戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 dy was conducted to develop a time-efficient tilt table test.
2 ilt table test was compared with the passive tilt table test.
3 defined by plasma NE >600 pg/ml and abnormal tilt table test.
4 ive (n=10) or negative (n=11) responses to a tilt-table test.
5 blood pressure) was observed during negative tilt-table tests.
6 resyncope (mean age 15.2+/-0.7 years) during tilt table testing.
7  and one (7%) had a positive response during tilt-table testing.
8 ts after adenosine administration and during tilt-table testing.
9  maneuver, respiratory sinus arrhythmia, and tilt-table testing.
10 ilt table testing but positive isoproterenol tilt table testing (0.05 microg/kg per min, 70 degrees,
11             After meal ingestion and head-up tilt-table testing, 22% of functionally independent elde
12                                  A 15-minute tilt-table test (60 degrees head-up) was performed appro
13  inducible vasovagal response during passive tilt table testing (70 degrees, 45 min, group I), 16 wit
14 tomatic hypotension increased during head-up tilt-table testing after meal ingestion (12% during prep
15 blood pressure drop with active standing and tilt-table testing (all P < 0.05).
16 nking 5 minutes before tilt-table testing or tilt-table testing alone, with the alternative in a seco
17 tive vasovagal response during isoproterenol tilt table testing and 35 (32%; 23% to 41%) during passi
18 p in blood pressure with active standing and tilt-table testing and lesser respiratory sinus arrhythm
19 n adult population than the standard passive tilt table test, and it significantly reduced the proced
20                         Current protocols of tilt table testing are quite time-consuming.
21                   Meal ingestion and head-up tilt-table testing are associated with increasing occurr
22 with no history of syncope underwent head-up tilt-table testing at 60 degrees for 45 minutes or until
23                           Sequential head-up tilt-table testing at 60 degrees was performed before an
24 bility response to orthostatic stress during tilt table testing before and after normal saline admini
25  with a history of syncope, negative passive tilt table testing but positive isoproterenol tilt table
26 ons support the conclusion that single-stage tilt table testing could be a reasonable diagnostic opti
27 explained syncope with a normal heart is the tilt table test for evaluating predisposition to neuroca
28      A high frequency of positive results on tilt-table testing has confirmed an association between
29                The emergence of head-upright tilt-table testing has provide a valuable method for ide
30 was a blunted heart rate increase during the tilt-table test (HR: 6.1, 95% CI: 1.4-26).
31 rations in sympathetic and vagal tone during tilt-table testing in 23 children with a history of sync
32 cardiogenic syncope, the use of head-upright tilt-table testing in its diagnosis, and the potential t
33 s with frequent events and no injury, and 5) tilt-table testing in patients who have infrequent event
34                                              Tilt table testing is commonly utilized in the evaluatio
35                                              Tilt-table testing is a widely used diagnostic tool.
36                                              Tilt-table testing may be indicated to confirm orthostat
37 eproducibly developed syncope during control tilt table testing; median time to syncope was 9.4+/-2.1
38 is, we conducted polysomnography followed by tilt-table testing on 15 subjects with orthostatic intol
39  (473 mL) of water drinking 5 minutes before tilt-table testing or tilt-table testing alone, with the
40 ting and 35 (32%; 23% to 41%) during passive tilt table testing (p = 0.002).
41 ht before assuming the upright position in a tilt-table test (P = 0.015), a physiological indicator o
42 ion as measured by fall in blood pressure on tilt-table testing (R = -0.63, P < 0.001).
43 9 +/- 13.3 min for isoproterenol and passive tilt table testing, respectively (p < 0.001).
44 3% (61% to 99%) for passive and single-stage tilt table testing, respectively.
45                                       During tilt-table testing, subjects with UARS and a history of
46                 A single-stage isoproterenol tilt table test was compared with the passive tilt table
47               The single-stage isoproterenol tilt table test was more effective in inducing a positiv
48                                              Tilt table testing was more frequently positive in patie
49                                              Tilt-table testing was positive in 12 children and negat
50 sociation between meal ingestion and head-up tilt-table testing were additive and not synergistic.
51         The effects of adenosine and head-up tilt-table testing with or without isoproterenol were pr