1 most negligible matrix effects, even for the
total analysis.
2 Its verification in the
total analysis can be easily accomplished by simple calc
3 ludes 12,678 individuals and 1.5 M SNPs, the
total analysis can be run on a single desktop PC in less
4 The
total analysis sample consisted of 30 230 respondents fr
5 Here, we present a novel micro
Total Analysis System (muTAS) for the measurement of pol
6 izing molecular biological assays in a micro-
total analysis system (muTAS) were developed for the det
7 ab-on-a-chip systems, can be used as a Micro
Total Analysis System (muTAS).
8 Here we report an Oil Immersed Lossless
Total Analysis System (OIL-TAS), which integrates RNA ex
9 The microfluidic chip, a type of micro-
total analysis system (uTAS), provides an ideal platform
10 method can be integrated into a microfluidic
total analysis system composed of in-line DNA preconcent
11 fully integrated silicon/silica-based micro
total analysis system for proteomics.
12 rofluidic lab-on-a-chip (also called a micro-
total analysis system)(6,7) was visualized as an integra
13 reaction and analysis steps to form a micro
total analysis system.
14 Microscale
total analysis systems (microTAS) allow high-throughput
15 We envision its use in mu-
total analysis systems (mu-TAS) and in DNA-array chips u
16 cale can enhance the utility of miniaturized
total analysis systems (mu-TAS).
17 Micro-
total analysis systems (muTAS) have attracted wide atten
18 e for the development of droplet-based micro
total analysis systems (muTAS).
19 etection of nucleic acids (NAs) within micro
total analysis systems (muTASs) for point-of-care use is
20 With the rapid development of micro
total analysis systems and sensitive biosensing technolo
21 ssibilities to design new compact disc-based
total analysis systems applicable in chemistry and life
22 of microelectromechanical systems and micro
total analysis systems requires many types of control.
23 y paves the way for the development of micro-
total analysis systems that combine optical and impedime
24 results may lead toward the design of micro
total analysis systems with microfluidics based on the r
25 systems for sample preparation in microscale
total analysis systems, and improvements associated with
26 of this approach for integration into micro-
total analysis systems, we optimized the production of a
27 ab-on-a-chip (LOC), microfluidics, and micro
total analysis systems.
28 wavelength-tunable light sources, and micro
total analysis systems.
29 far afield, and future directions for micro
total analysis systems.
30 compounds was achieved within 16 min and the
total analysis time (35 min) was ca. 3-fold shorter than
31 time of about 3 min (1 min per method) and a
total analysis time (including derivatization) of less t
32 pounds was achieved in less than 3min with a
total analysis time (sample-to-sample) of 10min.
33 curcuminoids in approximately 1.3 min with a
total analysis time (sample-to-sample) of 7 min, includi
34 his microfluidic device, thus shortening the
total analysis time and increasing the analysis throughp
35 rocessed food by refining method robustness,
total analysis time and method sensitivity.
36 solution flow rate was found to decrease the
total analysis time at the cost of decreasing EE.
37 G) microscopy, which was shown to reduce the
total analysis time by rapidly identifying the suitable
38 oes not require a long extraction procedure (
total analysis time can be lower than 30 min) and can be
39 per milliliter range can be attained, while
total analysis time does not exceed 2 min per sample.
40 tion approaches when comparing the estimated
total analysis time for 1000 samples.
41 The
total analysis time for a 6 mm (2) surface, which is lim
42 Using this system, the
total analysis time for a 96-well microtiter plate has b
43 The
total analysis time for the assay was less than 15 min.
44 d sample clean-up steps effectively reducing
total analysis time from the previously reported ~5.5-20
45 Total analysis time including immunoassay was 22-32 min
46 ascorbic acid levels with less than a 15-min
total analysis time including sample preparation and der
47 Total analysis time is <2 min, and the procedure is line
48 imum therapeutic concentration (4 mg/L), and
total analysis time is shorter than 5 min.
49 s with an excess of interfering DNA and in a
total analysis time of 1 h and 30 min.
50 identify three explosive compounds within a
total analysis time of 10 min.
51 ere achieved using a capillary format with a
total analysis time of 11 min.
52 et122, Met127, and Met138 oxidation within a
total analysis time of 30 min.
53 ed characterization of the constituents in a
total analysis time of 35 min.
54 separation was performed in 25.5 min, with a
total analysis time of 35 min.
55 le platforms use just 50 muL of sample and a
total analysis time of 360 s.
56 With a
total analysis time of 60 min, the integrated platform p
57 the minimum detection limit of 5.0pg/ml and
total analysis time of 65min.
58 gration time precision less than 1% within a
total analysis time of 9.0 min.
59 e carried out in diluted plasma samples in a
total analysis time of 90 min.
60 to six different samples in parallel, with a
total analysis time of about 60 min.
61 nly one set of oligonucleotide probes, for a
total analysis time of less than 10 min post-PCR.
62 rforming as few as 10 thermal cycles, with a
total analysis time of less than 20 min.
63 be identified over a healthy control with a
total analysis time of less than 45 min.
64 For a
total analysis time of less than 5 min, we estimate a ma
65 addition to the ultra-high sensitivity, the
total analysis time of the assay is less than 3h, thus d
66 r the point-of-care detection of EVs, with a
total analysis time of two hours.
67 We anticipate that
total analysis time per region of interest is ~6 min for
68 on/analysis, and a duty cycle (percentage of
total analysis time spent acquiring data) of 40% were ac
69 -CBS extractions at the same time allows the
total analysis time to be reduced to less than 55 s per
70 ents in the experimental workflow allows the
total analysis time to be shortened very significantly a
71 Improvements made to the workflow reduced
total analysis time to less than 3 h.
72 yield improved signal-to-noise ratios with a
total analysis time under 10 s.
73 x 10(6) cells/profile), and is rapid, with a
total analysis time under 5 min/sample.
74 an 0.6% for intraday migration times and the
total analysis time was less than 20 min.
75 ocessed using an off-line FISH protocol, the
total analysis time was reduced from 2.5 h to 30 min.
76 The
total analysis time was ~2 min, and excellent agreement
77 The
total analysis time with default parameters was less tha
78 model compounds in human urine in under 10 s
total analysis time with excellent accuracy (95-120%) an
79 capacity of 32,600 within only 44 min of the
total analysis time, by implementing (x)IEF x (x)SEC x (
80 Automation enables reductions in
total analysis time, human intervention, and cost per sa
81 late format, thus significantly reducing the
total analysis time.
82 l sample consumption of 270 ng in 120 min of
total analysis time.
83 the detection of 71 impurities within 3 min
total analysis time.
84 tter correction but at the expense of longer
total analysis time.
85 onsequently, the solvent consumption and the
total analysis time.
86 e necessary for analysis and speeding up the
total analysis time.
87 ed rapid analysis with high reproducibility (
total analysis time: 2 min per sample; reproducibility:
88 Using fHTCE,
total analysis times can be reduced by up to 48% per mul
89 and 1622 protein groups were identified with
total analysis times of 7, 10, 15, and 30 min, correspon
90 formed and completed every few seconds, with
total analysis times of less than 10 min for tryptic pep
91 The
total analysis times of less than 11 min provided limits
92 ential to increase sample throughput, reduce
total analysis times, and increase signal-to-noise ratio
93 The
total analysis was also enriched for melanoma-associated
94 Total analysis was performed by flow-injection analysis