コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 of gefitinib; PBTC-014: phase I/II study of tipifarnib).
2 Fs), which sensitized nontransfected MEFs to tipifarnib.
3 escued by the farnesyl transferase inhibitor Tipifarnib.
4 that was further enhanced by the addition of tipifarnib.
5 ose-limiting toxicities occurred with 21-day tipifarnib.
6 farnib versus 5 of 30 (17%) receiving 21-day tipifarnib.
7 courses of a farnesyltransferase inhibitor, tipifarnib.
8 s with AML who are more likely to respond to tipifarnib.
9 mor (median, 100%; range, 55% to 100%) after tipifarnib.
10 hours), and predose trough concentrations of tipifarnib.
11 hway alterations, which confer resistance to tipifarnib.
14 n age, 77 years) received 224 cycles of oral tipifarnib (300-600 mg twice daily for 14 or 21 days) pl
17 in 50% of two 14-day tipifarnib cohorts: 3A (tipifarnib 600, etoposide 100) and 8A (tipifarnib 400, e
18 rs PI3K-mTOR and HRAS via the combination of tipifarnib, a farnesyltransferase (FTase) inhibitor, and
19 ioma to determine the efficacy and safety of tipifarnib, a farnesyltransferase inhibitor, dosed at th
20 fects of FTase inhibition in RMS we utilized tipifarnib, a potent and selective FTase inhibitor, in i
21 Exposure of MLL-AF6-rearranged AML blasts to tipifarnib, a RAS inhibitor, leads to cell autophagy and
22 Importantly, we investigate the efficacy of tipifarnib, a recently identified exosome biogenesis inh
24 macokinetic properties, the newly discovered tipifarnib analogues are ideal leads for the development
30 arnesylation inhibition, rather than dose of tipifarnib, and escalation beyond 300 mg bid might not r
32 farnesyltransferase inhibitors (FTI) such as tipifarnib as the most effective drugs in preventing rel
37 ete remissions occurred in 50% of two 14-day tipifarnib cohorts: 3A (tipifarnib 600, etoposide 100) a
38 way through c-Raf to Bim that contributes to tipifarnib cytotoxicity in human lymphoid cells but also
42 nesyltransferase inhibition was noted at all tipifarnib dose levels, as measured in peripheral-blood
46 ested the oral farnesyltransferase inhibitor tipifarnib in 158 older adults with previously untreated
47 arnib and MEK inhibition sensitized cells to tipifarnib in all settings, including in MEFs with PI3K
49 ), pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of tipifarnib in children with refractory solid tumors and
50 e assessable patients taking EIAEDs received tipifarnib in escalating doses from 300 to 700 mg bid fo
51 ca(H1047R) transduction led to resistance to tipifarnib in Hras(G13R)-transfected MEFs in the presenc
53 of patients from a phase 2 study of the FTI tipifarnib in older adults with previously untreated acu
55 value of the farnesyltransferase inhibitor, tipifarnib, in 25 TCL cell lines through the identificat
56 rkat, Molt3, H9, DoHH2, and RL) that undergo tipifarnib-induced apoptosis but not in lines (SKW6.4 an
57 ociated death domain or procaspase-8 undergo tipifarnib-induced apoptosis, whereas cells lacking casp
62 -matched strategy of combining alpelisib and tipifarnib is efficacious in PIK3CA- and HRAS-dysregulat
66 rted that the cancer drug clinical candidate tipifarnib kills the causative agent of Chagas disease,
68 By blocking feedback reactivation of mTORC1, tipifarnib may prevent adaptive resistance to additional
70 protein farnesyltransferase (PFT) inhibitor tipifarnib, now in phase III anticancer clinical trials,
73 We subsequently conducted a phase 1 trial of tipifarnib plus etoposide in adults over 70 years of age
75 ing modes of the substrate lanosterol and of Tipifarnib, providing a basis for the design of derivati
77 the dose-dependent administration of the FTI tipifarnib (R115777, Zarnestra) to this HGPS mouse model
81 onal cell growth, and in vivo treatment with tipifarnib resulted in tumor growth inhibition exclusive
82 B were associated as potential biomarkers of tipifarnib sensitivity and resistance, respectively.
84 ucleotide exchange factor RasGRP1 diminished tipifarnib sensitivity, suggesting that H-Ras or N-Ras i
90 randomly assigned to groups with and without tipifarnib treatment (10 mg/kg 3 times/wk) and monitored
94 malignant glioma patients were treated with tipifarnib using an interpatient dose-escalation scheme.
95 achieved in 16 of 54 (30%) receiving 14-day tipifarnib versus 5 of 30 (17%) receiving 21-day tipifar
96 ith AC every 2 weeks plus G-CSF, the RPTD of tipifarnib was 200 mg bid administered on days 2 to 7.
98 dy of the oral farnesyltransferase inhibitor tipifarnib was conducted in 93 adult patients with relap
101 f this classifier for predicting response to tipifarnib was validated in an independent set of 58 sam
103 ven in the presence of EIAEDs, the levels of tipifarnib were still sufficient to potently inhibit FTa
105 ssion ratio was found to predict response to tipifarnib with the greatest accuracy using a "leave one
106 of the farnesyltransferase (FTase) inhibitor tipifarnib (Zarnestra) in a phase 2 trial as well as its
107 The two FTase inhibitors (FTIs), R115777 (tipifarnib/Zarnestra) and BMS-214662, have undergone eva
108 inhibitors of prenylation (PTI) lonafarnib, tipifarnib, zoledronic acid, or atorvastatin at concentr