ライフサイエンスコーパス: tooth mobility

1 regeneration included smoking and excessive tooth mobility.

2 ugh it can present with symptoms of pain and tooth mobility.

3 e reliability of a novel technique to assess tooth mobility.

4 s rating of caries, periodontal disease, and tooth mobility.

5 .7 (95% CI: 4.1 to 33.4) for the question on tooth mobility.

6 t questions except those on painful gums and tooth mobility.

7 X, [Px]) reported with a chief complaint of tooth mobility and gingival enlargement.

8 nder study; specifically, those related with tooth mobility and gum migration.

9 e interleukin-6 [IL-6] gene), tooth factors (tooth mobility and tooth type), and site factors (mesial

10 factors, such as smoking, poor oral hygiene, tooth mobility, and defect morphology, on regeneration.

11 periodontitis, with self-reported history of tooth mobility as the most specific measure (0.87 for se

12 Tooth mobility assessment is subjective and current tech

13 A novel technique to assess tooth mobility based on intraoral scanner measurements p

14 Certain other tooth-specific conditions (tooth mobility, bulk restoration fracture, decayed surfa

15 For TLP, FI and tooth mobility degree III as well as mean CAL were ident

16 Use as abutment tooth, FI degree III, tooth mobility degrees I and II, mean PD, and CAL positi

17 the proportion of contained bony defects and tooth mobility, did not differ significantly between the

18 ecording the plaque scores, calculus scores, tooth mobility, gingival bleeding, probing depth, recess

19 sting of probing depth, bleeding on probing, tooth mobility, gingival index, and plaque index was per

20 performed to assess differences between the tooth mobility groups considering changes in PD, CAL, an

21 r bone loss >/=40% (1.25; 1.00 to 1.56), and tooth mobility >/=0.5 mm (1.43; 1.07 to 1.89).

22 us defects of teeth with limited presurgical tooth mobility; i.e., teeth with Miller's Class 1 and 2

23 e female presented with a chief complaint of tooth mobility in the right posterior mandible.

24 ng parameters were assessed: gingival index, tooth mobility; liver status, and portal vein caliber by

25 abutment status, furcation involvement [FI], tooth mobility, mean periodontal probing depth [PD], and

26 i.e., decreased attachment level, bone loss, tooth mobility/migration, altered periodontal perception

27 zole therapy, alveolar bone loss resulted in tooth mobility necessitating extraction of 2 involved te

28 In addition, tooth mobility of the anterior teeth on 36 of the 44 pat

29 to preliminarily test the impact of baseline tooth mobility on clinical outcomes.

30 y indicates a possible influence of baseline tooth mobility on clinical outcomes.

31 The relevance of tooth mobility on periodontal healing is still controver

32 dy was to evaluate the effect of presurgical tooth mobility on periodontal regenerative outcomes.

33 Initial PD (P= 0.01) and baseline tooth mobility (P= 0.036) were significant covariates.

34 ith calculus, but the differences in plaque, tooth mobility, probing depth > 2 mm, filled and decayed

35 er, when CPC was used in periodontal repair, tooth mobility resulted in the fracture and exfoliation

36 root exposure (rho = 0.638, p < 0.0001), and tooth mobility (rho = 0.55, p < 0.0001).

37 h (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), and tooth mobility (TM) by using Periotest M device were eva

38 attachment level (CAL), recession (REC), and tooth mobility (TM) were recorded at baseline and 1 year

39 ing index (GBI), probing pocket depth (PPD), tooth mobility (TM), and alveolar bone height.

40 lowing periodontium parameters were analyzed tooth mobility (TM), probing pocket depth (PPD), gingiva

41 Self-reported tooth mobility was associated strongly with periodontal

42 urcation involvements and/or Grade II or III tooth mobility were also detected in the sextant than wh

43 Periodontal bone loss and tooth mobility were also increased significantly (P <0.0

44 ge, number of missing teeth at baseline, and tooth mobility were associated with tooth loss in both m

45 CPITN) index, pocket probing depth (PD), and tooth mobility were measured in all the groups.

46 Gingival tissues, periodontal probing, and tooth mobility were within normal limits.

47 and non-rigid CPC may provide compliance for tooth mobility without fracturing the implant, and may a

48 It was anticipated that tooth mobility would follow the same pattern as AL in re