戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 sure of thrombus to endogenous and exogenous thrombolytics.
2 use of the limited effectiveness of existing thrombolytics.
3 ing vessel recanalization with intraarterial thrombolytics.
4 file of abciximab was observed between the 2 thrombolytics.
5 response venous thrombi to catheter-directed thrombolytics.
6 tment algorithm, especially for early window thrombolytics.
7 tracerebral haemorrhage after treatment with thrombolytics (2 [7%] telemedicine vs 2 [8%] telephone,
8 from baseline to the fifth year: intravenous thrombolytics (42.09% versus 72.84%), early antithrombot
9 tion, and the concomitant use of intravenous thrombolytics, among others.
10 wo hundred fifty-eight AMI patients from the Thrombolytics and Myocardia Infarction phase 7 and Globa
11 ion, (2) receipt of acute stroke treatments (thrombolytics and thrombectomy), and (3) health outcomes
12 sing stent retrievers, aspiration catheters, thrombolytics, and (in selected patients) carotid stenti
13 ed that ex vivo attachment of bioscavengers, thrombolytics, and nanoparticles (NPs) to glycophorin A
14 ilities, patients who received intracoronary thrombolytics, and those who received no medications wit
15 ral arterial access site, >6-Fr sheath size, thrombolytics, arterial dissection, fluoroscopy time >30
16 lready arrested, the difficulty of obtaining thrombolytics at the bedside rapidly enough to administe
17     We reported odds ratios (ORs) for use of thrombolytics, beta-blockers, ACE inhibitors, or aspirin
18 t indications for treatment with intravenous thrombolytics but were not eligible for treatment with e
19  elevation myocardial infarction who receive thrombolytics, clopidogrel therapy confers broad benefit
20 bition in myocardial infarction treated with thromboLYtics (COMPLY) and COMplement inhibition in Myoc
21 ion to a certified stroke center, receipt of thrombolytics (delivered using drip-and-ship and drip-an
22 d diagnosis of pulmonary embolism and use of thrombolytics during cardiopulmonary resuscitation may n
23  the lack of good data supporting the use of thrombolytics during resuscitation, the belief that thro
24 atments: coronary-artery reperfusion before, thrombolytics during, and beta-blockers, antiplatelet dr
25                                              Thrombolytics (eg, tissue-type plasminogen activator [tP
26 nother acute care hospital for evaluation of thrombolytics, endovascular therapy, or postthrombolytic
27             To increase the effective use of thrombolytics for acute stroke, the expertise of vascula
28                           Rapid clearance of thrombolytics from blood following intravenous injection
29 iximab in combination with administration of thrombolytics has been shown to improve epicardial and m
30 ng stroke recovery long after the window for thrombolytics has passed.
31                          Clinically approved thrombolytics have significant drawbacks, including blee
32 rdiopulmonary arrest and discuss the role of thrombolytics in cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
33 ted heparin was administered in 33 (87%) and thrombolytics in four (11%).
34                                   The use of thrombolytics in the treatment of vertebrobasilar occlus
35 .74-40.21 percentage points), and receipt of thrombolytics increased by 0.48 percentage points (95% C
36                            Catheter-directed thrombolytics is the primary treatment used to relieve c
37 ysis (USAT), and administering lower dose of thrombolytics (LDT) is unclear.
38 l patient population, those not treated with thrombolytics (n = 228,512) and those given thrombolytic
39  assess their suitability for treatment with thrombolytics, on the basis of standard criteria.
40 associated with increased rates of receiving thrombolytics only for White patients.
41  enzyme elevation, some argue for the use of thrombolytics or catheter thrombectomy even for hemodyna
42                          No patient received thrombolytics or surgical evacuation of clot.
43                   By multivariable analysis, thrombolytics, prior myocardial infarction, advancing ag
44  coronary syndromes who are not eligible for thrombolytics reduced the composite of recurrent ischemi
45 le patients, ultraslow, low-dose infusion of thrombolytics seems effective and safe and may be prefer
46 gment elevation AMI and contraindications to thrombolytics should be strongly considered.
47 , occlusion location, and use of intravenous thrombolytics, to receive either normobaric hyperoxia co
48                                       Use of thrombolytics was associated with lower all-cause mortal
49                Intracatheter instillation of thrombolytics was more frequent in patients who received
50  thrombolytics (n = 228,512) and those given thrombolytics were 10.4%, 12.9% and 5.9%, respectively (
51                                  Intravenous thrombolytics were used at an overall rate of 25% (31 [2
52                                              Thrombolytics were used at presentation in 19 (35%) pati
53 imaging and new clinical trials that combine thrombolytics with other pharmacological and interventio