ライフサイエンスコーパス: total hip replacement

1 Finland provided data for 92 series (215 676 total hip replacements).

2 sk for minor bleeding in patients undergoing total hip replacement.

3 grafting (CABG), carotid endarterectomy, and total hip replacement.

4 ere concordant for hip OA, as ascertained by total hip replacement.

5 lulare, septic wrist, bacteremia, and septic total hip replacement.

6 s had a total knee replacement and 825 had a total hip replacement.

7 eral elective surgical treatments, including total hip replacement.

8 ssigned to resistance training had undergone total hip replacement.

9 y of such events were known complications of total hip replacement.

10 For total hip replacement, 10-year implant survival rate was

11 resection ($63117 vs $21325; P < .001), and total hip replacement ($41354 vs $19028; P < .001).

12 n age, 67.6 years) were randomly assigned to total hip replacement (53 patients) or resistance traini

13 that strongly associate with osteoarthritis total hip replacement: a missense variant, c.1141G>C (p.

14 als performing coronary artery bypass graft, total hip replacement, abdominal aortic aneurysm repair,

15 core was 15.9 points in patients assigned to total hip replacement and 4.5 points in patients assigne

16 identified 63 158 patients who had undergone total hip replacement and 54 276 who had total knee repl

17 Among patients who had total knee or total hip replacement and received 4 to 10 days of posto

18 nce challenges the increasing trend for more total hip replacements and total knee replacements to be

19 replacement, 214 patients who had undergone total hip replacement, and 520 controls from the UK.

20 y, other comorbidity, admission FIM ratings, total hip replacement, and time to followup.

21 performed a genome-wide association study of total hip replacements, based on variants identified thr

22 ted with increased risk of readmission after total hip replacement: being older than 71 years (OR, 1.

23 ng 15-year survival of primary, conventional total hip replacement constructs in patients with osteoa

24 using bisphosphonate, it eventually leads to total hip replacement due to collapse of femoral head.

25 suggests that the satisfaction of demand for total hip replacement, given agreed criteria for surgery

26 hs, 5 patients (9%) who had been assigned to total hip replacement had not undergone surgery, and 12

27 d rates of CABG, carotid endarterectomy, and total hip replacement in 158 hospital-referral regions (

28 fee-for-service Medicare patients undergoing total hip replacement in 2016 at hospital systems identi

29 imate the population requirement for primary total hip replacement in England.

30 dance on wisdom tooth extraction and primary total hip replacement in the UK National Health Service.

31 Total hip replacement is a common and highly effective o

32 Total hip replacement is a commonly performed orthopedic

33 Death within 90 days after total hip replacement is rare but might be avoidable dep

34 Total hip replacement is routinely recommended for sever

35 07647), pulmonary resection (n = 91758), and total hip replacement (n = 307399) between 2009 and 2012

36 ity, comorbidity, admission FIM ratings, and total hip replacement, OA was associated with a longer r

37 ised controlled trials specifically compared total hip replacement or meniscal repair with non-operat

38 quiring revision surgery in patients who had total hip replacement or total knee replacement over the

39 Practice Research Datalink who had undergone total hip replacement or total knee replacement.

40 steoarthritis and an indication for surgery, total hip replacement resulted in a clinically important

41 In the 1960s, total hip replacement revolutionised management of elder

42 The Readmission After Total Hip Replacement Risk Scale was developed to predic

43 cation models, such as the Readmission After Total Hip Replacement Risk Scale, can identify high-risk

44 ey were used to create the Readmission After Total Hip Replacement Risk Scale, which was applied to t

45 rom a registry of patients who had undergone total hip replacement surgery over an 8-year period at a

46 The requirement for total hip replacement surgery was estimated on the basis

47 ndergone a primary or revision total knee or total hip replacement surgery.

48 if another family member also had undergone total hip replacement surgery.

49 For total hip replacement there was no significant change in

50 ABG) (218940 patients at 1056 hospitals), or total hip replacement (THR) (231774 patients at 1831 hos

51 Mortality and complication rates after total hip replacement (THR) are inversely associated wit

52 CI, 0.23-1.77]) and for patients undergoing total hip replacement (THR) for HRQOL on the 36-item Sho

53 Nearly 100,000 people underwent total hip replacement (THR) in the United Kingdom in 201

54 Total hip replacement (THR) is extremely common.

55 Implant survival after conventional total hip replacement (THR) is often poor in younger pat

56 Total hip replacement (THR) is successful in treating hi

57 ompared with patients undergoing an elective total hip replacement (THR) operation.

58 es the risk for venous thromboembolism after total hip replacement (THR) or total knee replacement (T

59 lity and spending for beneficiaries who need total hip replacement (THR) or total knee replacement (T

60 nd-stage hip osteoarthritis (OA) who undergo total hip replacement (THR) preferentially require subse

61 We investigated the revision rate of primary total hip replacement (THR) reported in the National Joi

62 eriprosthetic femoral fracture (POPFF) after total hip replacement (THR) requires complex surgery and

63 hyte score, decrease in MJS of > or =0.5 mm, total hip replacement (THR), and increase in lower extre

64 e rates in patients with hip OA undergoing a total hip replacement (THR), as compared with disease-fr

65 nts, and is used as a standard outcome after total hip replacement (THR), but may not fully represent

66 rates varied widely for patients undergoing total hip replacement (THR), colectomy, and pancreaticod

67 s, the progression of the disease required a total hip replacement (THR).

68 nter tenderness, hip pain or tenderness, and total hip replacement (THR).

69 h) and predictive validity (association with total hip replacement [THR] and signs and symptoms a mea

70 en concordant for primary OA (ascertained by total hip replacement [THR] or total knee replacement),

71 knee replacements (TKRs), and 537 women with total hip replacements (THRs) from the Nottingham case-c

72 for-service beneficiaries undergoing TKRs or total hip replacements (THRs) in New York State from 201

73 proportion of male patients ranged from 37% (total hip replacement) to 77% (abdominal aortic aneurysm

74 endarterectomy, reduction of femur fracture, total hip replacement, total knee replacement, partial c

75 es who underwent future targeted procedures (total hip replacement, total knee replacements) or nonta

76 nical characteristics of patients undergoing total hip replacement were abstracted.

77 en concordant for primary OA (ascertained by total hip replacement), were genotyped for 36 microsatel

78 ervices dictate that further developments in total hip replacement will be governed by their cost-eff

79 ter, randomized, controlled trial to compare total hip replacement with resistance training in patien

80 tent of variation in episode spending around total hip replacement within and across hospital systems