コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 tinued sensitivity to auditory, tactile, and thermal stimulation.
2 ses of human subjects to both mechanical and thermal stimulation.
3 horn neurones to electrical, mechanical and thermal stimulation.
4 atter correlating only to pain intensity for thermal stimulation.
5 female mice showed heightened sensitivity to thermal stimulation.
6 cited by local hypoxia-induced blood flow or thermal stimulation.
7 , and glucose, as well as deliver programmed thermal stimulations.
8 y task (2-back task) while receiving painful thermal stimulations.
9 nd 18 healthy individuals exposed to noxious thermal stimulations administered in a functional magnet
11 ver, these neurons were activated by noxious thermal stimulation and menthol applied to the corneal s
12 ulomb, Lorentz and Ampere forces, as well as thermal stimulation and optical signals, can be engaged
13 e tail-flick reflex restored vocalization to thermal stimulation and revealed a concurrent sensitizat
14 rent trigeminal neurons that respond to oral thermal stimulation and to the above chemesthetic compou
15 l, gastric, and rectal distension, cutaneous thermal stimulation, and vulvar pressure) to establish a
16 tations for barely painful or highly painful thermal stimulation, and we assessed how cues influenced
18 rmal sensitivity to cutaneous mechanical and thermal stimulation compared with wild-type mice, the de
21 increased EEG alpha and beta powers, (2) the thermal stimulation created opposite effects on EEG powe
23 line reflex nocifensive responses to noxious thermal stimulation (hotplate, tail flick) and to persis
24 n psychophysical responses to mechanical and thermal stimulation in a model of UVB irradiation and in
25 suppression of withdrawals evoked by noxious thermal stimulation in either lumbar or cervical dermato
26 s mechanical was more effective than noxious thermal stimulation in inducing NK-1 receptor internaliz
27 re we compared the effects of mechanical and thermal stimulation in normal rats and in rats with pers
28 ressive decreases in perfusion with repeated thermal stimulation in SCD are indicative of autonomic h
29 ensations of taste, it has been assumed that thermal stimulation in the gustatory system is somehow n
30 increased sensitivity to both mechanical and thermal stimulation in wild-type mice but not in PAF-R K
32 nsitivity of hindpaws to mechanical, but not thermal, stimulation, indicating that mechanical sensiti
33 power topographic patterns, and (3) tPBM and thermal stimulations induced significantly different top
34 lity of CPu and GP neurons to encode noxious thermal stimulation intensity and respond during the dyn
35 in imaging to record responses to concurrent thermal stimulation (left forearm) and visual attention
36 er, no study has investigated whether purely thermal stimulation might induce TR, without any tactile
37 ease of specific virus proteins initiated by thermal stimulation, mimicking the early stage of HAdV d
38 actone) (BSS-PLCL) that can be triggered via thermal stimulation near physiological temperature (~38
39 sed sensitivity in response to mechanical or thermal stimulation of hind paws, in comparison to Taxol
41 al lobe by using PET scanning during painful thermal stimulation of normal and capsaicin-treated skin
43 behavioral responsiveness to mechanical and thermal stimulation of sites below and above the injury
44 on of the face and hyperalgesic responses to thermal stimulation of the hind paw without alterations
45 , rats performed learned escape responses to thermal stimulation of the paws by 44.0. 47.0. or 0.3 de
46 roys RPE cells followed by regeneration, and Thermal Stimulation of the Retina (TSR), a stimulative p
47 reduced neuronal responses evoked by noxious thermal stimulation of the skin, an effect that was reve
48 owing electrical and natural (mechanical and thermal) stimulation of peripheral receptive fields.
49 ies have examined the effects of non-noxious thermal stimulation on tactile discriminative capacity.
52 ral patterns of brain responses to different thermal stimulations ranging from extremely cold and hot
53 in the length of one of its dimensions) upon thermal stimulation, resulting in a pronounced deformati
54 enuated antinociceptive responses to noxious thermal stimulation (tail-flick test) by both types of a
56 d from dental pulp upon dentin mechanical or thermal stimulation that induces dentin hypersensitivity
57 stress, produces hyperalgesia for a level of thermal stimulation that preferentially activates C noci
59 ps of healthy humans under tPBM (n = 46) and thermal stimulation (thermo_stim; n = 11) conditions.
63 ly on the nanofibrous substrate for applying thermal stimulation to release antibiotics on-demand.
66 en spontaneous pain of CBP was contrasted to thermal stimulation, we observe a double-dissociation be
68 ape and lick/guard (L/G) reflex responses to thermal stimulation were evaluated before and for 13-15
70 ns, we successfully classified the different thermal stimulations with an average test accuracy of 84