戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1  regression plot of input copy number versus threshold cycle by using HIV-1 RNA transcripts at copy n
2 are traditionally analyzed by estimating the threshold cycle (C(T) ) at which the fluorescence signal
3 pt liver, but the detection rate and RT-qPCR threshold cycle (C(T) ) values decreased over time.
4                  Lung and serum samples with threshold cycle (C(T) ) values of <30 had better VI succ
5              Weakly positive specimens, with threshold cycle (C(T) ) values of 33 or higher, were det
6 d to IRTP assays as the gold standard with a threshold cycle (C(T)) cutoff of 43.
7 ed amplification efficiency leads to broader threshold cycle (C(t)) distributions that can be fitted
8       Most GII samples positive by EIA had a threshold cycle (C(T)) of <26.5, and 50% of the GII samp
9 RNA qPCR exhibited a significant decrease in threshold cycle (C(T)) time values (C(T) control - C(T)
10                       The mean real-time PCR threshold cycle (C(T)) value for specimens with discorda
11                       The mean real-time PCR threshold cycle (C(T)) value for specimens with discorda
12                         All 220 samples with threshold cycle (C(T)) values of <30 for the SARS-CoV-2
13 tive by the CDC rRT-PCR by virtue of showing threshold cycle (C(T)) values only with universal InfA a
14 of the B1 target regardless of the genotype (threshold cycle [C(T) ] values for the Rep 529-1 and Rep
15      Of the 191 clinical specimens, 83 (with threshold cycle [C(T)] values of 15.58 to 32.54) were al
16 t in clinical samples and EQA samples with a threshold cycle (CT ) value of <30 were detected correct
17 m of throat swab samples was compared to the threshold cycle (Ct) of a reverse-transcriptase real-tim
18 ve quantities of the transgene by taking the threshold cycle (Ct) of both the transgene and an intern
19 se polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR)-based threshold cycle (Ct) value and the presence of infectiou
20                                   An average Threshold Cycle (Ct) value of 15.3 was obtained with S.
21 orming units, and respiratory specimens with threshold cycle (CT) values of <34 typically produced go
22   As expected, WGA products with low (<16.0) threshold cycle (CT) values yielded mostly Cryptosporidi
23 ime polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) uses threshold cycles (Ct values) for measuring relative gene
24                                              Threshold cycles (Ct) for positive PCR tests were obtain
25 y Prodesse ProFlu+ PCR (a mean real-time PCR threshold cycle [CT] value of 31.9 +/- 2.0), which inclu
26 le data, the standard curve constructed from threshold cycle data had a multiple R2 value of 1.00 and
27 actin gene, the coefficient of variation for threshold cycle data was 1.6%, whereas it increased to 1
28 d curves obtained from band densitometry and threshold cycle data, the standard curve constructed fro
29                                     The qPCR threshold cycle for direct PCR from whole blood is compa
30                                        Lower threshold cycles indicate increased mtDNA DAMP content.
31       The relative standard deviation in the threshold cycle number is approximately 0.6%.
32           MtDNA DAMPs were quantified as PCR threshold cycle number.
33 this included 20 samples that required 30-39 threshold cycles of RT-qPCR to achieve a positive detect
34 tarting copy numbers were amplified, and the threshold cycle showed an increase for decreasing amount
35               From this defined fluorescence threshold, cycle time (Ct) and the error for both amplic
36 c children, we defined a cutoff point in the threshold cycle value (26.7) that predicts rotavirus-att
37 calculated for each pathogen by plotting the threshold cycle value against the bacterial number (log
38 e Method, for analysis of qPCR data based on threshold cycle values (C q ) and efficiencies of reacti
39  reaction (PCR) amplification showed similar threshold cycle values as those obtained from a commerci
40 ich correlated to the measured difference of threshold cycle values for both probes.
41 r up to 7 days, with maximum changes in mean threshold cycle values observed at -80 C storage in Cary
42 ot detect HAdV with either low viral burden (threshold cycle values of >30) or nonrespiratory species
43 eal-time PCR (linear correlation between the threshold cycle versus log DNA copy number, >0.982).
44 ts of inflammatory biomarkers from the skin (threshold cycle) were assessed in 1 index patient with r