-21.8) in 27 women in the teriparatide to denosumab group, 14.0% (10.9-17.2) in 27
125 umab group (8.6% [7.1-10.0]; p=0.0446 vs the teriparatide to denosumab group, p<0.0001 vs the denosum
126 paratide group (4.9% [2.2-7.5]; p=0.0447 for teriparatide to denosumab vs denosumab to teriparatide,
127 menopausal osteoporotic women switching from teriparatide to denosumab, bone mineral density continue
128 t infrabony defect resolution was greater in teriparatide-treated vitamin-D-sufficient vs. -deficient
129 s who are clinically stable, and considering teriparatide treatment in individuals who experience an
131 ad scans at baseline and 6 mo after starting teriparatide treatment were used to compare response to
135 nsity, and strength, at levels comparable to teriparatide, while significantly reducing bone resorpti
137 double-blind, controlled trial, we compared teriparatide with alendronate in 428 women and men with
138 We compared the anti-fracture efficacy of teriparatide with risedronate in patients with severe os
139 .13; 95% CI, 0.05 to 2.21) administration of teriparatide, with no treatment being superior to NSAIDs
140 r administration of denosumab with high dose teriparatide would stimulate larger increases in bone ma